Sharon Zuckerman writing under the entry "Hazor" in
The Oxford Encyclopedia of the Bible and Archeaology (I know that this would be a liberal Biblical source but still scholarly enough to be of some consideration) published in 2013 on pages 481 - 2 writes in part:
"Noteworthy is the intentional mutilation and interment of statues and images of gods, kings, and other types of authority. All public structures came to a violent end, with evidence of fierce conflagration and severe destruction clearly visible. The fate of the domestic structures is still difficult to assess, but at least in one case (in area S) a courtyard house was abandoned in an orderly fashion rather than being violently destroyed.
Canaanite Hazor was destroyed sometime during the thirteenth century B.C.E. More precise dating, whether in the first or second half of the century, is still debated. Related to this issue is the identification of the agents of destruction, whether the Israelites, other Canaanite city-states, or the Hazorites themselves, in an act of vengeance targeted at the symbols of power of the ruling elites. In any case, the entire site was abandoned, the acropolis for at least a century and the lower city for good."
Earlier she pointed out in the entry:
"A small-scale excavation, directed by Sharon Zuckerman, was conducted in Area S in the center of the lower city."
So she writes whereof she has first hand experience. She also references the escapades of Joshua (as Biblical testimony) as a possible source of the destruction.
What I found fascinating (and didn't already know) was that Hazor had been a satellite city state with Egyptian linkage from 1504 - 1425 B.C.E. but in the 19th century had been described in Egyptian historical records as an "enemy" of Egypt. It would seem at some point Hazor came under Egyptian influence but how and why and when that happened there is no suggestion.
Hazor being in what would be northern Palestine at the time of Our Lord was quite a ways into the country. I had always thought Egyptian dominance at the time of the Exodus had been largely confined to Egypt itself.
I wonder, though, how they could think that the entire statue was an image of Ptah with only a foot and an ankle to go on (despite the - as yet - largely indecipherable Egyptian markings).
Thank you for sharing this very interesting discovery.