Just to help understand the article -- it has a sarcastic tone. He's approaching the whole thing tongue-in-cheek. It has a lot of interesting information though.


Burn in Hell you deniers of the h0Ɩ0cαųsts!
Ha! Call me a sell-out if you like, but I've decided to join with those who demand that history not be questioned. I now condemn all those who deny the h0Ɩ0cαųst. And as a man not given to half measures I'm upping the ante. It is no longer good enough to condemn those who question the h0Ɩ0cαųst. Since there were two h0Ɩ0cαųsts, both of them must be sacrosanct. Both of them demand that anyone who questions any aspect of either of them deserves to be jailed, broken, and have their life ruined. One is not good enough. It's both or nothing.

What two h0Ɩ0cαųsts you say? Fact is, there was a h0Ɩ0cαųst in each of the World Wars. Before the h0Ɩ0cαųst of WWII was the h0Ɩ0cαųst of WWI. If you're wondering why you've never heard of it, you need merely look to the anti-Semitic media. As we all know, Jєωs never get an even break in the media. If only they had a voice! A means to tell us of their suffering!

Never fear, I shall be their voice!


To dwell on the h0Ɩ0cαųst of WWII alone is not enough. Any right thinking person must also acknowledge the h0Ɩ0cαųst of WWI. To not do so is to dishonour the memory of the victims of a h0Ɩ0cαųst. Every aspect of German wickedness delivered upon the innocent Jєωιѕн victims was present in both events. Both had gas chambers. Both had soap rendered from human victims. Both had lampshades made from human skin. And crucially both had six million victims. 6,000,000! To not scream in shrill indignation over both of these events is the absolute height of moral depravity.

Consider the enormity of those who only discuss one of these two h0Ɩ0cαųsts. For mine, it's the moral equivalent a Palestinian mother who had ten children shot by the Israelis but only wants to talk about the five that she liked. Admit the truth you dreadful woman! The Israelis shot all ten of your children and all that rubbish about choosing five is just embroidery to, a) slur the good name of the Israelis and, b) save you acknowledging the five children you never liked anyway. Honestly, was there ever a people more deserving of their genocide than the Palestinians? The media is right to perpetually paint them as villains. How dare they resist their righteous Jєωιѕн masters!? Bloody untermenschen!


Where was I? Oh yes - as in all topics deserving of shrill moral condemnation, silence equals complicity. I'll say it again - Silence Equals Complicity. Anyone who wants to pretend that the first h0Ɩ0cαųst isn't the equal of the second may as well just lather up with human soap, settle down in bed next to a human-skin lamp, and read AJP Taylor's History Of The First World War. I read this hateful tome and it appallingly failed to contain a single mention of gas chambers or 6,000,000 Jєωιѕн victims. Taylor is a denier pure and simple, and if he isn't dead already, he certainly deserves to be.

And for those who want to start bleating about any other h0Ɩ0cαųsts, I spit in your face. I have no time for such piss weak 'moral equivalency' arguments. Fuck the massacre of the Armenians under the Donmeh Turks. Fuck the mass starvation of the Kulaks under the Bolsheviks. Were Jєωs involved in any of these? As victims, that is? NO. As we all know it's only genocides directed at Jєωs that are worthy of shrill condemnation. And since here we have two Jєωιѕн h0Ɩ0cαųsts with identical features it follows that the shrillness must be doubled. Subsequently those who deny that two h0Ɩ0cαųsts took place are twice as condemnable as those who only deny one. Don't argue, the logic is bullet proof.


It's always a beautiful thing to have the moral high ground. I am now one up on those who only ever seem to bang on about the h0Ɩ0cαųst, as if there was only one of them. Their moral unimpeachability is now laid bare as a sham, a hollow thing of no substance. Anything they say in their defence, ie: it never happened; the numbers don't add up; there's no evidence etc etc, falls at the first hurdle. As they've said themselves in their one-h0Ɩ0cαųst campaign, to argue the point is to be a denier - the Worst Thing In The World! Shrillness is all they deserve. Don't argue with them. Just scream '6,000,000 Victims!' How dare they dishonour Their memory! Sickening.

And besides, anyone who disputes this, instantly disappears up their own clacker. What does it mean if one h0Ɩ0cαųst is true and the other isn't? That the Jєωs merely imagined the first one? That they just made it up? What mad inhuman creatures would do this? What possible reason could Jєωs have for marching around America telling people that they'd been victims of an unparalleled injustice? Why would they do that? I can't think of a single reason. To even suggest that such a thing is possible is a tremendous slur against Jєωs. A clear case of anti-Semitism. Me - I reject anti-Semitism, I reject h0Ɩ0cαųst denial, I embrace all that I am meant to.


Anyone who objects to the 'facts' of the first h0Ɩ0cαųst, whether they like it or not, legitimises the questioning of the 'facts' of the second one. Both h0Ɩ0cαųsts carry nearly identical features - both were conducted against the Jєωs by the Germans, both had six million victims, both involved the same monstrous atrocities of lampshades, soap, and gas chambers. Between the two alternatives: that Jєωs concocted two identical stories to paint themselves as the world's greatest victims; or that Germans are the world's greatest monsters who pull the same shit over and over, only one of these is permissible.

As anyone who's been to the cinema knows, Jєωs are always victims and Germans are always villains. We cannot flip this coin and reverse these descriptions. To do so would be to say that all those h0Ɩ0cαųst movies were a load of shit. Perish the thought! Jєωs cannot be fraudulent villains who've tricked the world. Germans cannot be the victims of a colossal hoax. The very idea is monstrous. Thus we have no choice but to double the charges. Therefore Jєωιѕн victimhood climbs to ever greater Olympian heights (of the God-like variety not the sporting one) and German villainy doubles again, plunging to a whole new nadir.

Is Dante still alive? Someone should get in touch with him and tell him to rewrite his Inferno with an added 34th circle of hell reserved just for Germans. God knows they deserve it.


So! I stake out my territory. I take the highest of high moral ground. I refuse, unlike all those other people who question unquestionable orthodoxies, to deny anything. It's all or nothing. Either both are true, or both are questionable. And I reject the latter. No fence sitting! Silence Equals Complicity. And so, I point my finger - J'Accuse! Acknowledge both h0Ɩ0cαųsts or be hoist on your own petard of h0Ɩ0cαųst denial. Ignorance is no excuse! Anything other than accepting the truth of both h0Ɩ0cαųsts is no different to pushing that gas chamber button. Twice!