Send CathInfo's owner Matthew a gift from his Amazon wish list:
https://www.amazon.com/hz/wishlist/ls/25M2B8RERL1UO

Author Topic: Fr. James Jackson FSSP Convicted  (Read 4963 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Vanguard

  • Supporter
Re: Fr. James Jackson FSSP Convicted
« Reply #5 on: June 15, 2023, 11:36:12 AM »
Yeah, somewhat self righteous. Probably got a lot of hater’s on her previous commentary.  

I haven’t heard her speak about the SSPX, but I think the FSSP was set up as an alternative to the SSPX. I know several people who go to both depending upon the circuмstances of the week.

Offline Ladislaus

  • Supporter
Re: Fr. James Jackson FSSP Convicted
« Reply #6 on: June 15, 2023, 11:52:07 AM »
So Niles was attacking this site for "defending" Father Jackson.  He doesn't look like it to me ...


But I can see why they would attack them.


Re: Fr. James Jackson FSSP Convicted
« Reply #7 on: June 15, 2023, 11:58:38 AM »
I notice that her tone is completely different than when dealing with cases in SSPX, where they'd be foaming at the mouth about SSPX and even at times Archbishop Lefebvre.

Apart from that, this video is ALL ABOUT HER and justifying herself, etc.  She talks more about herself than about the case.

As for her saying that it's all about the victims, that's been proven false before, and when I called it out, my post got deleted from their website.

She's also wrong about receipt vs. possession being the same thing.  Someone can send me something, say, a link by e-mail, and I would be in receipt of it, but if I delete it, then I did not intend to keep possession of it.  So much for her background in law.  That said, he was certainly in possession of it and not just receipt ... just pleading guilty to receipt as part of the plea bargain.

Yes, I chose this video because by it I was alerted to the existence of the case. I had no idea this was going on. And secondly, though preachy and self-righteous in some sense, it gave a good overview of the facts.

Did you know about this one, Lad? 

Re: Fr. James Jackson FSSP Convicted
« Reply #8 on: June 15, 2023, 12:04:23 PM »
Yeah, somewhat self righteous. Probably got a lot of hater’s on her previous commentary. 

I haven’t heard her speak about the SSPX, but I think the FSSP was set up as an alternative to the SSPX. I know several people who go to both depending upon the circuмstances of the week.

This one hit much closer to home, as she is an FSSP attendee the last twenty years. Apparently she took mega heat from inside her own enclave. That would go far to explain the long self-justification spiel.

I give her credit for going after this one. He's an enormous fish. If she ever overstepped the line in her coverage of SSPX cases, she certainly "repaired" for it by a tremendous amount of suffering in her advocacy here. I can see that she has suffered - but she's very tough. And I find it interesting that she's tough without ever having actually practiced law. Then again, what Catholic who has navigated traddiedom is not made tough by it? ;)

Offline Ladislaus

  • Supporter
Re: Fr. James Jackson FSSP Convicted
« Reply #9 on: June 15, 2023, 03:21:13 PM »
Did you know about this one, Lad?

No, I hadn't heard about this, but I don't follow too closely the goings on of the FSSP.