Send CathInfo's owner Matthew a gift from his Amazon wish list:
https://www.amazon.com/hz/wishlist/ls/25M2B8RERL1UO

Author Topic: Latest Kolbe Center re Fr. Robinson's The Realist Guide to Religion and Science  (Read 3443 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Pax Vobis

  • Supporter
Anyone who starts questioning the meaning of "day" in genesis is simply a modernist.  Scripture is very clear that "there was evening and morning" on the first day.  Day does not mean an age, or a period, or an epoch of time.  It means day.  God tells us to have the simplicity and faith of children.  Accept words as God created them to be understood.  That's called humility.  As if God couldn't create the entire universe in 1 SECOND.  So He spread it out over 7 DAYS, for a reason.  

If you start questioning Scripture "I mean, does a day really mean a day?"  You're on the road to losing your Faith.

Sure, St Augustine was a big questioner of many things, but we only know this because he was a voluminous writer.  He wrote 1 thing and then changed his mind later.  He wrote a LOT.  There's a reason why Modernists love St Augustine, because you can find quotes on almost any topic, for different views.  He philosophized out loud, in the written word.  He was not consistent.

Given all of that, St Augustine didn't believe in evolution, nor did he believe in this modern-anti-church idea that Creation happened over millions of years.

Offline Mark 79

  • Supporter
Anyone who starts questioning the meaning of "day" in genesis is simply a modernist.  …

The original Catholic Bible is the Latin Vulgate, so it is all the more suspicious when any newbie starts arguing it's modernism from the "Hebrew", in this case the increasingly suspect newbie "O Sanctissimus":
https://www.cathinfo.com/fighting-errors-in-the-modern-world/latest-kolbe-center-re-fr-robinson's-the-realist-guide-to-religion-and-science/msg1040633/#msg1040633

There has been no Magisterium that allowed "diēs" and "diem" anywhere, a fortiori in Genesis 1:5. as anything other than a 24-hour day or daytime."

The Judaizing bullshit line that (((O Sanctissimus))) offered about "יום" (transliterated as yom or yôm) originated with the PBC 1909. Consideration of Genesis 1:5, whether in Latin, Greek, or Hebrew, as meaning anything other than a 24-hour day has absolutely no Apostolic lineage.  Understanding of Genesis 1:5 as an epoch or anything other than a 24-hour day is de novo modernist heresy, subversive Judaizing bullshit.

Similarly, the Septuagint's ἡμέρα (transliterated as hēmera) in Genesis 1:5 has no Apostolic lineage.

Quote
Genesis 1:5
And he called the light Day, and the darkness Night; and there was evening and morning one day.
Appellavitque lucem Diem, et tenebras Noctem : factumque est vespere et mane, dies unus.



The consideration and process is getting very close to a "diagnosis."  :laugh2::laugh2::laugh2: The Newbie (((O Sanctissimus))) reeks of the stench of gefilte fish. Keep an eye on that יענטע (transliterated yenta, Yiddish meaning "an annoying talkative Jew bitch").