ʝʊdɛօphilia, is a troublesome symptom of a dangerous malady
By Israel Shamir
December 12, 20D19 "Information Clearing House" - England and France, two antagonists, two mainstays of European civilisation, are simultaneously engulfed in paroxysm of ʝʊdɛօphilia. The result of the forthcoming very important parliamentary elections in Britain hinges on this issue, with Labour and Tories competing who will express their love of Jєωs more profusely, while the Jєωs can’t decide whom they loath less. France, after a year of the middle-class Yellow Vests rebellion, enters the fresh working class uprising with million strikers rioting on the streets, but its parliament finds prime time to ponder and rule how Frenchmen should love Jєωs and hate those who hate them. What is the meaning of this charade?
Surely they do not argue about Jєωιѕн cuisine. While palatable, it is rarely more than that. A proof can be found in Israel, where Arab food rules, Japanese is recognised, Italian cherished but Jєωιѕн cuisine shines by its absence. It is not Jєωιѕн noses, though a significant feature of facial anatomy, they are not more elaborate or prominent than, say, Sicilian. It is all about ideas.
ʝʊdɛօphilia, love of Jєωs is a troublesome symptom of a dangerous malady, of elites’ estrangement from its working classes, the malady presently in full bloom in France and England. ʝʊdɛօphilia strikes divided societies and could lead to their collapse much faster than its Siamese counter-twin, antisemitism. It did so in the past, most famously in Kingdom of Poland, where the szlachta (nobility) loved Jєωs and despised ordinary folks, the bydlo (rednecks), until their state collapsed. In a Christian, or post-Christian society, Jєωs are a symbol, a signifier of a certain attitude and behaviour that is profoundly non-Christian.
Jєωs are a small minority that defies the large society and opposes it. Jєωs care for themselves and disregard the majority and its needs; they have no scruples beyond prescribed by the criminal law; they feel no communality with the majority. Jєωs do not share communion with majority, and do not appeal to the same deity. Jєωs prosper when the majority regresses. They are fast to see a break and use it for their advantage. We won’t enter a discussion whether the real Jєωs fit the description, and to what extent. That is how they are perceived by those who love them and who hate them. There were Jєωs who acted against the paradigm, and they weren’t considered ‘good for Jєωs’. Bruno Kreisky, the Austrian Chancellor, Lazar Kaganovich, the Soviet official, Leon Trotsky or Torquemada weren’t ‘good for Jєωs’. And there are plentiful Gentiles who were considered ‘good for Jєωs’, like Hillary Clinton or Tony Blair. Usually they were bad for everybody else. So, while we shall defer our judgment on ‘real Jєωs’, there is no doubt that philo-Semites are bad for your health.
The dominant economic and political paradigm, Neo-Liberalism claims that Jєωιѕн attitude is the right one, and that we all should emulate Jєωs. This is an impossible claim; a majority can’t emulate a minority. A society whose members relate to each other as Jєωs-to-Gentiles is a cannibals’ cabal, and that is exactly what happens in our world. Jєωs prosper because they are few; if all emulate Jєωs, the result is misery, not prosperity. An all-Jєωιѕн society can’t exist; Israel is a place where Thai, Chinese, Ukrainians and Palestinians work, the Russians and Druze guard them, while Jєωs do usual Jєωιѕн things.
In England, the Jєωs are divided about Boris Johnson. They do not want Brexit to succeed, but the access of Corbyn scares them even more. Corbyn is an avowed enemy of … no, not of Jєωs, but of neo-liberalism. Combine it with his rejection of Israeli politics, and you come to the sum of anti-Jєωιѕн attitudes. Yes, Corbyn is anti-Jєωιѕн, if you wish, even αnтι-ѕємιтє, i.e. a man whom Jєωs hate, for he is against both Jєωιѕн modes of operation, the capitalist and the Zionist. He is perfectly ok with people of Jєωιѕн origin, he has no prejudice, he is no racist, but it is irrelevant. His victory won’t be ‘good for Jєωs’, neither for Jєωs who bleed Palestine, nor for Jєωs who prosper at the expense of the British worker. Perhaps Corbyn would be wonderful for Jєωιѕн workers, but they are not represented in the Board of Deputies, and the Chief Rabbi does not care for them.
On the international scene, Corbyn is not a friend of NATO. If he could he would take the UK out of this obsolete military alliance. So would President Trump, who is looking for a justification to steer the US out of NATO. Jєωs do not like this attitude. For them, the US and the UK should stay in NATO, for NATO is a strong defender and supporter of the Jєωιѕн state.
Brits have a difficult choice in the coming elections. Johnson is not too bad, and his stand against EU should be applauded. Corbyn is likely to seek compromise on every position, including Brexit, immigration, NATO, but his initial stand is good. For a working man, he is the right choice. And the Jєωιѕн attitude to him is a strong indicator: of the two contenders, Corbyn would be better for those who do not emulate Jєωs.
France
In France, the Jєωs are very close to power, and it is usually a sign that things do not go well for native middle and working classes. Indeed things go from bad to worse. While a million of French workers demonstrated against Macron’s government, the French parliamentarians discussed antisemitism. Not surprisingly, they accepted the definition produced by a Jєωιѕн organisation. Demurring against this definition caused a lot of trouble for Corbyn; Macron had learned a lesson.
I am all for such definitions; their scope is too narrow, if anything. I’d prefer a broad definition that would describe as αnтι-ѕємιтє any person who attends a church or a mosque; who does not contribute to Jєωιѕн settlements; who does not believe in God-chosen Jєωιѕн nation being above all mortal laws. Maybe then the Gentiles would be healed of their fear of being labelled ‘αnтι-ѕємιтє’. This fear kills their souls more than the accusation. Though, best of people, Shakespeare, St John the Divine, Dostoyevsky and Chesterton are considered αnтι-ѕємιтєs, and it did not diminish their fame and glory.
You can’t escape this label; if they want they will attach it to your name. Likewise, a man can’t avoid being called a male chauvinist and accused of harassment by a radical feminist. Anna Ardin, the Swedish feminist who accused Julian Assange of rape and destroyed his life as surely as if she’d knifed him, also accused a student of harassment because he avoided looking at her. Such accusations should be shrugged off.
France is not doing well because its elites are engaged in the rip-off and sale of their country’s industrial, political, and cultural assets. In the last few years, France had lost Alstom, Pechiney, Technip, Alcatel. These premium assets were lost to US companies. French businessmen and officials who were supposed to care about French heirlooms, betrayed their trust and defrauded their country, that’s why France is not doing well.
Not all of these treacherous men are Jєωιѕн, not by a long chalk. But Jєωs are invaluable partners in such publicity-shy schemes, and that’s why: “The Shoah Memorial is a secular temple for the entirety of France’s post-Christian elite. h0Ɩ0cαųst foundations, Jєωιѕн communal projects, Jєωιѕн benevolent societies and Jєωιѕн philanthropies allow the Jєωιѕн community to discourage reporting affairs they are involved in. They can facilitate the deals in obscurity” – I was told by a knowledgeable Jєωιѕн person, well versed with goings-on within the French Jєωιѕн community and in the higher business, banking and political circles of the Republic. I’ll call him JT (I shall share more of his knowledge in the next essay – ISH). – “Jєωιѕнness has once again become a way of avoiding scrutiny and accountability. Only αnтι-ѕємιтєs dare to see a link between the sale of Alstom, Macron’s career, the Rothschilds, and the Jєωιѕн community.” Wink wink.
“At two crucial moments Jєωιѕн communal support was decisive to Macron’s political career; first, at the second tour of the French elections, in which major Jєωιѕн organizations unanimously cajoled and preached the Macron vote to all and sundry; second, to suppress the Yellow Vests Uprising. Only αnтι-ѕємιтєs dare to think the Rothschilds had anything to do with either.” JT is very critical with France and French people: “French White gentiles are ashamed of their past and identity, flee into hedonism, profligacy, drugs, anti-depressants, libertinism, pornography, and ɧoɱosɛҳųαƖity. Their Stockholm syndrome is driven by an extra-European-birth-cohort whose numbers now exceed that of the native population. Unwilling to fight for their land and heritage, ignorant of their past and increasingly illiterate, their love of France is futile, superfluous, and incoherent at best.
“As France increasingly resembles a North African backwater, its Jєωs, the chief facilitators of this demographic shift, have become its chief losers, and a process of Jєωιѕн de-assimilation from the Republic has began. French Jєωs cannot identify with a society on its last legs, and a spineless native population. In such circuмstances, French Jєωs shift their focus to survival and opportunism, not to national defence. Israel, Miami, New York have become second homes. France’s Jєωιѕн patricians (all to the last dual-citizens since the fifties), are helpless. Their ties to an increasingly hard-up Israel and to the powerful Jєωιѕн American community make them leaders of the fire-sale of France’s industrial, political, and cultural assets. France is sliding into failed nation status in which everyone is abandoning ship.” French Jєωs help the US to rob France, says JT. The American companies supported by all-powerful DoJ are the main reason why France does not prosper. When France attempted to tax American Internet companies (Amazon, Google, Facebook) Trump threatened to slap 100% custom duties on French wine. The right choice for France is to part the company with the Yankee predator, to cease paying billions of fines for breaking unjustifiable unilateral American ‘sanctions’, to part with NATO and to laugh at Trump’s demands to pay more for unnecessary American protection. But France, and other European nations are hesitant. They do not jump at the opportunity offered by Trump’s stupidity and arrogance, though the Orange man did everything he could to free the Europeans. He opened the gates, he insulted them and kicked them, but they refused to leave the stables.
An Excellent American expert in International relations, Prof Michael Brenner of Pittsburgh U, has noted:
“Europe’s political class is psychologically unable to break free of its dominant/subordinate relationship with America. This pattern endures despite the presence of a mentally impaired man in the White House. The prognosis, therefore: ‘Wither thou goest, we go!” American leaders have exploited this compulsive deference ruthlessly. It allows Washington to ensure European fealty at virtually no cost. Moreover, they can extract compliance across a wide array of non-security issues – commercial, financial, IT (warring against Huawei), political, diplomatic – by drawing on the same free-floating loyalties.
Europe has been obedient to the siren call of Uncle Sam in following it over the cliff time after time – in Afghanistan, in Iraq (France excepted), on Russia, on Iran (by acquiescing in severe sanctions), on Saudi Arabia, in Yemen, in embracing Bolsonaro (invited Keynoter at Davos), even on Venezuela and Bolivia. The ultimate test will come were Washington to pick a fight with China that it, and the West, cannot win; will Europe then take the final, fatal leap hand-in-hand?” It appears that love of Jєωs is an integral element of this fealty, together with LGBT nonsense and other peculiar American imports. Love of Jєωs and love of America – are they separable at all? If and when France and England regain their independence, their Jєωs would recover their normal place in their societies. Admittedly, it won’t be a place at the top, but it would be a respectful place of equals in a healthy society, rather than a place of a symbol and a facilitator of foreign influence on the ruins of Europe, as it is now.
Israel Shamir can be reached at adam@israelshamir.net
This article was first published at The Unz Review
|
Topic: ʝʊdɛօphilia, is a troublesome sympton of a dangerous malady (Read 140 times)