Send CathInfo's owner Matthew a gift from his Amazon wish list:
https://www.amazon.com/hz/wishlist/ls/25M2B8RERL1UO

Poll

If you had to pick only one to live which one would you pick?

Your pet dog or cat.
An unknown person.
Other, please explain.
« previous next »
Pages: 1 2 [3]

Author Topic: Is an animal as important as a human being?  (Read 3523 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Miser Peccator

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4351
  • Reputation: +2041/-458
  • Gender: Female
Re: Is an animal as important as a human being?
« Reply #30 on: October 15, 2022, 01:17:06 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
    • Quote from: moneil on October 15, 2022, 08:36:20 AM
    The entity "One Health", as depicted on the posted web site, is a part of the United States Center for Disease Control, NOT an international organization, though there are references to international conferences and cooperation.

    I could find NO reference to either the World Veterinary Association or the World Medical Association on the posted web site.  There appears to be no connection that I could find between WVA or WMA and "One Health", neither any reference that they have "merged their goals and surveillance operations", whatever that means.

    Again, the World Veterinary Association or the World Medical Association HAVE NOT merged, that is simple untrue, and the truth ALWAYS matters.

    In addition to having been raised on a working farm with livestock I took my degree in Animal Science and have worked in the livestock industry my entire life.  Zoonosis is a real thing.  Rabies is well recognized example of that.
    I see.  Perhaps merge was the wrong term to use. 

    From what I can understand from this docuмent:
    https://www.wma.net/wp-content/uploads/2016/11/MoU_WVA.pdf

    The WVA and the WMA is working collabortively with the WHO to create a One-Health concept which is a "unified approach to veterinary and human medicine".

    On the bottom left of the CDC One-Health webpage:https://www.cdc.gov/onehealth/index.html

    It shows the "Surveillance and Information Operational Tool".  If you click on that it takes you to the WHO.

    So clearly they are collaborating.

    This WMA website shows:

    "The One Health Initiative is a movement to forge co-equal, all-inclusive collaborations between physicians, osteopaths, veterinarians dentists, nurses and other scientific-health and environmentally related disciplines."
    https://www.wma.net/blog-post/one-health-initiative-wma-and-wva/

    And yes, zoonosis is a real issue that must be dealt with.

    All of the organizations mentioned above do good work, but they also pander to the agenda of the UN/WEF as we have seen in the past year.

    The blogger giving the warning worked for FEMA and has some insights to the grand scheme unfolding and is pointing out how these preliminary steps are setting the stage for the globalists' end goals.

    Scientists are playing God and reclassifying humans as animals, purposely creating gain of function zoonotic bioweapons and releasing them, transfecting humans with animal DNA and creating chimeras. 

    So calling the One-Health initiative a CO-EQUAL collaborative between human and animal medicine is a red flag with disturbing connotations.
    As you have explained, it's very important that human rights take precedence while still respecting the balance of nature and proper treatment of animals.

    The UN's Agenda 21 seeks to make all of nature equal and all of nature (including humans) will be part of the Internet of Things economy ( as described in my first post in this thread) where all of nature is connected to the internet for constant surveillance and DAO smart contracts are made between the various plants/animals/humans.


    The UN goal is Agenda 21:

    "UN Agenda 21/Sustainable Development is the action plan implemented worldwide to inventory and control all land, all water, all minerals, all plants, all animals, all construction, all means of production, all energy, all education, all information, and all human beings in the world.  INVENTORY AND CONTROL.----Rosa Koire, Author of Behind the Green, Exposing Agenda 21




    Logged
    I exposed AB Vigano's public meetings with Crowleyan Satanist Dugin so I ask protection on myself family friends priest, under the Blood of Jesus Christ and mantle of the Blessed Virgin Mary! If harm comes to any of us may that embolden the faithful to speak out all the more so Catholics are not deceived.



    [fon

    Offline Miser Peccator

    • Hero Member
    • *****
    • Posts: 4351
    • Reputation: +2041/-458
    • Gender: Female
    Re: Is an animal as important as a human being?
    « Reply #31 on: October 15, 2022, 01:57:56 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
    • Here is a bit more showing the One-Health (OH) connection to the UN Agenda 21/30:


    Roadmap to a One Health Agenda 2030

    https://www.researchgate.net/publication/316841993_Roadmap_to_a_One_Health_Agenda_2030


    The current fragmented framework of health governance for humans, animals and environment, together with the conventional linear approach to solving current health problems, is failing to meet today's health challenges and is proving unsustainable. Advances in healthcare depend increasingly on intensive interventions, technological developments and expensive pharmaceuticals. The disconnect grows between human health, animal health and environmental and ecosystems health. Human development gains have come with often unrecognized negative externalities affecting ecosystems. Deterioration in biodiversity and ecosystem services threatens to reverse the health gains of the last century. A paradigm shift is urgently required to de-sectoralize human, animal, plant and ecosystem health and to take a more integrated approach to health, One Health (OH). The Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) offer a framework and unique opportunity for this. Through analysing individual SDGs, we argue the feasibility of an OH approach towards achieving them. Feasibility assessments and outcome evaluations are often constrained by sectoral politics within a national framework, historic possession of expertise, as well as tried and tested metrics. OH calls for a better understanding, acceptance and use of a broader and transdisciplinary set of assessment metrics. Key objectives of OH are presented: That humans reconnect with our natural past and accept our place in, and dependence on our planet's ecosystems; and that we recognize our dependence on ecosystem services, the impact of our development thereon and accept our responsibility towards future generations to address this. Several action points are proposed to meet these objectives.





    Here are maps of their plans:











    Logged
    I exposed AB Vigano's public meetings with Crowleyan Satanist Dugin so I ask protection on myself family friends priest, under the Blood of Jesus Christ and mantle of the Blessed Virgin Mary! If harm comes to any of us may that embolden the faithful to speak out all the more so Catholics are not deceived.



    [fon

    Offline HolyAngels

    • Jr. Member
    • **
    • Posts: 317
    • Reputation: +130/-28
    • Gender: Male
    Re: Is an animal as important as a human being?
    « Reply #32 on: October 15, 2022, 04:53:42 PM »
  • Thanks!2
  • No Thanks!0
    • The thread title reminded me of something I witnessed one day. I'm following a car approaching a four-way stop sign. The car in front of me stops at the stop sign and the door flies open and the lady driving jogs across the intersection toward an elderly lady with a small terrier on a leash.

    The driver of the car proceeds to point her finger at the elderly lady repeatedly. I could not hear the conversation but I could tell that the drivers body language suggested she was angry. This went on for about 20 seconds and I was about to get out and go see what was going on but the driver walked back to her car, got in and slammed the door shut.

    So I parked and walked over to the lady with the dog who was in tears and asked what happened. The sweet old lady had started to enter the intersection with her dog and when she saw the cars pull up she pulled on the dog's leash to get him to come back to the curb. The driver of the car scolded her for jerking on the leash of the dog. The sweet old lady said she didn't yank the leash, just tugged on it. Her dog was fine, wagging his tail and cute as can be.

    The kicker here is lady who scolded her had a bumper sticker on her trunk lid I noticed as she sped away.

    It read " My Body, My Choice "

    Logged
    For our wrestling is not against flesh and blood; but against principalities and power, against the rulers of the world of this darkness, against the spirits of wickedness in the high places
    Ephesians 6:12

    Offline Donan

    • Jr. Member
    • **
    • Posts: 249
    • Reputation: +137/-18
    • Gender: Male
    Re: Is an animal as important as a human being?
    « Reply #33 on: October 16, 2022, 11:45:21 AM »
  • Thanks!2
  • No Thanks!0
    • Of course human beings are more important, however, animals are God’s creation and should be treated with care. To quote the great St Francis:

    [color=var(--black)]"If you have men who will exclude any of God's creatures from the shelter of compassion and pity, you will have men who will deal likewise with their fellow men."[/color]
    Logged

    Offline DigitalLogos

    • Hero Member
    • *****
    • Posts: 8304
    • Reputation: +4719/-754
    • Gender: Male
    • Slave to the Sacred Heart
      • Twitter
    Re: Is an animal as important as a human being?
    « Reply #34 on: October 16, 2022, 12:16:07 PM »
  • Thanks!2
  • No Thanks!0
    • Quote from: HolyAngels on October 15, 2022, 04:53:42 PM
    The thread title reminded me of something I witnessed one day. I'm following a car approaching a four-way stop sign. The car in front of me stops at the stop sign and the door flies open and the lady driving jogs across the intersection toward an elderly lady with a small terrier on a leash.

    The driver of the car proceeds to point her finger at the elderly lady repeatedly. I could not hear the conversation but I could tell that the drivers body language suggested she was angry. This went on for about 20 seconds and I was about to get out and go see what was going on but the driver walked back to her car, got in and slammed the door shut.

    So I parked and walked over to the lady with the dog who was in tears and asked what happened. The sweet old lady had started to enter the intersection with her dog and when she saw the cars pull up she pulled on the dog's leash to get him to come back to the curb. The driver of the car scolded her for jerking on the leash of the dog. The sweet old lady said she didn't yank the leash, just tugged on it. Her dog was fine, wagging his tail and cute as can be.

    The kicker here is lady who scolded her had a bumper sticker on her trunk lid I noticed as she sped away.

    It read " My Body, My Choice "
    That's absurd. Such a person would be reeling at the fact that we use prong, e-collars and even bark collars with our dogs. It's a tool for correction, just like this lady tugging on the leash. Yet it may cause any slight pain, which is seen as an ultimate evil these days. God forbid any creature experience pain :facepalm:

    And ironically here, with your anecdote, the one attacking the elderly woman took no consideration of the mental or emotional harm they caused.
    Logged
    "Be not therefore solicitous for tomorrow; for the morrow will be solicitous for itself. Sufficient for the day is the evil thereof." [Matt. 6:34]

    "In all thy works remember thy last end, and thou shalt never sin." [Ecclus. 7:40]

    "A holy man continueth in wisdom as the sun: but a fool is changed as the moon." [Ecclus. 27:12]
    Pages: 1 2 [3]
    « previous next »