In fact, there's not a single good/convincing argument FOR evolution.  It's based on nothing more than the absolutely false premise that if two things share common features, then one must have derived from the other.  Look, humans and monkeys have a lot of characteristics in common, so humans must have derived from monkeys.  Common features could just as easily derive from a common DESIGN, i.e. a Common Designer.  So the actual premise behind evolution reduces to nothing other than the assumption that there is no God.  In circular argument, they rely on the assumption that there is no God to prove that there is no God.

The word needs to get out, to Trads even:

The so-called "scientists" who actually preach a false religion (materialistic atheism, evolution) admit when you corner them: there are no transitional fossils, and that poses a real problem...

They have no explanation or excuse either.

And if evolution were entirely random rather than directed, you would have millions of failed species for every one that survived.  And that too would manifest itself in the fossil record.  Before you had an animal that developed two eyes perfectly spaced apart so as to render 3-D vision, you would have animals with eyes on their buttocks or the soles of their feet, or every other place, and you would have millions of failed attempts at eyes.  It's obvious that the design of the eye follows the PURPOSE of what the eye does, and it did not create itself with that purpose.  Evolution is absolutely preposterous.  I don't understand how anyone of good will could find that crap convincing.  Except that most people don't think it through.  They just stop at "hmm, humans and monkeys look alike, so humans came from monkeys.  Makes sense.  Now I will move along to buying the newest model of the iPhone."