Send CathInfo's owner Matthew a gift from his Amazon wish list:
https://www.amazon.com/hz/wishlist/ls/25M2B8RERL1UO

Author Topic: Fr. Paul Robinson v. Robert Sungenis  (Read 6821 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Pax Vobis

  • Supporter
Re: Fr. Paul Robinson v. Robert Sungenis
« Reply #5 on: October 12, 2018, 10:17:14 AM »
Quote
Point 4 -
It’s not “Biblicism” that is the issue, but what verses the Church has already
decided to be interpreted literally. The die has already been cast, but Fr.
Robinson is trying to change it. Fr. Robinson has chosen NOT to interpret
Genesis literally just as the Protestants have chosen not to interpret Mat 26:26
literally. They come from the same mold—the mold in which the individual
chooses what is literal instead of the Church. The Fathers, backed by Leo XIII,
told us that everything in the Bible is to be interpreted literally, unless it is
unreasonable or impossible to do so. The science Fr. Robinson attempts to use
to deliteralize the Bible is nothing but unproven theory. Without the slightest
critical evaluation, Fr. Robinson accepts what they claim about the Big Bang
and long ages, and they become is “sole” authority.

This is a great point by Mr Sungenis.  Fr R tries to write-off all previous biblical interpretations so he can 'start from scratch' with modern science.  Fr R wants to interpret the bible according to modern science.  That's totally backwards!  You have to start with the bible and use modern science to explain and ENHANCE the bible.  Faith and Science are meant to work together.  Science is meant to explain the Faith, to work FOR the Faith, because earthly things are lower than spiritual.

Re: Fr. Paul Robinson v. Robert Sungenis
« Reply #6 on: October 12, 2018, 07:48:56 PM »
Wow.  Sungenis wiped the ground with Fr. Robinson.  Clear and concise.  

It's a shame, because Fr. Robinson is a modernist and he doesn't even know it.


Offline Pax Vobis

  • Supporter
Re: Fr. Paul Robinson v. Robert Sungenis
« Reply #7 on: October 12, 2018, 08:44:14 PM »

Quote
Point 30-
R. Sungenis:
The preponderance of the evidence rests with the Fathers and the
tradition. They interpreted the Days of Genesis 1 as 24-hours for 1900 years
until the liberal-influenced Vigouroux began to break under the pressure of
modern theoretical science. Until if and when Fr. Robinson comes up with a
better interpretation than his Big Bang universe, he has no offering to make to
the 1909 PBC. Scientifically, the Big Bang is a total shame. Augustine and
Pope Leo XIII said proof was required to depart from the literal reading of the
Bible, and that is one thing that Fr. Robinson lacks. All he has are theories,
and most of them are dubious. Read my book and find out why.
This is another excellent point by Dr Sungenis.  Fr R labels anyone who interprets Genesis as 24hrs a "biblicist" (i.e. a protestant), yet he ignores the fact that the idea of 24hrs is supported by both the Church Fathers, and consequently, the Church.  

Re: Fr. Paul Robinson v. Robert Sungenis
« Reply #8 on: October 14, 2018, 08:51:54 PM »
Wow.  Sungenis wiped the ground with Fr. Robinson.  Clear and concise.  

It's a shame, because Fr. Robinson is a modernist and he doesn't even know it.

And Fr. Robinson has resorted to judaic propaganda tactics, labeling his critics.

If you disagree with a jew, automatically you're anti-semitic. 

If you disagree with Fr. Robinson, the "science guy" who holds only a Masters degree, you're a "biblicists"  :jester:

Re: Fr. Paul Robinson v. Robert Sungenis
« Reply #9 on: October 25, 2018, 06:42:11 PM »
https://gwwdvd.com/2018/10/11/fr-paul-robinson-v-robert-sungenis/

Fr. Paul Robinson v. Robert Sungenis
Posted: 11 Oct 2018 09:44 AM PDT
Robert Sungenis responds to Fr. Paul Robinson's latest rebuttal regarding evolution. October 2018.
The post Fr. Paul Robinson v. Robert Sungenis appeared first on Journey to the Center of the Universe.


Hmmm.... here's an interesting comment someone ( ) left under Robert Sungenis' response to Fr. Paul Robinson seen at https://gwwdvd.com/2018/10/11/fr-paul-robinson-v-robert-sungenis/: