In fact, there's not a single good/convincing argument FOR evolution. It's based on nothing more than the absolutely false premise that if two things share common features, then one must have derived from the other. Look, humans and monkeys have a lot of characteristics in common, so humans must have derived from monkeys. Common features could just as easily derive from a common DESIGN, i.e. a Common Designer. So the actual premise behind evolution reduces to nothing other than the assumption that there is no God. In circular argument, they rely on the assumption that there is no God to prove that there is no God.