And talk about Goliath going up against David.  The bigger they are the harder they fall.

I don' t know that it matters that a number could be called, Jєωs. The question would be, do they act to the detriment of civilized society and in a way that could be predicted by knowing only that they were Jєωs. It would have to suggest a shared philosophy, religion, a plan of action on the part of the conspirators, even just a single mindset were they never to actually meet on any matter or contact each other. Many of those listed would not seem to share such a common view.

I think the above remark betrays a certain ignorance of the Jєωιѕн ethos.  Modern Jєωs can be found at all points along the political spectrum, (though most of them bunch up along the left end of it.)  Yet they all seem to share certain traits in common.  Most are actively, (at least passively), pro-Israel.  They boast, actively or passively of a certain racial superiority.  Most of them, on some level, view themselves as the Chosen of God, or the chief beneficiaries of a Messianic tradition, whether that tradition embraces the idea of a future Messiah or a Messianic state.  Most Jєωs are socially liberal, i.e. opposed to Christian social and moral values.  99% of modern Jєωry believes that 6 million of their correligionists were sytematically exterminated in the h0Ɩ0cαųst. And most importantly, all those calling themselves Jєωs are active or passive enemies of Jesus Christ and His Church.
As for a "single mindset:" Jєωs cleverly avoid revealing a single mindset by seeming to take a variety of postions on the social and political issues confronting society.  It gives them a tremendous tactical advantage, I believe.  
Take the radio talkshow host, Michael Savage, for example.  He rails against abortion and ɧoɱosɛҳųαƖity all the time, and appears to be foursquare socially conservative.  However, I'll bet you he'd find perfect agreement on a a number of things with House member, Barney Frank, the most notorious Jєωιѕн ɧoɱosɛҳųαƖ in the U.S. Congress.  They both support Israel fervently.  They would both agree that the Palestinians are to blame for the failure to achieve peace there.  For both, the h0Ɩ0cαųst would provide a centerpiece of mutual racial identity.  Both these Jєωs would nuke Iran in a minute in the interest of protecting Israel and advancing that country's hegemony over the region.  Both these Jєωs, I am certain, got enthusiastically behind the initial invasion of Iraq.  Both would agree, presently speaking, that militant Islam is the Western World's chief nemesis.  Both of them, by definition, are anti-Christian and essentially one in their opposition to the spread of the Christian Gospel in the world.
Let it be remembered, to cite a bit of irrefutable history, that it was basically capitalist Jєωιѕн bankers, like Jacob Schiff, who financed Jєωs like Trotsky and communist Bolshevism in general.  Even Hitler, no less a figure than Bishop Richard Williamson declares,  was put into power with Jєωιѕн money.   The problem today is simply this, in my opinion.  Joe Sixpack doesn't really understand how the Jєωs work, particularly the militant, activist ones.  He doesn't really fathom the yin and the yang of тαℓмυdic Judaism.
I recommend a short book to you all.  It breaks no new ground, but can serve as a good summary of a few of the things I have attempted to point out, particularly about the present crisis and the role of the Jєωs in it.  The book is entitled The Sword of Christiandom by Fr. Stephen Delallo of SSPX.  It's out of print now, but some of you may already have a copy, or you can order a used copy online.  It's dynamite in dealing with very issues we're discussing here.