Send CathInfo's owner Matthew a gift from his Amazon wish list:
https://www.amazon.com/hz/wishlist/ls/25M2B8RERL1UO

Author Topic: Fr. James Jackson FSSP Convicted  (Read 4862 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Simeon

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 1564
  • Reputation: +1028/-101
  • Gender: Female
Fr. James Jackson FSSP Convicted
« on: June 15, 2023, 08:23:57 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • I just learned about this case yesterday, yet it's been ongoing since 2021. I don't recall reading about it here. What a terrible mess we are in. 




    Offline Ladislaus

    • Supporter
    • *****
    • Posts: 48028
    • Reputation: +28375/-5309
    • Gender: Male
    Re: Fr. James Jackson FSSP Convicted
    « Reply #1 on: June 15, 2023, 09:24:16 AM »
  • Thanks!1
  • No Thanks!0
  • I notice that her tone is completely different than when dealing with cases in SSPX, where they'd be foaming at the mouth about SSPX and even at times Archbishop Lefebvre.

    Apart from that, this video is ALL ABOUT HER and justifying herself, etc.  She talks more about herself than about the case.

    As for her saying that it's all about the victims, that's been proven false before, and when I called it out, my post got deleted from their website.

    She's also wrong about receipt vs. possession being the same thing.  Someone can send me something, say, a link by e-mail, and I would be in receipt of it, but if I delete it, then I did not intend to keep possession of it.  So much for her background in law.  That said, he was certainly in possession of it and not just receipt ... just pleading guilty to receipt as part of the plea bargain.


    Offline Ladislaus

    • Supporter
    • *****
    • Posts: 48028
    • Reputation: +28375/-5309
    • Gender: Male
    Re: Fr. James Jackson FSSP Convicted
    « Reply #2 on: June 15, 2023, 09:34:09 AM »
  • Thanks!1
  • No Thanks!0
  • It's also garbage that you can't hack into a computer and "upload" content from it.  Hackers absolutely can get full control of your system where they can both download and upload stuff.  That's not to say this was the case with Fr. Jackson, but her claims that it's impossible are nonsense.  I've seen corporate servers hacked where traffic was going outbound from it.  That's in fact how they get secure information off the servers and send it back to their servers to use.

    Offline Vanguard

    • Jr. Member
    • **
    • Posts: 211
    • Reputation: +138/-17
    • Gender: Female
    Re: Fr. James Jackson FSSP Convicted
    « Reply #3 on: June 15, 2023, 10:09:58 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • She sounds a bit like the True Restoration guy. It’s too bad that the priest wasn’t stronger. If you have a problem like this, please stay off the internet. 

    Offline Ladislaus

    • Supporter
    • *****
    • Posts: 48028
    • Reputation: +28375/-5309
    • Gender: Male
    Re: Fr. James Jackson FSSP Convicted
    « Reply #4 on: June 15, 2023, 11:13:15 AM »
  • Thanks!1
  • No Thanks!0
  • She sounds a bit like the True Restoration guy. It’s too bad that the priest wasn’t stronger. If you have a problem like this, please stay off the internet.

    Yeah, it's sad.  There's a saying corruptio optimi pessima, i.e. "the corruption of the best is the worst", similar to "the higher they go, the harder they fall".

    At least it would appear that he didn't personally molest or assault children, but once someone starts getting into material of that variety, it probably would have just been a matter of time.

    But the majority of the video was about Niles, making it about herself, and justifying herself.

    MUCH different tone against FSSP than against SSPX, and in fact, she used this to attack SSPX (couldn't help herself).  You could say that's because SSPX was more about the coverup, except that she called out that a couple of priests of FSSP appeared to be trying to protect Father Jackson.  While she mentioned that, it was not accompanied with the inevitable 10-minute rant about the EEEE-vil of FSSP that she or Voris would have hurled against SSPX. 

    In fact, given Voris' past lifestyle, which went beyond mere porn (but actually living it out), why aren't they going after Voris and saying that he should not be stood up as some kind of public figure?

    She was appalled that Father Jackson was not edited out of videos about the TLM.  Well, then Voris should be edited out of Church Militant for his equally-unsavory past.  Instead, he's the face of neo-quasi-Trad conservative Novus Ordism.

    FSSP had a bad priest, but SSPX is ...


    Offline Vanguard

    • Jr. Member
    • **
    • Posts: 211
    • Reputation: +138/-17
    • Gender: Female
    Re: Fr. James Jackson FSSP Convicted
    « Reply #5 on: June 15, 2023, 11:36:12 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Yeah, somewhat self righteous. Probably got a lot of hater’s on her previous commentary.  

    I haven’t heard her speak about the SSPX, but I think the FSSP was set up as an alternative to the SSPX. I know several people who go to both depending upon the circuмstances of the week.

    Offline Ladislaus

    • Supporter
    • *****
    • Posts: 48028
    • Reputation: +28375/-5309
    • Gender: Male
    Re: Fr. James Jackson FSSP Convicted
    « Reply #6 on: June 15, 2023, 11:52:07 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • So Niles was attacking this site for "defending" Father Jackson.  He doesn't look like it to me ...


    But I can see why they would attack them.

    Offline Simeon

    • Full Member
    • ***
    • Posts: 1564
    • Reputation: +1028/-101
    • Gender: Female
    Re: Fr. James Jackson FSSP Convicted
    « Reply #7 on: June 15, 2023, 11:58:38 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • I notice that her tone is completely different than when dealing with cases in SSPX, where they'd be foaming at the mouth about SSPX and even at times Archbishop Lefebvre.

    Apart from that, this video is ALL ABOUT HER and justifying herself, etc.  She talks more about herself than about the case.

    As for her saying that it's all about the victims, that's been proven false before, and when I called it out, my post got deleted from their website.

    She's also wrong about receipt vs. possession being the same thing.  Someone can send me something, say, a link by e-mail, and I would be in receipt of it, but if I delete it, then I did not intend to keep possession of it.  So much for her background in law.  That said, he was certainly in possession of it and not just receipt ... just pleading guilty to receipt as part of the plea bargain.

    Yes, I chose this video because by it I was alerted to the existence of the case. I had no idea this was going on. And secondly, though preachy and self-righteous in some sense, it gave a good overview of the facts.

    Did you know about this one, Lad? 


    Offline Simeon

    • Full Member
    • ***
    • Posts: 1564
    • Reputation: +1028/-101
    • Gender: Female
    Re: Fr. James Jackson FSSP Convicted
    « Reply #8 on: June 15, 2023, 12:04:23 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!1
  • Yeah, somewhat self righteous. Probably got a lot of hater’s on her previous commentary. 

    I haven’t heard her speak about the SSPX, but I think the FSSP was set up as an alternative to the SSPX. I know several people who go to both depending upon the circuмstances of the week.

    This one hit much closer to home, as she is an FSSP attendee the last twenty years. Apparently she took mega heat from inside her own enclave. That would go far to explain the long self-justification spiel.

    I give her credit for going after this one. He's an enormous fish. If she ever overstepped the line in her coverage of SSPX cases, she certainly "repaired" for it by a tremendous amount of suffering in her advocacy here. I can see that she has suffered - but she's very tough. And I find it interesting that she's tough without ever having actually practiced law. Then again, what Catholic who has navigated traddiedom is not made tough by it? ;)

    Offline Ladislaus

    • Supporter
    • *****
    • Posts: 48028
    • Reputation: +28375/-5309
    • Gender: Male
    Re: Fr. James Jackson FSSP Convicted
    « Reply #9 on: June 15, 2023, 03:21:13 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Did you know about this one, Lad?

    No, I hadn't heard about this, but I don't follow too closely the goings on of the FSSP.

    Offline jen51

    • Sr. Member
    • ****
    • Posts: 2039
    • Reputation: +2111/-94
    • Gender: Female
    Re: Fr. James Jackson FSSP Convicted
    « Reply #10 on: June 15, 2023, 03:46:24 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • So what ever came of this. Is he in prison now? 
    Religion clean and undefiled before God and the Father, is this: to visit the fatherless and widows in their tribulation: and to keep one's self unspotted from this world.
    ~James 1:27


    Offline AMDGJMJ

    • Hero Member
    • *****
    • Posts: 4162
    • Reputation: +2538/-95
    • Gender: Female
    Re: Fr. James Jackson FSSP Convicted
    « Reply #11 on: June 15, 2023, 04:24:16 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • So what ever came of this. Is he in prison now?
    https://twitter.com/jdflynn/status/1666933456549580800

    It seems he pleaded guilty and will likely be sentenced to 5-20 years in September.

    https://fssp.com/statement-on-fr-jackson/
    "Jesus, Meek and Humble of Heart, make my heart like unto Thine!"

    http://whoshallfindavaliantwoman.blogspot.com/

    Offline Jr1991

    • Full Member
    • ***
    • Posts: 721
    • Reputation: +329/-90
    • Gender: Male
    Re: Fr. James Jackson FSSP Convicted
    « Reply #12 on: June 16, 2023, 12:23:41 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • This story, I believe, was discussed here sometime last year. Most of the Catholic “media” tried to cover it up. 

    Offline hollingsworth

    • Sr. Member
    • ****
    • Posts: 2834
    • Reputation: +2933/-523
    • Gender: Male
    Re: Fr. James Jackson FSSP Convicted
    « Reply #13 on: June 16, 2023, 10:49:40 AM »
  • Thanks!1
  • No Thanks!0

  • Quote
    Ladislas: I notice that her tone is completely different than when dealing with cases in SSPX, where they'd be foaming at the mouth about SSPX and even at times Archbishop Lefebvre.

    Apart from that, this video is ALL ABOUT HER and justifying herself, etc.  She talks more about herself than about the case.


    This is not about Christine Niles.  It is about the raging forces of Hell attempting to destroy the Church.  Niles is merely a messenger trying go awaken faithful Catholics to the present realities.  Pray much! 

    Offline Ladislaus

    • Supporter
    • *****
    • Posts: 48028
    • Reputation: +28375/-5309
    • Gender: Male
    Re: Fr. James Jackson FSSP Convicted
    « Reply #14 on: June 16, 2023, 12:38:17 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0

  • This is not about Christine Niles.

    Of course it's not.  But Niles made this video all about her, and justifying herself.