Public figures may be criticized, corrected, and debated. They may not be unjustly presumed guilty, malicious, or morally defective without sufficient evidence.
As you presume guilty, malicious, and morally defective those posters who did absolutely nothing like what you accuse them.
Matt engages in certain behavior in public, i.e. banning people for making comments criticizing the Jews. OP solicits opinions about whether he might not be controlled by the Jews ... and in no way makes ANY "accusations" and "presumption of guilty or malice", but was merely asking the question and speculating. At no point were there accusations, at no point did anyone "presume guilt", or "malice" ... except when YOU FALSELY ACCUSED OP and several other posters of making accusations and presuming guilt, and judging them to be malicious. If you can't see the hypocrisy of that, then that's really sad.
Are you dating Michael Matt or something? [Obviously sarcastic ... lest you accuse me of accusing you of being sodomite, given your weak comprehension skills] ... meaning that you seem inordinately "triggered" by some very gentle speculation about a public figure.