Send CathInfo's owner Matthew a gift from his Amazon wish list:
https://www.amazon.com/hz/wishlist/ls/25M2B8RERL1UO

Author Topic: Father Pfeiffer slaming Flat Earth, our response  (Read 13690 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Meg

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6173
  • Reputation: +3147/-2941
  • Gender: Female
Re: Father Pfeiffer slaming Flat Earth, our response
« Reply #120 on: September 24, 2017, 10:55:18 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!1
  • Just look at that!  Before I even had time to go and read my own post... thumbs down! Incredible!

    ;D
    "It is licit to resist a Sovereign Pontiff who is trying to destroy the Church. I say it is licit to resist him in not following his orders and in preventing the execution of his will. It is not licit to Judge him, to punish him, or to depose him, for these are acts proper to a superior."

    ~St. Robert Bellarmine
    De Romano Pontifice, Lib.II, c.29


    Offline St Ignatius

    • Full Member
    • ***
    • Posts: 1024
    • Reputation: +794/-158
    • Gender: Male
    Re: Father Pfeiffer slaming Flat Earth, our response
    « Reply #121 on: September 24, 2017, 10:56:27 AM »
  • Thanks!1
  • No Thanks!0
  • Yes, I am the one using the thumbs down option. It's good that the forum allows it. I'm often being thumbed down in return, but that's okay. I expect that.
    That's fine... it's the constant thumbing down without substantive refutation that annoys me... 


    Offline DZ PLEASE

    • Sr. Member
    • ****
    • Posts: 2928
    • Reputation: +741/-787
    • Gender: Male
    • "Lord, have mercy."
    Re: Father Pfeiffer slaming Flat Earth, our response
    « Reply #122 on: September 24, 2017, 10:56:55 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!1
  • That's hilarious... NOT!

    How the culturally debased adopted this "yo momma so fat..." with pride, as a signature of their lowly state of being...

    Now it's far worse because it's manifesting itself intellectually within the ranks of the "Remnant."
    Have you noticed that they are using the thumbs down option more and more as their weapon of choice to respond?
    While I suspect this to be the case, I can't truly say that I know it; it's the nature of this, minimal to nil accountability, "environment" of anonymity.

    The thumbs thing is largely useless, this end at least; it's like voting for the prom queen - an extension of high school.

    That said, it renders it of null effect for a thinking person, otherwise it can be like a feeder bar for a chimp that pushes the "correct" combination of buttons.
    "Lord, have mercy".

    Offline DZ PLEASE

    • Sr. Member
    • ****
    • Posts: 2928
    • Reputation: +741/-787
    • Gender: Male
    • "Lord, have mercy."
    Re: Father Pfeiffer slaming Flat Earth, our response
    « Reply #123 on: September 24, 2017, 10:57:53 AM »
  • Thanks!1
  • No Thanks!0
  • That's fine... it's the constant thumbing down without substantive refutation that annoys me...
    Right, .*. "... useless... "
    "Lord, have mercy".

    Offline kiwiboy

    • Full Member
    • ***
    • Posts: 518
    • Reputation: +217/-455
    • Gender: Male
    Re: Father Pfeiffer slaming Flat Earth, our response
    « Reply #124 on: September 24, 2017, 12:27:26 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Ad hominem attacks? How so?

    If you seriously see it this way, then you're attached to your opinions emotionally rather than intellectually...

    You are demanding one of a superior intellect (Neil in this case) to debase himself to a lower standard of learning and reasoning. His opinions are formed by the skills of critical thinking. He judges the merit of something based on the proper use of reason, study and experience.

    You on the other hand, have adopted another's opinion strictly by the use of the external senses, reason out the window. The modern motion pictures tend to bypass the faculties of the mind. It, by it's very nature, tends to enforce it's objective on one's will... very dangerous to those without prior objective convictions. I'm not saying that boobtube is always a bad thing, but it IS very dangerous to use as a primary source to form an objective opinion on an important matter.

    To sum it up, when a young child enters his first years of elementary training, he is taught by those things which are of a visual nature. As he becomes more mature, those things which are of the visual become less and less... they become more of an aid rather than a necessary tool.
    Ad hominem attacks? You just called me stupid without providing a shred refutation for the videos on the non curvature of the earth?
    How can you claim to be serious?
    Technology is a an indifferent medium. If you are Catholic you know that. You yourself are posting on a web forum!
    Complaining about the fact that the proofs are in videos is ridiculous because the proofs are visual. You can't do most experiments  by just writing about them. They have to be observed.
    So please, just go back to bed if you don't want to engage in serious discussion.
    Eclipses neither prove nor disprove the flat earth.

    "As for whether or not I work for NASA, I'm sorry, but I fail to understand what that could possibly have to do with anything" Neil Obstat, 08-03-2017


    Offline St Ignatius

    • Full Member
    • ***
    • Posts: 1024
    • Reputation: +794/-158
    • Gender: Male
    Re: Father Pfeiffer slaming Flat Earth, our response
    « Reply #125 on: September 24, 2017, 12:51:47 PM »
  • Thanks!1
  • No Thanks!0
  • Ad hominem attacks? You just called me stupid without providing a shred refutation for the videos on the non curvature of the earth?
    How can you claim to be serious?
    Technology is a an indifferent medium. If you are Catholic you know that. You yourself are posting on a web forum!
    Complaining about the fact that the proofs are in videos is ridiculous because the proofs are visual. You can't do most experiments  by just writing about them. They have to be observed.
    So please, just go back to bed if you don't want to engage in serious discussion.
    If you want to equate one that analyizes the evidence by properly using the instruments given to him by God to reach a reasonable conclusion to one who's only evidence is the regurgitation of another's opinion per vadum without any thoughtful consideration...  than yes, I'd say that's stupid.

    Offline kiwiboy

    • Full Member
    • ***
    • Posts: 518
    • Reputation: +217/-455
    • Gender: Male
    Re: Father Pfeiffer slaming Flat Earth, our response
    « Reply #126 on: September 24, 2017, 01:11:47 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Are your posts a joke?

    Are you actually reading your own posts before you put them up?

    You're just throwing around big words to sound intelligent when in fact you are just talking absolute rubbish.

    But so you can't say I didn't respond...

    They are perfectly reasonable. Flat earthers and globalists agree on the circuмference of the earth. Approx 25000 miles.

    If the earth is a ball there must be a curvature at a fixed mathematical rate. 8 inches per mile squared. This means logically that after a certain point objects should cease to be visible once they have gone beyond a vanishing point. If you can see objects which you know to be at a certain point beyond that vanishing point, then you have completely undermined they hypothesis that this rate of curvature exists.

    IT'S THAT SIMPLE.

    The only way you will come to accept this, is to go and do the experiments yourself.
    Eclipses neither prove nor disprove the flat earth.

    "As for whether or not I work for NASA, I'm sorry, but I fail to understand what that could possibly have to do with anything" Neil Obstat, 08-03-2017

    Offline DZ PLEASE

    • Sr. Member
    • ****
    • Posts: 2928
    • Reputation: +741/-787
    • Gender: Male
    • "Lord, have mercy."
    Re: Father Pfeiffer slaming Flat Earth, our response
    « Reply #127 on: September 24, 2017, 01:14:52 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Are your posts a joke?

    Are you actually reading your own posts before you put them up?

    You're just throwing around big words to sound intelligent when in fact you are just talking absolute rubbish.

    But so you can't say I didn't respond...

    They are perfectly reasonable. Flat earthers and globalists agree on the circuмference of the earth. Approx 25000 miles.

    If the earth is a ball there must be a curvature at a fixed mathematical rate. 8 inches per mile squared. This means logically that after a certain point objects should cease to be visible once they have gone beyond a vanishing point. If you can see objects which you know to be at a certain point beyond that vanishing point, then you have completely undermined they hypothesis that this rate of curvature exists.

    IT'S THAT SIMPLE.

    The only way you will come to accept this, is to go and do the experiments yourself.
    The earth is a "ball"? (as in shaped, yes I know you don't mean something to sport with.)
    "Lord, have mercy".


    Offline St Ignatius

    • Full Member
    • ***
    • Posts: 1024
    • Reputation: +794/-158
    • Gender: Male
    Re: Father Pfeiffer slaming Flat Earth, our response
    « Reply #128 on: September 24, 2017, 01:30:52 PM »
  • Thanks!1
  • No Thanks!0
  • Are your posts a joke?
    Guess they could pass as that to the unlearned..
    Quote
    They are perfectly reasonable. Flat earthers and globalists agree on the circuмference of the earth. Approx 25000 miles.
    Thanks but no thanks...

    Don't believe in false ecuмenisim... don't start with the "what we have in common" jargon...

    Go back to your elders and tell them that we Catholics don't want anything to do with their newfound religion....

    Offline kiwiboy

    • Full Member
    • ***
    • Posts: 518
    • Reputation: +217/-455
    • Gender: Male
    Re: Father Pfeiffer slaming Flat Earth, our response
    « Reply #129 on: September 24, 2017, 02:29:25 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Guess they could pass as that to the unlearned..Thanks but no thanks...

    Don't believe in false ecuмenisim... don't start with the "what we have in common" jargon...

    Go back to your elders and tell them that we Catholics don't want anything to do with their newfound religion....
    Glad to see you are exercising humility...

    It's not false ecuмenism, it's logic. Perhaps you have not studied that, which is fair enough. But I can see you are not interested in this discussion, so why don't you just leave?
    Eclipses neither prove nor disprove the flat earth.

    "As for whether or not I work for NASA, I'm sorry, but I fail to understand what that could possibly have to do with anything" Neil Obstat, 08-03-2017

    Offline DZ PLEASE

    • Sr. Member
    • ****
    • Posts: 2928
    • Reputation: +741/-787
    • Gender: Male
    • "Lord, have mercy."
    Re: Father Pfeiffer slaming Flat Earth, our response
    « Reply #130 on: September 24, 2017, 02:35:45 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Glad to see you are exercising humility...

    It's not false ecuмenism, it's logic. Perhaps you have not studied that, which is fair enough. But I can see you are not interested in this discussion, so why don't you just leave?
    Maybe he perhaps with most to all others not of your creed, is more interested not having this "discussion" if you can make that distinction, and more with either the persons "having" it leaving, or at least being less intrusive, boorish, obnoxious, honestly and immediately responsive, and keeping it chained in its own yard instead of splattered everywhere like some vomitous drunk's dinner and "Dewars".
    "Lord, have mercy".


    Offline kiwiboy

    • Full Member
    • ***
    • Posts: 518
    • Reputation: +217/-455
    • Gender: Male
    Re: Father Pfeiffer slaming Flat Earth, our response
    « Reply #131 on: September 24, 2017, 02:39:03 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Maybe he perhaps with most to all others not of your creed, is more interested not having this "discussion" if you can make that distinction, and more with either the persons "having" it leaving, or at least being less intrusive, boorish, obnoxious, honestly and immediately responsive, and keeping it chained in its own yard instead of splattered everywhere like some vomitous drunk's dinner and "Dewars".
    Then stop reading the threads. It's really very easy.

    Surely you have enough self discipline to to that?
    Eclipses neither prove nor disprove the flat earth.

    "As for whether or not I work for NASA, I'm sorry, but I fail to understand what that could possibly have to do with anything" Neil Obstat, 08-03-2017

    Offline DZ PLEASE

    • Sr. Member
    • ****
    • Posts: 2928
    • Reputation: +741/-787
    • Gender: Male
    • "Lord, have mercy."
    Re: Father Pfeiffer slaming Flat Earth, our response
    « Reply #132 on: September 24, 2017, 02:42:04 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!1
  • Then stop reading the threads. It's really very easy.

    Surely you have enough self discipline to to that?
    Which ones? ALL of them?

    I've come to the conclusion that you're a lying ass sir.

    THEY DON'T STAY CONTAINED TO JUST FE THREADS AND YOU KNOW THAT.
    All of you keep you 2D 'Moonie" garbage in it's own can and that will do much to cool things, but we both know that is not how things are done; or do you "...have enough self discipline to (do) that"?
    You're full of it.
    "Lord, have mercy".

    Offline St Ignatius

    • Full Member
    • ***
    • Posts: 1024
    • Reputation: +794/-158
    • Gender: Male
    Re: Father Pfeiffer slaming Flat Earth, our response
    « Reply #133 on: September 24, 2017, 03:20:18 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Didn't find your response(s) wanting anything from me... well put, thanks DZ

    Offline DZ PLEASE

    • Sr. Member
    • ****
    • Posts: 2928
    • Reputation: +741/-787
    • Gender: Male
    • "Lord, have mercy."
    Re: Father Pfeiffer slaming Flat Earth, our response
    « Reply #134 on: September 24, 2017, 03:23:02 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Didn't find your response(s) wanting anything from me... well put, thanks DZ
    In hindsight, could have used at least a check on grammar and punctuation, speaking of drunken verbiage but...

     :cheers:

    "Lord, have mercy".