I do not doubt that many may have diabolic influences (many logos have clear free masonic influences, for example).
What about diabolical Jєωιѕн influences in logos? What do you think about that possibility?
Here's how Manuel recently defended blasphemous flattery that he once bestowed upon a Jєω.
OHCA quoting from a blog connected to ManuelChavez:
"As the elderly man stepped out of his vehicle, my heart raced. I could not believe that Jerry Goldsmith himself was just a few feet away.
"I tread nervously toward him. I had no idea what to say. I could have pleaded for his autograph, or told him I worshiped him as a god, or uttered a thousand other things about his career or the honor it was to be in his presence."
http://reelmusiconline.blogspot.com/2009/08/my-goldsmith-moment.html?m=1 ManuelChavez:
The comment about worshiping him as a God was a reference to what happened with the founder of another film music magazine. The audience I wrote for would have gotten the reference, since it was fairly well known by this small group of film music fans.
You have not all the facts, so you use your opinion and bias to fill the large gaps in your knowledge.
OHCA:
I don't doubt that your audience was blasphemous marxists/Jєωs. But your "reference" is blasphemy--pure--simple--regardless of context--blasphemy!
ManuelChavez:
You mock what you don't understand.
You also do not want to hear the truth, for you have already made a determination on what transpired nearly 12 years ago.
My audience of film music fans were familiar with the other event i referenced, where the well-known magazine founder walked up to Goldsmith and said, "I worship you as a God." Goldsmith spent a minute or so berating the fan for his blasphemous outburst. It was a humorous event, and that story occurred to me before I met Goldsmith myself. I would not want to repeat such an idiotic and blasphemic mistake.
Context is important, as are facts. You simply choose to ignore them and wallow in ignorance and your unfounded, preconceived biases.