Author Topic: How Jєωιѕн is Hollywood? (Read 1023 times)

Classiccom · « **Reply #1 on:** December 22, 2008, 04:23:11 AM »

Quote

As a proud Jєω, I want America to know about our accomplishment. Yes, we control Hollywood. Without us, you'd be flipping between "The 700 Club" and "Davey and Goliath" on TV all day

I have to agree. Give the Jєωs and the Devil their due. How do you enfeeble one billion Catholics so that they have a nearly zero profile in current media culture? Blame it on pseudo faith that is being sold as "Christianity". The Infallibles have done a wonderful job of extinguishing the spirit of Christianity in the world. You have made the Church a laughing stock to the world. They should have thrown shoes at Pope John Paul II at the 1986 Assisi Paganfest.

I don't think Jesus Christ was afraid of doing helpful physical world work. Eg. Carpentry, fishing, feeding the poor. Check out the Amish - their agricultural productivity. How about those Moonies - they even own a fishing fleet!. Christ spoke to mass audiences of his time. Here in Catholic America, proseletyzing has been a dirty word for about a 100 years. Give the Jєωs credit, they understand that you actually have to do something to make the world work. Faith without works is dead.
Instead of consecrating Russia, I wish we could get a majority of Bishops and a Christian pope to consecrate the Church to reestablish all things in Christ. Maybe then we will stop selling our souls to corporations and all other godless entities that are usually tied in with money, power and sex.

Of course there are exceptions, but on the whole, 21st century Christianity should have a lot more to show for itself. We can't even produce the original "talent" that was given to us. Like Madoff, we have squandered our inheritance!

roscoe · « **Reply #2 on:** December 22, 2008, 04:16:52 PM »

Classicom continues to see Alice through the looking glass. It is not Papal Infalliblity that is the problem, it is that Papal Infallibility has been forgatten.

Again I would suggest reading Truth of Papal Claims by Cardinal Del Val

http://used.addall.com

roscoe · « **Reply #3 on:** December 22, 2008, 04:50:41 PM »

Like Dollinger, Classicom puts himself above the Vatican Council.

Classiccom · « **Reply #4 on:** December 22, 2008, 08:04:20 PM »

Quote

ike Dollinger, Classicom puts himself above the Vatican Council.

-----------------------------------------------------

"If the pope teaches error, do not follow him" -Pope Pius IX

a.k.a. - Mr. Infallible (the first of ten)

--------------------------------------------------------

Your Right Roscoe, I am not qualified to argue any of this stuff. But nevertheless, I firmly believe that both Vatican Councils were the worst mistake . And it is really not even about any of the items of each council, but rather an outlook on the Church. Nobody reads anything put out by the popes or bishops. If you went door to door and asked what the general public (or Catholics for that matter) if they know about any specific papal bull or encyclical or vatican council docuмent, you would draw a blank response. On the other hand I don't think Jesus Christ wrote any long and drawn out docuмent constructed in such a manner that only a lawyer might understand the docuмent. So this whole idea of high priesthood of elitists who don't even communicate with the common man is really bogus. It might be legalistcally correct, but in reality it is not the way Jesus operated, and it diminishes respect from the masses.
Another problem is when these rickety extended rube goldberg type notions are put forth, you have all these endless and fruitless debates. The basic tenets of the Faith should be preached and practiced -period. That means the focus should be the establishment of God's grace in each human heart. Don't belittle the common man because of his ignorance of Robert's Rules of Vatican procedures.

OK, I quit arguing.

I want everyone here to have a blessed Christmas and a happiness in your heart than no one can take away.

roscoe · « **Reply #5 on:** December 22, 2008, 09:01:25 PM »

The Vatican Council was a necessary reaction to the French Revolution. The Infallible Constitution of Holy Church proclaimed by the Council is composed almost completly of excerpts from the Gospels of St's John and Matthew that demonstrate the Primacy of St Peter and his successors.

If you reject it you might as well be a Bogomil, Arian, Templar, Communist or any other such heresy.

There is no such thing as a v2 'council'.

Classiccom · « **Reply #6 on:** December 23, 2008, 08:42:41 AM »

Quote

The Vatican Council was a necessary reaction to the French Revolution. The Infallible Constitution of Holy Church proclaimed by the Council is composed almost completly of excerpts from the Gospels of St's John and Matthew that demonstrate the Primacy of St Peter and his successors.

Your assertion implies that God did not do an adequate job in providing Holy Scriptures. We always seem to need some kind of update like it was a Microsoft program. You people know how much I like the 1917 Fatima patch, or the 1870 Infallible firmware. Come to think of it, Fatima was like flash ram. The point is that God issued a curse to anyone who adds or subtracts from Holy Scripture. When you employ "let them eat Vatican Council" imperial rule that trumps scripture, you are usurping God's authority and have waged war against faithful Christians. The pope has the authority, but he becomes like an adulterous and abusive father that causes his family to flee to safety.

-----------------------------------------

So these are though times, but thinking for yourself and to rely on the grace of God for your decision making process may be God's choice.

Here is a good story of someone who was forced to work on her own to obtain God's blessing.

Music of My Heart

http://www.opus118.org/