From the anti-Christian, anti-white Diversity Chronicle (link):

By Ivan Fernando

“If you are a white male, you don’t deserve to live. You are a cancer, you’re a disease, white males have never contributed anything positive to the world! They only murder, exploit and oppress non-whites! At least a white woman can have sex with a black man and make a brown baby but what can a white male do? He’s good for nothing. Slavery, genocides against aboriginal peoples and massive land confiscation, the inquisition, the h0Ɩ0cαųst, white males are all to blame! You maintain your white male privilege only by oppressing, discriminating against and enslaving others!” Professor Noel Ignatiev, a tenured professor at Massachusetts College loudly proclaimed to his class last Monday, his final teaching day before retirement.

The good Professor’s sound and reasonable words resonate with every enlightened and progressive mind. They are indisputable and no one can debate them. They should not be controversial in the slightest, yet remarkably a few far-right extremists object to Prof. Ignatiev’s advice. The Professor however, reported receiving “a standing ovation” from his “largely white and middle class students.” Prof. Ignatiev’s critics say that openly calling for students, even if they are white males, to kill themselves was inappropriate and perhaps excessive. In this article, we will look at the other side of the issue.

Fortunately, I was able to arrange a telephone interview with the professor. I felt he deserved a chance to tell his side of the story. A side that our radical and racist far-right media refuse to report. The transcript of our dialogue follows below:

Prof. Ignatiev: I chalk it all up to white supremacist attitudes. The goal of destroying the white race is simply so desirable, it boggles the mind trying to understand how anyone could possibly object to it. Those who object to my advice, knowingly or perhaps unknowingly, are themselves white supremacists. They wish to go on oppressing and exploiting other races and maintaining their own privileged positions of power. That is the conscious and sometimes subconscious motivation of all of my critics. That is why they object to destroying the cancer of humanity known as the white race. That ugly disease, which dares to call itself a people and a culture.

Ivan Fernando: All whites, or just white males should commit ѕυιcιdє?

Prof. Ignatiev: Obviously, all whites need to be destroyed, but why not start with white males? They are behind most of history’s greatest atrocities. Besides, some of the brothers like to bang white women. Eventually white women can breed out, but my feeling is that if you are a white male, you should kill yourself now. If you are a thoughtful person, with a social consciousness who considers himself white, you will consider ѕυιcιdє. It’s the right thing to do. Let me read you an e-mail that I received today from a xenophobic white-supremacist.

“I’m not a racist, in fact I am an avowed anti-racist, I just think calling for all white males to kill themselves is extreme. When you say that every white person is bad or advocate violence against them, it sounds almost as though you are becoming a kind of racist yourself. You say it is good for everyone to be proud of their culture. Blacks, Mexicans and everyone else. Why should whites be the only exception? For the sake of argument, supposing whites have wronged many other races historically. Should we punish people today for their ancestor’s sins? Today minorities have affirmative action and generous social welfare programs to protect them. Can we really say that most whites are racist now or that the government is? Should Blacks who descend from Blacks who owned or sold slaves feel guilty and be punished for ancestral wrongs?”

Ivan Fernando: Wow. (laughter)

Prof. Ignatiev: I know, mind boggling. What an absurd and irrational line of reasoning. They just throw logic out the window entirely. It’s impossible to dialogue with these people. Notice the blind and irrational hatred behind every word! No one has committed violence, genocide and dispossession on the level of white males. The whole purpose of white male culture is to perpetuate their privileged status and continue their oppression of non-whites. Whites don’t have a culture like other races in which traditions and customs are preserved as an expression of a common identity. White culture is an entirely economic and social culture which is about shutting out other people deemed “non-white” as a means of preventing their social and economic advancement! In other words all of ‘white culture’ so-called, stems from hatred of the other, unlike other ethnicities which do have cultures. White people are a disease, they are parasites! They don’t deserve to live!

Ivan Fernando: Yes, Absolutely, could you give us some examples though for our readers, regarding the racist nature of white culture.

Prof. Ignatiev: Columbus Day, whites literally celebrate the genocide of non-whites, delighting in it. Thanksgiving Day. Whites honour the Pilgrims who gave Native Americans blankets deliberately infected with small pox to kill their babies. Yeah, it is about being thankful, thankful that whites butchered most Native Americans so they could steal their land and establish a racist society based on white male privilege! Christmas is also racist. Should I go on?

Ivan Fernando: Please do.

Prof. Ignatiev: The idea of celebrating the birth of a middle eastern Semite, yet portraying him as a Nordic white person in visual art is not only racist, but obscene and Anti-Semitic! Of course there is Santa Claus as well. Who is he? A bearded old white man! He lives at the North Pole, it doesn’t get whiter than that! Who works for Santa? Of course elves, diminutive, perhaps slightly brown people, with pointed ears who have been enslaved by a privileged white male. Christmas and white culture disgust me. I hate this time of year so much. I hate going outside and seeing Christmas trees or Christmas lights. They should be banned! A Christmas tree is just one notch above a burning cross in my opinion!

Ivan Fernando: What do you suggest that people do for the holidays. Especially, minority families who may feel pressured to celebrate Christmas, or other European racist holidays? Is there an alternative?

Prof Ignatiev: A great Black Professor in the 60’s came up with Kwanza, a way to celebrate African heritage. Hopefully a Mexican-American equivalent will soon be developed as another Christmas alternative.

Ivan Fernando: I am sorry, but we are starting to run low on time. Let me ask you, have you suffered any attacks personally, or received any threats for your advice to your students during your final class?

Prof. Ignatiev: (laughter) No. I haven’t. In fact all the responses I have received, except for a few e-mails have been positive. I feel vindicated. Perhaps we are finally coming to an awareness in this country that the cancer known as the white race must be obliterated. Especially in the form of white males. Obama is president, and I think there is an excellent chance that we will never have a white male president again. I think we are witnessing the breaking of the back of the white male power structure. We will still have residual white males that must be dealt with, but I am confident that we’ve won. Eventually, I would like to put white males in cσncєnтrαтισn cαмρs and work them to death just like they’ve done to everyone else. When they are all dead we can throw a party and dance around their corpses!

Ivan Fernando: I certainly hope so. I hope you are right. If so it is the dawning of a new era of peace and progress. I apologize Professor, but we are out of time now. Thank you again, and it was a pleasure speaking with you.

Prof Ignatiev. The pleasure was mine. Thank you Ivan. I love Diversity Chronicle by the way, I recommended it to all my students. Keep up the good work!

Ivan Fernando: You are very kind Prof. Ignatiev. Thank you again and Good night.

Prof. Ignatiev: Good Night.

That's white guilt for you.  It's only going to get worse.  

I really do not want to involve myself in a long drawn out conversation about this.  I simply do not have the time.  But, gollee-gee, it's still Black History Month.  And, what with Beyonce's latest homage to black power, and the recent energy coming out of Black Lives Matter, I could not help but feel compelled to contribute something new to the "conversation about race" that Al Sharpton keeps complaining that we need to have.  

So here goes.  

The snobbish despiser of Americans, Immaculata001 last month, said something very interesting that I thought could turn into an interesting conversation.  Unfortunately, most of her responses were dull narcissistic troll attempts to virtue signal.  Her endless one-person parade about everyone being a white supremacist who doesn't talk about race the way she does--yes, that 30+ page of comedy--it really made me realize that it is impossible to talk to her.  There is no exchange.  Just her pontifications, and my attempt to provide content for the conversation.  

However, a broken watch is right twice a day, and I want to jump off of something she said early in the fiasco:

Oh heck, just for the sake of it, I want to contribute to the inevitable degeneration of this thread (by its fruits)...

Since many here very clearly feel comfortable denigrating whole races of people (so far, I've read that Africans are stupid demonic cannibals who don't baptize their children), I think it's an extremely valuable intellectual exercise to explore all the possibilities of seemingly benign discussions on the "differences" of the races (we all know that's now what this conversation is about -- we know what peoples' intent is). I'm going to give common non-White perceptions of White people, and what the culmination of the claims and evidence might mean about how Whites are "different". After all, the OP supports free speech and doesn't understand why these kinds of conversations are detrimental on a Catholic forum.

Very well. Let's begin.

Whites are, demonstrably, moral degenerates. I once read the argument of a "Black Nationalist" that stated that if human races could be classified as different categories of the DSMV, the White race would be the sociopaths and psychopaths.

The best evidence of this, from the Catholic perspective, would be the V2 catastrophe -- and notice, it is usually described as a "crisis" to minimize its impact on the destruction of every traditional structure from the inception of human society, from economics, to the family, to human sɛҳuąƖity, faith and worship, and perceptions of good and evil. The fact that one would compartmentalize a human catastrophe on an epic scale as a simple "crisis" shows an innate inability to perceive good and evil. This inability demonstrates that "Whites" possess a psychological or mental reflex that no other races possess. Collectively, people who are capable of doing this individually and collectively on an international scale are wholly abnormal and represent a psychic and moral cancer. Look at a globe. There is no where on the planet where crimes against humanity and epic catastrophes have not happened as a result of the arrival of Europeans -- it's universal and provable, and not paralleled by any other race.

But back to the catastrophe. If we could classify human "races" according to DSMV categories, Africans would be diagnosed as mental retards, according to White Supremacists.

But retards don't have the capacity to hijack and warp God-given institutions and sacraments. Retards don't mobilize rings of devil-worshiping pedophiles to  celebrate a Satanic enthronement of Lucifer in a Vatican holy site, while offering up a Satanic sacrifice at alternates locations, all with the hope of murdering, effectively, the Catholic Church in a conspiratorial plot that spanned decades, if not centuries, of covert and but dedicated effort. Retards can't create a catastrophe so mind-warping and soul-crushing that honest and god-fearing people have no institutions that can be reliably expected to offer spiritual guidance and support without the taint of sin, confusion, or modernism -- there is truly nowhere to run and nowhere to hide for a sincere Catholic of any race. Every vestige of traditional Catholic culture has been destroyed(the arts, media, fraternal organization, business associations and systems, child-rearing, gender roles, family, national ties and characteristics, discourse and rhetoric, the corruption of history as a tool for propaganda...). Even monasteries and convents are places that endanger the souls of their inhabitants.

The rub -- and the proof of an innate moral degeneracy -- is that this catastrophic revolution was entirely willing and voluntary. It seems that "Whites," if one traces the evolution and spread of Christianity throughout the world, were to be the custodians of God's faith and saving all of humanity from perdition. But instead of carrying out their charge, "Whites" unconsciously proclaimed themselves Gods. After even miraculous events, like Fatima, "Whites" sowed doubt in the truth of a philosophy their forefather's bled for, and died for. A philosophy that was the foundation of all of European civilization -- essentially, Europeans voluntarily committed cultural, social, moral, and spiritual ѕυιcιdє, knowingly destroying every vestige of the world as they knew, all because they had an all consuming desire to create the world we now have: a cesspool of sin, degeneracy, hate, and evil. The role of "Whites" in world history can be paralleled to the rebellion of Lucifer and his angels in Heaven: no, they would not serve.

No retarded Africans have created a human calamity unlike anything the world has ever seen. Which is the greater sin or deficit: complete amorality and a kind of psychopathic urge for self-deification that no other race possesses, or belonging to a "primitive" culture like most of the progenitors of Non-Whites?

While this may have upset some folks in that thread, I cannot help but sort of agree in a certain way.  I even stated, after clarifying myself due to a punctuation error:

I considered your post engaging and enjoyable, and I'm not just saying that because you are the black person.

Isn't it wonderful how I am able to talk with people, in spite of the fact that they talk at me?  That's how great I am.  

Anyway.  


I think it is perhaps arguable that, yes, whites have a real problem.  They do tend to be degenerates in a certain effeminate and cowardly manner.  Now, now, now, caucasians.  Before you get upset at me for speaking, just hear me out.  I know that there are exceptions to the rule, and that perhaps you are such an exception.  Perhaps your family is an exception.  But let us not forget who we are, here at Cathinfo.  We are a tiny minority in the Catholic culture.  And even then, not everyone is a practicing Catholic.  We are a minority of a minority.  If there's going to be exceptions to the rule, they will be located here, most definitely, on a forum like this.  

However, the majority of white people in this country...have you seen these people?  These nasty, narcissistic, hedonistic, disgusting people?  I'm not judging them for what they are, but for who they are.

I work in a medical setting.  Tens of thousands of people, most of them white, pass by me every day.  These people are, for the most part, not exceptionally noble.  Let me put it to you this way, go to Google, type in "Meth Capital of the World," and it'll pull up my town.  Who does meth?  Whites.

But screw that for a minute.  Let's get a little academic here.  Let's consider White Flight.  In America, whites are always on the run from bad neighborhoods.  They run and flee to their white enclaves.  They have no courage to stay in a shitty neighborhood to maintain their presence.  They are afraid of conflict.  Generally speaking (and again, I'm not targeting the exceptional white people), the whites run.  

Look at Europe today.  Look at how pathetic the whites are at handling the encroaching Muslims.  Sure, a minority are putting up a fight and are taking to nationalism.  But the majority of Europeans are holding up poster boards for the invading Muslim refugees.  It's disgusting.  They're handing over Europe to barbarians.  It'll take another 700 years to kick them out at this rate.  Another Reconquista.  Do the Europeans of this generation have what it takes?  I do not think so.  They have history to guide them, but I think most people don't give to bits about history.  



Consider how cowardly and effeminate white men are today.  Look at the priests of the Conciliar Church.  50% fαɢs, I tell you.  Look at how men have no sense of masculinity any longer.  Look at how they allow women to run willy-nilly into a harsh cruel working world, or how they allow women to become their kings.  How white men allow their women to speak--as if they have the authority that men are supposed to have.  Why do white men do this?  Because they are effeminate, and they cower from responsibility and confrontation.  They run.  White Flight.  Just like whites leave bad neighborhoods in this country, the white men of the west run from confrontation and hassle.  Because "confrontation and hassle" are bad neighborhoods that they want to escape.  

Speaking of bad neighborhoods:



[youtube]https://www.youtube.com/embed/UKAQX74yRyc[/youtube]

For those of you who just watched that video...just listen to the frustration of that woman.  Listen to her, as she describes how the 17,000 muslims have simply moved into Calais, and created their muslim city-within-a-city.  They have their own named streets in their own little muslim shantytown, for crying out loud.  And listen to this woman's frustration at how the citizens of Calais are dumb and clueless about what to do.  Listen to how the police are not going after the muslims...but instead they are going after any citizen who dares to complain.  Defend yourself against a muslim attack, and you will get thrown in jail.  Could this be the nature of white people?  Where the hell are the men?  Cowards, most of them.  Again, I'm sure there's exceptions--such as this woman's son.  But the lot of them are doing nothing about this.  All of this madness is being allowed by these insane white people.  All across Europe.  There is hardly a trace of masculinity to be found anywhere in the face of this crisis.  Everyone has given in to their hedonistic desires for comfort.  For pleasure.  

And, in the face of this European madness, what in the hell are white women doing?  They are going after the invading barbarians.  They're welcoming the muslims in with open arms.  But this isn't, exactly about Europe's muslim immigrant crisis.  I'm having a discussion about race.  What are white women doing here in America?  A lot of the time, they're riding a carousel of men through their twenties.  80% of the decent women are running after 20% of the men--and this 20% is usually the alpha males who will use up those women.  And what else are white women doing?  Mudsharking.  Fornicating with black men.



I have nothing against interrational marriage.  There are exceptions--sometimes a white girl going for a black guy can be true love.  However, often times, these are DTF girls who are trying to be deviant for deviant's sake.  They're going after something exotic.  They're leaving their circle, their community, their sphere, and going after something a little more strange and mysterious.  And why?  Because the caucasian men have failed them.  The caucasian men have fled.  They have run off to...I dunno.  They've become gαy.  They've become metro.    (The latter, underlined link is hilarious.)  What woman wants to be with a spineless video-game-playing marshmallow?  It's disgusting.  White culture in America is literally engaged in a cuckold.  



[youtube]https://www.youtube.com/embed/UxpVwBzFAkw[/youtube]

Whites are on the run.  Whites are on the run from bad neighborhoods.  Whites are on the run from muslims.  White men are on the run from duty and honor.  White women are on the run from duty, honor, and spineless white men.  Running is what whites do, a lot of the times.  AGAIN.  YES.  Exceptions.  Plenty of exceptions.  LOTS of exceptions.  Heaven forbid I forget the Alamo, or the American Revolution, the Vendee, the Battle of Lepanto, and so on.  Yes, I know.  

But did you people know that caucasians dominated the Middle East?  Arabs did not control Asia Minor until Islam.  Whites have lost Asia Minor, Northern Africa, damn near lost Europe, but they're on the way to losing it again.  In America, whites have forefit their territories to criminal minorities.  

From approximately the third millenium BC to 500 AD, most of central Asia was inhabited by nations genetically related to modern Persians and Europeans.  Mummies found that date back to that time include many with blonde, red, and light brown hair.  As late as 600 AD, depictions of the Tocharian people of the Tarim basin in what is now western China show them with light-colored hair and eyes.  And in Anatolia, the population was primarily Indo-European, including Greeks, Armenians, and others.  Today, thanks to immigration, war, and ethnic cleansing, the region is now almost entirely inhabited by Turkic peoples speaking Turkish languages.  

-From Cuckservative: How "Conservatives" Betrayed America

When the Gothics were invading Rome through aggressive immigration, consider the cowardice of the Romans.  Yes, it was white Germans who were invading.  I believe they were trying to escape the Huns, however.  And, it was also white Romans--who ought have had their act together and not been afraid of anything--who fled.  The Romans had everything, but they squandered it.  Just as Caucasians are doing today.  Let's look at one of their cowardly statements, as they failed to see their own doom settling into their own heartland--they sound just like the white shitlibs of today:

The barbarians, having forsworn their swords, have turned to the plow and nurture the surviving Romans as allies now, and friends.  - Orosius 417 AD

Ha!  

Now, let's read about their regrets:

Finally, by the mixture of pottery and iron, materials which never form a cohesive bond, which one after another are going to separate from each other, are signified in as much as it is well known that Roman soil has been occupied by foreign or rebellious peoples, or has been surrendered to those who have surrendered themselves through the fiction of peace, and we see barbarian peoples...which have been mixed into our armies, cities and provinces, living among us but not assimilating our customs.  -Sulpicius Severus

The ancient Romans were feared, we are afraid.  The barbarian peoples used to pay them tribute, we are dependent on the barbarians...  How unfortunate we are!  How far we have declined. -Salvian of Marsellies, On the Government of God  440 AD

No longer will our ancestors even glory in this appellation, because they now begin to lose their descendants.  -Saint Sidonius Apollinaris, Bishop of Auvergne

As the author sums it up in the book, Cuckservative:

The migrants easily crossed the relatively undefended frontier, and proceeded to wander, taking what they wished and burning cities as they went.  Again, remember, these were not armies, and not even raiding parties of warriors along the lines of the Vikings; these were entire populations with women and children in two.

 

Rome couldn't even defend against migrants.  They ran from that responsibility.  


Running is what whites do.  

Why?  Because whites always are on the hunt for hedonistic pleasure.  And so, in that regard, perhaps Immaculata001 is right.  Sure, it's entirely possible that she was being a jaded and snide little snot with her post to me.  I wouldn't put it past her.  But her point is a point.  Let's consider it for a moment.  Perhaps the act of fleeing is the "sickle cell crisis" of whites.  I mean, hell...whites are the ones who are liberal.  Haven't you noticed?

Some years ago at a Baptist-affiliated church in Minnesota, a white man performed an unusual ritual.  He got on his knees before the black music leader and tearfully begged the man's forgiveness for the historical sin committed by his white American ancestors in enslaving the music leader's African ancestors.  

The music leader, on behalf of all black Americans past and present, raised the white man to his feet and announced that he (and presumably all black Americans), accepted the white man's (and presumably white America's) repentance, forgave him on behalf of all black Americans past and present, and the two men embraced.  About two-thirds of the congregation immediately rose to their feet applauding both men, and more than a few tears were surreptitiously wiped away from more than a few eyes.  

It was apparently, in the glistening eyes of many, a deeply touching moment.  

The other one-third of the congregation sat there in disbelief, incredulous at the arrogant inanity of the ludicrous church theater.  For some, it took a heroic amount of self-control to restrain the laughter that threatened to burst forth at the absurd racial self-flaggelation on display.  

God help us.  

 

To what end do I mention this?  I dunno.  I suppose I'm just offering food for thought on 2016's Black History Month.  It is clear that I am put out with white behavior in the West.  White behavior in the West is, for the most part, liberal behavior.  I hate liberalism.  

Folks, I'm at Level Jonah.  I'm at Level Jonah with the Church, this country, and white people.  Basically, every structure that I'm supposed to be able to rely upon is a pathetic failure.  Of course, this is where the need for Catholicism comes in.  But even then, you've gotta watch out for fαɢɢօt priests who would misguide you.  So, good luck.  

I hope you've enjoyed the source material I've provided in this little post for your entertainment.  Let the conversations begin.  Just keep in mind, I'll likely not be responding much, as I'm going to be very busy in the next few weeks.  Although, I'm sure that I'll be checking in anyway, as I've always found racial discussion to be stimulating.    

Part of the reason whites flee is because negroes, mexicans, and dune-coons spoil everything they touch with filth.  Once they are in near proximity, there's hardly anything worth fighting for due to the spoliation they emit.  Can you imagine the condition the White House must be in?

I have a suggestion for you: before you publish what you have written, ask yourself ... Do these words reflect the words and actions of Our Lord Jesus Christ? Am I writing to promote the Catholic faith, or are my words promoting hatred and scandal?

You should think again before posting more like this.

Quote from: ManuelChavez

Quote from: OHCA

Part of the reason whites flee is because negroes, mexicans, and dune-coons spoil everything they touch with filth.  Once they are in near proximity, there's hardly anything worth fighting for due to the spoliation they emit.  Can you imagine the condition the White House must be in?

I have a suggestion for you: before you publish what you have written, ask yourself ... Do these words reflect the words and actions of Our Lord Jesus Christ? Am I writing to promote the Catholic faith, or are my words promoting hatred and scandal?

You should think again before posting more like this.

Crawl back to your den of marxist Jєωs that you idolize.

God bless you. Keep holy the Sabbath.

Quote from: ManuelChavez

Quote from: OHCA

Quote from: ManuelChavez

Quote from: OHCA

Part of the reason whites flee is because negroes, mexicans, and dune-coons spoil everything they touch with filth.  Once they are in near proximity, there's hardly anything worth fighting for due to the spoliation they emit.  Can you imagine the condition the White House must be in?

I have a suggestion for you: before you publish what you have written, ask yourself ... Do these words reflect the words and actions of Our Lord Jesus Christ? Am I writing to promote the Catholic faith, or are my words promoting hatred and scandal?

You should think again before posting more like this.

Crawl back to your den of marxist Jєωs that you idolize.

God bless you. Keep holy the Sabbath.

Manuel, I respect you greatly as I do all people. But it would do you good to just leave him alone. You're getting nowhere. Put him on ignore or something. Que Dios en Su Santa misericordia te bendiga mucho.

I always hold out hope that everyone can change for the better, myself included. You may be right, though. Thank you.

Quote from: ManuelChavez

I always hold out hope that everyone can change for the better, myself included. You may be right, though. Thank you.

You are heavily steeped in marxist and Jєωιѕн influence.  Those are the forces that hijacked the Church and threw us into the current crisis, I am sure you are aware.

Regarding my influences, that is your biased and ill-formed opinion, best left unsaid.

For your consideration.

For your consideration.

In response to your Fact/Opinion graph, how is this for facts demonstrating that you are heavily influenced by marxists/Jєωs and idolize them?

------------

"As the elderly man stepped out of his vehicle, my heart raced. I could not believe that Jerry Goldsmith himself was just a few feet away.

"I tread nervously toward him. I had no idea what to say. I could have pleaded for his autograph, or told him I worshiped him as a god, or uttered a thousand other things about his career or the honor it was to be in his presence."

http://reelmusiconline.blogspot.com/2009/08/my-goldsmith-moment.html?m=1

---------------

Intriguing that you could have told Jєω Jerry Goldsmith that you "worshiped him as a god."  Also intriguing is your self-interest in Hollywood. No wonder you took such offense at my pointing out issues with Jєωtube pioneer Fred Rogers, the frocked heretic of Mister Rogers fame.