International Red cross records put the h0Ɩ0cαųst death toll of camp inmates at 271,301
Friday, November 29, 2013 9:49

http://beforeitsnews.com/alternative/2013/11/international-red-cross-records-put-the-h0Ɩ0cαųst-death-toll-of-camp-inmates-at-271301-2835710.html


Above is a photo taken of the liberation of Dachau. The inmates hardly look at deaths door do they? Yet this was at the time of greatest hardship for them.
And having said that, even the extreme hardship that they were living under wasn’t because of any ‘Final Solution’ policy.
The reason for this hardship was that vital food and other supply lines to the camps had been cut off by the advancing allied armies air supremacy,leading to bombing raids obliterating train tracks previously used by the Germans to provide the camps with their day to day needs.
Course, it wasn’t just camp inmates going hungry at that time. Germany was in disarray, their army decimated, defeated and retreating. food was scarce and everyone was going without.
But even then, the deaths of cσncєnтrαтισn cαмρ inmates were not in the millions.
In fact, according to Official International Red Cross records, the death toll of those who died in the camps was 271,301.
A bit of a reduction from the 6 million that we constantly have shoved down our throats.
Then again, perhaps the IRC are αnтι-ѕємιтєs too.

OFFICIAL INTERNATIONAL RED CROSS RECORDS RELEASED
Sealed and guarded since the end of WWII at Arolsen, Germany, the Official IRC records reveal the actual cσncєnтrαтισn cαмρ total death toll was 271,301
For years, people around the world – “the West” in particular – have been told that “six million Jєωs were systematically murdered by Germans in ‘cσncєnтrαтισn cαмρs’ during World War 2.”
Thousands of honest people disputing this claim have been viciously smeared as a hateful αnтι-ѕємιтє. Several countries around the world have jailed and heavily fined people for disputing the claim that “6 Million” Jєωs were killed.
Provided here is a scanned image of an Official International Red Cross docuмent, proving the so-called “h0Ɩ0cαųst” [the long-and-often-claimed-6-million Jєωs] is just plain wrong. Jєωs around the world have intentionally exaggerated and perpetually lied for the purpose of gaining political, emotional and business advantages for themselves.
They committed willful, criminal FRAUD upon millions of trusting people around the world!
Please NOTE that the truth has been known since long before 1979!!! The above compiler, replying to a letter, had to rely on information that was already in existence!!!
Tax-payers of Germany, Switzerland, Austria, Latvia, Poland and other nations have had multiple Millions of dollars taken from their wages to be paid out to “h0Ɩ0cαųst survivors” and their descendants for something that DID NOT HAPPEN.
The tax-payers of these United States of America spend Billion$ each year in direct, indirect and military support of the State of Israel (which is not Biblical Israel).
This is intentional, criminal fraud on a scale so massive as to be almost incomprehensible.
Red Cross and East German government figures put the total deaths at every camp as 272.000, and 282,000 respectively which includes ɧoɱosɛҳųαƖs, communists, gypsies, murderers, paedophiles etc. The 6 Million figure is a Kabbalist number, a magickal figure which featured in news papers in the early 1900′s.


Where do the innocent Germans, Americans and others go to get a refund?
I call for criminal prosecution of individuals and groups who filed false lawsuits to obtain h0Ɩ0cαųst reparations and financial damage awards and perpetrating deliberate fraud upon Courts.
I call for the removal of h0Ɩ0cαųst references in History books and educational materials.
I call for the removal of h0Ɩ0cαųst Memorials worldwide.
It is long overdue that this intentional fraud be halted and those who perpetrated it be brought to justice for over 60 years of National Blood Libel against Germany and other nations through vicious lies and financial fraud.
Two of the most important surveys of the Jєωιѕн question in Europe during World War II are David Irvings examination of the Russian archives after the wall came down. Irving published his findings in his book, “Hitler’s War” and said not one word about gas chambers.
When question about this omission he said that there was no reference to gas chambers in the archives and therefore he did not discuss the question of gas chambers. Irving was arrested in several countries for hate speech for his scholarly omission.
The International Red Cross published their analysis in a three volume “Report of the International Committee of the Red Cross on its Activities during the Second World War” published in Geneva in 1948. This analysis expanded findings of two previous publications: “Sur L’activite’ du CICR en faveur des civils detencus dans les camps de concentration en Allemagne 1939-1945 (Geneva, 1946) and “Inter Arma Caritas: The Work of the ICRF during the Second World War” (Geneva, 1947).
In 1949 the International Red Cross interviewed prisoners in the German camps. They were not allowed to interview prisoners in the Russian camps which were far more harsh.
The German camps held both political prisoners (Schutzhaflinge) and those convicted of crimes. The Germans allowed the Red Cross to distribute food, medicine and clothing to the prisoners.
Grateful prisoners sent letters of thanks from Dachau, Buchenwalk, Sangerhausen, Sachsenhausen, Oranienburg, Flossenburg, Landsberg-am-Lech, Fibha, Ravensbruck, Hamburg-Neuengamme, Mauthausen, Theresienstadt, Auschwitz, Bergen-Belsen and others.
“The principal recipients were Belgians, Dutch, French, Greeks, Italians, Norwegians, Poles and stateless Jєωs” (Vol. III, p. 83).
Regarding Theresienstadt, the Red Cross said, “”where there were about 40,000 Jєωs deported from various countries, was a relatively privileged ghetto” (Vol. III, p. 75).
“The Committee’s delegates were able to visit the camp at Theresienstadt (Terezin) which was used exclusively for Jєωs and was governed by special conditions … From information gathered by the Commmee, this camp had been started as an experiment by certain leaders of the Reich … These men wished to give the Jєωs the means of setting up a communal life in a town under their own administration and possessing almost complete autonomy … two delegates were able to visit the camp on April 6, 1945.
They confirmed the favourable impression gained on the first visit” (Vol. I, p. 642).
The ICRC also had praise for the regime of Ion Antonescu of Fascist Rumania where the Committee was able to extend special relief to 183,000 Rumanian Jєωs until the time of the Soviet occupation.
The aid then ceased and the ICRC complained bitterly that it never succeeded “in sending anything whatsoever to Russia” (Vol. II, p. 62). The same situation applied to many of the German camps after their “liberation” by the Russians.
The ICRC received a voluminous flow of mail from Auschwitz until the period of the Soviet occupation, when many of the internees were evacuated westward. But the efforts of the Red Cross to send relief to internees remaining at Auschwitz under Soviet control were futile.
However. food parcels continued to be sent to former Auschwitz inmates transferred west to such camps as Buchenwald and Oranienburg.


NO MENTION OF GAS CHAMBERS
One of the most important aspects of the Report of the ICRC is that it clarifies the true cause of those deaths that undoubtedly occurred in the camps towards the end of the war.
Says the Report: “in the chaotic condition of Germany after the invasion during the final months of the war, the camps received no food supplies at all and starvation claimed an increasing number of victims. Itself alarmed by this situation, the German Government at last informed the ICRC on February 1, 1945 … In March 1945, discussions between the President of the ICRC and General of the S.S. Kaltenbrunner gave even more decisive results. Relief could henceforth be distributed by the ICRC and one delegate was authorised to stay in each camp ..I.” (Vol. III, p.83).

Clearly, the German authorities were at pains to relieve the dire situation as far as they were able.
The Red Cross are quite explicit in stating that food supplies ceased at this time due to the Allied bombing of German transportation, and in the interests of interned Jєωs they had protested on March 15, 1944 against “the barbarous aerial warfare of the Allies” (Inter Armet Caritns, p. 78).

By October 2, 1944, the ICRC had warned the German Foreign Office of the impending collapse of the German transportation system, declaring that starvation conditions for people throughout Germany were becoming inevitable.
In dealing with this comprehensive, three-volume Report, it is important to stress that the delegates of the International Red Cross found no evidence whatsoever of ‘gas chambers’.
The original 1946 edition did not even talk of ‘extermination’ or ‘death camps’ but after the emotional impact of the Nuremberg trials the Red Cross felt compelled to introduce into the expanded 1948 Report several, very cursory references to ‘death camps’ (Vol. 1 p. 641) and ‘extermination camps’ (Vol. I p. 645).
However, no means of’extermination’ is indicated.
In all its 1,600 pages the three-volume Report does not even mention such a thing as a ‘gas chamber’. It acknowledges that Jєωs, like many other wartime nationalities, suffered rigours and privations, but’ its complete silence on the subject of’gassings’ is ample refutation of the ‘h0Ɩ0cαųst’ legend.


NOT ALL WERE INTERNED
Volume III of the Report of the ICRC, Chapter 3 (I. Jєωιѕн Civilian Population) deals with the “aid given to the Jєωιѕн section of the free population” and this chapter makes it quite plain that by no means all of the European Jєωs were placed in internment camps but remained, subject to certain restrictions, as part of the free civilian population.
This conflicts directly with the “thoroughness” of the supposed “extermination programme”, and with the claim in the forged Hoess memoirs that Eichmann was obsessed with seizing every single Jєω he could lay his hands on,” In Slovakia, for example, where Eichmann’s assistant Dieter Wisliceny was in charge, the Report states that “A large proportian of the Jєωιѕн minority had permission to stay in the country, and at certain periods Slovakia was looked upon as a comparative haven of refuge for Jєωs, especially for those coming from Poland.

Those who remained in Slovakia seem to have been in comparative safety until the end of August 1944, when a rising against the German forces took place. While it is true that the law of May 15, 1942 had brought about the internment of several thousand Jєωs, these people were held in camps where the conditions of food and lodging were tolerable, and where the internees were allowed to do paid work on terms almost equal to those of the free labour market” (Vol. I, p. 646).
Not only did large numbers of the three million or so European Jєωs avoid internment altogether, but the emigration of Jєωs continued throughout the war, generally by way of Hungary, Rumania and Turkey. Ironically, post-war Jєωιѕн emigration from German-occupied territories was also facilitated by the Reich, as in the case of the Polish Jєωs who had escaped to France before its occupation.
“The Jєωs from Poland who, whilst in France, had obtained entrance permits to the United States were held to be American citizens by the German occupying authorities, who further agreed to recognise the validity of about three thousand passports issued to Jєωs by the consulates of South American countries” (Vol. 1, p. 645).
As future U.S. citizens, these Jєωs were held at the Vittel camp in southern France for American aliens. The emigration of European Jєωs from Hungary in particular proceeded during the war unhindered by the German authorities. “Until March 1944,” says the Red Cross Report, “Jєωs who had the privilege of visas for Palestine were free to leave Hungary” (Vol. 1, p. 648). Even after the replacement of the Horthy Government in 1944 (following its attempted armistice with the Soviet Union) with a government more dependent on German authority, the emigration of Jєωs continued.
The Committee secured the pledges of both Britain and the United States “to give support by every means to the emigration of Jєωs from Hungary, ” and from the U.S. Government the ICRC received a message stating that “The Government of the United States… now specifically repeats its assurance that arrangements will be made by it for the care of all Jєωs who in the present circuмstances are allowed to leave” (Vol. 1, p. 649).