Today I learned that, as of two months ago, I am banned from posting comments on LifeSiteNews. I was going there today to comment on the
article about Milo Yiannopoulos (I believe he is trolling Catholics) only to discover that I was banned from comments. Two months ago I posted a reply on an Opinion piece by Dr. Alan Fimister, "
Christians must resist the diabolical emergence of antisemitism."
My reply to a user never made the cut. It was basically a brief presentation of what E. Michael Jones presents in his Jєωιѕн Revolutionary Spirit. I have had to be tricky about posting the same response on Parler now because they have been censoring certain segments of it, which I have to post in 6 parts due to character length. It's basically my "boiler-plate" whenever someone, (usually a Protestant) posts a "Christian-Zionist" message and they ask people who disagree with them to prove it. Let me know if it could use some polishing. Thanks.
[1 of6]
St. Peter, later to become the first bishop of Rome, the first pope, and a Jєω by DNA, "filled with the Holy Spirit" (therefore God Himself speaking) said to the Jєωs:
"Be it known to you all, and to all the people of Israel, that by the name of our Lord Jesus Christ of Nazareth, whom you crucified, whom God hath raised from the dead, even by him this man standeth here before you whole.
This is the stone which was rejected by you the builders, which is become the head of the corner.
Neither is there salvation in any other. For there is no other name under heaven given to men, whereby we must be saved."
-Acts 4:10-12
[2 of 6]
The Church is the New Israel; Judaists (those who say they are Jєωs) reject their inheritance and therefore have no share in it.
DNA means nothing, hence Jesus to the Pharisees who prided themselves on their race:. "I tell you I can raise up sons of Abraham from these stones." Just because an ethnostate calls itself Israel, doesn't make them so. John chapter 8 is the point at where the word "Jєω" now means one who identifies with the race of Abraham but who reject their Inheritance, Jesus Christ. He counters them, saying "If you were Abraham's children, you would do as Abraham did" i.e., follow God's will and accept Jesus as the Son of God and Messiah. Since the Jєωs reject Jesus, they reject their father Abraham as well, and show that "the devil is [their] father." Jesus is the Fulfillment of the faith of Israel, and by rejecting Him, they are apostates from the religion and revelation given them.
[3 of 6]
Remember, Jesus' audience were Jєωs when He said "Whoever acknowledges Me before men I will acknowledge before My Father Who is in Heaven. But whoever disowns me before others, I will disown before my Father in heaven." Unless they are baptized, profess Christ, they cannot be saved. He is their Salvation. God is not a rapist, He respects free will. If you live your life rejecting Him, He's not going to force you to spend eternity with Him. If a Jєω dies having rejected Him, then by his own free will he has chosen eternal separation from Him. Which is hell. Christians have to mangle the Word of God in order to be zionists. Paul warned the early Church often about the judaizers who sought to corrupt the faith which they have received. His warnings are just as pressing today as then.
[4 of 6]
The old promise was fulfilled, He is the Fulfillment of the Law and the Prophets. Those Jєωs who accepted Jesus and His Promise were baptized and entered into their Inheritance. Those Jєωs who persist in defying God, rejecting their Inheritance do so to their peril into perdition. This is why the Temple and it's priesthood and it's sacrifice had to be destroyed. They were no longer efficacious. To seek to rebuild the Temple (which the Jєωs tried under Julian the Apostate) leads to bƖσσdshɛd and death. Christ is the Temple, His Body the Church. To speak of rebuilding the temple in Jerusalem is heresy, is Antichrist.
[5 of 6]
Their inheritance was/is Jesus Christ, Logos (as John called him in Greek) the Word (Logos) Incarnate. Those who accepted their Inheritance were Baptized and became known as Christians. The Church, which is His Body, is the New Israel. Those Jєωs who rejected Logos, rejected their Inheritance, and instead chose Barabbas the Revolutionary. They wanted an earthly kingdom and were (and still are) jealous that God granted His Inheritance to whosever should believe in His Son, not just Jєωs. If the world would be blessed by their conversion, doesn't it stand that it remains cursed in some way through their rejection of their Inheritance? From the moment they chose the Revolutionary over Logos, the Jєωιѕн people have been plagued with a Revolutionary Spirit, and is the reason why so many revolutionary movements are either directly led and dominated or indirectly influenced by Jєωs. It's theological, not racial.
[6 of 6]
I might add, Pilate knew they wanted to murder Jesus because of envy (Matthew 27:18). The people of Israel were Chosen to bring forth the Messiah. Mission Accomplished! They were also Chosen to accept their Messiah, Who came to call them into His Church, preparing for a Heavenly Kingdom, not an earthly one. This infuriated them, they hated Rome, they wanted utopia here and now. And every utopian ideology leads to bƖσσdshɛd, even Deicide. This utopian ideology has pervaded and entwined itself in the Jєωιѕн milieu for two thousand years and is called the Jєωιѕн Revolutionary Spirit. When the Temple was destroyed, so was the priesthood and so was the sacrifice. W/o these things the old Judaism ceased to exist. What emerged was тαℓмυdic judaism which is younger than Christianity and is defined by it's rejection of Jesus Christ.
That's the end of my reply to you. I hope this helps. Christians deny Jєωs the Gospel (and themselves become heretics) when they endorse zionist apostasy.
This issue is urgently salvation related for the Jєωs who have been told that they don't have to convert.And no, we are not talking about a displacement (replacement) theology as some have come to call it, we are talking people who rejected their Inheritance.What you are preaching is a theology that wasn't held until the time of Cromwell. British cabalists like John Dee and Freemasons started preaching it when they fell for it being promulgated by Jєωs who wanted back into England. No Christian believed the dual salvation bit until then. It's a novelty. How many Jєωιѕн souls fall into perdition because of such heretical doctrine. 
Topic: Just Learned that I am Banned from commenting on LifeSiteNews (Read 908 times)