I will admit that E. Michael Jones is kind of brash and effective in his speaking, like Brother Nathaniel but without the attire. But, as I've said before, E. Michael Jones is a lickspittle and he rants and raves about stuff that isn't all that important. As for Hollingsworth noting that E Michael Jones pointed out that the Jєωs are organized around a denial of Our Lord, well, who doesn't know that? And I mean that seriously. Jєωs hate Our Lord. Our Lord called them vipers in the Gospel and the enemies of Our Lord have been haters of Catholics since day one. In short, who really needs E. Michael Jones to explain that to them?
E. Michael Jones does consider the SSPX to be schismatic and Mr. Jones does think the Novus ordo is fine - he does rants and spread his saliva everywhere, hence the reason I call him a lickspittle, about "bishops not backing up the Church".
I will say that if some other posters here are in such a cultural desert that they need to be entertained by E. Michael Jones then please be my guest and enjoy his stuff. No doubt the guy is very bright and combative but why does he not see the error in the Novus Ordo?