The thought of Muslims conquering the West doesn't bother me at all. I consider Muslims to be more civilized than Jєωs and their friends. I would much prefer being ruled by Muslims than by the Jєωs and freemasons and progressive wingnuts who currently rule over me.

In the best of all possible worlds I would be ruled by a Catholic king, but if my only choices come down to being ruled by Muslims or Jєωs and freemasons, I'll pick Muslims.

I know some Muslims and they are not nearly as close to the devil as the Jєωs are. Also, when a Muslim converts to the Church you don't have to worry that he may be a marrano. In general, Catholics have far more in common with Muslims than they do with Jєωs and freemasons and zionist Christians like John Hagee.

Now let me make a distinction: Muslims that have been successfully conquered by the Jєωs will be a problem. The Jєωs have a interesting talent for making the people they conquer think that some other group is responsible for their problems. Anyone who is knowledgeable about the Atlantic slave trade knows that it was almost single-handedly run by Jєωs (a huge percentage of the slaves were shipped to sugar plantations in the Caribbean, 90% of which were owned by Jєωs). Also, there were tons of white slaves shipped to these Jєωιѕн-owned slave plantations too (a fact that historians like to bury). And yet today most blacks think white gentiles were the major players, and if any other group was involved it was only to a tiny degree. So if Muslims end up being conquered by the Jєωs they will be a major problem in that the poor among them will fall away from their religion and become ghettoized and blame all their problems on whitey.

But I don't worry about the Muslims that haven't been conquered by the Jєωs conquering the West. If they did it would be an improvement for pious Catholics. People are wicked in degrees. Muslims are far closer to Christ than are the Jєωs and their cronies.

So the number of loss of souls is greater if we are rulled by moslems than if by Jєωs.

Yes, I'm casper, and they banned me. Thank you for your reply spouseofjesus.

I also posted the topic on ignusardens where i have learned some things: http://cathinfo-warning-pornography!/Ignis_Ardens/index.php?showtopic=4011&st=15&#entry9566634

Spouseofjesus makes some interesting points which I shall have to think about.

Yes, I'm casper, and they banned me. Thank you for your reply spouseofjesus.

I also posted the topic on ignusardens where i have learned some things: http://cathinfo-warning-pornography!/Ignis_Ardens/index.php?showtopic=4011&st=15&#entry9566634

Spouseofjesus makes some interesting points which I shall have to think about.

You'r wellcome. :)

Did spouse of Jesus go by the name "angelofmercy" on Fisheaters? If so, I enjoyed her posts there. She would ask common sense questions that would go over most everybody's heads.

I would also argue that whatever Muslim threat that exists now is certainly not from some Persian/Iranian dictator, nor from cavemen in Afganistan, nor rag-tag citizens in Palestine or Lebanon, but from Moors from Africa. It's the Moors (Moracans, Tunisians, Algerians, and Nigerians) from Africa who are overrunning repopulating Europe with Islamists, and are the Muslims who are definetly the most militant in the world. Whenever there is talk of killing Christians and conquoring the West it is usually a black African Muslim speaking, not a Mideast person.

Now Im not saying that all black people want to conquor the west. Im just saying, that is how I recognize them... by the colour of their skin and by the way that they dress it is obvious that they are North Africans and not American born blacks that have been here several hundred years.

America, the enemy is in your front lawn, not across the sea in the Mideast.

While both the Jєωιѕн and Islamic religion are both diabolical in origin and are a danger to all souls, I would argue that Islam is less a danger to the world than Judaism. The reason being is simply because Judaism is purely a religion of Naturalism and is atheistic as   opposed to Islam, and Muslims certainly wouldnt live and pray openly like a Christian merely to enter into the seminary in order to become a priest and preach heresy to the faithful as the Jєωs have been doing for a thousand years. Anyone who has studied the history of Spain (or any history for that matter) knows that Islam poses a danger to our temporal welfare (via: military invasion, enslavement, and persecution) while Judaism threatens us with spiritual (as well as cultural) death by contaminating us with naturalist and materialist philosophies, propagating heresy, and eliminating Christian culture, infiltrating the church to destroy it from within, as well as enslaving us and killing as many of us as possible.

Islam's power would have never grown as it has now without the help of the Jєωs anyway. North Africa and Spain would have never fallen unless the few Jєωιѕн inhabitants opened the gates of the fortified cities and allowed the Muslim armies and their Jєωιѕн allies to enter in. Who is more dangerous? The enemy across the sea , or the enemy behind you with a gun pressed into your back?

Hadn't seen this yet when I posted.

Did spouse of Jesus go by the name "angelofmercy" on Fisheaters? If so, I enjoyed her posts there. She would ask common sense questions that would go over most everybody's heads.

Yes I was angel of mercy. Thank you for your kind compliments!