Send CathInfo's owner Matthew a gift from his Amazon wish list:
https://www.amazon.com/hz/wishlist/ls/25M2B8RERL1UO

Author Topic: Flat Earth-curious  (Read 48204 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Re: Flat Earth-curious
« Reply #115 on: January 08, 2022, 07:05:11 PM »
Sure, I will give you that haha. The problem with this experiment is that it's impossible for it to be entirely accurate. It can demonstrate ideas, but of course cannot prove anything. Staring at the sun causes eye damage. The flashlight and the candle are a lot less bright than the sun. They also throw light in a different way (at least as far as RE is concerned, with the idea of a globe sun)
Not to mention, for RE, the sun is thought to be very very far away. Hard to replicate that on small scale unfortunately. I do understand why you would prefer to use the flat horizon paper towel model, but really what I would like to see is a big huge globe to test! Unfortunately all I had was the onion :laugh1:

Did you try the side view with the paper towels? It actually did still represent what the onion experiment did, at least for me. The light can be well below the top of the paper towels and still be illuminating the top.

For the ceiling light, try turning the photos upside-down. Now, consider the light bulb to be the "sun". You can see that the light bulb is well below the horizon/ground (ceiling) but it still brightly illuminates the ground/ceiling. It "curves" around a corner to do so. If you compare it to the part of the ceiling that is higher up, you can see that that part cannot be touched by the light in the same way. This is where the light hits its limit and cannot curve far enough.

(Edited to include visual for ceiling light example)

Imagine you are standing where the little orange guy is (minus the fact that his feet are hanging off the edge lol)

The sunlight still reaches him even though the sun has dipped completely below the horizon/ground/whatever you want to call it.





Well, here's the thing about the side view you describe.  It puts the person on the top of the curve.  I was assuming the person would be on one side of the curve and the sun on the opposite side of the curve like the hill in your drawing.  That way the sun is getting "hidden behind the curve" like supposedly what happens at sunset. 


 
There is a bump between the person and the sun on ball earth.

No bump, no hidden sun behind the curve.

So the guy can't be standing on the top of the curve.

I see what you are saying with the recessed ceiling light now.  Thanks!

But the light is all around like the sunlight in the sky.   

We are talking specifically about the "reflection" or sun glint...that shiny narrow line of light that extends across the water.

It's a reflection that demonstrates the angle of the sun hitting the water.

When the candle or flashlight is this high behind the paper towel the light will extend to the person on the other side of the hill/bump/curve.






When the candle/flashlight is lower it looks very much like this.






Except with the paper towel roll in the dark room the light does not reach to the other side of the curve.  It doesn't go over the bump.

I don't know how to load photos or I would show it.

The paper towel with the light behind it in a dark room looks just like this photo actually...it's a really good replication

except the sunglint wouldn't reach over the curve to the feet of the photographer.  The photographer would be standing with total darkness at his feet.

If the photographer stood on top of the curve he would still see the sun and it wouldn't be setting or "hiding behind the curve." Where is the horizon line?

It wouldn't be "sinking down below the horizon line".

For the sun to hide behind the curve,  there has to be a bump between the viewer and the sun on the ball earth.







Re: Flat Earth-curious
« Reply #116 on: January 08, 2022, 08:08:41 PM »
I just tried this experiment. As far as I could reach, the coin did not disappear from the bottom up UNLESS I allowed the table to actually obstruct my view of the coin. Similarly to how the RE model says that the curve of the earth obstructs view of the sun and makes it disappear, if you hold your eyes low enough compared to the edge of the table, the bottom of the coin is cut off.

This is not a good representation of flat earth however. On FE, your viewpoint is positioned ABOVE the ground, which is why you can see so far. On the table, in order to make the coin disappear you have to have almost no real view of the table at all. In fact, you pretty much just see the corner! I don't think flat earth is supposed to have corners (at least not in that sense lol). You could probably replicate that viewpoint of the sun on FE if you were standing inside of a trench, but not if you were standing on flat ground.







Yes, obstruction of view. :)

When the table starts to obstruct your view it's because of the visual convergence of what is above the horizon line with what is below.  

This convergence starts to happen before the vanishing point.

The table example is not perfect of course but it's an experiment to replicate what happens when something moves towards and beyond the vanishing point on the horizon.


Your experiment never demonstrated the vanishing point.  

Dave Weiss demonstrated how it works with his kitchen counter in the video I shared in the other thread, but he would need a much longer counter to demonstrate it better since he used the mountains as the vanishing point horizon line with the sun overhead.  

If he had kept going further with a lonnng countertop  he could have demonstrated the sun meeting with the counter top at vanishing point.  

Dave's "sun" would converge with the counter top in the far distance.  The bottom part of the "sun" (ball on the string above the counter) would visually disappear from the bottom up until the whole thing disappeared.  It would look like it went "down behind the counter" even though in reality it stayed the same height above the counter.  It's just perspective.









If you strung a ball on those lines above the tracks and moved it along at the same height above the tracks the ball would eventually look like it was getting cut off on the bottom as it converged with the horizon shortly before it disappeared altogether.

In real life the ball would stay at the same height moving along the lines above the tracks.  Yet it would look like it the ball went down the further away it got.  Then it would start to disappear from the bottom up.








So we are replicating what happens when an object moves towards vanishing point on the table.  Not as good as the ball overhead but it still works.

Objects that move beyond the vanishing point can no longer be seen.

What happens as the quarter reaches closer to vanishing point?

It starts to get visually cut off from the bottom.  

So you could say "the table starts to obstruct your view" or you could say what is above and below the table is starting to visually converge prior to vanishing point.

Imagine these boxes keep moving forward at the same height across a flat plane.  Would they all crash into each other?  No.  Would it look like they started to converge?  Yes.  When they move away far enough the ones above the horizon line would disappear from the bottom up and the ones below would disappear from the top down.  




Anyway, for the experiment the view of the table has to be split in half at eye level.

The horizon line is always at eye level.  If you sit down at the beach and then you stand up, what happens to the horizon line?  It moves down to remain at eye level.  

The table can be "like" the horizon line for our experiment if we put our eye down at the level of the table so our view is cut in half.

No it's not a horizon line in the distance like at the beach. 

We're making a fake horizon line right up close for our experiment to show convergence before the vanishing point.

As the coin moves beyond the horizon line into the distance it is cut off more and more from the bottom up until it is all gone from view.

That's how the vanishing point perspective works.






You can even do this with your laptop.  Put the bottom at eye level and lay your finger on it.  Now move your finger into the distance.  It starts to disappear from the bottom up.  

Visual convergence before vanishing point.


























Re: Flat Earth-curious
« Reply #117 on: January 08, 2022, 08:46:03 PM »
FEs have made videos of where the sun had appeared to set, where a large part of it was visuall "cut off" and then zoomed in on it and found it still above the horizon.  I'll try to find it.


I've seen that too.  Hard to find them later because the word search doesn't work and they disappear from my Youtube history. :/

Offline Quo vadis Domine

  • Supporter
Re: Flat Earth-curious
« Reply #118 on: January 08, 2022, 08:49:57 PM »

I've seen that too.  Hard to find them later because the word search doesn't work and they disappear from my Youtube history. :/


If this is true and not a fake video, ask yourself why don’t people observe this on a daily basis? Why isn’t the internet rife with videos showing this? 

Re: Flat Earth-curious
« Reply #119 on: January 08, 2022, 09:08:21 PM »

If this is true and not a fake video, ask yourself why don’t people observe this on a daily basis? Why isn’t the internet rife with videos showing this?


That's a good question.  There are probably 100 zoom out videos on the water showing ships and oil rigs disappear and reappear.  Amateurs are using their Nikon p900 or 1000 all around the world and posting those.

Here's a question for you.  How far away does a boat need to get to go over the curve and disappear from view?