Children being forced into unnatural living arrangements is not correct.   Our Lord blessed marriage and choose His Mother and earthly father.  That's the model, prove me wrong.  I mean if you didn't want children why did you make a vow?  Tell me who really cares about the children.   If that doesn't anger you it's hopeless. 

Children being forced into unnatural living arrangements is not correct.  Our Lord blessed marriage and choose His Mother and earthly father.  That's the model, prove me wrong.  I mean if you didn't want children why did you make a vow?  Tell me who really cares about the children.  If that doesn't anger you it's hopeless.

And yet, St. Joachim and Anna gave Our Lady to religious life at the age of 3. There are countless examples in lives of other saints through the ages of them being reared by religious. Your modern Protestant bias is showing.

Fact: nobody cares about you like your parents.   How many of these 39 children are restoring the Church through preaching, or forgiving sins in the confessional?   Sounds like whoever thought that that was a good idea was not tradional or Catholic. 

Fr Feeney was no different than if you or I went off the rails with regards to private judgment, except he aggregated authority to himself as to infallibility on the question. 
He could have corrected abuse and been in obedience to the Church.

Fact: nobody cares about you like your parents.  How many of these 39 children are restoring the Church through preaching, or forgiving sins in the confessional?  Sounds like whoever thought that that was a good idea was not tradional or Catholic.

I strongly suspect that this is not a sincere question because you still have not manned up. And you have not answered the question of the name of the sin that the parents who took religious vows while still providing for the exceptional education of their children committed. The fact that you don't know how many of these children became religious or had lovely families of their own means you should shut up. It would take a book or volumes to tell the story of their impact. Maybe that's the book that needs to be written instead of the story of the one damaged soul whose father sent him into the Center school, pulled him out, and then sent him back when he got a new woman. Facts don't matter to the detractors of Fr. Feeney, however, as has been demonstrated by this thread.

Take any position to the extreme and then you might see how wrong it is.  I mean death after birth when you have valid baptism might be the surest path to eternal bliss.

Yes, it actually is. Your problem is with eternal Rome and basic catechesis, not Fr. Feeney.

I think your beef should be with the parents who made the decisions about THEIR family, not Fr Feeney.  None of these parents were forced to go along with him.  And they all stayed of their own free will.  There wasn't barbed wire and fences around the property. 

Grow up and place your criticism (even if unjustified) where it belongs - with the parents.  Not Fr Feeney.

And at the end of the day, it's all irrelevant to the doctrinal question, but emotional thinkers can't help conflating. It's truly pathetic, though, when such attacks come from other trads, especially those such as the Catholic Family Podcast, whom, it is my understanding, are CMRI affiliated. Of all people, they do not get to cast aspersions of abuse on other trads with the criminal skeletons sitting in their own closet. It is the duty of any Catholic to ascertain the facts before running their mouths. And that clearly was not done.