There is no doubt in my mind that the Jєωs control most Catholics' thinking. We Catholics need to have towards the Jєωs the same attitude that St. John Chrysostom had: "I hate the Jєωs," he preached, "and you ought to hate them too." But what do most of us do with the Jєωs. We play 'good cop-bad cop' game. Yes, we reason, there are lots of evil Jєωs, but there are some good ones too. So we hem and haw and temporize about the Jєωs. The only good Jєω is a converted Jєω, or a Jєω who has totally abandoned Judaism and the Jєωιѕн culture- men like Gilad Atzmon and Brother Nathanael Kapner are the only ex-Jєωs who I can embrace. Jєωs are chameleons, in my opinion. You've got a guy like Norman Finkelstein, who, yes, supports and defends the Palestinians in Gaza, and writes about the "h0Ɩ0cαųst Industry." Well, that's good. Yet at the same time he's talking about his relatives who were "exterminated" by the nαzιs in the "h0Ɩ0cαųst," etc. He refers back to his parents often, who, he says, were interned in nαzι "death camps," etc. He's compromised, IMO. I don't trust that kind of Jєω. I think E. Michael Jones has it pretty straight. Has any Jєω ever come to the defense of Jones' right to free speech? Has any Jєω, 'good cop' Jєω or 'bad cop' Jєω, ever risen up and rebuked the rabbis for protesting a Jones speaking engagement. I think not. I don't cut the Jєωs much slack. They certainly don't exhibit much tolerance towards Christians, unless it is to marry into a Christian family for purposes of gaining the ideological mastery over it.