https://starkrealities.substack.com/p/hiroshima-nagasaki-bombings-were (https://starkrealities.substack.com/p/hiroshima-nagasaki-bombings-were)
[color=var(--print_on_web_bg_color, var(--color-primary))]Hiroshima, Nagasaki Bombings Were Needless, Said World War II's Top US Military Leaders
[color=var(--print_secondary, var(--print_secondary_on_web_bg_color, var(--print_secondary, var(--color-secondary))))]Mythology about these mass civilian slaughters warps thinking about US militarism[/color]
[color=var(--print_on_web_bg_color, var(--color-primary))](https://substackcdn.com/image/fetch/w_80,c_limit,f_auto,q_auto:good,fl_progressive:steep/https%3A%2F%2Fbucketeer-e05bbc84-baa3-437e-9518-adb32be77984.s3.amazonaws.com%2Fpublic%2Fimages%2F07d831ee-6333-4804-afff-dac2f08c56d5_1571x1019.jpeg)[/color] (https://substack.com/profile/1018607-brian-mcglinchey)
[color=var(--color-primary-themed)][color=var(--print_on_web_bg_color, var(--color-primary))]BRIAN MCGLINCHEY[/color] (https://substack.com/@starkrealities)[/font][/size][/color][/font][/size][/color]
[color=var(--print_on_web_bg_color, var(--color-primary))]The anniversaries of the atomic bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki present an opportunity to demolish a cornerstone myth of American history — that those twin acts of mass civilian slaughter were necessary to bring about Japan’s surrender, and spare a half-million US soldiers who’d have otherwise died in a military conquest of the empire’s home islands.[/font][/size][/color]
[color=var(--print_on_web_bg_color, var(--color-primary))][color=var(--print_on_web_bg_color, var(--color-primary))]Those who attack this mythology are often reflexively dismissed as unpatriotic, ill-informed or both. However, the most compelling witnesses against the conventional wisdom were patriots with a unique grasp on the state of affairs in August 1945 — America’s senior military leaders of World War II.[/color][/color]
[color=var(--print_on_web_bg_color, var(--color-primary))][color=var(--print_on_web_bg_color, var(--color-primary))]Let’s first hear what they had to say, and then examine key facts that led them to their little-publicized convictions:[/color][/color]
- [color=var(--print_on_web_bg_color, var(--color-primary))][color=var(--print_on_web_bg_color, var(--color-primary))]General Dwight Eisenhower (https://www.trumanlibrary.gov/education/lesson-plans/re-thinking-dropping-atomic-bombs-lesson-2)[/iurl] [/b]on learning of the planned bombings: “I had been conscious of a feeling of depression and voiced to [Secretary of War Stimson] my grave misgivings, first on the basis of my belief that Japan was already defeated and that dropping the bomb was completely unnecessary, and secondly because I thought that our country should avoid shocking world opinion by the use of a weapon whose employment was, I thought, no longer mandatory as a measure to save American lives. It was my belief that Japan was, at that very moment, seeking some way to surrender with a minimum loss of ‘face’.”[/color][/font][/size][/color]
- [color=var(--print_on_web_bg_color, var(--color-primary))][color=var(--print_on_web_bg_color, var(--color-primary))]Admiral William Leahy (https://apjjf.org/2021/20/Kuzmarov-Peace.html)[/iurl],[/b] Truman's Chief of Staff: “The use of this barbarous weapon…was of no material assistance in our war against Japan. The Japanese were already defeated and ready to surrender because of the effective sea blockade and the successful bombing with conventional weapons.”[/color][/font][/size][/color]
- [color=var(--print_on_web_bg_color, var(--color-primary))][color=var(--print_on_web_bg_color, var(--color-primary))]Major General Curtis LeMay (https://www.thenation.com/article/world/why-the-us-really-bombed-hiroshima/)[/iurl], [/b]21st Bomber Command: “The war would have been over in two weeks (https://pearlharbor.org/blog/america-hadnt-dropped-bombs/) without the Russians entering and without the atomic bomb…The atomic bomb had nothing to do with the end of the war at all.”[/color][/font][/size][/color]
- [color=var(--print_on_web_bg_color, var(--color-primary))][color=var(--print_on_web_bg_color, var(--color-primary))]General Hap Arnold (https://duluthreader.com/articles/2015/08/05/105115-no-one-saves-lives-by-dropping-bombs-on-cities)[/iurl],[/b] US Army Air Forces: “The Japanese position was hopeless even before the first atomic bomb fell, because the Japanese had lost control of their own air.” “It (https://duluthreader.com/articles/2015/08/05/105115-no-one-saves-lives-by-dropping-bombs-on-cities) always appeared to us that, atomic bomb or no atomic bomb, the Japanese were already on the verge of collapse.”[/color][/font][/size][/color]
- [color=var(--print_on_web_bg_color, var(--color-primary))][color=var(--print_on_web_bg_color, var(--color-primary))]Ralph Bard (https://www.amazon.com/Hotter-Than-Sun-interviews-Alperovitz/dp/1733647368)[/iurl],[/b] Under Secretary of the Navy: “The Japanese were ready for peace, and they already had approached the Russians and the Swiss…In my opinion, the Japanese war was really won before we ever used the atom bomb.”[/color][/font][/size][/color]
- [color=var(--print_on_web_bg_color, var(--color-primary))][color=var(--print_on_web_bg_color, var(--color-primary))]Brigadier General Carter Clarke (https://www.amazon.com/Hotter-Than-Sun-interviews-Alperovitz/dp/1733647368)[/iurl], military intelligence officer[/b] who prepared summaries of intercepted cables for Truman: “When we didn’t need to do it, and we knew we didn’t need to do it…we used [Hiroshima and Nagasaki] as an experiment for two atomic bombs. Many other high-level military officers concurred.”[/color][/font][/size][/color]
- [color=var(--print_on_web_bg_color, var(--color-primary))][color=var(--print_on_web_bg_color, var(--color-primary))]Fleet Admiral Chester Nimitz (https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/CREC-2012-09-19/html/CREC-2012-09-19-pt1-PgH6128-2.htm)[/iurl][/b], Pacific Fleet commander: “The use of atomic bombs at Hiroshima and Nagasaki was of no material assistance in our war against Japan. The Japanese were already defeated and ready to surrender.”[/color][/font][/size][/color]
[color=var(--print_on_web_bg_color, var(--color-primary))]Putting out feelers through third-party diplomatic channels, the Japanese were seeking to end the war weeks before the atomic bombings on August 6 and 9, 1945. Japan’s navy and air forces were decimated, and its homeland subjected to a sea blockade and allied bombing carried out against little resistance.
(https://substackcdn.com/image/fetch/f_auto,q_auto:good,fl_progressive:steep/https%3A%2F%2Fsubstack-post-media.s3.amazonaws.com%2Fpublic%2Fimages%2F4570d215-97b4-4d6f-87e0-4d7159d700db_740x585.jpeg)
(https://substackcdn.com/image/fetch/w_1456,c_limit,f_auto,q_auto:good,fl_progressive:steep/https%3A%2F%2Fsubstack-post-media.s3.amazonaws.com%2Fpublic%2Fimages%2F4570d215-97b4-4d6f-87e0-4d7159d700db_740x585.jpeg)
(https://substackcdn.com/image/fetch/f_auto,q_auto:good,fl_progressive:steep/https%3A%2F%2Fsubstack-post-media.s3.amazonaws.com%2Fpublic%2Fimages%2F4570d215-97b4-4d6f-87e0-4d7159d700db_740x585.jpeg)[/font][/size][/color]
[color=var(--print_secondary, var(--print_secondary_on_web_bg_color, var(--print_secondary, var(--color-secondary))))]Full of midget submarines, a drydock in the port city of Kure, Japan lies in ruins[/font][/size][/color]
[color=var(--print_on_web_bg_color, var(--color-primary))]The Americans knew of Japan’s intent to surrender, having intercepted a July 12 cable (https://nsarchive.gwu.edu/docuмent/28458-docuмent-39b-magic-diplomatic-summary-war-department-office-assistant-chief-staff-g) from Japanese Foreign Minister Shigenori Togo, informing Japanese ambassador to Russia Naotake Sato that “we are now secretly giving consideration to the termination of the war because of the pressing situation which confronts Japan both at home and abroad.”[/font][/size][/color]
[color=var(--print_on_web_bg_color, var(--color-primary))][color=var(--print_on_web_bg_color, var(--color-primary))]Togo told Sato to “sound [Russian diplomat Vyacheslav Molotov] out on the extent to which it is possible to make use of Russia in ending the war.” Togo initially told Sato to obscure Japan’s interest in using Russia to end the war, but just hours later, he withdrew that instruction, saying it would be “suitable to make clear to the Russians our general attitude on ending the war”— to include Japan’s having “absolutely no idea of annexing or holding the territories which she occupied during the war.”[/color][/color]
(https://substackcdn.com/image/fetch/f_auto,q_auto:good,fl_progressive:steep/https%3A%2F%2Fsubstack-post-media.s3.amazonaws.com%2Fpublic%2Fimages%2Fece1dd6c-9b17-4ae4-acf3-eb7d2f9bfdf7_1095x552.jpeg)
(https://substackcdn.com/image/fetch/w_1456,c_limit,f_auto,q_auto:good,fl_progressive:steep/https%3A%2F%2Fsubstack-post-media.s3.amazonaws.com%2Fpublic%2Fimages%2Fece1dd6c-9b17-4ae4-acf3-eb7d2f9bfdf7_1095x552.jpeg)
(https://substackcdn.com/image/fetch/f_auto,q_auto:good,fl_progressive:steep/https%3A%2F%2Fsubstack-post-media.s3.amazonaws.com%2Fpublic%2Fimages%2Fece1dd6c-9b17-4ae4-acf3-eb7d2f9bfdf7_1095x552.jpeg)
[color=var(--print_secondary, var(--print_secondary_on_web_bg_color, var(--print_secondary, var(--color-secondary))))]An excerpt from a July 12, 1945 US War Department summary of intercepted cables from Japan’s Foreign Minister to his ambassador to the Soviet Union[/font][/size][/color]
[color=var(--print_on_web_bg_color, var(--color-primary))]Japan’s central concern was the retention of its emperor, Hirohito, who was considered a demigod. Even knowing this — and with many US officials feeling the retention of the emperor could help Japanese society through its postwar transition —the Truman administration continued issuing demands for unconditional surrender, offering no assurance that the emperor would be spared humiliation or worse.[/font][/size][/color]
[color=var(--print_on_web_bg_color, var(--color-primary))][color=var(--print_on_web_bg_color, var(--color-primary))]In a July 2 memorandum (https://history.state.gov/historicaldocuмents/frus1945Berlinv01/d592), Secretary of War Henry Stimson drafted a terms-of-surrender proclamation to be issued at the conclusion of that month’s Potsdam Conference. He advised Truman that, “if…we should add that we do not exclude a constitutional monarchy under her present dynasty, it would substantially add to the chances of acceptance.”[/color][/color]
[color=var(--print_on_web_bg_color, var(--color-primary))][color=var(--print_on_web_bg_color, var(--color-primary))]Truman and Secretary of State James Byrnes, however, continued rejecting recommendations to give assurances about the emperor. The final Potsdam Declaration (https://ahf.nuclearmuseum.org/ahf/key-docuмents/potsdam-declaration/), issued July 26, omitted Stimson’s recommended language, sternly declaring, “Following are our terms. We will not deviate from them.”[/color][/color]
[color=var(--print_on_web_bg_color, var(--color-primary))][color=var(--print_on_web_bg_color, var(--color-primary))]One of those terms could reasonably be interpreted as jeopardizing the emperor: “There must be eliminated for all time the authority and influence of those who have deceived and misled the people of Japan into embarking on world conquest.”[/color][/color]
[color=var(--print_on_web_bg_color, var(--color-primary))]At the same time the United States was preparing to deploy its formidable new weapons, the Soviet Union was moving armies from the European front to northeast Asia.[/font][/size][/color]
[color=var(--print_on_web_bg_color, var(--color-primary))][color=var(--print_on_web_bg_color, var(--color-primary))]In May, Stalin told the US ambassador (https://history.state.gov/historicaldocuмents/frus1945Berlinv01/d26) that Soviet forces should be positioned to attack the Japanese in Manchuria by August 8. In July, Truman predicted the impact of the Soviets opening a new front. In a diary entry (https://hsi.wm.edu/cases/bomb/bomb_docuмents.html) made during the Potsdam Conference, he wrote that Stalin assured him “he’ll be in the Jap War on August 15th. Fini (https://www.dictionary.com/browse/fini) Japs when that comes about.”[/color][/color]
[color=var(--print_on_web_bg_color, var(--color-primary))][color=var(--print_on_web_bg_color, var(--color-primary))]Right on Stalin’s original schedule, the Soviet Union declared war on Japan two days after the August 6 bombing of Hiroshima. That same day — August 8 — Emperor Hirohito told the country’s civilian leaders that he still wanted to pursue a negotiated surrender that would preserve his reign.[/color][/color]
[color=var(--print_on_web_bg_color, var(--color-primary))][color=var(--print_on_web_bg_color, var(--color-primary))]On August 9, Soviet attacks commenced on three fronts (https://blog.nationalarchives.gov.uk/soviet-japan-and-the-termination-of-the-second-world-war/). News of Stalin’s invasion (https://www.theamericanconservative.com/wholesale-slaughter-of-japanese-non-combatants-in-wwii-was-evil/) of Manchuria prompted Hirohito to call a new meeting to discuss surrender — at 10 am, one hour before the strike on Nagasaki. The final surrender decision came on August 10.[/color][/color]
(https://substackcdn.com/image/fetch/f_auto,q_auto:good,fl_progressive:steep/https%3A%2F%2Fsubstack-post-media.s3.amazonaws.com%2Fpublic%2Fimages%2Fc5847194-8b6d-46b7-a6a3-e2f8c2d035e2_629x439.jpeg)
(https://substackcdn.com/image/fetch/w_1456,c_limit,f_auto,q_auto:good,fl_progressive:steep/https%3A%2F%2Fsubstack-post-media.s3.amazonaws.com%2Fpublic%2Fimages%2Fc5847194-8b6d-46b7-a6a3-e2f8c2d035e2_629x439.jpeg)
(https://substackcdn.com/image/fetch/f_auto,q_auto:good,fl_progressive:steep/https%3A%2F%2Fsubstack-post-media.s3.amazonaws.com%2Fpublic%2Fimages%2Fc5847194-8b6d-46b7-a6a3-e2f8c2d035e2_629x439.jpeg)
[color=var(--print_secondary, var(--print_secondary_on_web_bg_color, var(--print_secondary, var(--color-secondary))))]Three-year old Shinichi Tetsutani, burned as he was riding this tricycle when the atomic bomb hit Hiroshima, died a painful death that night (Hiroki Kobayashi/[color=var(--print_on_web_bg_color, var(--color-primary))]National Geographic (https://www.nationalgeographic.co.uk/photography/2020/08/the-elusive-horror-of-hiroshima)[/iurl][/i])[/size][/color][/font][/size][/color]
[color=var(--print_on_web_bg_color, var(--color-primary))]The Soviet timeline makes the atomic bombings all the more troubling: One would think a US government that’s appropriately hesitant to incinerate and irradiate hundreds of thousands of civilians would want to first see how a Soviet declaration of war affected Japan’s calculus.[/font][/size][/color]
[color=var(--print_on_web_bg_color, var(--color-primary))][color=var(--print_on_web_bg_color, var(--color-primary))]As it turns out, the Japanese surrender indeed appears to have been prompted by the Soviet entry into the war on Japan — not by the atomic bombs. “The Japanese leadership never had photo or video evidence of the atomic blast and considered the destruction of Hiroshima to be similar to the dozens of conventional strikes Japan had already suffered,” wrote Josiah Lippincott at [color=var(--print_on_web_bg_color, var(--color-primary))]The American Conservative[/color] (https://www.theamericanconservative.com/wholesale-slaughter-of-japanese-non-combatants-in-wwii-was-evil/)[/i].[/color][/color][/font][/size]
[color=var(--print_on_web_bg_color, var(--color-primary))]Sadly, the evidence points to a US government determined to drop atomic bombs on Japanese cities as an end in itself, to such an extent that it not only ignored Japan’s interest in surrender, but worked to ensure that surrender was delayed until after upwards of 210,000 people — disproportionately women, children and elderly — were killed (https://thebulletin.org/2020/08/counting-the-dead-at-hiroshima-and-nagasaki/) in the two cities.[/font][/size][/color]
[color=var(--print_on_web_bg_color, var(--color-primary))][color=var(--print_on_web_bg_color, var(--color-primary))]Make no mistake: This was a deliberate targeting of civilian populations. Hiroshima and Nagasaki were chosen because they were pristine, and could thus fully showcase the bombs’ power. Hiroshima was home to a small military headquarters, but the fact that both cities had gone untouched by a strategic bombing campaign that began 14 months earlier (https://media.defense.gov/2010/Sep/27/2001330168/-1/-1/0/AFD-100927-081.pdf) certifies their military and industrial insignificance.[/color][/color]
(https://substackcdn.com/image/fetch/f_auto,q_auto:good,fl_progressive:steep/https%3A%2F%2Fsubstack-post-media.s3.amazonaws.com%2Fpublic%2Fimages%2F56aff397-a126-45ce-b2d8-81707e485afa_2048x1044.jpeg)
(https://substackcdn.com/image/fetch/w_1456,c_limit,f_auto,q_auto:good,fl_progressive:steep/https%3A%2F%2Fsubstack-post-media.s3.amazonaws.com%2Fpublic%2Fimages%2F56aff397-a126-45ce-b2d8-81707e485afa_2048x1044.jpeg)
(https://substackcdn.com/image/fetch/f_auto,q_auto:good,fl_progressive:steep/https%3A%2F%2Fsubstack-post-media.s3.amazonaws.com%2Fpublic%2Fimages%2F56aff397-a126-45ce-b2d8-81707e485afa_2048x1044.jpeg)
[color=var(--print_on_web_bg_color, var(--color-primary))][color=var(--print_on_web_bg_color, var(--color-primary))]“The Japanese were ready to surrender and it wasn’t necessary to hit them with that awful thing,” Eisenhower would later say (https://www.aei.org/op-eds/japan-was-already-defeated-the-case-against-the-nuclear-bomb-and-for-basic-morality/). “I hated to see our country be the first to use such a weapon.”[/color][/color]
[color=var(--print_on_web_bg_color, var(--color-primary))][color=var(--print_on_web_bg_color, var(--color-primary))]According to his pilot, General Douglas MacArthur (https://www.antiwar.com/blog/2021/06/05/who-opposed-nuking-japan/), commander of US Army Forces Pacific, was “appalled and depressed by this Frankenstein monster.”[/color][/color]
[color=var(--print_on_web_bg_color, var(--color-primary))][color=var(--print_on_web_bg_color, var(--color-primary))]“When I asked General MacArthur about the decision to drop the bomb,” wrote journalist Norman Cousins, “I was surprised to learn he had not even been consulted…He saw no military justification for the dropping of the bomb. The war might have ended weeks earlier, he said, if the United States had agreed, as it later did anyway, to the retention of the institution of the emperor.”[/color][/color]
[color=var(--print_on_web_bg_color, var(--color-primary))]What then, was the purpose of devastating Hiroshima and Nagasaki with atomic bombs?[/font][/size][/color]
[color=var(--print_on_web_bg_color, var(--color-primary))][color=var(--print_on_web_bg_color, var(--color-primary))]A key insight comes from Manhattan Project physicist Leo Szilard. In 1945, Szilard organized a petition (https://ahf.nuclearmuseum.org/ahf/key-docuмents/szilard-petition/), signed (https://www.atomicarchive.com/history/atomic-bombing/hiroshima/page-6.html) by 70 Manhattan Project scientists, urging Truman not to use atomic bombs against Japan without first giving the country a chance to surrender, on terms that were made public.[/color][/color]
[color=var(--print_on_web_bg_color, var(--color-primary))][color=var(--print_on_web_bg_color, var(--color-primary))]In May 1945, Szilard met with Secretary of State Byrnes to urge atomic restraint. Byrnes wasn’t receptive to the plea. Szilard — the scientist who’d drafted the pivotal 1939 letter (https://ahf.nuclearmuseum.org/ahf/key-docuмents/einstein-szilard-letter/) from Albert Einstein urging FDR to develop an atomic bomb — recounted (https://books.google.com/books?id=_-dEEAAAQBAJ&pg=PT58&lpg=PT58&dq=szilard+):[/color][/color]
[color=var(--print_on_web_bg_color, var(--color-primary))]"[Byrnes] was concerned about Russia's postwar behavior. Russian troops had moved into Hungary and Romania, and Byrnes thought it would be very difficult to persuade Russia to withdraw her troops from these countries, that Russia might be more manageable if impressed by American military might, and that a demonstration of the bomb might impress Russia."[/font][/size][/color]
(https://substackcdn.com/image/fetch/f_auto,q_auto:good,fl_progressive:steep/https%3A%2F%2Fsubstack-post-media.s3.amazonaws.com%2Fpublic%2Fimages%2Fffbcef56-5046-4898-8a19-25675756f7ab_735x490.jpeg)
(https://substackcdn.com/image/fetch/w_1456,c_limit,f_auto,q_auto:good,fl_progressive:steep/https%3A%2F%2Fsubstack-post-media.s3.amazonaws.com%2Fpublic%2Fimages%2Fffbcef56-5046-4898-8a19-25675756f7ab_735x490.jpeg)
(https://substackcdn.com/image/fetch/f_auto,q_auto:good,fl_progressive:steep/https%3A%2F%2Fsubstack-post-media.s3.amazonaws.com%2Fpublic%2Fimages%2Fffbcef56-5046-4898-8a19-25675756f7ab_735x490.jpeg)
[color=var(--print_secondary, var(--print_secondary_on_web_bg_color, var(--print_secondary, var(--color-secondary))))]Burned to impress Stalin: A victim of the US atomic bombing of Hiroshima (AP /The Association of the Photographers of the Atomic Bomb Destruction of Hiroshima, Yotsugi Kawahara)[/font][/size][/color]
[color=var(--print_on_web_bg_color, var(--color-primary))]Whether the atomic bomb’s audience was in Tokyo or Moscow, some in the military establishment championed alternative ways to demonstrate its power.[/font][/size][/color]
[color=var(--print_on_web_bg_color, var(--color-primary))][color=var(--print_on_web_bg_color, var(--color-primary))]Lewis Strauss, Special Assistant to the Navy Secretary, said he proposed (https://studylib.net/doc/8421323/atomic-bombs-dbq---ottumwa-community-schools) “that the weapon should be demonstrated over… a large forest of cryptomeria trees not far from Tokyo. The cryptomeria tree is the Japanese version of our redwood… [It] would lay the trees out in windrows from the center of the explosion in all directions as though they were matchsticks, and, of course, set them afire in the center. It seemed to me that a demonstration of this sort would prove to the Japanese that we could destroy any of their cities at will.”[/color][/color]
[color=var(--print_on_web_bg_color, var(--color-primary))][color=var(--print_on_web_bg_color, var(--color-primary))]Strauss said Navy Secretary Forrestal “agreed wholeheartedly,” but Truman ultimately decided an optimal demonstration required burning hundreds of thousands of noncombatants and laying waste to their cities. The buck stops there.[/color][/color]
[color=var(--print_on_web_bg_color, var(--color-primary))]The particular means of inflicting these mass murders — a solitary object dropped from a plane at 31,000 feet — helps warp Americans’ evaluation of its morality. Using an analogy, historian Robert Raico (https://original.antiwar.com/ralph-raico/2009/08/05/hiroshima-and-nagasaki/) cultivates ethical clarity:[/font][/size][/color]
[color=var(--print_on_web_bg_color, var(--color-primary))]“Suppose that, when we invaded Germany in early 1945, our leaders had believed that executing all the inhabitants of Aachen, or Trier, or some other Rhineland city would finally break the will of the Germans and lead them to surrender. In this way, the war might have ended quickly, saving the lives of many Allied soldiers. Would that then have justified shooting tens of thousands of German civilians, including women and children?”[/font][/size][/color]
[color=var(--print_on_web_bg_color, var(--color-primary))]The claim that dropping the atomic bombs saved a half-million American lives is more than just empty: Truman’s stubborn refusal to provide advance assurances about the retention of Japan’s emperor arguably cost American lives.[/font][/size][/color]
[color=var(--print_on_web_bg_color, var(--color-primary))][color=var(--print_on_web_bg_color, var(--color-primary))]That’s true not only of a war against Japan that lasted longer than it needed to, but also of a Korean War precipitated by the US-invited Soviet invasion of Japanese-held territory in northeast Asia. More than 36,000 US service members died in the Korean War — among a staggering 2.5 million (https://www.britannica.com/event/Korean-War/Back-to-the-38th-parallel) total military and civilian dead on both sides of the 38th Parallel.[/color][/color]
(https://substackcdn.com/image/fetch/f_auto,q_auto:good,fl_progressive:steep/https%3A%2F%2Fsubstack-post-media.s3.amazonaws.com%2Fpublic%2Fimages%2F70f3f270-edea-479a-81fa-38a301e7fe5e_1200x1232.png)
(https://substackcdn.com/image/fetch/w_1456,c_limit,f_auto,q_auto:good,fl_progressive:steep/https%3A%2F%2Fsubstack-post-media.s3.amazonaws.com%2Fpublic%2Fimages%2F70f3f270-edea-479a-81fa-38a301e7fe5e_1200x1232.png)
(https://substackcdn.com/image/fetch/f_auto,q_auto:good,fl_progressive:steep/https%3A%2F%2Fsubstack-post-media.s3.amazonaws.com%2Fpublic%2Fimages%2F70f3f270-edea-479a-81fa-38a301e7fe5e_1200x1232.png)
[color=var(--print_on_web_bg_color, var(--color-primary))][color=var(--print_on_web_bg_color, var(--color-primary))]We like to think of our system as one in which the supremacy of civilian leaders acts as a rational, moderating force on military decisions. The needless atomic bombing of Hiroshima and Nagasaki — against the wishes of World War II’s most revered military leaders — tells us otherwise.[/color][/color]
[color=var(--print_on_web_bg_color, var(--color-primary))][color=var(--print_on_web_bg_color, var(--color-primary))]Sadly, the destructive effects of the Hiroshima myth aren’t confined to Americans’ understanding of events in August 1945. “There are hints and notes of the Hiroshima myth that persist all through modern times,” State Department whistleblower and author Peter Van Buren said on The Scott Horton Show (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YIK8p-5DTV4).[/color][/color]
[color=var(--print_on_web_bg_color, var(--color-primary))][color=var(--print_on_web_bg_color, var(--color-primary))]The Hiroshima myth fosters a depraved indifference to civilian casualties associated with US actions abroad, whether it’s women and children slaughtered in a drone strike in Afghanistan, hundreds of thousands dead (https://watson.brown.edu/costsofwar/costs/human/civilians/iraqi) in an unwarranted invasion of Iraq, or a baby who dies for lack of imported medicine (https://starkrealities.substack.com/p/advocates-of-economic-sanctions-mirror) in US-sanctioned Iran.[/color][/color]
[color=var(--print_on_web_bg_color, var(--color-primary))][color=var(--print_on_web_bg_color, var(--color-primary))]Ultimately, to embrace the Hiroshima myth is to embrace a truly sinister principle: That, in the correct circuмstances, it’s right for governments to intentionally harm innocent civilians. Whether the harm is inflicted by bombs or sanctions, it’s a philosophy that mirrors the morality of al Qaeda (https://starkrealities.substack.com/p/advocates-of-economic-sanctions-mirror).[/color][/color]
[color=var(--print_on_web_bg_color, var(--color-primary))][color=var(--print_on_web_bg_color, var(--color-primary))]That’s not the only thread connecting 1945 to 2023, as Truman’s insistence on unconditional surrender is echoed by the Biden administration’s utter disinterest in pursuing a negotiated peace in Ukraine.[/color][/color]
[color=var(--print_on_web_bg_color, var(--color-primary))][color=var(--print_on_web_bg_color, var(--color-primary))]Today, confronting an adversary with 6,000 nuclear warheads — each a thousand times more powerful than the bombs dropped on Japan — Biden’s own stubborn perpetuation of war puts us all at risk of sharing the fate of Hiroshima and Nagasaki’s innocents.[/color][/color]
I received the Providence to meet Mr. David Dionisi this Spring and he gave me a copy of his book.
(https://m.media-amazon.com/images/I/51SB-CQO3JL._AC_UF1000,1000_QL80_.jpg)
This is the same author David J. Dionisi! Not sure what to make of this book or his other book on 9-11. The reviews give no mention whatsoever of who exactly was responsible for 9-11. I hope I'm wrong, but I got the impression this guy is a gatekeeper -- at least on the subject of 9-11. I never saw anything on 9-11 with a title so strange as this one.
9/11: The Secret War Against the Jєωs
by David J. Dionisi (https://www.amazon.com/David-J-Dionisi/e/B001K8X7U6/ref=dp_byline_cont_book_1) (Author)
5.0 5.0 out of 5 stars (http://javascript:void(0)) 1 rating (https://www.amazon.com/gp/product/1426993730/ref=x_gr_bb_amazon?ie=UTF8&tag=x_gr_bb_amazon-20&linkCode=as2&camp=1789&creative=9325&creativeASIN=1426993730&SubscriptionId=1MGPYB6YW3HWK55XCGG2#customerReviews)
To fully understand why there is a secret war against the Jєωs and all children of God, read this book and for additional information visit the Teach Peace Foundation website.
***************************************************************************************************
This linked article may be another big red flag when it comes to Dionisi.
DEFEATING the BROTHERHOOD of DEATH – AFP Store (americanfreepress.net)
(https://afpstore.americanfreepress.net/product/defeating-the-brotherhood-of-death/)
Out of stock
(https://afpstore.americanfreepress.net/product/defeating-the-brotherhood-of-death/)
[img width=469 height=606 title=BrotherhoodofDeath]https://afpstore.americanfreepress.net/wp-content/uploads/2018/01/BrotherhoodofDeath.jpg[/img] (https://afpstore.americanfreepress.net/wp-content/uploads/2018/01/BrotherhoodofDeath.jpg)[/font][/size][/color][/iurl][/font][/size][/color][/b]
DEFEATING the BROTHERHOOD of DEATH
(https://afpstore.americanfreepress.net/product/defeating-the-brotherhood-of-death/)COMPARE (https://afpstore.americanfreepress.net/?action=yith-woocompare-add-product&id=302)
- Description (https://afpstore.americanfreepress.net/product/defeating-the-brotherhood-of-death/#tab-description)
- Additional information (https://afpstore.americanfreepress.net/product/defeating-the-brotherhood-of-death/#tab-additional_information)
Is an international banking cabal pushing a plan for world government? If so, are they just hungry for absolute power? Or is there an ideological or even pseudo-religious basis for their global domination project? (https://afpstore.americanfreepress.net/product/defeating-the-brotherhood-of-death/)
Defeating the Brotherhood of Death by David Dionisi is not just about the Third Secret of Fatima. It can help you understand what people perceive as supernatural events, for instance, why Pope Francis was influenced by a prophetic event in May 2014, and why the third extraordinary jubilee in the history of the Catholic Church is ending on November 20, 2016. (https://afpstore.americanfreepress.net/product/defeating-the-brotherhood-of-death/)
This book also provides overwhelming concrete evidence that interlocking secret societies seek a third world war to help establish a nєω ωσrℓ∂ σr∂єr. And if you doubt that, take a look at U.S. foreign policy today, which seems designed to foment a major conflict between the most militarily powerful nations on the planet. (https://afpstore.americanfreepress.net/product/defeating-the-brotherhood-of-death/)
Dionisi, a former U.S. Army intelligence officer, argues that at the top of the nєω ωσrℓ∂ σr∂єr power pyramid is The Brotherhood of Death—a dark “religious” cult with roots in ancient Egypt and Babylon. The Brotherhood of Death, which dominates the highest levels of Fɾҽҽmαsσɳɾყ, worships big lies and human sacrifice and believes that wealth and slaves amassed in this life will accompany their owner to the next world, making him a sort of immortal god. The Brotherhood loathes traditional religions, especially the Abrahamic monotheisms; the real purpose of the phony “war on terror,” according to Dionisi, is to turn Christians, Muslims and Jєωs against each other so that monotheism destroys itself.
But this is not a book that is all bad news. Dionisi is surprisingly optimistic about our chances for prevailing against these dark forces.
Softcover, 326 pages, indexed, 75 illustrations, 675 footnotes, five appendices
(https://afpstore.americanfreepress.net/product/defeating-the-brotherhood-of-death/)
https://www.unz.com/kbarrett/the-h0Ɩ0cαųst-and-nuclear-h0Ɩ0cαųst/ (https://www.unz.com/kbarrett/the-h0Ɩ0cαųst-and-nuclear-h0Ɩ0cαųst/)
"The h0Ɩ0cαųst" and Nuclear h0Ɩ0cαųst
fαℓѕє fℓαg Weekly News commentators explore the hidden connections
KEVIN BARRETT (https://www.unz.com/author/kevin-barrett/) • AUGUST 13, 2023
Video Link (https://rumble.com/embed/v34aad7/?pub=4)
Rumble link (https://rumble.com/v36vp0v-the-h0Ɩ0cαųst-vs.-nuclear-h0Ɩ0cαųst-false-flag-weekly-news-with-j.-michael-.html) Bitchute link (https://www.bitchute.com/video/adgl3YyWGygb/)
Is “the h0Ɩ0cαųst” inciting nuclear h0Ɩ0cαųst? That’s the contention, in a nutshell, of Anthony Hall’s article “Addressing ‘The’ h0Ɩ0cαųst in an Era of Heightened Danger of Nuclear h0Ɩ0cαųst (https://anthonyjhall.substack.com/p/addressing-the-h0Ɩ0cαųst-in-an-era),” which inspired the AI-assisted image above. Citing another fαℓѕє fℓαg Weekly News (https://kevinbarrett.heresycentral.is/category/ffwn/) contributor, E. Michael Jones, who recently reviewed the film (https://thephaser.com/2023/08/emj-live-36-part-ii-oppenheimer-applied-Jєωιѕн-science/)Oppenheimer (https://thephaser.com/2023/08/emj-live-36-part-ii-oppenheimer-applied-Jєωιѕн-science/), Hall writes:
Jones congratulates the movie maker, Christopher Nolan, for putting front and centre the thesis that the Manhattan Project was first and foremost a Jєωιѕн project. Robert Oppenheimer was the team leader of the Los Alamos group that produced the original A-bombs. Prof. Jones makes a parallel between what happened in 1945, when the US Armed Forces obliterated Hiroshima and Nagasaki with the new type of weapon, and what is going on now…As Prof. Jones sees it, the large Jєωιѕн contingent currently dominating the foreign policy apparatus of the United States seems to mean business in pushing forward the possibility of a US-driven nuclear confrontation with China and Russia. In trying to show the connections between many historical and contemporary dots, the commentator expresses the view that The h0Ɩ0cαųst has provided the dominant narrative defining much about the order and disorder engulfing us. As Jones sees it, the US Empire, which became a worldwide infrastructure of imperial power after 1945, grew up on the foundations of The h0Ɩ0cαųst narrative.
How does the mainstream h0Ɩ0cαųst narrative alleging the murder of six million Jєωs, mostly in gas chambers, as part of an early-1940s official German government total-extermination program, drive the world toward nuclear h0Ɩ0cαųst today? For Dr. Jones and to a lesser extent Dr. Hall, the h0Ɩ0cαųst narrative has sparked the rise of a bitterly vindictive, fanatically self-righteous Jєωιѕн elite that has seized control of US and Western imperial policy and is driving it over the nuclear cliff. For Jones, there is a theological as well as political dimension to the tragedy: He sees today’s “Jєωs” as descendants of the people who rejected Jesus, and attributes to them a “revolutionary spirit (https://www.fidelitypress.org/book-products/the-Jєωιѕн-revolutionary-spirit)” bent on denying, rejecting, or overthrowing God and His creation. That destructive impulse towards God and creation is, in Jones’s view, a key factor driving the world towards nuclear war.
The development of nuclear weapons may have been a largely Jєωιѕн project propelled by scientists who feared and hated Hitler. But it is far from clear that the world’s first two nuclear h0Ɩ0cαųsts—the twin sacrifices of the populations of Hiroshima and Nagasaki in fiery burnt offerings—were primarily the work of Jєωs. Overall, Oppenheimer and his fellow Jєωιѕн scientists seem to have been, if anything, less enthusiastic about those bombings than their non-Jєωιѕн counterparts. Gen. Leslie Groves, very much a goy, directed the Manhattan Project and according to Greg Mitchell (https://www.motherjones.com/politics/2023/08/nagasaki-nuclear-bomb-anniversary-oppenheimer/) among others “fiercely promoted using the first bomb and stifled attempts by scientists (not including Oppenheimer) to convince Truman otherwise.” Groves was also, according to Mitchell, “the man perhaps most responsible for the Nagasaki bomb”—which, by alleged coincidence, detonated directly above Nagasaki’s cathedral, the center of heroic Christianity in Asia. (Nagasaki’s Christians were the descendants of persecutions that made Rome’s look like proverbial tea parties.) We are told that bad visibility caused the bombing team to randomly defecate their payload, which like bird excrement over a luckless bald man, just happened to drop directly above the dome. One might be excused for doubting that coincidence theory: David Dionisi certainly does. (Check out my interview with Dionisi (https://www.unz.com/audio/kbarrett_david-dionisi-on-the-new-world-order-brotherhood-of-death/) and James Perloff’s book review (https://jamesperloff.net/book-review-atomic-bomb-secrets/).)
But freemasonic ritual or not, the twin h0Ɩ0cαųsts of 1945 were certainly satanic (https://www.unz.com/audio/kbarrett_edward-curtin-on-the-satanic-nature-of-the-atomic-bombings-of-hiroshima-and-nagasaki/). Gary Kohls (https://consortiumnews.com/2015/08/09/christianity-and-the-nagasaki-crime/) writes:
At 11:02 am, during Thursday morning mass, hundreds of Nagasaki Christians were boiled, evaporated, carbonized or otherwise disappeared in a scorching, radioactive fireball that exploded 500 meters above the cathedral. The black rain that soon came down from the mushroom cloud contained the mingled cellular remains of many Nagasaki Shintoists, Buddhists and Christians. The theological implications of Nagasaki’s Black Rain surely should boggle the minds of theologians of all denominations. Most Nagasaki Christians did not survive the blast. 6,000 of them died instantly, including all who were at confession that morning. Of the 12,000 church members, 8,500 of them eventually died as a result of the bomb. Many of the others were seriously sickened with a highly lethal entirely new disease: radiation sickness.
The nuclear incinerations of Hiroshima and Nagasaki, like the less-high-tech burnings of Tokyo and Dresden and other cities, were h0Ɩ0cαųsts in the word’s two primary senses: “mass slaughters of civilians” and “burnt offerings, fiery sacrifices.” The big-H h0Ɩ0cαųst, by contrast, may have involved the mass killing of civilians, but is said to have been done by gas and bullets, not fire. So how did it come to be called a h0Ɩ0cαųst? According to Josh Fleet (https://www.huffpost.com/entry/the-word-h0Ɩ0cαųst-history-and-meaning_n_1229043), a former kosher winemaker and founder of Phish тαℓмυd:
The usage came about gradually. The lower-case “h0Ɩ0cαųst” has described (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Names_of_the_h0Ɩ0cαųst) the violent deaths of large groups of people probably since the 18th century, according the Oxford English Dictionary. Before World War II, the word was used by Winston Churchill and others to refer to the genocide of Armenians during World War I. In 1933, “h0Ɩ0cαųst” was first associated with the nαzιs (https://www.forward.com/articles/2793/) after a major book burning. And after Word War II, the “Final Solution (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Final_Solution)” was often called a h0Ɩ0cαųst. By the 1960s, according to the (http://www.Jєωιѕнmag.com/107mag/h0Ɩ0cαųstword/h0Ɩ0cαųstword.htm)Jєωιѕн Magazine (http://www.Jєωιѕнmag.com/107mag/h0Ɩ0cαųstword/h0Ɩ0cαųstword.htm), it became common to refer to the nαzι genocide of Jєωs as “The h0Ɩ0cαųst.”
That’s plausible, if still somewhat mysterious. But why did h0Ɩ0cαųst become associated with alleged gassing deaths, rather than the burning deaths of Hiroshima and Nagasaki (and Tokyo and Dresden)?* Because the corpses of the alleged Jєωιѕн gassing victims are said to have been burned (which conveniently explains the paucity of forensic evidence)? Fleet:
Still, the magnitude and uniqueness of this catastrophic event in Jєωιѕн history transcends the meaning of words and defies understanding. Yes, many of nαzι’s victims (sic) were consumed wholly by flame. But was this some sort of divine retribution for the sins of a nation? “I wouldn’t want to know the God who sacrificed these people,” (h0Ɩ0cαųst Studies professor Michael) Berenbaum said.
That last paragraph is quite revealing. The real meaning of The h0Ɩ0cαųst, for the likes of Fleet and Berenbaum, is that it transcends meaning and defies understanding. In other words, it must not be thought or spoken of rationally or empirically or historically, but only theologically. Like the God of negative theology and mysticism, The h0Ɩ0cαųst is absolutely unique and ineffable. But h0Ɩ0cαųst worship goes beyond negative theology and becomes anti-theology. The whole point is to deny and revile God: “I wouldn’t want to know the God who sacrificed these people.” Which brings us back to square one: E. Michael Jones’s contention that Jєωs are at war with God and His creation.
I’m not sure that’s entirely true of pre-h0Ɩ0cαųst Jєωs. Many of them just worshipped G*d like the rest of us. But it does seem to fit the post-h0Ɩ0cαųst Jєωιѕн zeitgeist. My first religious studies mentor, Jacob Needleman, Allah yarhamhu, memorably told me that the h0Ɩ0cαųst had had a catastrophic effect on the Western world’s faith in God, starting with the Jєωs. “How can you believe in a God who allowed THAT to happen” has become the rallying cry of all manner of atheism, irreligion, blasphemy, and satanism (as well as some pretty decent Protestant theology (https://www.unz.com/article/god-exists-the-rest-is-speculation/), but that’s an outlying exception).
In conclusion, I’m afraid that my esteemed fαℓѕє fℓαg Weekly News colleagues are right: In the emerging Godless world, anchored by the official h0Ɩ0cαųst narrative that explains why we must all revile God and deny Him and rebel against Him, ethnic-but-not-religious Jєωs, with their persecution complex and maniacally paranoid tribalism and insufferable self-righteousness and Straussian machevellianism, have become the ideological, financial, and political leaders of the American Empire—and are driving it, and the world, toward nuclear destruction.
–
*A Freudian attuned to the unconscious’s genius at word-play designed to hide unpleasant truth from conscious awareness might wonder whether the transfer of the word h0Ɩ0cαųst from the all-too-real h0Ɩ0cαųsts of Hiroshima, Nagasaki, Tokyo, Dresden, etc. to the exaggerated propaganda version of Germany’s ethnic cleansing of European Jєωs, was intended to hide the guilt of the Allies—who had perpetrated many real, fiery h0Ɩ0cαųsts—by falsely blaming a not-so-firey “h0Ɩ0cαųst” on their German victims.
*****************************************************
anarchyst (https://www.unz.com/comments/all/?commenterfilter=anarchyst) says:
August 14, 2023 at 1:23 am GMT • 1.0 hours ago (https://www.unz.com/kbarrett/the-h0Ɩ0cαųst-and-nuclear-h0Ɩ0cαųst/#comment-6104346) • 300 Words ↑ (https://www.unz.com/kbarrett/the-h0Ɩ0cαųst-and-nuclear-h0Ɩ0cαųst/#)
I wouldn’t discount the “Samson Option”.
The zionists are stupid enough to try it, especially if the world goes against them and demands a real solution to the “Palestinian situation”. Notice that I did not call the Palestinian situation a “problem” as it is the foreign zionist Jєω interlopers who are the “problem”.
Keep in mind that no country that possesses live “nukes” will be attacked or invaded. North Korea, India, Pakistan, and other countries are smart to keep their nukes under wraps and not succuмb to the demands of “international nuclear arms inspectors”. This is the only thing keeping the world “deep state” from attacking them.
That being said, the same should apply to israel (but does not). Every country’s nukes are within the borders of their respective countries, but not so for israel. You see, israel’s nukes are already “in place” and as such, no delivery systems are needed. Israel’s nuclear “Damocles swords” are in major cities around the world and are ready to go at a moment’s notice. This is a major reason why israel refuses to allow “international nuclear arms inspectors” to perform inspections. Israel could not account for all of its nukes.
The next “9-11” will be a nuclear detonation (not an exchange or other conflagration) in a major American or European city. Look for an israeli nuke to be detonated in Los Angeles, Chicago or Atlanta. “Jєω York City” is “off-limits” as it is the Jєωιѕн seat of power in the USA. European targets will be Rome, Brussels or Paris. Jєωs would LOVE to destroy the seat of the Roman Catholic Church, so look at Rome as being a prime target.
Of course, the nuclear detonation will be blamed on an Arab country, passports being found in the “rubble”, just as with 9-11 (yeah, right).
If I had my way, israel would be “embargoed” until it produces ALL of its nukes for international inspection.