Send CathInfo's owner Matthew a gift from his Amazon wish list:
https://www.amazon.com/hz/wishlist/ls/25M2B8RERL1UO

Author Topic: fαɢɢօt Elton John blasphemes Jesus  (Read 4416 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Matthew

  • Mod
  • *****
  • Posts: 31182
  • Reputation: +27095/-494
  • Gender: Male
fαɢɢօt Elton John blasphemes Jesus
« on: February 18, 2010, 11:59:13 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • I won't even post the story here -- the headline was more than enough for me.

    What a lot of nerve!

    Elton John is corrupted by the vice of sodomy, so he wants to inflict his misery and corruption on others, including the pure and innocent. What a foul man!

    May God's will be done unto him.

    Matthew
    Want to say "thank you"? 
    You can send me a gift from my Amazon wishlist!
    https://www.amazon.com/hz/wishlist/ls/25M2B8RERL1UO

    Paypal donations: matthew@chantcd.com


    Offline Belloc

    • Hero Member
    • *****
    • Posts: 6600
    • Reputation: +615/-5
    • Gender: Male
    fαɢɢօt Elton John blasphemes Jesus
    « Reply #1 on: February 18, 2010, 01:00:47 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • ah for a Catholic state again....

    Rom 1:26 and following===

    26 For this cause God delivered them up to shameful affections. For their women have changed the natural use into that use which is against nature. 27 And, in like manner, the men also, leaving the natural use of the women, have burned in their lusts one towards another, men with men working that which is filthy, and receiving in themselves the recompense which was due to their error. 28 And as they liked not to have God in their knowledge, God delivered them up to a reprobate sense, to do those things which are not convenient; 29 Being filled with all iniquity, malice, fornication, avarice, wickedness, full of envy, murder, contention, deceit, malignity, whisperers, 30 Detractors, hateful to God, contumelious, proud, haughty, inventors of evil things, disobedient to parents,
    Proud "European American" and prouder, still, Catholic


    Offline Elizabeth

    • Hero Member
    • *****
    • Posts: 4845
    • Reputation: +2194/-15
    • Gender: Female
    fαɢɢօt Elton John blasphemes Jesus
    « Reply #2 on: February 20, 2010, 12:43:25 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • News like that supports the SV Theory-how this can be stated publicly by a Knight is mind-boggling.

    Offline spouse of Jesus

    • Full Member
    • ***
    • Posts: 1903
    • Reputation: +336/-4
    • Gender: Female
    fαɢɢօt Elton John blasphemes Jesus
    « Reply #3 on: February 20, 2010, 08:27:03 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  •    We do not believe in the modern lies about people being born pervert. As these sinful desires are results of sinful lifestyle, which is many times caused by the person's not having access to a lawful marriage, then why we stick soooo rigorously to our ideas and standards of "suitable man" or the "perfect match" at the expese of causing the damnation of "imperfect ones"?
      They would rather see their God blasphemed than allow a lame/unimpeloyed/homely person to marry.

    Offline Matthew

    • Mod
    • *****
    • Posts: 31182
    • Reputation: +27095/-494
    • Gender: Male
    fαɢɢօt Elton John blasphemes Jesus
    « Reply #4 on: February 20, 2010, 10:16:45 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • I don't claim to know everything, but I do know that there is an element to ɧoɱosɛҳųαƖity by which others are RECRUITED (or, corrupted) by existing ɧoɱosɛҳųαƖs.

    I know of at least one case where a normal man was abused as a boy (by someone at a protestant church camp), and he later grew up and abused a boy of his own. It shows first-hand how ɧoɱosɛҳųαƖs are "made" (not born).

    Also, the fact that the "ɧoɱosɛҳųαƖ lifestyle" is intrinsically bound up with promiscuity, lack of commitment, other forms of gluttony and pleasure, and an obsession with the body in general -- there's something wrong there.

    Let's just put it this way. Liberals would maintain that:

    A gαy man is to his boyfriend
    as
    Matthew is to his wife

    But that is not true.

    My wife and I are monogamous, we live our lives based on what God wants (and God clearly does not want premarital sex, promiscuity, or ɧoɱosɛҳųαƖ relationships), we don't obsess about the body all day long, we don't take drugs, nor do we wallow in every kind of pleasure.

    There is no equivalency between "gαy love" and the proper love between a man and a woman.

    It's the difference between eating healthy, well-balanced meals 3 times a day, and constant gluttony on 100% deep-fried fast food, ice cream, and candy.

    "He just prefers fast food, while you prefer eating healthy food".  Yes, but I don't spend all day talking about my next meal. And I don't order my whole life around eating.

    Matthew
    Want to say "thank you"? 
    You can send me a gift from my Amazon wishlist!
    https://www.amazon.com/hz/wishlist/ls/25M2B8RERL1UO

    Paypal donations: matthew@chantcd.com


    Offline Dulcamara

    • Full Member
    • ***
    • Posts: 1067
    • Reputation: +38/-0
    • Gender: Female
    fαɢɢօt Elton John blasphemes Jesus
    « Reply #5 on: February 20, 2010, 02:09:44 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • I believe any GENUINE attraction between human beings is prompted by our inborn love and desire to be with our Creator, by the faint glimpses of his various perfections we see in our fellow human beings.

    Whether you're talking looks, personality traits, etc.... either we are drawn to some quality God possesses perfectly or is perfectly Himself, or else a perverted/twisted/sick mind may be drawn to some perverse exaggeration or perversion of those traits (like a girl may be drawn to an abusive man, by an exaggeration or perversion of her natural desire for the natural order of things... the man being the head and the leader, etc.).

    ɧoɱosɛҳųαƖity, on the other hand, has always been (I believe) much more oriented toward the love of VICE, rather than even a perverted love that was originally geared toward some good. Like Chant says, mostly they're obsessed with sinful pleasure. It is definitely frequently caused by abuse or sinful encounters. But I think that in our age, there is an element to this growing crisis that may not have existed in any other age before.

    Even in the age of Sodom, I believe human beings have always acknowledged what is natural to mankind, even though they may have gone drastically against it. The natural feelings of a human being, natural (genuine) friendships, etc... all were acknowledged even if defied or perverted.

    I don't believe that ever before has mankind been so radically insane in it's moral and mental order, as to insist almost universally that human beings do not and must not have emotions or deep emotional attachments to other human beings. That there can be no human emotions, virtually, except for anger and lust. That any positive emotion outside of anger (and sometimes including anger or hatred) can only be lust. But today, society has brainwashed itself into believing these things wholeheartedly. EVERYTHING is called lust today. Even the natural feelings between parents and children, are perverted in "psychological" textbooks (more like trash books) into lust or forms of lust. Anything you can say, anything you can draw or write or anything, can be made by the people of today into something related to lust.

    I have long contended (partly because I have seen it personally, and therefore know it to be true in some cases), that it is this complete, insane denial of the full natural range of human emotions, and the full, normal, healthy range of deep and meaningful human relationships, that is throwing gas on the fires of the rank perversion of ɧoɱosɛҳųαƖity. The young people of today are being told by society that they may not have any love, any kindness, any compassion, any sorrow... in short, any emotion or virtue in their heart, especially in relation to another human being. At best, they are taught to "love" everyone in so grossly wrong a manner, as to turn off their moral compass completely. But we are all human beings. We DO have emotions. We do (men and women alike!) have emotional needs. We DO need real, deep and meaningful personal relationships with other human beings. But today we are told that if we do have these things, we are weak, or that all of our feelings towards another human being amount to lust. Is it any wonder why, having been literally shamed out of all natural virtue and affection, the young people, growing up in an atmosphere and society that mocks God and religion as ancient superstitions (eg, without the religious compass to keep them on course in spite of society), these young people are turning to shameful outlets for feelings they have been made thoroughly ashamed of?

    Regrettably, I believe we will see ever more and more people saying they are ɧoɱosɛҳųαƖ or "bi." Yes, because first of all, there are lots of perverted people out there doing these things or teaching these things to the young people. But also because today the young are born into a world that teaches them there is nothing more shameful or disgraceful than all natural feeling or attachment. Having already had their family lives utterly destroyed by this attitude at home (whether by abuse, or else because the parents were brainwashed in the same attitudes before them, to be cold and indifferent and cruel), it is no wonder if girls are so desperate for anything like motherly or sisterly affection they turn toward one another, and then, led astray by the notion that all feelings are lust, call themselves lesbians? Or if the young men, so desperate for anything LIKE love or kindness from their fathers, turn to one another, and mistaken by the same notion, call themselves gαy? And tragically, with the men, it seems once they get into that life, they DO tend to turn toward abusing people. If they have been taught to be ashamed of every natural feeling, and equally they must be ashamed of every unnatural feeling, it's no wonder if, having lived already a whole life in shame, they can so easily cross such boarders into atrocities, unthinkable to any morally sane person.

    Our problem is now twofold, and getting ever worse. It used to be, I believe, much more usually a matter of perversion in terms of someone getting into this sin, and then abusing others. Now, that same situation is coupled and very much inflamed with the crisis of human beings so rebelling against God, that in their revolutionary fervor, they have tried even to renounce their own humanity, only to fall into these perversions in order to feed in some way (however twisted or sinful) the natural desires none of us can escape, but which they are trying desperately to deny.

    At the bottom of almost every crisis... moral, social, political, artistic, you name it... it is becoming clearer and clearer that there lies a more fundamental revolution, with more far reaching consequences than most people yet realize: a revolution against God, everything Godly, everything God made, in the way God made them and so forth... A complete attempt to throw off the Divine authority and to enthrone man as and in the place of the Creator. That revolution, which began with the first "non servum" (I believe), has been working on and in mankind ever since. Today, the revolution has reached a fever pitch, and is so total and complete, that people rarely even begin to realize how thoroughly the chaos in virtually every department of human life, thought and action, are united under the same diabolical war cry of, "we will not serve!" This issue is a perfect illustration. Deny the nature of man as God created it, and try to change it, and you will fail... but man, in his weakness, and unable to escape that nature, WILL find an outlet, even as he found idols with which to try to replace his need for religion.
    I renounce any and all of my former views against what the Church through Pope Leo XIII said, "This, then, is the teaching of the Catholic Church ...no one of the several forms of government is in itself condemned, inasmuch as none of them contains anythi

    Offline Belloc

    • Hero Member
    • *****
    • Posts: 6600
    • Reputation: +615/-5
    • Gender: Male
    fαɢɢօt Elton John blasphemes Jesus
    « Reply #6 on: February 22, 2010, 07:36:48 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Quote from: Elizabeth
    News like that supports the SV Theory-how this can be stated publicly by a Knight is mind-boggling.


    what Knight? If you mean the K of C, they are modernistic and Americanist/Neocons....forget them!! Judging value of SV position by them is not worth your time, trust me.....
    Proud "European American" and prouder, still, Catholic

    Offline Elizabeth

    • Hero Member
    • *****
    • Posts: 4845
    • Reputation: +2194/-15
    • Gender: Female
    fαɢɢօt Elton John blasphemes Jesus
    « Reply #7 on: February 22, 2010, 08:00:37 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • I mean he was knighted by the Queen, his name now begins with Sir.


    Offline Belloc

    • Hero Member
    • *****
    • Posts: 6600
    • Reputation: +615/-5
    • Gender: Male
    fαɢɢօt Elton John blasphemes Jesus
    « Reply #8 on: February 22, 2010, 09:54:45 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Quote from: Elizabeth
    I mean he was knighted by the Queen, his name now begins with Sir.


    oh, gotcha!

    I ignore the Queen, not that I am opposed to monarchies, but the woman is a One world Prot....let her renounce her continued theft of Church property and truly convert to the faith......

    Catholics in this country for past 100+ yrs seem enamored with the English/Royal family...had a guy tell me that he hated the IRA (some parts of it, understandable) and was generally pro-British.and the guy was Irish Catholic!!!

    Like a slave loving his abusive master and defending him, sucking up to him.......at some point, one would fight or run away....
    Proud "European American" and prouder, still, Catholic

    Offline Belloc

    • Hero Member
    • *****
    • Posts: 6600
    • Reputation: +615/-5
    • Gender: Male
    fαɢɢօt Elton John blasphemes Jesus
    « Reply #9 on: February 24, 2010, 12:27:59 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • we do like plain-speak here and FYI, CI requires thick skin.please intro yourself
    Proud "European American" and prouder, still, Catholic

    Offline Belloc

    • Hero Member
    • *****
    • Posts: 6600
    • Reputation: +615/-5
    • Gender: Male
    fαɢɢօt Elton John blasphemes Jesus
    « Reply #10 on: February 24, 2010, 12:38:19 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • ok,you came here as it was a Trad Catholic website, then say the gαy relationships, basically, can be loving and just as bad or good as straight ones...


    do you see some problems here?


    ɧoɱosɛҳųαƖity is a enormous sin against God and cries out to heaven.fornication and adultry between opposite sexes are mortal sins, but are still not put on same par, as they do not inherantly go against natural order.......

    Least one suspect you from the git-go of being a  :gandalf: , please go to:

    http://www.cathinfo.com/index.php/Introduce-yourself-2

    and introduce yourself, tell us about you! your faith, beliefs,etc....
    Proud "European American" and prouder, still, Catholic


    Offline Elizabeth

    • Hero Member
    • *****
    • Posts: 4845
    • Reputation: +2194/-15
    • Gender: Female
    fαɢɢօt Elton John blasphemes Jesus
    « Reply #11 on: February 24, 2010, 12:41:41 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Quote from: Nuno


     I thought this was a traditional Catholic forum I joined?

     I am appalled by a "moderator" using disgusting words like "f-aggot". Are we not above speaking like this?

      :roll-laugh1: :roll-laugh2: :laugh2: :chef:

    Waaaah.

    Offline Matthew

    • Mod
    • *****
    • Posts: 31182
    • Reputation: +27095/-494
    • Gender: Male
    fαɢɢօt Elton John blasphemes Jesus
    « Reply #12 on: February 24, 2010, 12:45:34 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • I had to ban "Nuno" as he is one and the same as Boniface, Sebastian, etc.

    He's signed up for about 5 accounts here so far.

    As a matter of fact, he's influenced me to put "IP ban" on my to-do list for CathInfo. Currently CathInfo doesn't have such a feature, but it would be easy to implement.

    Matthew
    Want to say "thank you"? 
    You can send me a gift from my Amazon wishlist!
    https://www.amazon.com/hz/wishlist/ls/25M2B8RERL1UO

    Paypal donations: matthew@chantcd.com

    Offline Belloc

    • Hero Member
    • *****
    • Posts: 6600
    • Reputation: +615/-5
    • Gender: Male
    fαɢɢօt Elton John blasphemes Jesus
    « Reply #13 on: February 24, 2010, 12:48:12 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • wow, did not think Boniface was that bad, boy I was wrong..his wording in pasts suggested strongly he was a homo or at least, playing Devils advocate......
    Proud "European American" and prouder, still, Catholic

    Offline Matthew

    • Mod
    • *****
    • Posts: 31182
    • Reputation: +27095/-494
    • Gender: Male
    fαɢɢօt Elton John blasphemes Jesus
    « Reply #14 on: February 24, 2010, 01:11:35 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Not to brag, but I implemented the IP ban function already.

    Matthew
    Want to say "thank you"? 
    You can send me a gift from my Amazon wishlist!
    https://www.amazon.com/hz/wishlist/ls/25M2B8RERL1UO

    Paypal donations: matthew@chantcd.com