Send CathInfo's owner Matthew a gift from his Amazon wish list:
https://www.amazon.com/hz/wishlist/ls/25M2B8RERL1UO

Author Topic: Fr. Paul Robinson v. Robert Sungenis  (Read 6857 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Ladislaus

  • Supporter
Re: Fr. Paul Robinson v. Robert Sungenis
« Reply #15 on: October 25, 2018, 08:33:49 PM »
I don't think that's what Fr. Robinson was saying.
 
On the other thread, there's a direct quote of him saying exactly that verbatim.

Re: Fr. Paul Robinson v. Robert Sungenis
« Reply #16 on: October 25, 2018, 08:58:55 PM »

On the other thread, there's a direct quote of him saying exactly that verbatim.
You're interpreting what he said in that quote. Perhaps your interpretation is right, but it's not the only interpretation.


Offline Ladislaus

  • Supporter
Re: Fr. Paul Robinson v. Robert Sungenis
« Reply #17 on: October 25, 2018, 10:22:28 PM »
You're interpreting what he said in that quote. Perhaps your interpretation is right, but it's not the only interpretation.

There was nothing to interpret.  He said that Church tells us we can't oppose various scientific theories on theological grounds but only on scientific.  He's a Modernist.

Re: Fr. Paul Robinson v. Robert Sungenis
« Reply #18 on: October 25, 2018, 11:40:50 PM »
There was nothing to interpret.  He said that Church tells us we can't oppose various scientific theories on theological grounds but only on scientific.  He's a Modernist.
If the Church said there are no theological grounds to object to a specific theory, how would it be modernism to say that?
In another case, if some theory had no theological consequences, would there by any theological grounds to oppose it?

Re: Fr. Paul Robinson v. Robert Sungenis
« Reply #19 on: October 25, 2018, 11:49:34 PM »
If you disagree with Fr. Robinson, the "science guy" who holds only a Masters degree
His masters degree is in "Engineering, Mathematics and Computer Science". To me, that sounds like mostly computer science, and probably only the basic science expected of an engineer. And his philosophy and theology training was at an SSPX seminary. So his credentials are not great.

That said, do any of those criticizing him here have better credentials in science, philosophy or theology?