OHCA, you have brought great dishonor to the reputation of Cathinfo. You have consistently insulted me, and libeled, misrepresented and twisted my words.
You are a terrible example of a traditional Catholic.
Go to confession for your breaking of the eighth commandment.
Leave Cathinfo. You've done enough damage with your paranoid delusions and diabolic accusations.
My "paranoid delusions and diabolic accusations?" Because I point out that you made a blasphemous statement for humor?
You will never understand, because you are blinded by your own ignorance and delusional mentality. I explained it, you refused to listen. I won't explain it again. I am right. You are wrong.
Pearls before swine, indeed. You have wasted my time.
Your explanation was essentially that you made the blasphemous statement for a humorous effect, playing off of the blasphemous statement being made by someone quite some time earlier. If you think that is a justifiable explanation, then your aren't much of an example of a traditional Catholic (which I don't believe you are anyway).
You're the king of wasted time Mr. 30 Days in La-La Land.
You don't know what blasphemy is:
Blasphemy, by reason of the significance of the words with which it is expressed, may be of three kinds.
It is heretical when the insult to God involves a declaration that is against faith, as in the assertion: "God is cruel and unjust" or "The noblest work of man is God".
It is imprecatory when it would cry a malediction upon the Supreme Being as when one would say: "Away with God".
It is simply contumacious when it is wholly made up of contempt of, or indignation towards, God, as in the blasphemy of Julian the Apostate: "Thou has conquered, O Galilaean".
Again, blasphemy may be (1) either direct, as when the one blaspheming formally intends to dishonour the Divinity, or (2) indirect, as when without such intention blasphemous words are used with advertence to their import.
What I wrote seven years ago does not fall under any of these. Stop making a molehill into a mountain.