Finkle-Think: How Jєωs Successfully Manipulate Masses, INCLUDING Dissidents (Who Should Know Better)

https://truthtopowernews.com/media-criticism/finkle-think-how-Jєωs-successfully-manipulate-masses-including-dissidents-who-should

It used to be that news reporters reported the news. Then men could argue about and debate it and even fight about it. The manipulators learned to then analyze the news. Tell you one side, the other side and what was the correct way to think about it. Now, men don't argue, debate or fight about it. When the news broadcast is finished they all just say Duh! All the thinking has been done for them.

Be serious, poche. Do you truly fail to see that masses is being used here in its sense of "people en masse"? Of course, describing people en masse as "the masses"—a term popularized by Karl Marx and a mainstay of ʝʊdɛօ-Communist propaganda for 170 years—is a perfect example of what the article's headline refers to: being manipulated by the Jєωs all unawares.

Sadly, this fact alone should probably have disqualified this article from being posted here at CathInfo. But a reading of the article itself, wherein we are told that George Soros is a good guy who has been the object of a campaign of vilification, demonstrates conclusively that this is clearly yet another instance where RC1953 has posted an article he has failed to vet beforehand. His fans may read it with pleasure and gratitude, but no one else should.

St John when he wrote his Gospel would have said the people en masse or the masses when he wrote his gospel.

Be serious, poche. Do you truly fail to see that masses is being used here in its sense of "people en masse"? Of course, describing people en masse as "the masses"—a term popularized by Karl Marx and a mainstay of ʝʊdɛօ-Communist propaganda for 170 years—is a perfect example of what the article's headline refers to: being manipulated by the Jєωs all unawares.

Sadly, this fact alone should probably have disqualified this article from being posted here at CathInfo. But a reading of the article itself, wherein we are told that George Soros is a good guy who has been the object of a campaign of vilification, demonstrates conclusively that this is clearly yet another instance where RC1953 has posted an article he has failed to vet beforehand. His fans may read it with pleasure and gratitude, but no one else should.

Someone finally said it. Thank you!

Maybe you need some courses in reading comprehension. The article doesn't portray Soros as a good guy and victim. It's showing a strategy used by Jєωs to demonize a Jєω (Soros) without calling him a Jєω.

Snark is evidently your strongest intellectual asset, perhaps your only one.

The act of claiming that the Jєω criminal Soros has been demonized in any respect whatsoever is an aspect of a classic Jєωιѕн grift: creating a faux opposition, one whose purpose is twofold: (1) to draw critics away from the actual strong opposition and associate them with the carefully limited opposition of the tricksters, and (2) to persuade those who have been drawn in that the strong opposition is hotheaded, dangerous, and irrational and hence to be eschewed. It was through such trickery that the Jєωιѕн neocons co-opted the conservative movement in the eighties, and they have done precisely the same thing with the patriotic anti-immigration movement, the appeal to which was the primary reason for Trump's election in 2016. That Trump has done effectively nothing to slow legal and illegal immigration or to eliminate birthright citizenship is obvious to everyone except Trump's blind loyalists.

I think the most surprising thing about this article is the implication that Orban is a fake nationalist. I'm assuming the author is a White Nationalist.

I am also assuming the author probably thinks Trump was an illusion of choice as well.

To achieve this you run highly personalized negative campaigning against your opponent. Don’t demonize the party, demonize the candidate. People can be made to hate individuals more easily than institutions.

Your base must be charged up on an emotional level by fear and hatred of the opponent. Old hatreds grow stale as motivators, so new enemies must be discovered, and if necessary invented.

(. . .)

When Viktor Orbán was seeking re-election in 2008, his old friend, Benjamin Netanyahu, introduced him to the two Jєωιѕн consultants who had made him PM 13 years before: George Birnbaum and Arthur Finkelstein, or “Finky”, as he was referred to by Orbán. Before working with Orbán, Finky checked in with Hungarian Jєωs in Israel to see if Orbán was an αnтι-ѕємιтє. Not at all, as he found out. Orbán had waged war against anti-semitism, even giving his daughter the Jєωιѕн name “Rahel.”

(. . .)

Finkelstein needed to dig into his bag of tricks and find a real enemy. Someone Hungarians would know well. An individual who could credibly epitomize the most sinister aspects of Jєωιѕн conspiracy theories. The puppetmaster. “It always helps rally the troops and rally a population when the enemy has a face” Birnbaum once said. Finkelstein: “you did not fight against the nαzιs but against Adolf Hitler. Not against al-Qaeda, but against Osama bin Laden.”

Now that Orbán was in power, he needed a puppetmaster. That person was George Soros. Birnbaum was thunderstruck. Soros was perfect.

(. . .)

Finkel-Think has evolved with the express purpose of tricking this newly minted dissident demographic in addition to keeping normie lightswitch brains stuck in two party ping pong politics. Having two strategies running simultaneously – what novelty! It’s what Trump’s entire 2016 campaign was predicated on. And Bolsonaro’s. And dozens of politicians across Europe. This is the essence of Fake Nationalism.

I think the most surprising thing about this article is the implication that Orban is a fake nationalist. I'm assuming the author is a White Nationalist.

Yes, it is a surprising suggestion, but it is also one for which the supporting evidence is small to nil. For that reason alone, the idea that the article's author, Jazzhands McFeels(!), is a white nationalist doesn't compute. Rather, he is almost certainly a hasbara Jєω tasked with creating distortion and suspicion while pretending to reveal what Jєωs are really up to.

Orbán certainly has critics in the nationalist community, mostly for granting citizenship to a few dozen superrich Arabs for a hefty price, but in the main he is greatly admired there. Even the Counter-Currents crowd is overall pretty positive about Orbán.

The guy who runs Truth to Power seems serious and well-meaning, and he certainly is right about how everything Russian is distorted into unrecognizability by the manstream media, but I don't get the feeling that he knows a great deal about much else than Russia—and cares even less.

Yes, it is a surprising suggestion, but it is also one for which the supporting evidence is small to nil.

I get such a feeling moreso with Putin.

Large number of Stormfronter's and VNNers fawn over that man.