Never believe the MSM stories that push a "progressive " agenda.Especially the one's that are supposed to tug on your heart strings. They are always fake.

https://spokesman-recorder.com/2018/10/19/20-years-later-was-matthew-shepards-murder-a-hate-crime-or-a-drug-crime/

You're showing your hand here kid. You clearly have no clue of the particulars in that case.

Which was evidently way before your time.

Just parroting the same old fαɢɢօty , leftist bs.

I know the whole story. How the hell am I parroting fαɢɢօty leftist bs? Matthew Shepard sinned, he was gαy and this has nothing to do with this. I was literally just giving an example on how this is not a political or religious issue. But, maybe read all what I said before you make judgements.  

Never believe the MSM stories that push a "progressive " agenda.Especially the one's that are supposed to tug on your heart strings. They are always fake.

https://spokesman-recorder.com/2018/10/19/20-years-later-was-matthew-shepards-murder-a-hate-crime-or-a-drug-crime/

Oh my God. I should have never mentioned Matthew Shepard as an example.  I did not want to open up this can of worms. But, I accidentally did. This isn't about Matthew Shepard, The Media used him Shepard as a puppet for gαy rights and that was wrong back then because the media hates religious people who disagree with ɧoɱosɛҳųαƖity. This is about that black man who beat up a white elderly man in a nursing home. It's evil. My whole point was that. I don't see any Jєωιѕн propaganda or any religious or political issues. I think it's funny that you would say I am pushing a progressive agenda with ONE SENTENCE I said about Matthew Shepard. So that's fine? Tugging people's heart strings for lies? Matthew Shepard was in a sinful lifestyle. But, I didn't know that Jesus approved of a kid like Shepard to be tied to a fence, robbed, pistol-whipped, and tortured on a fence left to die. If you believe that, you've got the whole message of the bible wrong. Love the sinner, Hate the sin.

Metapolitically and metaculturally speaking, American whites are so detached from any sense of identity and continuity that they dump their patrimony (who themselves embraced multiculturalism, so they're not guiltless) in these awful places, to be cared for by the somalis and other discultureds whose entry level nursing degrees are subsidized by their cultural guilt. Now the chickens are coming home to roost. Time to wake up. 

My grandma was abused by a nigger at a nursing home, too.

Also, I didn't know you could say the N-word on Cathinfo. It definitely makes this more of a grown up conversation. Not! 

I know the whole story. How the hell am I parroting fαɢɢօty leftist bs? Matthew Shepard sinned, he was gαy and this has nothing to do with this. I was literally just giving an example on how this is not a political or religious issue. But, maybe read all what I said before you make judgements.  

I believe this is what you said/wrote;

We can't make it all a political, religious, or race issue. I see what you mean. But, I think your looking too much into this personally. I don't see this like when Emmett Till was murdered in 1955 because he was black or when Matthew Shepard was murdered in 1998 because he was gαy. 

You specifically stated that the queer Shepard was murdered BECAUSE he was gαy. Which was specifically NOT the case.

He was murdered by being caught up in a web of drugs, deceit and sodomy, murdered by another fag caught up in the same.
It had nothing to do with his sɛҳuąƖ "orientation."

That is the narrative paraded out there by the sodomites and their liberal and leftist cohorts in the media, go'vt, etc. Which basically turned this drug dealing/abusing  sodomite  into some kind of national icon and hero.

Meanwhile, a young boy ( Jesse Dirkhising)who was bound , drugged, tortured, raped and murdered over the course of two days by two male adult fαɢs alone in a house around the same time barely made a mention by the same yellow, fαɢɢօt "journalists" and a system that almost completely ignored it while championing and canonizing the drug-dealing , serial, fag/prostitute Shepard.

As Don King used to say ...." Only in America" 

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Murder_of_Jesse_Dirkhising

Also, I didn't know you could say the N-word on Cathinfo. It definitely makes this more of a grown up conversation. Not!

All right, let's take this particular example, since it's so difficult to parse through all of the other modernist /secular / Jєωιѕн errors you've demonstrably internalized into your thinking process.

I understand that you're a very young man, and, Lord knows, at your age, I had internalized more than my fair share of modernist / secular / Jєωιѕн errors. However, unlike you, I had little to no interest in Traditional Catholicism, so you're off on a far better foot than I was, in that sense, and are to be commended. I apologize for allowing my exasperation to get the better of me and dismissing you too cavalierly in the previous post. I ought to endeavor to build our young men up, and not tear them down. We all ought to.

That having been said, let's just look at your knee-jerk reaction to the word "nigger." It's not at all unusual; in fact it's how nearly every white person in the entire anglosphere would react nowadays to its utterance, regardless of age. But ask yourself: "why?" Is it because just uttering this word violates some Catholic dogma, or even the duty to Catholic charity? Some would answer in the affirmative. But how? My pious Catholic grandfather (an immigrant from Malta) used that word from time to time. He found black people, on the whole, extraordinarily enervating to work with, to live near (when he had to), and complained they were the single worst thing about life in America, so far as he could see. Here's the funny thing: the Maltese tend to be some of the darkest-skinned Europeans (along with Sicilians, to whom they are essentially ethnically identical), and some of them look like full-blooded Arabs (unsurprising if you know the nation's history, or have heard its language). If DNA ancestry tests are to be believed (I'm not so sure they are, but we'll put that aside), my family has some negligible amount of sub-Saharan African ancestry (something like 2 - 3%). Again, not terribly surprising - some Arab invaders may have fornicated with their Zanj slave girls, and the resultant offspring mixed into the population. What's the point in mentioning all this? Well, to illustrate why it was that, on occasion, my own grandfather was himself called "nigger" by a few fair-skinned, fair-haired, blue-eyed Americans of Northern European extraction. So who was the "Racist?" My grandfather? His paler detractors? All of the above?

My grandfather shrugged off these insults as only natural, considering he was a foreigner from a Southern European country that many people here had had no knowledge of or exposure to. He didn't bitch and moan about it, file HR complaints (or whatever the equivalent was back then), run to the open arms of the opportunist Jєωs at the ACLU or NAACP, or run to the news media about it. It was all part of the banter of the time and he gave as good as he got. And at no point did he - a man of redoubtable piety and Catholicity - ever suffer pangs of guilt or scruples that his use of the dreaded "N-WORD" made him a "racist" or bespoke a want of Catholic charity on his part. No, it took his pompous, college-educated, arrogant, Jєωιѕн-influenced, secularized Boomer children to level those charges at him - people with (at that time anyway) all of the Sensus Catholicus of Ruth Bader Ginsberg.

"Racism" is a non-existent category for Catholics. It's a moral category invented in the 20th Century, by Marxist Jєωs, as a tool for demoralization and subversion. It ought to go without saying that Catholics have no obligation to accept Marxist-Jєωιѕн moral categories. And yet, in the anglosphere, anyway, we overwhelmingly do. Why? Because it's a central part of the over-arching narrative in the cartoons we watched, the movies we've seen, the educations we received, the news we consume, the history books we read, the celebrities whose words we hear, etc. etc. etc. And why? What's the common denominator in all these things? Jєωιѕн control. Directly, in many cases (media moguls, producers, directors, publishers, etc.) and indirectly in others (gentile puppets backed by Jєωιѕн finance). Recall the words of Mayer Amschel Rothschild: "Let me issue and control the money of a nation, and I care not who makes its laws." It's all part of the ѕуηαgσgυє of Satan's ongoing war against Christendom. And it doesn't stop even when widespread apostasy has occurred. When there's no more Catholicity or even bare Christianity in even a Protestant sense to make war on, then the war is against "whiteness," for "whiteness" is European, and Europe was (and may yet again become) Christendom. The Jєωs don't make distinctions here any more than they do for themselves - a Jєω is a Jєω, even if he is an atheist.

So when you see yourself reacting so viscerally to the use of a word - a simple word - "nigger" - whose roots are in the Latin word "niger," which simply means "black - and you find yourself unable to even repeat it in writing, regardless of context, and defer to use of the Officially Approved Euphemistic Form (the incredibly infantile "N-Word"), you really ought to ask yourself: Why? Why do I have that reaction? In what is it based? Am I really so immune to the influences of the Enemies of Christ who control literally every public vessel of influence over the hearts and minds of the masses?

All right, let's take this particular example, since it's so difficult to parse through all of the other modernist /secular / Jєωιѕн errors you've demonstrably internalized into your thinking process.

I understand that you're a very young man, and, Lord knows, at your age, I had internalized more than my fair share of modernist / secular / Jєωιѕн errors. However, unlike you, I had little to no interest in Traditional Catholicism, so you're off on a far better foot than I was, in that sense, and are to be commended. I apologize for allowing my exasperation to get the better of me and dismissing you too cavalierly in the previous post. I ought to endeavor to build our young men up, and not tear them down. We all ought to.

That having been said, let's just look at your knee-jerk reaction to the word "nigger." It's not at all unusual; in fact it's how nearly every white person in the entire anglosphere would react nowadays to its utterance, regardless of age. But ask yourself: "why?" Is it because just uttering this word violates some Catholic dogma, or even the duty to Catholic charity? Some would answer in the affirmative. But how? My pious Catholic grandfather (an immigrant from Malta) used that word from time to time. He found black people, on the whole, extraordinarily enervating to work with, to live near (when he had to), and complained they were the single worst thing about life in America, so far as he could see. Here's the funny thing: the Maltese tend to be some of the darkest-skinned Europeans (along with Sicilians, to whom they are essentially ethnically identical), and some of them look like full-blooded Arabs (unsurprising if you know the nation's history, or have heard its language). If DNA ancestry tests are to be believed (I'm not so sure they are, but we'll put that aside), my family has some negligible amount of sub-Saharan African ancestry (something like 2 - 3%). Again, not terribly surprising - some Arab invaders may have fornicated with their Zanj slave girls, and the resultant offspring mixed into the population. What's the point in mentioning all this? Well, to illustrate why it was that, on occasion, my own grandfather was himself called "nigger" by a few fair-skinned, fair-haired, blue-eyed Americans of Northern European extraction. So who was the "Racist?" My grandfather? His paler detractors? All of the above?

My grandfather shrugged off these insults as only natural, considering he was a foreigner from a Southern European country that many people here had had no knowledge of or exposure to. He didn't bitch and moan about it, file HR complaints (or whatever the equivalent was back then), run to the open arms of the opportunist Jєωs at the ACLU or NAACP, or run to the news media about it. It was all part of the banter of the time and he gave as good as he got. And at no point did he - a man of redoubtable piety and Catholicity - ever suffer pangs of guilt or scruples that his use of the dreaded "N-WORD" made him a "racist" or bespoke a want of Catholic charity on his part. No, it took his pompous, college-educated, arrogant, Jєωιѕн-influenced, secularized Boomer children to level those charges at him - people with (at that time anyway) all of the Sensus Catholicus of Ruth Bader Ginsberg.

"Racism" is a non-existent category for Catholics. It's a moral category invented in the 20th Century, by Marxist Jєωs, as a tool for demoralization and subversion. It ought to go without saying that Catholics have no obligation to accept Marxist-Jєωιѕн moral categories. And yet, in the anglosphere, anyway, we overwhelmingly do. Why? Because it's a central part of the over-arching narrative in the cartoons we watched, the movies we've seen, the educations we received, the news we consume, the history books we read, the celebrities whose words we hear, etc. etc. etc. And why? What's the common denominator in all these things? Jєωιѕн control. Directly, in many cases (media moguls, producers, directors, publishers, etc.) and indirectly in others (gentile puppets backed by Jєωιѕн finance). Recall the words of Mayer Amschel Rothschild: "Let me issue and control the money of a nation, and I care not who makes its laws." It's all part of the ѕуηαgσgυє of Satan's ongoing war against Christendom. And it doesn't stop even when widespread apostasy has occurred. When there's no more Catholicity or even bare Christianity in even a Protestant sense to make war on, then the war is against "whiteness," for "whiteness" is European, and Europe was (and may yet again become) Christendom. The Jєωs don't make distinctions here any more than they do for themselves - a Jєω is a Jєω, even if he is an atheist.

So when you see yourself reacting so viscerally to the use of a word - a simple word - "nigger" - whose roots are in the Latin word "niger," which simply means "black - and you find yourself unable to even repeat it in writing, regardless of context, and defer to use of the Officially Approved Euphemistic Form (the incredibly infantile "N-Word"), you really ought to ask yourself: Why? Why do I have that reaction? In what is it based? Am I really so immune to the influences of the Enemies of Christ who control literally every public vessel of influence over the hearts and minds of the masses?

I agree with a lot of what you said. It makes me want to do more homework. I am actually not as offended by the N Word as the average person. Luckily I am not a snowflake. I am a libertarian traditionalist catholic and that is a minority in my generation full of liberal socialism and mind control. I have my own conspiracy theory on the Jєωιѕн people. I believe that the freemasons have brainwashed the Jєωs in this country to control everything. That's just my opinion. I see what your saying though. I believe that the freemasons have a much more evil history controlling everything through the Jєωs like the Rockefellers and the Rothschild families. I believe there is a reason that the catholic church did condemn freemasons. I do have questions though. If racism was started by Marxists, I can see that. But, Marxist Jєωs? I thought Karl Marx spoke against the Jєωιѕн people in his book On The Jєωιѕн Question and in 1933, his books were burned in Germany because of his Jєωιѕн ancestry and Hitler's nαzιsm that was inspired by Karl Marx was against the Jєωs. Studying stuff like this, I found a connection that really had not as much to do with Catholics and Christendom or even the Jєωs as much. But, more the protestant reformation. You see, Many protestants welcome Fɾҽҽmαsσɳɾყ and encourage it. It wasn't until 1995 when the baptist church condemned white supremacy. I believe that the high ranking Masonic protestants have taken over America controlling Catholics and Jєωs to think in a one way type of thinking. I believe they have been trying to brainwash white people and black people to go against each other because they love a race war and they love hurting the poor basically stomping on Christ's true message. What confirms this even more is the book On The Jєωs and Their Lies which was written by Martin Luther, Founder of Protestantism. Martin Luther paved the way for a protest version of christianity against catholicism and spoke out against the Jєωs when they wouldn't convert to his version of christianity. In nαzι Germany, every anti-Jєωιѕн book printed from the Third Reich had citations and quotations from Martin Luther's book On the Jєωs and their lies. The nαzι's found Martin Luther's legacy to be so important that Martin Luther's book on the Jєωs was at the first nuremburg rallies. Hereby, Luther wanted revenge on the Jєωs for not converting to protestantism paving the way centuries later for the Jєωs to be punished. Martin Luther was dead by then but he got what he wished for. By the way, I am not a h0Ɩ0cαųst denier and I never will be. My grandfather saw the bodies of all the dead Jєωs and he had to take photographs of the bodies. He saw it all. This is my conspiracy theory. It has a lot of facts and it shows how the freemasons and protestants had a ploy to take over the world and to use other people to think differently. I respect Jєωs for what they did for Christianity though. There is a reason that 44 out of our 45 presidents in America are not catholic or Jєωιѕн and the one who was catholic was killed. You can disagree. But, I want you to think about that we wouldn't have the old testament if it weren't for them. My last question to you is and it's generic but, If the Jєωs were so bad, Why was Jesus Christ a Jєω?