As Special Consultant to the Secretary of War ... I spent nearly eight months intensively studying war destruction in Europe and Asia.  I became thoroughly familiar with every variety of damage - from high explosives, incendiaries, artillery shells, dynamite, and combinations of these.

In this study, I inspected Hiroshima and Nagasaki, the targets of our atom bomb, examining the ruins, interrogating eyewitnesses and taking hundreds of pictures.

the effects of the atom bombs ... had been wildly exaggerated.

the results in Hiroshima and Nagasaki could have been achieved by about 200 B-29's loaded with incendiaries

the physical results of the two bombs ... happened to be in startling contrast to the hysterical imaginative versions spread through the world.

Hiroshima looked exactly like all the other burned-out cities in Japan.

It was obvious that the blast could not have been so powerful as we had been led to believe.

At the T-bridge, the aiming point for the atomic bomb, I looked for the "bald spot" where everything presumably had been vaporized in the twinkling of an eye.  It wasn't there or anywhere else.  I could find no traces of unusual phenomena.

What I did see was in substance a replica of Yokohama or Osaka, or the Tokyo suburbs - the familiar residue of an area of wood and brick houses razed by uncontrollable fire.

The blast impact therefore could not have been unusual.

three blocks from the center of the explosion ... The people caught in the building did not suffer any unusual effects.

a mile from the heart of the explosion ...  The people inside the hospital were not seriously affected by the blast.  In general the effects here were analogous to those produced by the blast of a distant TNT bomb.

the character of the damage was in no sense unique

All destruction in Nagasaki has been popularly credited to the atom bomb.  Actually, the city had been heavily bombed six days before.

[Hiroshima and Nagasaki were cities] of flimsy, half-rotted wooden houses and rickety brick buildings ... [the bombs'] effectiveness was increased by the incredible flimsiness of most Japanese structures, built of two-by-fours, termite-eaten and dry-rotted

The victims did not die instantaneously in a sort of atomic dissolution.  They died as people die in any fire.

I also interrogated fire fighters and Red Cross workers who had rushed to the scene in the first few minutes.  They all denied personal knowledge of any lingering radioactivity.

It simply is not true that matter was vaporized in the intense heat

both atom-bombed areas have tree trunks and walls with growing vines to disprove the claims of super heat.

Humankind has stampeded into a state of near hysteria at the first exhibits of atomic destruction.  Fantasy is running wild.

The atom bomb fitted propaganda purposes.

[In the Atomic Bomb Casualty Commission] I had a dozen different groups of medical people in, wanting to know about the effects of the atomic bomb, which was under my control.

When I was first in Hiroshima and landed this group, got on the radio some professor from Columbia was saying that “anybody who got into Hiroshima in the next fifty years would die of radiation.” We’d get this nonsense all the time. We just went through it here a few days ago.

You know, you get the extremists, you get a lot of theoretical physicists or a lot of radiologists who said, “Oh boy, genetic effects are going to be so-and-so for this.” We wanted to find out the facts and it would be a long-term project.

There was a letter ... in which the President was looking for a new deterrent against a future war ... the object of this instruction, called Letter of Instruction, was “You will play up the devastating effect of the atomic bomb.” All right? So I was the one who set the deadline this time. Anybody who had been in Hiroshima and died within six months, whether they got run over by a bicycle or whatnot, would be credited to the atomic bomb.

When the bomb went off, about 2 thousand people out of 250 thousand got killed ... about 21 thousand people died in 36 hours as a result of being trapped and burned and so on.

You see, it wasn’t “Bing” like ... a bomb went off and a city disappeared. No such thing happened. That was the propaganda

Then, as I say, I set the six months’ deadline for anybody who had been there, even though they went away and so on, to put a deadline on deaths from delayed radiation effects

One of us ... got a priest there to say he guessed 100 thousand people died when the bomb went off. Well, you see, it didn’t. There never was 100 thousand people [who] died.

That’s the facts of Hiroshima.

When I came back to this country, I was appalled, from a military standpoint, to find that our major planners in the War Department were using their own propaganda, 100 thousand deaths, Bing!

Actually, the atomic bomb was a damn poor killer in comparison to the exposed population.

I used to tell them back in the general staff and so on and including the chief of staff, “... if you can deter a war, for God’s sake, let’s do it and blow up the effects all you want. But don’t believe your own propaganda if you are applying it to your military planning.” Unfortunately, we created such hysteria in this country that the mere mention of radiation, or thermal nuclear power, or a couple of millirems of radiation and you have a hysteria. So this is a fact. Actually, the atomic bomb was a poor killer.

you don’t hear much about the effects of Nagasaki because actually it was pretty ineffective.

We’re still paying for that hysteria following the atomic bomb, which is deliberately blown up for a very good reason, and which I participated in, in accordance with policy of the government.

That doesn't even make sense. How do you fake NUKES? Are we just going to dismiss everything that happened not in our lifetime as fake like some people do?

"The Entire 20th Century Was a Giant F*** HOAX: A Play By LaughingAmigo"

Laughing Amigo,

Its me, Aryzia.  You probably don't want to hear from me, but I have to say, that this post is right on.  I know about the faking of nukes through other sources than yours, so I would have to agree, nukes are not what "they" claim.

Quote from: JezusDeKoning

That doesn't even make sense. How do you fake NUKES? Are we just going to dismiss everything that happened not in our lifetime as fake like some people do?

"The Entire 20th Century Was a Giant F*** HOAX: A Play By LaughingAmigo"

Act 1:  The h0Ɩ0cαųst.

Act 2:  Atomic Bombs.

Act 3:  The Moon Landing.

Starring JezusDeKoning playing the role of a Gentile.

Any books to recommend on this subject?

Quote from: aryzia

Quote from: LaughingAmigo

Quote from: aryzia

Laughing Amigo,

Its me, Aryzia.  You probably don't want to hear from me, but I have to say, that this post is right on.  I know about the faking of nukes through other sources than yours, so I would have to agree, nukes are not what "they" claim.

Do you agree that "they", at least at the very top of the conspiracy, are Jєωιѕн by ethnicity?

In a sense, yes.  The modern Jєωs of the cabal that run the banks, etc., whose true Jєωιѕн ethnicity is in question.

This article demolishes the Khazar theory:  http://davidduke.com/rethinking-khazar-theory/

Read it, or at least pretend to, then try to answer the question again.  Are we witnessing the advent of a Jєω World Order or not?