Author Topic: E Michael Jones lectures (Read 2336 times)

LaramieHirsch · « **on:** February 20, 2016, 05:48:47 AM »

E. Michael Jones is tearing it up this week. And who gets the credit for hosting Jones and his lectures? (This'll frustrate you, but what can you do?) It's CMTV. I guess they figure they've got to put something out there that's actually substantial...since they won't cover the fact that the Pope, who is humble by the way, just told folks to use contraception, and that protecting yourself with a wall is not Christian.

Meh. Whatevs. If you want to hear Jones speak, here's the links:

Stubborn · « **Reply #1 on:** February 20, 2016, 06:15:43 AM »

I know only a very little about E. Michael Jones, but will say that if CMTV is in any way supporting him, for me, it does not bode well for E. Michael Jones.

I don't have time to look him up at the moment, but can anyone else substantiate or correct my suspicion?

ClarkSmith · « **Reply #2 on:** February 20, 2016, 12:57:15 PM »

Quote from: Stubborn

I know only a very little about E. Michael Jones, but will say that if CMTV is in any way supporting him, for me, it does not bode well for E. Michael Jones.

I don't have time to look him up at the moment, but can anyone else substantiate or correct my suspicion?

E. Michael Jones recognizes the negative effects of the Second Vatican Council. His research on the Jєωιѕн influence in the Church and society is quite accurate. However, he's had some spats with traditional Catholics. I think that's when he changed the name of his magazine and started focusing on Jєωs. I'm pretty sure he called the SSPX schismatic in the past. It's probably why CMTV is promoting him now.

LaramieHirsch · « **Reply #3 on:** February 20, 2016, 09:37:13 PM »

Quote from: ClarkSmith

Quote from: Stubborn
I know only a very little about E. Michael Jones, but will say that if CMTV is in any way supporting him, for me, it does not bode well for E. Michael Jones.

I don't have time to look him up at the moment, but can anyone else substantiate or correct my suspicion?

E. Michael Jones recognizes the negative effects of the Second Vatican Council. His research on the Jєωιѕн influence in the Church and society is quite accurate. However, he's had some spats with traditional Catholics. I think that's when he changed the name of his magazine and started focusing on Jєωs. I'm pretty sure he called the SSPX schismatic in the past. It's probably why CMTV is promoting him now.

Yes, I've seen some video of him talking about the SSPX, claiming that it is in schism. This is unfortunate.

That being said, his research about Jєωιѕн cultural warfare against Catholics is UNMATCHED. Jones is THE go-to guy when it comes to reading who is doing what in the Jєωιѕн war against God in the West. His books are tomes. If you like references and annotations, Jones is for you.

Stubborn, I can't believe you haven't heard about this guy.

I know he's on the other side of the SSPX divide. However, do not discount him. I promise you, you will appreciate the research he has done.

Tell you what. If I get some time tonight, maybe I can link to some past threads about him or something.

Got to go.

-LH

Maximus33 · « **Reply #4 on:** February 21, 2016, 05:21:54 PM »

"If you are a white male, you don’t deserve to live. You are a cancer, you’re a disease, white males have never contributed anything positive to the world! They only murder, exploit and oppress non-whites! At least a white woman can have sex with a black man and make a brown baby but what can a white male do? He’s good for nothing. Slavery, genocides against aboriginal peoples and massive land confiscation, the inquisition, the h0Ɩ0cαųst, white males are all to blame! You maintain your white male privilege only by oppressing, discriminating against and enslaving others!"

And also: "Obviously, all whites need to be destroyed, but why not start with white males? They are behind most of history’s greatest atrocities."

Whoever said this should be strung up in the street.

Maximus33 · « **Reply #5 on:** February 21, 2016, 05:24:14 PM »

Yes, I agree. E. Michael Jones is the man when it comes to the Jєωιѕн question and cultural warfare. I believe he is unmatched on these subjects. However, I do not agree with him concerning the SSPX.

LaramieHirsch · « **Reply #6 on:** February 21, 2016, 10:14:30 PM »

Quote from: Maximus33

"If you are a white male, you don’t deserve to live. You are a cancer, you’re a disease, white males have never contributed anything positive to the world! They only murder, exploit and oppress non-whites! At least a white woman can have sex with a black man and make a brown baby but what can a white male do? He’s good for nothing. Slavery, genocides against aboriginal peoples and massive land confiscation, the inquisition, the h0Ɩ0cαųst, white males are all to blame! You maintain your white male privilege only by oppressing, discriminating against and enslaving others!"

And also: "Obviously, all whites need to be destroyed, but why not start with white males? They are behind most of history’s greatest atrocities."

Whoever said this should be strung up in the street.

This is from my signature. It was said by a Jєωιѕн Harvard professor, Noel Ignatiev. They love this guy over there. I posted it for Black History Month.

LaramieHirsch · « **Reply #7 on:** February 21, 2016, 10:23:27 PM »

Quote from: LaramieHirsch

Quote from: ClarkSmith
Quote from: Stubborn
I know only a very little about E. Michael Jones, but will say that if CMTV is in any way supporting him, for me, it does not bode well for E. Michael Jones.

I don't have time to look him up at the moment, but can anyone else substantiate or correct my suspicion?

E. Michael Jones recognizes the negative effects of the Second Vatican Council. His research on the Jєωιѕн influence in the Church and society is quite accurate. However, he's had some spats with traditional Catholics. I think that's when he changed the name of his magazine and started focusing on Jєωs. I'm pretty sure he called the SSPX schismatic in the past. It's probably why CMTV is promoting him now.

Yes, I've seen some video of him talking about the SSPX, claiming that it is in schism. This is unfortunate.

That being said, his research about Jєωιѕн cultural warfare against Catholics is UNMATCHED. Jones is THE go-to guy when it comes to reading who is doing what in the Jєωιѕн war against God in the West. His books are tomes. If you like references and annotations, Jones is for you.

Stubborn, I can't believe you haven't heard about this guy.

I know he's on the other side of the SSPX divide. However, do not discount him. I promise you, you will appreciate the research he has done.

Tell you what. If I get some time tonight, maybe I can link to some past threads about him or something.

Got to go.

-LH

Stubborn, this is for you.

This is a collection of my notes from the first ten chapters of Jєωιѕн Revolutionary Spirit. By chapter ten, I was just astounded. Suffice to say, I was unable to continue to read the book, as it's THICK, I was out of time (I borrowed the book), and I had to prepare for something else in life.

http://www.cathinfo.com/catholic.php/Summary-of-Jєωιѕн-Revolutionary-Spirit

Enjoy. It's from Summer 2012

Cantarella · « **Reply #8 on:** February 21, 2016, 11:18:48 PM »

Thank you very much Laramie,

I am a big fan of Dr. E. Michael Jones. He is a very well educated man and certainly unmatched when it comes to unmasking the Jєωιѕн war against Christendom as well as the Jєωιѕн influence in the utter demoralization of America and the West.

Who is the Real Enemy? by E. Michael Jones

Quote

This war began 2000 years ago at the foot of the cross, when the Jєωιѕн high priests, Annas and Caiphas, said to Jesus Christ, “If you come down from the cross, we will accept you as our Messiah. Needless to say, Jesus did not come down from the cross. And because he didn’t, the Jєωs rejected Him. Instead, they chose Barabbas, a bandit who had been condemned to death for his revolutionary activities.

At once, by doing this—by preferring a notorious criminal to a man of spotless innocence who had come to redeem them—the Jєωs became revolutionaries themselves: condemned to seek heaven on earth by following one false Messiah after another from Simon bar Kokhbar to Shabbetai Zevi, from Alex Portnoy to Paul Wolfowitz....

https://www.darkmoon.me/2012/who-is-the-real-enemy-by-e-michael-jones/

LaramieHirsch · « **Reply #9 on:** February 21, 2016, 11:31:44 PM »

Quote from: Cantarella

Thank you very much Laramie,

I am a big fan of Dr. E. Michael Jones. He is a very well educated man and certainly unmatched when it comes to unmasking the Jєωιѕн war against Christendom as well as the Jєωιѕн influence in the utter demoralization of America and the West.

No problem. Yer welcome!

I remember being so excited and intrigued while I was reading that book. I'd wake up, and I'd be excited the next day to see what was on the next page.

Maybe I'll pick the book up again some day when I have more time and continue the notes.

RomanCatholic1953 · « **Reply #10 on:** February 21, 2016, 11:34:11 PM »

Quote from: Maximus33

"If you are a white male, you don’t deserve to live. You are a cancer, you’re a disease, white males have never contributed anything positive to the world! They only murder, exploit and oppress non-whites! At least a white woman can have sex with a black man and make a brown baby but what can a white male do? He’s good for nothing. Slavery, genocides against aboriginal peoples and massive land confiscation, the inquisition, the h0Ɩ0cαųst, white males are all to blame! You maintain your white male privilege only by oppressing, discriminating against and enslaving others!"

And also: "Obviously, all whites need to be destroyed, but why not start with white males? They are behind most of history’s greatest atrocities."

Whoever said this should be strung up in the street.

This came from a mind of a Jєω. This is the way they think.

The last sentence may is revealing.

The way it is going the only white person allowed to exist in 2050 will be Jєωs and they will have no care at all for the nonwhites. Look at the example of the Palestinians. They are housed behind walls and deplorable living conditions.

At lease some white gentiles that are knowledgeable on the Jєωs do
care about nonwhites and it is not getting votes for a political
election.

Stubborn · « **Reply #11 on:** February 22, 2016, 05:21:58 AM »

Quote from: LaramieHirsch

Stubborn, this is for you.

This is a collection of my notes from the first ten chapters of Jєωιѕн Revolutionary Spirit. By chapter ten, I was just astounded. Suffice to say, I was unable to continue to read the book, as it's THICK, I was out of time (I borrowed the book), and I had to prepare for something else in life.

http://www.cathinfo.com/catholic.php/Summary-of-Jєωιѕн-Revolutionary-Spirit

Enjoy. It's from Summer 2012

Thanks LH, I will go through it as I can.

Alexandria · « **Reply #12 on:** February 24, 2016, 01:40:39 PM »

Does anyone know where I can get a very inexpensive used copy of this book?

Brennus · « **Reply #13 on:** February 24, 2016, 02:13:36 PM »

Quote from: LaramieHirsch

Quote from: LaramieHirsch
Quote from: ClarkSmith
Quote from: Stubborn
I know only a very little about E. Michael Jones, but will say that if CMTV is in any way supporting him, for me, it does not bode well for E. Michael Jones.

I don't have time to look him up at the moment, but can anyone else substantiate or correct my suspicion?

E. Michael Jones recognizes the negative effects of the Second Vatican Council. His research on the Jєωιѕн influence in the Church and society is quite accurate. However, he's had some spats with traditional Catholics. I think that's when he changed the name of his magazine and started focusing on Jєωs. I'm pretty sure he called the SSPX schismatic in the past. It's probably why CMTV is promoting him now.

Yes, I've seen some video of him talking about the SSPX, claiming that it is in schism. This is unfortunate.

That being said, his research about Jєωιѕн cultural warfare against Catholics is UNMATCHED. Jones is THE go-to guy when it comes to reading who is doing what in the Jєωιѕн war against God in the West. His books are tomes. If you like references and annotations, Jones is for you.

Stubborn, I can't believe you haven't heard about this guy.

I know he's on the other side of the SSPX divide. However, do not discount him. I promise you, you will appreciate the research he has done.

Tell you what. If I get some time tonight, maybe I can link to some past threads about him or something.

Got to go.

-LH

Stubborn, this is for you.

This is a collection of my notes from the first ten chapters of Jєωιѕн Revolutionary Spirit. By chapter ten, I was just astounded. Suffice to say, I was unable to continue to read the book, as it's THICK, I was out of time (I borrowed the book), and I had to prepare for something else in life.

http://www.cathinfo.com/catholic.php/Summary-of-Jєωιѕн-Revolutionary-Spirit

Enjoy. It's from Summer 2012

I have that book. I was astounded by the stuff in there about Frederick Douglass. The John Dee material was interesting as well, but that is farther back and not so easily substantiated.

Alexandria · « **Reply #14 on:** February 24, 2016, 02:21:00 PM »

Quote from: Maximus33

"If you are a white male, you don’t deserve to live. You are a cancer, you’re a disease, white males have never contributed anything positive to the world! They only murder, exploit and oppress non-whites! At least a white woman can have sex with a black man and make a brown baby but what can a white male do? He’s good for nothing. Slavery, genocides against aboriginal peoples and massive land confiscation, the inquisition, the h0Ɩ0cαųst, white males are all to blame! You maintain your white male privilege only by oppressing, discriminating against and enslaving others!"

And also: "Obviously, all whites need to be destroyed, but why not start with white males? They are behind most of history’s greatest atrocities."

Whoever said this should be strung up in the street.

Did someone actually say this?

If so, change "white" to "black" and we'd never be hearing the end of it. It would be plastered all over the internet.

But since it concerns us, not a peep.

Two faced hypocrites.