I saw the movie recently, so I can add my take (or at least some of it).
I remember the locusts being a prominent part of the plot, but I don't remember anything about a fog vax. Intriguingly, the idea of the CEO bad guy in this film (Lewis Dodgson) and his company BioSyn genetically tampering with crops has been around for a long time in the history of the Jurassic Park franchise.
Here's a tidbit about his character that we garner from The Lost World: Jurassic Park novel (quite different from the movie of the same name), taken from a wiki site:
The novel heavily implies that Dodgson has a history of abusing children, starting from sending at least one child to the hospital due to experimental marketing of genetically engineered food products, to killing at least one child in the rabies vaccine's experiment, implying a general distaste for humanity's status on the food chain.
https://villains.fandom.com/wiki/Lewis_Dodgson_(novel)
Here's also a direct quote from the book concerning the actions of this character. Looks like Michael Crichton was ahead of the curve about mad scientists messing with "human gene therapy". Was that concept ever talked about back in the 1990s?
Controversy had dogged his career: as a graduate student at Hopkins, he had been dismissed for planning human gene therapy with FDA permission. Later, after joining BioSyn, he had conducted a controversial rabies-vaccine test in Chile - the illiterate farmers who were the subjects were never informed they were being tested.
The Lost World (cf. Chapter "Exploitation")
I don't remember anything about BioSyn being involved with vaccines in the movie, but I remember that their idea was that you could find cures for human diseases by studying dinosaur genomes - thus the justification for their remote dinosaur research facility/sanctuary. I suppose they may have thrown something in there about creating vaccines (though I think they may have just used the term "medicines" or "cures") from dinosaur genetic material. Of course, in the minds of them masses, sadly "vaccine" is synonymous with medicine/cure, so maybe I'm just writing in circles at this point.
It definitely seems like there was predictive programming concerning that part of the plot regardless, though it has historical precedent in the source material of the series.
There was also predictive programming concerning the "New Normal" of dinosaurs interacting with humanity across the world in this movie. Though it seems like many people in-universe want the dinosaurs killed, we don't encounter any groups in this movie set up to achieve that purpose, to bring things back to "how they used to be".
At the end of the previous
Jurassic World movie,
Jurassic World: Fallen Kingdom (2018), we see the dinosaurs (along with genetic samples) being unleashed the mainland for the first time, introducing this "New Normal". Now fast forward to
Jurassic World: Dominion, which is set in 2022, and we see dinosaurs being kept as pets, being sold in international black markets, and interacting with contemporary wildlife.
Could it be that the dinosaurs now serve as a bit of an analogue, whether intended originally or not, for the COVID nonsense?
You could argue that the directors of these flims were on the know about the plandemic and were asked to make a plot point in the 2018 movie about dinosaurs getting to the mainland and spreading as predictive programming, but I'm not entirely sure I buy into that explanation. I say that because the idea of dinosaurs getting off the islands in this series goes back to the original Jurassic Park novel, and was briefly explored in
The Lost World: Jurassic Park movie with the T-Rex rampage in San Diego. Now, it seems to me that this concept was retroactively used as predictive programming in
Jurassic World Dominion, to normalize the idea of not fighting back against negative world changing events (such as the plandemic).
The only group that seems to curtailing the spread of the dinosaurs is BioSyn, who cooperate with the US Fish & Wildlife Dept. to capture them and airlift them to their sanctuary. It is implied that other governments have a similar relationship with the megacorporation. An allegory for the cooperation between Big Pharma and the governments as the "only solution" for resolving the plandemic?
Maybe I'm thinking too deeply about this, I don't know. I may write more about the movie at a later time, in terms of an overall review.