CathInfo.com

contra, if today I acknowledge that Bobby Prevost is a non-Catholic and therefore cannot possibly be the Vicar of Christ's Church on earth - this actually implies a whole different way of viewing/thinking of the papacy (a healthy Catholic way I would argue) AND it implies action, by positively having no communion with a false Pope whatsoever and cutting all ties to the false church spawned at Vatican II. But that is where the fear kicks in and it gets "real" because they think if they view the Vatican like that for 30+years they will never be able to return if somehow things could be righted there (don't ask me how). But this isn't prudence as much as fear. And it also shows a lack of trust in God and a weak faith, IMO. Religious truth matters for it's own sake, and the papacy question goes well beyond mere Church politics - it is in the realm of do, or die in the fight for our souls (again IMO).

Again, you can have whatever opinion you want. Opinions are like a-----s (armpits), everyone has one and it stinks.

But you have a distorted, inaccurate view of how non-sede Traditional Catholics live, act, and believe on a daily basis. You either don't know any non-Sede Trad families IRL, or you only know OF a few, superficially (as names at work, names on the Internet, etc.)

But your opinion has been proven invalid. There have been sedes, large groups of them, even WHOLE CHAPELS of them since the 80's, and what is the current status of the Crisis? Still ongoing? Yeah, I thought so. 

Yup, Sedevacantism and $5 will get you a cup of coffee. Sedevacantism and $10 will get you a value meal at McDonald's.

Again, Moral certainty isn't dogma.

Let me ask this, if you will be so kind as to answer, "Are you morally certain either way if the current man claiming to be Pope is actually the Pope?

You learn well. Those are my words. "Moral certainty is not dogma".

I have enough moral certainty to act as I need to, yes. But again, all I need to do is go to Mass, believe and practice the Catholic Faith as it was always believed and practiced, and avoid the contagion of Vatican II and the Conciliar Church.
I'm doing all those things, without "sedevacantism". So apparently it isn't necessary. C'est la vie.

Moral certainty just means "enough clarity for ME to act on, to make a decision on." And I'm morally certain there is a Crisis in the Church, and that the post-V2 Popes can't be obeyed as they overstep their authority and attempt to start a literal new religion. Vatican II has proven to be destructive of the Faith, and of souls.

Now you want to get all philosophical and ask, "WHY would God allow this?", "HOW could the Pope promote a liturgy that is noxious to souls?" I'm going to have to respond "I don't know" because I have no friggin idea.
Ask God if you must demand an answer. It wasn't my idea, nor is it "my problem". My only "problem" or job is to save my soul, and those of my family, during this Crisis. Everything else is an extra, or even a distraction.

The difference between the status of the Pope and the shape of the earth, is that the latter CAN BE determined. Which is quite refreshing, I might add! Because I'm quite sick of the Pope issue, which has no definitive answer. Still waiting for God's big "reveal" on that one, to sort everything out. In the meantime, we wait, watch and pray (and keep the Faith).

So it seems that you do NOT have moral certainty one way or the other, on THAT question. 

You still don't understand the limitations of moral certainty.