Send CathInfo's owner Matthew a gift from his Amazon wish list:
https://www.amazon.com/hz/wishlist/ls/25M2B8RERL1UO

Author Topic: Interesting points - are Nukes real?  (Read 101937 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Everlast22

  • Supporter
  • ***
  • Posts: 981
  • Reputation: +860/-228
  • Gender: Male
Re: Interesting points - are Nukes real?
« Reply #15 on: September 03, 2025, 10:49:06 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Did 2 separate planes hit the towers?  Yes or no?  If no please provide your best authenticated evidence to prove your case.
    "No Planes" 9-11

    sure. heres a quick one, because the only evidence YOU have, is the media outlets. Rabbi.

    Offline Everlast22

    • Supporter
    • ***
    • Posts: 981
    • Reputation: +860/-228
    • Gender: Male
    Re: Interesting points - are Nukes real?
    « Reply #16 on: September 03, 2025, 10:51:32 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • An aluminum plane cannot go through a steel massive tower like butter. Look at the fake CGI footage. 

    Crisis actors hired as well, just like 98 percent of all the other tragedies the mainstream media covers.


    Offline Mat183

    • Jr. Member
    • **
    • Posts: 252
    • Reputation: +107/-26
    • Gender: Male
    Re: Interesting points - are Nukes real?
    « Reply #17 on: September 03, 2025, 11:05:53 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • "No Planes" 9-11

    sure. heres a quick one, because the only evidence YOU have, is the media outlets. Rabbi.

    Thanks for telling us where you are coming from in spite of your totally unfounded allegation about me topped off by the silly name calling.  As for me I will go with Christopher Bollyn: Solving 9-11, The Deception That Changed The World.  If you want to vilify him and his work you are in the company of the ADL and SPLC in doing so.                                                         

    Offline Ladislaus

    • Supporter
    • *****
    • Posts: 47085
    • Reputation: +27914/-5205
    • Gender: Male
    Re: Interesting points - are Nukes real?
    « Reply #18 on: September 03, 2025, 11:36:08 AM »
  • Thanks!2
  • No Thanks!0
  • They’re the same wackos that don’t believe that viruses exist and that Paul VI had a double…….

    While you're entitled to your opinion, ignorant statements like this that demonstrate that you do not consider matters with an open mind and honestly seeking truth, so they serve only to discredit you.  Too many people have been deceived by writing off various "conspiracy theories" as "wacko" out of the gate ... precisely as they had been conditioned.  While substantive comments are welcome, this kind of trash is obnoxious and only shows that you're brainwashed sheep.

    As for "viruses", none other than the former VP of Pfizer, Michael Yeadon, has recently come out to question the viral theory of disease transmission, citing numerous studies where they've never been able to replicate diseases transmission by virus in a laboratory.  It's not that these do not exist, just that they do not transmit illness or disease in the manner in which most people have understood them to.  There's some other mechanism involved, but he hasn't come to a conclusion yet about exactl what that is.  But, yes, he's a "wacko" too ... just becaue you say so, sitting in your armchair curling a beer ... where I'm sure that your credentials far outweigh his.

    Offline Everlast22

    • Supporter
    • ***
    • Posts: 981
    • Reputation: +860/-228
    • Gender: Male
    Re: Interesting points - are Nukes real?
    « Reply #19 on: September 03, 2025, 12:05:19 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Thanks for telling us where you are coming from in spite of your totally unfounded allegation about me topped off by the silly name calling.  As for me I will go with Christopher Bollyn: Solving 9-11, The Deception That Changed The World.  If you want to vilify him and his work you are in the company of the ADL and SPLC in doing so.                                                       
    He's right about Israel being behind it. That's obvious.


    Offline Seraphina

    • Hero Member
    • *****
    • Posts: 4408
    • Reputation: +3362/-350
    • Gender: Female
    Re: Interesting points - are Nukes real?
    « Reply #20 on: September 03, 2025, 03:54:20 PM »
  • Thanks!2
  • No Thanks!1
  • You folks are full of it.
     The second plane WAS a plane. How do I know? I saw it. I heard it. I smelled it, the smoke and debris for smoldered for months and sometimes blew into my apartment. I had to throw out the clothes I was wearing that day, leather shoes included. The smell could not be washed, dry-cleaned, or steam cleaned away. My top was a ramie cotton sweater, bottom, 100% cotton batik skirt, under garments 100% cotton knit, 1/2 slip culottes cotton/poly, knee high hose, nylon, but they got dirty and ripped, shoes were leather t-strap Dr. Martins. 
    I agree demolition was most likely involved, probably explosives on the planes, as well.
    Building 7 roof was on fire, but it fell perfectly as a demolition. It was not preceded by all manner of debris falling before coming down exactly into its footprint. The towers were close, but not exact. If it was solely a demolition, the company that did it should have lost its license.
    As for nuclear experimentation in the Pacific, my father kept that a secret for decades although we long suspected. My Dad worked in particle physics after he left the Navy. Those were nuclear bombs they detonated. Why do you think the US chose a remote chain of islands inhabited by people who’d not object, had no power, no influence, and were cut off, communication wise from most of the world? In 1948 he visited Hiroshima.  There is no reason on earth my Dad would participate in an evil government lie. He was NOT a liar, the purest-minded man I’ve ever known. May his soul Rest In Peace. 

    Offline AMDG forever

    • Newbie
    • *
    • Posts: 98
    • Reputation: +126/-55
    • Gender: Male
    Re: Interesting points - are Nukes real?
    « Reply #21 on: September 03, 2025, 04:38:17 PM »
  • Thanks!1
  • No Thanks!0
  • While you're entitled to your opinion, ignorant statements like this that demonstrate that you do not consider matters with an open mind and honestly seeking truth, so they serve only to discredit you.  Too many people have been deceived by writing off various "conspiracy theories" as "wacko" out of the gate ... precisely as they had been conditioned.  While substantive comments are welcome, this kind of trash is obnoxious and only shows that you're brainwashed sheep.

    As for "viruses", none other than the former VP of Pfizer, Michael Yeadon, has recently come out to question the viral theory of disease transmission, citing numerous studies where they've never been able to replicate diseases transmission by virus in a laboratory.  It's not that these do not exist, just that they do not transmit illness or disease in the manner in which most people have understood them to.  There's some other mechanism involved, but he hasn't come to a conclusion yet about exactl what that is.  But, yes, he's a "wacko" too ... just becaue you say so, sitting in your armchair curling a beer ... where I'm sure that your credentials far outweigh his.
    Hey guy, as for your “out of the gate” comment, I’ve studied all these matters extensively, so don’t presume I didn’t. Man, you really fall for any conspiracy as long as it’s wacky enough, right? 
    Yeah, I’m convinced that many of the more common conspiracy theories are true, like 911, Peril Harbor, the Red Shields, and the JFK stuff, but dudes like you spread these easily disproven ones making the real ones less credible to those who are searching for the truth. :facepalm:



    Offline Pax Vobis

    • Supporter
    • *****
    • Posts: 12611
    • Reputation: +8031/-2491
    • Gender: Male
    Re: Interesting points - are Nukes real?
    « Reply #22 on: September 03, 2025, 05:07:13 PM »
  • Thanks!1
  • No Thanks!0
  • You folks are full of it.
     The second plane WAS a plane. How do I know? I saw it. I heard it. I smelled it, the smoke and debris for smoldered for months and sometimes blew into my apartment. I had to throw out the clothes I was wearing that day, leather shoes included. The smell could not be washed, dry-cleaned, or steam cleaned away. My top was a ramie cotton sweater, bottom, 100% cotton batik skirt, under garments 100% cotton knit, 1/2 slip culottes cotton/poly, knee high hose, nylon, but they got dirty and ripped, shoes were leather t-strap Dr. Martins.
    I agree demolition was most likely involved, probably explosives on the planes, as well.
    Building 7 roof was on fire, but it fell perfectly as a demolition. It was not preceded by all manner of debris falling before coming down exactly into its footprint. The towers were close, but not exact. If it was solely a demolition, the company that did it should have lost its license.
    As for nuclear experimentation in the Pacific, my father kept that a secret for decades although we long suspected. My Dad worked in particle physics after he left the Navy. Those were nuclear bombs they detonated. Why do you think the US chose a remote chain of islands inhabited by people who’d not object, had no power, no influence, and were cut off, communication wise from most of the world? In 1948 he visited Hiroshima.  There is no reason on earth my Dad would participate in an evil government lie. He was NOT a liar, the purest-minded man I’ve ever known. May his soul Rest In Peace.
    I don’t think the avg person could tell the difference between a nuclear vs atomic vs dirty bomb vs ballistic missle.  We only know nuclear bombs exist because of Japanese pictures, the “mushroom cloud” video and Hollywood’s movies.  
    Ask the avg person what happens when a nuke goes off and they’ll say that everyone will die of radiation.  Thats the propaganda.  When in fact, radiation from nukes dissipates after 2 weeks and is highly survivable, if you take some precautions.  The point is, separating fact from fiction is difficult.  


    Offline SoldierofCtK

    • Jr. Member
    • **
    • Posts: 248
    • Reputation: +243/-27
    • Gender: Male
      • YouTube Channel
    Re: Interesting points - are Nukes real?
    « Reply #23 on: September 03, 2025, 05:24:44 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • 1. To paraphrase Louis Pasteur's last words, "Béchamp was right."

    2. Word of the day, "compartmentalization."
    +J.M.J.+

    Fides Ex Auditu - Faith Comes From Hearing
    YouTube - SoldierofCtK

    Offline Everlast22

    • Supporter
    • ***
    • Posts: 981
    • Reputation: +860/-228
    • Gender: Male
    Re: Interesting points - are Nukes real?
    « Reply #24 on: September 03, 2025, 05:33:30 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Hey guy, as for your “out of the gate” comment, I’ve studied all these matters extensively, so don’t presume I didn’t. Man, you really fall for any conspiracy as long as it’s wacky enough, right?
    Yeah, I’m convinced that many of the more common conspiracy theories are true, like 911, Peril Harbor, the Red Shields, and the JFK stuff, but dudes like you spread these easily disproven ones making the real ones less credible to those who are searching for the truth. :facepalm:

    "easily disproven" :laugh1::laugh1: - 

    Offline Mat183

    • Jr. Member
    • **
    • Posts: 252
    • Reputation: +107/-26
    • Gender: Male
    Re: Interesting points - are Nukes real?
    « Reply #25 on: September 03, 2025, 07:23:52 PM »
  • Thanks!1
  • No Thanks!0
  • Perhaps, the best, albeit heart breaking, film docuмentary ever made on the nuke testing at Bikini Atoll.
    **************************************************************************************

    Radio Bikini (Full Movie) - Nuclear Testing at Bikini Atoll in the Marshall Islands - WITH SUBTITLES

    Radio Bikini is a 1988 American docuмentary film directed by Robert Stone. It was nominated for an Academy Award in 1988 for Best Docuмentary Feature.

    The film docuмents the nuclear tests performed around Bikini Atoll during Operation Crossroads in 1946, and their effects on the indigenous population and American servicemen involved.

    The film was produced in-part by attorney Jonathan Weisgall.  In 1975, he had been sent by Covington & Burling to meet with displaced Bikini Islanders from the 1946 atomic tests.  He eventually published a book on the subject, “Operation Crossroads: The Atomic Tests at Bikini Atoll.

    The Los Angeles Times wrote, “The film by British film maker Robert Stone (an Oscar nominee for feature docuмentary) is an outstanding achievement on all levels. Stone conveys an enormous body of facts, figures, attitudes and effects in the most organically subtle fashion. There’s also a uniquely emotional quality thanks to the participation of two witnesses--Kilon Bauno, the chief of 162 Bikinians who were relocated throughout the Marshall Islands to clear the way for the nuclear invaders, and John Smitherman, a Navy pilot involved in dropping the bombs.”

    The Washington Post wrote, “Stone's film is an eloquent, if harrowing, examination of the psychic and physical fallout of the testing, both on Bikinians and on unprotected American servicemen who were drenched in radioactive mists while monitoring the blasts.  The most surreal footage comes from government archives
    - never-before seen film shot for a propaganda epic that was never made. Seven hundred and fifty cameras and half the world's existing movie film were shipped to Bikini to capture the Felliniesque events. Men shear lambs, grease them with Flashpoint cream and strap them to the decks of "target" ships in the Bikini lagoon to test the effects of the blasts. There is footage of uncomprehending Bikinians leaving their home, of fresh-faced sailors walking, naked, into showers jokingly labeled "Radio Active," of military men hand-painting the name "Gilda" on a fat 20-kiloton bomb. It's all perky, upbeat—Beaver Cleaver Drops the Bomb.”

    Michaela Pontellini wrote in Vancouver Weekly, “Radio Bikini, which is named for the temporary radio station positioned on the island shortly before Operation Crossroads began, is firmly against the destructive powers of nuclear energy. There are no interviews with anyone other than the victims of the disaster, and the focus is entirely on what is portrayed to be completely useless nuclear testing and the sheer callousness of the United States government for putting its servicemen at risk. Smitherman notes that none of the servicemen were informed as to what the tests were, nor the possible dangers of their involvement. The complete lack of consent is galling, and highlights the American governments decision to sacrifice a few for the ‘greater good’.”




    Offline Mark 79

    • Supporter
    • *****
    • Posts: 12985
    • Reputation: +8539/-1612
    • Gender: Male
    6 sentences. 12 stupidities.
    « Reply #26 on: September 03, 2025, 08:39:30 PM »
  • Thanks!2
  • No Thanks!0
  • I don’t think the avg person could tell the difference between a nuclear vs atomic vs dirty bomb vs ballistic missle.  [As if "average people" are the dispositive arbiters of the physical and biological sciences???] We [Who exactly is "we"?] only know nuclear bombs exist because of Japanese pictures, the “mushroom cloud” video and Hollywood’s movies. [As if the Bikini Atoll and Nevada desert evidence was also fabricated and wa sreally due to your TNT laced with alkylating agents and 'dirty' radionuclides?]
    Ask the avg person what happens when a nuke goes off and they’ll say that everyone will die of radiation.  [There are those "average people" and what they say" again.] Thats the propaganda. [Your argument is a straw man advanced by nobody here.] When in fact, radiation from nukes dissipates after 2 weeks [The half-life of Strontium-90 is approximately.  28.91 years.The half-life of cesium-137 is approximately 30.04 years. Iodine-129 has a half-life of 15,700,000 years. The 36 known radioisotopes of iodine all have varying half-lives, so exert their rad-bio effects with matching time frames.] and is highly survivable, if you take some precautions.  [Those precautions include: (1) knowing in advance where Ground-Zero will be so you don't live there when the bomb explodes, (2) Living, working, and traveling in a home/office/vehicle hardened against the initial gamma burst, (3) breathing filtered air at all times, (4) Consuming food post-blast that is not contaminated by persistent ionizing radionuclides.] The point is, separating fact from fiction is difficult. [To separate fact from fiction, you must (1) actually put forth the required effort to do so and (2) once you have been informed, to remember the lines of evidence that vaporize your crackpot theories.]

    6 sentences, 12 stupidities.

    See attachment.  :laugh2::laugh2::laugh2::laugh2::laugh2::laugh2::laugh2::laugh2:

    Offline Pax Vobis

    • Supporter
    • *****
    • Posts: 12611
    • Reputation: +8031/-2491
    • Gender: Male
    Re: Interesting points - are Nukes real?
    « Reply #27 on: September 03, 2025, 08:58:47 PM »
  • Thanks!1
  • No Thanks!1
  • :laugh1: The irony is that the main proponents of the nuclear-bomb-h0Ɩ0cαųst-fairytale (govt/hollywood/joos) are the very people  whom Mark repeatedly criticizes for lying to us.

    Offline Mark 79

    • Supporter
    • *****
    • Posts: 12985
    • Reputation: +8539/-1612
    • Gender: Male
    7th sentence, 13th stupidity
    « Reply #28 on: September 03, 2025, 09:03:33 PM »
  • Thanks!2
  • No Thanks!0
  • :laugh1: The irony is that the main proponents of the nuclear-bomb-h0Ɩ0cαųst-fairytale (govt/hollywood/joos) are the very people  whom Mark repeatedly criticizes for lying to us. [non-sequitur. The propensity of Jews to deceive and genocide neither affirms your TNT-laced-with-alkylating-agents-and-'dirty'-radionuclides nor negates physics.]
    7th sentence, 13th stupidity.


    Even a fool, if he will hold his peace shall be counted wise: and if he close his lips, a man of understanding. Proverbs 17:28

    Read it. Understand it. Live it.

    Offline Seraphina

    • Hero Member
    • *****
    • Posts: 4408
    • Reputation: +3362/-350
    • Gender: Female
    Re: Interesting points - are Nukes real?
    « Reply #29 on: September 03, 2025, 11:06:47 PM »
  • Thanks!3
  • No Thanks!0
  • I don’t think the avg person could tell the difference between a nuclear vs atomic vs dirty bomb vs ballistic missle.  We only know nuclear bombs exist because of Japanese pictures, the “mushroom cloud” video and Hollywood’s movies. 
    A nuclear physicist is not an average person. My father saw them, assisted in assembly, and directly witnessed several in the Pacific. No, he not see Hiroshima getting bombed. No Hollywood movies were involved. 
    Upon leaving the Navy, he eventually worked at Brookhaven National Laboratory, Head of the Beam Separator Group. BNL still exists. If you don’t think direct exposure to radiation is hazardous to your continued earthly existence, sneak into BNL and stand in the beam when the separator is on line. Arrange, first, for a lead casket and a Zoom funeral. The priest will be wearing protective vestments, so you’ll need to arrange for someone to make them, too.