Send CathInfo's owner Matthew a gift from his Amazon wish list:https://www.amazon.com/hz/wishlist/ls/25M2B8RERL1UO
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
I notice that her tone is completely different than when dealing with cases in SSPX, where they'd be foaming at the mouth about SSPX and even at times Archbishop Lefebvre.Apart from that, this video is ALL ABOUT HER and justifying herself, etc. She talks more about herself than about the case.As for her saying that it's all about the victims, that's been proven false before, and when I called it out, my post got deleted from their website.She's also wrong about receipt vs. possession being the same thing. Someone can send me something, say, a link by e-mail, and I would be in receipt of it, but if I delete it, then I did not intend to keep possession of it. So much for her background in law. That said, he was certainly in possession of it and not just receipt ... just pleading guilty to receipt as part of the plea bargain.
Yeah, somewhat self righteous. Probably got a lot of hater’s on her previous commentary. I haven’t heard her speak about the SSPX, but I think the FSSP was set up as an alternative to the SSPX. I know several people who go to both depending upon the circuмstances of the week.
Did you know about this one, Lad?