Catholic Info
Traditional Catholic Faith => Fighting Errors in the Modern World => Topic started by: LaughingAmigo on February 25, 2016, 12:06:14 AM
-
(http://i.imgur.com/aOtgN2S.png)
Left is Yahoo's first logo. Right was Yahoo's favicon for August 11, 2013 when Yahoo was testing uppercase and lowercase Y's in different fonts.
YAHOO is a variant spelling of YAHU which is Hebrew for GOD.
ע and עְּ is the Hebrew symbol for EYE (the latter being a rare variant found in 1 Samuel 5:12) (https://www.win.tue.nl/~aeb/natlang/hebrew/hebrew_bible.html) especially God's eye, the EYE OF PROVIDENCE. Compare to the first logo.
Does the blue ball represent Earth? Consider the implication. :scared2:
עיִ is pronounced AI (eye) in English, and עַיִ is pronounced EL in Yiddish, which translates to God in Hebrew from English (I know that's confusing, copy and paste them in Google Translate if you don't believe me).
Compare these two symbols to the second logo. Keep in mind Hebrew is read backwards.
Up next: Google!
-
עיִ without the underline will also do to get EL in Yiddish.
-
The word GOOGOL was invented by the Jєω, Edward Kasner:
(https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/9/94/PSM_V70_D187_Edward_Kasner.jpg)
The company name GOOGLE is obviously a variation, but what is the symbolism behind the variation? I'll let Jєωs themselves explain in the book, Group Relations Work: Exploring the Impact and Relevance Within and Beyond its Network, by Eliat Aram, Robert Baxter and Avi Nutkevitch: (screenshots from Google Books preview)
(http://i.imgur.com/8zRKnnL.png)
(http://i.imgur.com/TyOHpqH.png)
(http://i.imgur.com/vcSyt3f.png)
Wow! Jєωs themselves associate the company name Google with rebellion against God! Of course, there's more shady symbolism behind Google ... that's up next.
-
(http://i.imgur.com/WBxHGYX.png)
As the y in ymail signified the ʝʊdɛօ-Masonic EYE OF PROVIDENCE, the G in Gmail signifies their GOD. Which of course are the same thing.
-
(http://i.imgur.com/s2auO9Y.png)
Apple's first logo was an illustration of Newton's apple legend (the falling apple that supposedly gave him knowledge regarding Earth's supposed motion). Newton was an Arian Cabalist (A gentile who practices Jєωιѕн magic and denies Jesus' divinity). What year did the falling apple story supposedly happen?
1666!
It's a safe bet the rainbow color is a reference to Newton's prism experiment (and possibly the ɧoɱosɛҳųαƖ who is currently Apple's Chief Executive). What year is that said to have taken place?
1666!
How much was the first Apple computer sold for?
$666.66!
I'll go out on a limb and say the bite taken out is a reference to that infamous bite at the beginning of time inspired by ...
Satan.
The person who built that first Apple computer is a self-professed Freemason, and his partner Steve Jobs was of Semitic descent: His father is (allegedly) a Muslim and from Syria and is currently the very rich Vice-President of a casino.
Job's sister married a Jєω named Richard Appel.
-
(https://s-media-cache-ak0.pinimg.com/564x/bd/b5/f9/bdb5f99f8d67c581967e9a22e9f1bfdd.jpg)
How could I forget!? Google Chrome's logo is an eye composed of 666.
-
(http://vignette1.wikia.nocookie.net/logopedia/images/a/a8/Best_Buy_logo_%2783.png/revision/latest?cb=20110405224815)
Best Buy's logo was similar. It was SIX 6's arranged to look like an eye, or the rising sun of the east (towards Israel).
-
Speaking of the rising sun...
(http://img1.liveinternet.ru/images/attach/c/11/116/877/116877493_imagesCA5USJIF.jpg)
Shell Oil's logo potentially symbolizes more than the shells of fossil fuel. You can discern a red shield (Rothschild) and the rising sun of the Orient.
-
And speaking of Red Shields ...
(http://www.salvationarmy.ca/dignity/wp-content/themes/sac-responsive/img/mobile-header-logo.jpg)
The Salvation Army is supposedly a charity organization. Surely they don't just launder most of those donations to the House of Rothschild?
Too bad its founder, the Jєω William Booth, is dead and we can't ask him:
(http://salvos.org.au/image?src=/scribe/sites/auesalvos/files/images/our-history/Info_Pack_-_William_Booth2_GeneralsFounder.jpg&width=200&height=270)
-
Matthew, feel free to ban me for spam. But otherwise, let's continue, shall we?
(http://thewildvoice.org/wp-content/uploads/2014/07/151.jpg)
The Rockefeller's Trilateral Commission really didn't need to stick 666 in their logo to be suspicious, but they went ahead anyway.
-
From Laughing Amigo:
It's a safe bet the rainbow color is a reference to Newton's prism experiment (and possibly the ɧoɱosɛҳųαƖ who is currently Apple's Chief Executive). What year is that said to have taken place?
My response: Logos have a great impact on our understanding and reception of products, and can provide subliminal messages as well. I do not doubt that many may have diabolic influences (many logos have clear free masonic influences, for example).
Some of the details are incorrect, though. Tim Cook, Apple's current chief executive, joined Apple in 1998, when the company was in decline. The rainbow logo was used from 1977 to 1998. At that time of its introduction, Steve Jobs and Steve Wozniak were in control of the fledgling company. The rainbow had nothing to do with Tim Cook.
As a side note, Steve Wozniak claimed that the price was selected because he liked repeating numbers, that the cost of $666.66 was one-third markup of the $500 wholesale cost, and that he was unaware of the Satanic nature of the number. It may seem far-fetched, especially the supposed ignorance of the number's meaning, but that is what he has publicly claimed.
-
I do not doubt that many may have diabolic influences (many logos have clear free masonic influences, for example).
What about diabolical Jєωιѕн influences in logos? What do you think about that possibility?
-
(http://logok.org/wp-content/uploads/2014/09/Bing-logo-2013.png)
Bing is a very, very Jєωιѕн name and you can discern three 6's in the logo.
-
וֹוֹוֹ is Hebrew for 666, as seen in the MySpace logo.
(http://www.userlogos.org/files/logos/jumpordie/myspace_01.png)
-
Game Maker had a G in a circle as its logo. We can probably forgive them for that. I won't assume it's the Freemasonic G.
(http://gamemakerblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/12/final-game-maker-logo.jpg)
But can we forgive the logo of the company that acquired them?
(https://scottishgames.files.wordpress.com/2014/03/yoyo_games_new_logo.png?w=470)
It's an eye made of a pair of 6's and the name is YoYo Games.
Yo is Hebrew for God.
And their parent company logo vaguely resembles the pyramid and eye of providence.
(http://www.casinoaffiliateprograms.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2012/08/playtechlogo_jpg.jpg)
I'm sure everyone's seen this before:
(http://www.deonvsearth.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/11/monster-666.jpg)
-
(http://logok.org/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/beats-by-dr-dre-logo.png)
Eye composed of a 6.
-
(http://logok.org/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/beats-by-dr-dre-logo.png)
Eye composed of a 6.
-
(http://i.imgur.com/s2auO9Y.png)
Apple's first logo was an illustration of Newton's apple legend (the falling apple that supposedly gave him knowledge regarding Earth's supposed motion). Newton was an Arian Cabalist (A gentile who practices Jєωιѕн magic and denies Jesus' divinity). What year did the falling apple story supposedly happen?
1666!
It's a safe bet the rainbow color is a reference to Newton's prism experiment (and possibly the ɧoɱosɛҳųαƖ who is currently Apple's Chief Executive). What year is that said to have taken place?
1666!
How much was the first Apple computer sold for?
$666.66!
I'll go out on a limb and say the bite taken out is a reference to that infamous bite at the beginning of time inspired by ...
Satan.
The person who built that first Apple computer is a self-professed Freemason, and his partner Steve Jobs was of Semitic descent: His father is (allegedly) a Muslim and from Syria and is currently the very rich Vice-President of a casino.
Job's sister married a Jєω named Richard Appel.
That rainbow Apple logo is from like, the late 90s... long before Tim Cook was CEO... who only is where he is, literally, because Steve Jobs died.
-
I do not doubt that many may have diabolic influences (many logos have clear free masonic influences, for example).
What about diabolical Jєωιѕн influences in logos? What do you think about that possibility?
I think it is true that there are Jєωιѕн influences in logos. I was adding that there are also freemasonic references as well.
-
From Laughing Amigo:
It's a safe bet the rainbow color is a reference to Newton's prism experiment (and possibly the ɧoɱosɛҳųαƖ who is currently Apple's Chief Executive). What year is that said to have taken place?
My response: Logos have a great impact on our understanding and reception of products, and can provide subliminal messages as well. I do not doubt that many may have diabolic influences (many logos have clear free masonic influences, for example).
Some of the details are incorrect, though. Tim Cook, Apple's current chief executive, joined Apple in 1998, when the company was in decline. The rainbow logo was used from 1977 to 1998. At that time of its introduction, Steve Jobs and Steve Wozniak were in control of the fledgling company. The rainbow had nothing to do with Tim Cook.
As a side note, Steve Wozniak claimed that the price was selected because he liked repeating numbers, that the cost of $666.66 was one-third markup of the $500 wholesale cost, and that he was unaware of the Satanic nature of the number. It may seem far-fetched, especially the supposed ignorance of the number's meaning, but that is what he has publicly claimed.
Apple has always been pioneering ɧoɱosɛҳųαƖism.
Laughing Amigo, if you compiled your content into an article, I think it would be well-received at The Vigilant Citizen (http://vigilantcitizen.com). At the very least, you could upload it to their forum (http://vigilantcitizen.com/forums/index.php). The sites are certainly not Catholic, but many non-Catholics are awakening to the ʝʊdɛօ-Luciferian control of "syphilization," such as it is.
-
(http://2014.jsconf.eu/sponsors/images/badoo.png)
The logo of Badoo, a dating social network site, is 666 followed by an eye.
(http://halalinthefamily.tv/wp-content/uploads/2015/05/abc-news-logo.jpg)
Seems ABC did their best with the font to make it look like 666 in an eye.
Can't say they didn't try. :rolleyes:
-
More on GOOGLE. As we saw earlier, the LE at the end is EL when read backwards as in Hebrew, which means GOD.
Turns out an alternative spelling of Gog (an evil ruler who attacked Israel in the Book of Ezekiel, and the name of a nation that will fight under Satan's banner in the Book of Revelation) is Gug, pronounced Goog.
So if we read GOOGLE backwards as in Hebrew we get ELGOOG, EL-GOOG, EL-GUG, GOD-GOG which is ambiguously ominous.
Make of that what you will, not sure if it's intentional although I wouldn't put it past them.
-
(http://vignette2.wikia.nocookie.net/logopedia/images/a/ab/AOL_Logo.svg/revision/latest?cb=20130617063655)
Eye of Providence inside pyramid.
-
(http://www.logospike.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/11/Ebay_logo-8.png)
666 followed by ע, meaning Eye of Providence.
-
I think I'll stop. Personally I find the Yahoo!, Google, Apple and Salvation Army logos the most convincingly Jєωιѕн.
-
I do not doubt that many may have diabolic influences (many logos have clear free masonic influences, for example).
What about diabolical Jєωιѕн influences in logos? What do you think about that possibility?
Here's how Manuel recently defended blasphemous flattery that he once bestowed upon a Jєω.
OHCA quoting from a blog connected to ManuelChavez:
"As the elderly man stepped out of his vehicle, my heart raced. I could not believe that Jerry Goldsmith himself was just a few feet away.
"I tread nervously toward him. I had no idea what to say. I could have pleaded for his autograph, or told him I worshiped him as a god, or uttered a thousand other things about his career or the honor it was to be in his presence."
http://reelmusiconline.blogspot.com/2009/08/my-goldsmith-moment.html?m=1
ManuelChavez:
The comment about worshiping him as a God was a reference to what happened with the founder of another film music magazine. The audience I wrote for would have gotten the reference, since it was fairly well known by this small group of film music fans.
You have not all the facts, so you use your opinion and bias to fill the large gaps in your knowledge.
OHCA:
I don't doubt that your audience was blasphemous marxists/Jєωs. But your "reference" is blasphemy--pure--simple--regardless of context--blasphemy!
ManuelChavez:
You mock what you don't understand.
You also do not want to hear the truth, for you have already made a determination on what transpired nearly 12 years ago.
My audience of film music fans were familiar with the other event i referenced, where the well-known magazine founder walked up to Goldsmith and said, "I worship you as a God." Goldsmith spent a minute or so berating the fan for his blasphemous outburst. It was a humorous event, and that story occurred to me before I met Goldsmith myself. I would not want to repeat such an idiotic and blasphemic mistake.
Context is important, as are facts. You simply choose to ignore them and wallow in ignorance and your unfounded, preconceived biases.
-
I do not doubt that many may have diabolic influences (many logos have clear free masonic influences, for example).
What about diabolical Jєωιѕн influences in logos? What do you think about that possibility?
Here's how Manuel recently defended blasphemous flattery that he once bestowed upon a Jєω.
OHCA quoting from a blog connected to ManuelChavez:
"As the elderly man stepped out of his vehicle, my heart raced. I could not believe that Jerry Goldsmith himself was just a few feet away.
"I tread nervously toward him. I had no idea what to say. I could have pleaded for his autograph, or told him I worshiped him as a god, or uttered a thousand other things about his career or the honor it was to be in his presence."
http://reelmusiconline.blogspot.com/2009/08/my-goldsmith-moment.html?m=1
ManuelChavez:
The comment about worshiping him as a God was a reference to what happened with the founder of another film music magazine. The audience I wrote for would have gotten the reference, since it was fairly well known by this small group of film music fans.
You have not all the facts, so you use your opinion and bias to fill the large gaps in your knowledge.
OHCA:
I don't doubt that your audience was blasphemous marxists/Jєωs. But your "reference" is blasphemy--pure--simple--regardless of context--blasphemy!
ManuelChavez:
You mock what you don't understand.
You also do not want to hear the truth, for you have already made a determination on what transpired nearly 12 years ago.
My audience of film music fans were familiar with the other event i referenced, where the well-known magazine founder walked up to Goldsmith and said, "I worship you as a God." Goldsmith spent a minute or so berating the fan for his blasphemous outburst. It was a humorous event, and that story occurred to me before I met Goldsmith myself. I would not want to repeat such an idiotic and blasphemic mistake.
Context is important, as are facts. You simply choose to ignore them and wallow in ignorance and your unfounded, preconceived biases.
STOP THIS NONSENSE.
-
I'd like to add Chavez is a very, very Jєωιѕн name. In fact the most famous Chavez is the Jєω Hugo Chavez who ruled communist Venezuela and was buddies with the Jєω Castro of Cuba and the Jєω Ahmadinejad of Iran.
-
I'd like to add Chavez is a very, very Jєωιѕн name. In fact the most famous Chavez is the Jєω Hugo Chavez who ruled communist Venezuela and was buddies with the Jєω Castro of Cuba and the Jєω Ahmadinejad of Iran.
I am not a Jєω, either in whole or in part.
-
I do not doubt that many may have diabolic influences (many logos have clear free masonic influences, for example).
What about diabolical Jєωιѕн influences in logos? What do you think about that possibility?
Here's how Manuel recently defended blasphemous flattery that he once bestowed upon a Jєω.
OHCA quoting from a blog connected to ManuelChavez:
"As the elderly man stepped out of his vehicle, my heart raced. I could not believe that Jerry Goldsmith himself was just a few feet away.
"I tread nervously toward him. I had no idea what to say. I could have pleaded for his autograph, or told him I worshiped him as a god, or uttered a thousand other things about his career or the honor it was to be in his presence."
http://reelmusiconline.blogspot.com/2009/08/my-goldsmith-moment.html?m=1
ManuelChavez:
The comment about worshiping him as a God was a reference to what happened with the founder of another film music magazine. The audience I wrote for would have gotten the reference, since it was fairly well known by this small group of film music fans.
You have not all the facts, so you use your opinion and bias to fill the large gaps in your knowledge.
OHCA:
I don't doubt that your audience was blasphemous marxists/Jєωs. But your "reference" is blasphemy--pure--simple--regardless of context--blasphemy!
ManuelChavez:
You mock what you don't understand.
You also do not want to hear the truth, for you have already made a determination on what transpired nearly 12 years ago.
My audience of film music fans were familiar with the other event i referenced, where the well-known magazine founder walked up to Goldsmith and said, "I worship you as a God." Goldsmith spent a minute or so berating the fan for his blasphemous outburst. It was a humorous event, and that story occurred to me before I met Goldsmith myself. I would not want to repeat such an idiotic and blasphemic mistake.
Context is important, as are facts. You simply choose to ignore them and wallow in ignorance and your unfounded, preconceived biases.
STOP THIS NONSENSE.
I know that blowing your cover makes you mad and that you urgently want this dismissed as "nonsense." But this proves several things: how intricately connected you are (or fancy yourself being) with the liberal/Jєω entertainment industry; how you gush over Jєωs in the industry; how you cheerily tongue-in-cheek toss blasphemy around and defend doing so.
-
STOP THIS NONSENSE.
I know that blowing your cover makes you mad and that you urgently want this dismissed as "nonsense." But this proves several things: how intricately connected you are (or fancy yourself being) with the liberal/Jєω entertainment industry; how you gush over Jєωs in the industry; how you cheerily tongue-in-cheek toss blasphemy around and defend doing so.
Did he ever explain why he chose a Presbעterian minister as his first avatar? You know, since Presbעterianism was founded by Jєωs and is thus a Jєωιѕн cult.
-
Both of you, stop this libelous assault on my character. This is not a charitable, Catholic action. It is demonic. It is sinful.
-
STOP THIS NONSENSE.
I know that blowing your cover makes you mad and that you urgently want this dismissed as "nonsense." But this proves several things: how intricately connected you are (or fancy yourself being) with the liberal/Jєω entertainment industry; how you gush over Jєωs in the industry; how you cheerily tongue-in-cheek toss blasphemy around and defend doing so.
Did he ever explain why he chose a Presbעterian minister as his first avatar? You know, since Presbעterianism was founded by Jєωs and is thus a Jєωιѕн cult.
ManuelChavez - I am wondering about the picture of Mr. Rogers. Did you know he was a Protestant minister?
Yes, I do. Fred Rogers was a pioneer in children's television programming. He was gentle and soft-spoken, and never raised his voice in anger or impatience. He wrote and played music, and encouraged others through good example.
"Fred Rogers was a pioneer in children's television programming."
Yes--yes he was. I am sure the Jєωs are very proud of him.
"He was gentle and soft-spoken, and never raised his voice in anger or impatience. He wrote and played music, and encouraged others through good example."
What the world has labeled as "anger or impatience" is sometimes called for. Also, his "good example" was calculated to effeminize and fαɢɢօtize male children.
In this and other posts (fondness for non-Catholic music, "boy" is derogatory, your general method of discourse) you sure have demonstrated that you are plugged in to the Jєωs' social engineering system.
-
Both of you, stop this libelous assault on my character. This is not a charitable, Catholic action. It is demonic. It is sinful.
90% of what I am doing is repeating your own words. 10% is connecting the dots.
-
He was gentle and soft-spoken, and never raised his voice in anger or impatience. He wrote and played music, and encouraged others through good example.
You couldn't find any Catholics that matched that description?
You had to choose a minister of a Jєωιѕн cult?
:scratchchin:
-
I will only say it once more...
STOP.
YOU WILL HAVE TO ANSWER BEFORE GOD FOR YOUR LIBELOUS ACTIONS.
Has Cathinfo become the safe harbor for those who flagrantly break the eighth commandment?
Your "connecting the dots" is based on lies, deception and manipulation of a few truths.
-
He was gentle and soft-spoken, and never raised his voice in anger or impatience. He wrote and played music, and encouraged others through good example.
You couldn't find any Catholics that matched that description?
You had to choose a minister of a Jєωιѕн cult?
:scratchchin:
I used to watch his show as a child, and I thought it would make an interesting choice for an avatar, immediately recognizable.
-
I will only say it once more...
STOP.
YOU WILL HAVE TO ANSWER BEFORE GOD FOR YOUR LIBELOUS ACTIONS.
Has Cathinfo become the safe harbor for those who flagrantly break the eighth commandment?
Your "connecting the dots" is based on lies, deception and manipulation of a few truths.
You should be praying for the grace to confess and repent for your blasphemy and Jєωmongering.
-
I will only say it once more...
STOP.
YOU WILL HAVE TO ANSWER BEFORE GOD FOR YOUR LIBELOUS ACTIONS.
Has Cathinfo become the safe harbor for those who flagrantly break the eighth commandment?
Your "connecting the dots" is based on lies, deception and manipulation of a few truths.
You should be praying for the grace to confess and repent for your blasphemy and Jєωmongering.
Stop. Your accusations are unfounded and need to cease.
-
He was gentle and soft-spoken, and never raised his voice in anger or impatience. He wrote and played music, and encouraged others through good example.
You couldn't find any Catholics that matched that description?
You had to choose a minister of a Jєωιѕн cult?
:scratchchin:
I used to watch his show as a child, and I thought it would make an interesting choice for an avatar, immediately recognizable.
Several people pointed out for you that he was a frocked heretic. I pointed out that he was a Jєωtube pioneer and enticed young males to effeminacy and fαɢɢօtry. You ignored proper rebuke and persisted with him as your avatar until recently.
-
I will only say it once more...
STOP.
YOU WILL HAVE TO ANSWER BEFORE GOD FOR YOUR LIBELOUS ACTIONS.
Has Cathinfo become the safe harbor for those who flagrantly break the eighth commandment?
Your "connecting the dots" is based on lies, deception and manipulation of a few truths.
You should be praying for the grace to confess and repent for your blasphemy and Jєωmongering.
Stop. Your accusations are unfounded and need to cease.
Repeating blasphemy for a humorous effect does not make it any less blasphemous.
-
He was gentle and soft-spoken, and never raised his voice in anger or impatience. He wrote and played music, and encouraged others through good example.
You couldn't find any Catholics that matched that description?
You had to choose a minister of a Jєωιѕн cult?
:scratchchin:
I used to watch his show as a child, and I thought it would make an interesting choice for an avatar, immediately recognizable.
Several people pointed out for you that he was a frocked heretic. I pointed out that he was a Jєωtube pioneer and enticed young males to effeminacy and fαɢɢօtry. You ignored proper rebuke and persisted with him as your avatar until recently.
So what! It is a bloody avatar, not a profession of faith. He was not promoting effeminacy or fαɢɢօtry. That's a lie.
Your rebuke is far from proper. It is abominable.
Begone, Satan.
-
He was gentle and soft-spoken, and never raised his voice in anger or impatience. He wrote and played music, and encouraged others through good example.
You couldn't find any Catholics that matched that description?
You had to choose a minister of a Jєωιѕн cult?
:scratchchin:
I used to watch his show as a child, and I thought it would make an interesting choice for an avatar, immediately recognizable.
Several people pointed out for you that he was a frocked heretic. I pointed out that he was a Jєωtube pioneer and enticed young males to effeminacy and fαɢɢօtry. You ignored proper rebuke and persisted with him as your avatar until recently.
So what! It is a bloody avatar, not a profession of faith. He was not promoting effeminacy or fαɢɢօtry. That's a lie.
Your rebuke is far from proper. It is abominable.
Begone, Satan.
I wasn't the only one who rebuked you.
-
OHCA, you have brought great dishonor to the reputation of Cathinfo. You have consistently insulted me, and libeled, misrepresented and twisted my words.
You are a terrible example of a traditional Catholic.
Go to confession for your breaking of the eighth commandment.
Leave Cathinfo. You've done enough damage with your paranoid delusions and diabolic accusations.
-
Also, you have gone way off topic.
- - -
Laughingamigo, take a look at the Exxon and Nabisco logos. There is an element of Fɾҽҽmαsσɳɾყ in each.
Have you ever seen the logo of the Iglesia Ni Christo? It is filled with Jєωιѕн and Freemason symbols.
-
OHCA, you have brought great dishonor to the reputation of Cathinfo. You have consistently insulted me, and libeled, misrepresented and twisted my words.
You are a terrible example of a traditional Catholic.
Go to confession for your breaking of the eighth commandment.
Leave Cathinfo. You've done enough damage with your paranoid delusions and diabolic accusations.
My "paranoid delusions and diabolic accusations?" Because I point out that you made a blasphemous statement for humor?
-
OHCA, you have brought great dishonor to the reputation of Cathinfo. You have consistently insulted me, and libeled, misrepresented and twisted my words.
You are a terrible example of a traditional Catholic.
Go to confession for your breaking of the eighth commandment.
Leave Cathinfo. You've done enough damage with your paranoid delusions and diabolic accusations.
My "paranoid delusions and diabolic accusations?" Because I point out that you made a blasphemous statement for humor?
You will never understand, because you are blinded by your own ignorance and delusional mentality. I explained it, you refused to listen. I won't explain it again. I am right. You are wrong.
Pearls before swine, indeed. You have wasted my time.
-
OHCA, you have brought great dishonor to the reputation of Cathinfo. You have consistently insulted me, and libeled, misrepresented and twisted my words.
You are a terrible example of a traditional Catholic.
Go to confession for your breaking of the eighth commandment.
Leave Cathinfo. You've done enough damage with your paranoid delusions and diabolic accusations.
My "paranoid delusions and diabolic accusations?" Because I point out that you made a blasphemous statement for humor?
You will never understand, because you are blinded by your own ignorance and delusional mentality. I explained it, you refused to listen. I won't explain it again. I am right. You are wrong.
Pearls before swine, indeed. You have wasted my time.
Your explanation was essentially that you made the blasphemous statement for a humorous effect, playing off of the blasphemous statement being made by someone quite some time earlier. If you think that is a justifiable explanation, then your aren't much of an example of a traditional Catholic (which I don't believe you are anyway).
You're the king of wasted time Mr. 30 Days in La-La Land.
-
OHCA, you have brought great dishonor to the reputation of Cathinfo. You have consistently insulted me, and libeled, misrepresented and twisted my words.
You are a terrible example of a traditional Catholic.
Go to confession for your breaking of the eighth commandment.
Leave Cathinfo. You've done enough damage with your paranoid delusions and diabolic accusations.
My "paranoid delusions and diabolic accusations?" Because I point out that you made a blasphemous statement for humor?
You will never understand, because you are blinded by your own ignorance and delusional mentality. I explained it, you refused to listen. I won't explain it again. I am right. You are wrong.
Pearls before swine, indeed. You have wasted my time.
Your explanation was essentially that you made the blasphemous statement for a humorous effect, playing off of the blasphemous statement being made by someone quite some time earlier. If you think that is a justifiable explanation, then your aren't much of an example of a traditional Catholic (which I don't believe you are anyway).
You're the king of wasted time Mr. 30 Days in La-La Land.
You don't know what blasphemy is:
Blasphemy, by reason of the significance of the words with which it is expressed, may be of three kinds.
It is heretical when the insult to God involves a declaration that is against faith, as in the assertion: "God is cruel and unjust" or "The noblest work of man is God".
It is imprecatory when it would cry a malediction upon the Supreme Being as when one would say: "Away with God".
It is simply contumacious when it is wholly made up of contempt of, or indignation towards, God, as in the blasphemy of Julian the Apostate: "Thou has conquered, O Galilaean".
Again, blasphemy may be (1) either direct, as when the one blaspheming formally intends to dishonour the Divinity, or (2) indirect, as when without such intention blasphemous words are used with advertence to their import.
What I wrote seven years ago does not fall under any of these. Stop making a molehill into a mountain.
-
(http://i.imgur.com/etTVl6v.jpg)
Game Maker was acquired by YoYo Games, but it seems they were both Jєωιѕн from the start anyways.
The original Game Maker logo has the red hammer of Communism, while the newer one under YoYo Games has the G of Fɾҽҽmαsσɳɾყ inside the gear of Communism.
Yo, as said before, is Hebrew for God. YoYo Games also created GM Oculus (whatever that is) which obviously has the eye and gear as its symbol.
The gear logo of Rotary Club International appears to be an allusion to the Communist International, and incidentally it has 6 spokes (like the 6 points of the Jєωιѕн Star) which may not be an accident.
More on Game Maker up next.
-
Also, you have gone way off topic.
- - -
Laughingamigo, take a look at the Exxon and Nabisco logos. There is an element of Fɾҽҽmαsσɳɾყ in each.
Have you ever seen the logo of the Iglesia Ni Christo? It is filled with Jєωιѕн and Freemason symbols.
Manuel, are you Filipino?
[For those who don't know, Iglesia Ni Cristo is basically Filipino Mormonism]
-
Also, you have gone way off topic.
- - -
Laughingamigo, take a look at the Exxon and Nabisco logos. There is an element of Fɾҽҽmαsσɳɾყ in each.
Have you ever seen the logo of the Iglesia Ni Christo? It is filled with Jєωιѕн and Freemason symbols.
Manuel, are you Filipino?
[For those who don't know, Iglesia Ni Cristo is basically Filipino Mormonism]
I am not Filipino. I have had run-ins with many INC fanatics over the last two years. They deny the divinity of Our Lord, and they mock the Catholic Church. It is a truly crazy sect.
-
Here is the logo. There are so many references to Fɾҽҽmαsσɳɾყ and Satanism.
-
(http://vignette3.wikia.nocookie.net/logopedia/images/d/d0/IE6.png/revision/latest?cb=20121221232621)
(http://gamemakerblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/09/game-maker-7-logo.gif)
Both of these logos look like a blue version of the planet Saturn with an orange ring.
It may take a second for this to be noticed, especially for the Game Maker logo, but it's significant enough to not be dismissed as definitely an accident.
Blue in Judaism symbolizes divinity. The letter E is a common Hebrew symbol for God. In Hebrew, it looks like this:
ה
It's what turned into the English letter e (even though it seems like it would've been the letter h, all sources I've seen insist it turned into e).
However, when referring to God, it usually looks like this:
ה׳
With that little dash at the top left. If we replace the Hebrew sign for the English one we would get this:
׳e
Now compare to this version of the Internet Explorer logo:
(http://www.renew.net/images/internet_explorer.png)
So what's the deal with associating the planet Saturn with the Hebrew God? Well in Acts 7:43 St. Stephen accuses the Jєωs of having worshiped the star of a false god named Rephan, and an identical accusation had been made against the Jєωs long before in the Old Testament in Amos 5:26.
The consensus among biblical scholars seems to be that Rephan is identical for the god Saturn. For example of one such argument see here: http://www.biblestudytools.com/dictionary/remphan/
According to "The History and Practice of Magic", 1979, the hexagram (a.k.a. Star of David) is the symbol of Saturn. Incidentally, it could be considered a stylized top-down view of Saturn.
These two logos of Game Maker and Internet Explorer would seem to corroborate this claim, although I just need one more source confirming the hexagram represents Saturn and I would consider this case closed.
If someone could help with that I'd be grateful.!
-
(http://vignette3.wikia.nocookie.net/logopedia/images/d/d0/IE6.png/revision/latest?cb=20121221232621)
(http://gamemakerblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/09/game-maker-7-logo.gif)
Both of these logos look like a blue version of the planet Saturn with an orange ring.
It may take a second for this to be noticed, especially for the Game Maker logo, but it's significant enough to not be dismissed as definitely an accident.
Blue in Judaism symbolizes divinity. The letter E is a common Hebrew symbol for God. In Hebrew, it looks like this:
ה
It's what turned into the English letter e (even though it seems like it would've been the letter h, all sources I've seen insist it turned into e).
However, when referring to God, it usually looks like this:
ה׳
With that little dash at the top left. If we replace the Hebrew sign for the English one we would get this:
׳e
Now compare to this version of the Internet Explorer logo:
(http://www.renew.net/images/internet_explorer.png)
So what's the deal with associating the planet Saturn with the Hebrew God? Well in Acts 7:43 St. Stephen accuses the Jєωs of having worshiped the star of a false god named Rephan, and an identical accusation had been made against the Jєωs long before in the Old Testament in Amos 5:26.
The consensus among biblical scholars seems to be that Rephan is identical for the god Saturn. For example of one such argument see here: http://www.biblestudytools.com/dictionary/remphan/
According to "The History and Practice of Magic", 1979, the hexagram (a.k.a. Star of David) is the symbol of Saturn. Incidentally, it could be considered a stylized top-down view of Saturn.
These two logos of Game Maker and Internet Explorer would seem to corroborate this claim, although I just need one more source confirming the hexagram represents Saturn and I would consider this case closed.
If someone could help with that I'd be grateful.!
That's the letter 'hei' in Hebrew, which represents H, not E. E is represented by the letter aleph. So God, or Elohim (a foreboding to the Trinity as -im in the male is plural in Hebrew) is represented by אֱלֹהִים
-
That's the letter 'hei' in Hebrew, which represents H, not E. E is represented by the letter aleph. So God, or Elohim (a foreboding to the Trinity as -im in the male is plural in Hebrew) is represented by אֱלֹהִים
Do you have a source for that claim (that the letter hei means h)?
It does seem the more obvious interpretation yet all sources I've seen state it's related to the English e, not h.
Also, how do you know any Hebrew? Did you learn some basic Hebrew from your Jєωιѕн mother?
-
Interestingly, the Jєωιѕн holy day is Saturday, the Day of Saturn, which is the sixth day of the week according to the international standard. So there we have corroborating evidence that the Jєωs consider Saturn, Saturday, the number 6, and the hexagram to be related.
(https://infrakshun.files.wordpress.com/2015/05/six-pointed-star666.jpg)
Based on that hypothesis, we'd now have to conclude NASA photos of Saturn are fake, because these photos are just too convenient:
HEXAGRAM (6 sides) on Saturn's north pole:
http://earthsky.org/space/the-eye-of-saturn
(http://www.nasa.gov/sites/default/files/pia18274_full.jpg)
EYE on Saturn's south pole:
http://www.space.com/3095-freak-eyed-monster-storm-spotted-saturn.html
(https://outofthisworldx.files.wordpress.com/2014/10/49804-illuminatiwatcherdotcom-saturn13.jpg)
Either NASA is yanking our chain here, or it's just a big double coincidence, or some ancients had already made this observation thousands of years ago and it got passed down from them into mythology.
At the moment I'm going with NASA hoax.
-
2012 London Olympics logo subliminally says "ZION" in plain sight:
-
2012 London Olympics logo subliminally says "ZION" in plain sight:
:stare:
Wow, this is the third time I check this thread and your image finally loaded for me. Do you have anymore?! :shocked:
-
2012 London Olympics logo subliminally says "ZION" in plain sight:
:stare:
Wow, this is the third time I check this thread and your image finally loaded for me. Do you have anymore?! :shocked:
Not sure if I have anymore pertaining specifically to Jєωιѕн symbolism that hasn't already been mentioned on this or other threads, but I might be able to dig up subliminal messages, mockery of future orchestrated events and predictive programming in images.
How did you make your images in your posts available to be seen by everyone without the need to log in? People can only see my post if they're logged in.
-
2012 London Olympics logo subliminally says "ZION" in plain sight:
:stare:
Wow, this is the third time I check this thread and your image finally loaded for me. Do you have anymore?! :shocked:
Not sure if I have anymore pertaining specifically to Jєωιѕн symbolism that hasn't already been mentioned on this or other threads, but I might be able to dig up subliminal messages, mockery of future orchestrated events and predictive programming in images.
How did you make your images in your posts available to be seen by everyone without the need to log in? People can only see my post if they're logged in.
I have no idea!
-
That's the letter 'hei' in Hebrew, which represents H, not E. E is represented by the letter aleph. So God, or Elohim (a foreboding to the Trinity as -im in the male is plural in Hebrew) is represented by אֱלֹהִים
Hebrew letters are consonants with the vowels shown as dots and other small symbols around them. The letter "hei" makes the same sound as "h" does in English. The letter "aleph" is a silent consonant that takes on the sound of whatever vowel is placed by it.
(https://s-media-cache-ak0.pinimg.com/originals/11/db/66/11db669f15d46ea5d6effaa2881bd46b.gif)
(I studied Hebrew as a child and also took several university courses on it.)
By the way, Saturday is not the sixth day of the week for Jєωs. The Hebrew names for the days of the week translate as " first day," "second day," etc. corresponding to Sunday, Monday, and so on. The only exception is Saturday which is called "Shabat" which means "rest" but sounds similar to the word for seven "sheva." It is a pun in Hebrew.
-
(I studied Hebrew as a child and also took several university courses on it.)
By the way, Saturday is not the sixth day of the week for Jєωs. The Hebrew names for the days of the week translate as " first day," "second day," etc. corresponding to Sunday, Monday, and so on. The only exception is Saturday which is called "Shabat" which means "rest" but sounds similar to the word for seven "sheva." It is a pun in Hebrew.
Thanks! But Saturday is the 6th day of the week according to the International Standard.
Who do you think made that decision?
:scratchchin:
(http://i.imgur.com/1OkG9Z0.png)
-
http://postimg.org/image/sxmokt8r5/