Send CathInfo's owner Matthew a gift from his Amazon wish list:
https://www.amazon.com/hz/wishlist/ls/25M2B8RERL1UO

Author Topic: Interesting points - are Nukes real?  (Read 31619 times)

0 Members and 9 Guests are viewing this topic.

Online Mark 79

  • Supporter
  • *****
  • Posts: 12902
  • Reputation: +8514/-1611
  • Gender: Male
just to annoy PV
« Reply #60 on: September 05, 2025, 12:08:39 PM »
  • Thanks!2
  • No Thanks!2

  • Not everyone has the patience to sift through a 5 page megathread.  …

    …but some of the people who don't have the patience to address the evidence have no qualms about watching (and posting) a 17:07 minute video that makes claims already debunked.

    You were willing to watch (and post) a 17 minute bullshit video and were also willing to spend 17 minutes speculating about world politics and scams and bewailing your "ad hominem" victimhood, but not willing to spend 17 or 34 minutes evaluating the rebuttal evidence offered.

    Your claim of championing intellectual inquiry falls flat when you don't read or address the answers offered in response to your questions and instead "have the patience" to go off on speculative tangents.

    Offline Pax Vobis

    • Supporter
    • *****
    • Posts: 12560
    • Reputation: +7976/-2464
    • Gender: Male
    Re: debunked… period.
    « Reply #61 on: September 05, 2025, 12:33:54 PM »
  • Thanks!2
  • No Thanks!3
  • Bottom line: Best evidence supports the existence of nuclear weapons… period.  "No nukes" is a batshit crazy claim.
    Do nukes exist?  Yes, bombs using nuclear energy exist.

    Do nukes exist in the way explained by govts and hollywood?  Not proven.

    Were nukes used in Japan?  Yes.

    Were the bombs used in Japan 100% nuclear?  Not proven.

    Could Japan have been bombed by nuclear AND OTHER types (i.e. a mix of bombs)?  Yes, it's possible.

    Did the nukes in Japan detonate in the same way as the famous "mushroom cloud" bomb?  No.

    Has there been ANY nuke denotation IN HISTORY, (outside of the "mushroom cloud" video) that proves the effects of nuclear bombs on society/humans?  No. 

    So do we have any evidence (outside of the "mushroom cloud" video) that nukes are as dangerous as the govt/hollywood tell us?  No.


    Offline Maverick

    • Newbie
    • *
    • Posts: 31
    • Reputation: +4/-32
    • Gender: Male
    Re: debunked… period.
    « Reply #62 on: September 05, 2025, 12:41:22 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Do nukes exist?  Yes, bombs using nuclear energy exist.

    Do nukes exist in the way explained by govts and hollywood?  Not proven.

    Were nukes used in Japan?  Yes.

    Were the bombs used in Japan 100% nuclear?  Not proven.

    Could Japan have been bombed by nuclear AND OTHER types (i.e. a mix of bombs)?  Yes, it's possible.

    Did the nukes in Japan detonate in the same way as the famous "mushroom cloud" bomb?  No.

    Has there been ANY nuke denotation IN HISTORY, (outside of the "mushroom cloud" video) that proves the effects of nuclear bombs on society/humans?  No.

    So do we have any evidence (outside of the "mushroom cloud" video) that nukes are as dangerous as the govt/hollywood tell us?  No.

    It seems we can’t all agree that they are in fact fake, but can we all agree that they are gαy?

    Offline Pax Vobis

    • Supporter
    • *****
    • Posts: 12560
    • Reputation: +7976/-2464
    • Gender: Male
    Re: debunked… period.
    « Reply #63 on: September 05, 2025, 12:58:54 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • It seems we can’t all agree that they are in fact fake, but can we all agree that they are gαy?
    Absolutely.  

    Online Mark 79

    • Supporter
    • *****
    • Posts: 12902
    • Reputation: +8514/-1611
    • Gender: Male
    "ain't tryin'" stupidity
    « Reply #64 on: September 05, 2025, 01:08:28 PM »
  • Thanks!1
  • No Thanks!0
  • Were the bombs used in Japan 100% nuclear?  Not proven.

    …How utterly foolish. Not only were the bomb cases and electrical components non-nuclear, but Little Boy and Fat Man used conventional explosives to drive the nuclear fuels together to make critical mass.

    This is precisely the kind of "100%" of "ain't tryin'" stupidity that earns you ridicule.




    Did the nukes in Japan detonate in the same way as the famous "mushroom cloud" bomb?  No.

    "Nukes in Japan" were air-bursts. Other "mushroom cloud" nukes were ground bursts… and then there were the underground bursts.

    Has there been ANY nuke denotation IN HISTORY, (outside of the "mushroom cloud" video) that proves the effects of nuclear bombs on society/humans?  No.

     Not only did Japan and Hiroshima "prove the effects of nuclear bombs on human," but eye and cancer problems of observers at Bikini Atoll, the Nevada Desert "prove the effects of nuclear bombs on humans."


    See attachment.


    Offline Pax Vobis

    • Supporter
    • *****
    • Posts: 12560
    • Reputation: +7976/-2464
    • Gender: Male
    Re: Interesting points - are Nukes real?
    « Reply #65 on: September 05, 2025, 01:17:03 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Mark (“trust the science”—“Hollywood never embellishes the truth”—“I’m from the govt and I’m here to help”) 79.  :laugh1:

    Online Mark 79

    • Supporter
    • *****
    • Posts: 12902
    • Reputation: +8514/-1611
    • Gender: Male
    Re: Interesting points - are Nukes real?
    « Reply #66 on: September 05, 2025, 02:57:38 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Mark (“trust the science”—“Hollywood never embellishes the truth”—“I’m from the govt and I’m here to help”) 79.  :laugh1:
    Any evidence that I have ever advanced any one of your straw man propositions????

    Offline Maverick

    • Newbie
    • *
    • Posts: 31
    • Reputation: +4/-32
    • Gender: Male
    Re: Interesting points - are Nukes real?
    « Reply #67 on: September 05, 2025, 03:12:01 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • In 80 years better and more expert minds have examined the "no nukes" premise and nobody has debunked or refuted the evidence I have repeatedly put forward.

    None of the proffered alternative theories—conventional weapons, dirty bomb, TNT laced with alkylating agents—fit the evidence.

    Only nukes explain the time and distance pattern of the observed and irrefutable 1 retinal damage, 2 corneal damage, 3 cataracts, 4 birth defects, 5 vegetation mutations, 6 epicenter versus hypocenter pressure wave geometry, 7 early and late thyroid cancers from short half-life iodine radionuclides, 8 early and late leukemias, 9 early deaths from gamma burst radiation poisoning, namely classic deaths from radiation destruction of quickly reproducing cellular tissues, namely bone marrow (bleeding to death) and gut (fluid losses from vomiting and diarrhea), and 10 late cancers from ingested (air and food) radionuclides (especially bone seeking radionuclides).

    I have adduced 10 very specific and unique lines of evidence, an interlocked and inseparable pattern of evidence, that is only consistent with "nukes."

    You admitted that you cannot refute the evidence adduced.

    Why then, after years of being presented the evidence that you cannot refute, do you find it "interesting" to resurrect discussion of the "no nukes" crackpot claims?


    “Man covid was a hoax, the moon landing? fake and gαy. But the nukes dude, the NUkEs$)@“!!! NUKES are real, look at the science man!!!”

    If nuclear weapons were real, they would have been used again in the past 80 years of constant war, the fact they never were proves they are a bluff built on fear, not fact


    Online Mark 79

    • Supporter
    • *****
    • Posts: 12902
    • Reputation: +8514/-1611
    • Gender: Male
    Re: Interesting points - are Nukes real?
    « Reply #68 on: September 05, 2025, 03:19:06 PM »
  • Thanks!2
  • No Thanks!0

  • “Man covid was a hoax, the moon landing? fake and gαy. But the nukes dude, the NUkEs$)@“!!! NUKES are real, look at the science man!!!”

    If nuclear weapons were real, they would have been used again in the past 80 years of constant war, the fact they never were proves they are a bluff built on fear, not fact
    So your gratuitous assertions, stuff you made up in your mind, vaporize real and verifiable evidence.

    :facepalm:

    So much for Traddieland.

    Offline Maverick

    • Newbie
    • *
    • Posts: 31
    • Reputation: +4/-32
    • Gender: Male
    Re: bizarro-world
    « Reply #69 on: September 05, 2025, 03:19:18 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Besides the evidence I have adduced, I'll piggyback a testimonial on top of your own. As a graduate student in Japan, my graduate advisor/professor, a hematology specialist, leukemia sub-specialist, worked (among other duties) for the then-named ABCC (Atomic Bomb Casualty Commission). I accompanied him to the ABCC where he showed me the medical evidence of  the eye and cancer problems that I discussed in the posts preceding.

    According to the expressed criteria of some of the crazies here, the fact that someone has studied, is knowledgable, or worse, a specialist, is immediately prima facie discrediting. In  their bizarro-world the welfare parasite, janitor, or ignorant Trad is in a better position to assess the evidence than a nuclear physicist, radiation biologist, or a hemo-pathologist.

    Go figure. :facepalm:  Truly they live in bizarro-world of those who have crippled themselves with unjustifiable levels of skepticism.

    Ya and the evidence and experts say that 6,000,000 foreskins were used to build an airship for the fourth reich or whatever the narrative is nowadays (haven’t been keeping up with it)

    Come on mark.

    Offline Maverick

    • Newbie
    • *
    • Posts: 31
    • Reputation: +4/-32
    • Gender: Male
    Re: Interesting points - are Nukes real?
    « Reply #70 on: September 05, 2025, 03:21:51 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • So your gratuitous assertions, stuff you made up in your mind, vaporize real and verifiable evidence.

    :facepalm:

    So much for Traddieland.

    Like I said above there is verifiable evidence that 6,000,000 foreskins were used to build a gas station in Antarctica. (I am pretty sure I said this above, I hope I am up to date with the current narrative)


    Online Mark 79

    • Supporter
    • *****
    • Posts: 12902
    • Reputation: +8514/-1611
    • Gender: Male
    Re: bizarro-world
    « Reply #71 on: September 05, 2025, 03:26:49 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Ya and the evidence and experts say that 6,000,000 foreskins were used to build an airship for the fourth reich or whatever the narrative is nowadays (haven’t been keeping up with it)

    Come on mark.
    OK, solid work!  Because Jews have a propensity to lie, nuclear weapons do not exist.

    Now I understand. Thanks for sharing.

    Since you mentioned Antarctica, see Jews in Antarctica coming soon to a polar cap near you!
    https://archive.md/QNykT and also the attachment proving that the "six million" actually went to Antarctica.

    Offline Maverick

    • Newbie
    • *
    • Posts: 31
    • Reputation: +4/-32
    • Gender: Male
    Re: bizarro-world
    « Reply #72 on: September 05, 2025, 03:30:25 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • OK, solid work!  Because Jews have a propensity to lie, nuclear weapons do not exist.

    Now I understand. Thanks for sharing.

    Since you mentioned Antarctica, see the attachment proving that the "six million went to Antarctica.

    Mark it appears you have found expert and verifiable footage of a staging area for the clipping operation to begin, it seems like authentic proof that this must have been minutes before they were made into a tent to facilitate said gas station.

    Offline Everlast22

    • Supporter
    • ***
    • Posts: 971
    • Reputation: +849/-226
    • Gender: Male
    Re: Interesting points - are Nukes real?
    « Reply #73 on: September 06, 2025, 05:37:31 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!1


  • This is earth God created. 

    Online Mark 79

    • Supporter
    • *****
    • Posts: 12902
    • Reputation: +8514/-1611
    • Gender: Male
    Re: Interesting points - are Nukes real?
    « Reply #74 on: September 06, 2025, 10:18:55 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0


  • This is earth God created.

    Can you pinpoint the Antarctica location of Chabad on the map?  

    Actually, Chabad is no laughing matter. Chabadniks are among the most influential and virulently genocidal of all Jews: https://archive.is/v6lSZ