CathInfo.com

This is a view of windmills out at sea between 8 and 11 miles away from the observer.



So, again, the two-way laser experiment, which you undoubtedly also didn't bother watching, absolutely devastates refraction.  You would have to have a continuously increasing density gradient all the way there.  But, then on the way back, you would by definition have a continually DECREASING density gradient, which would not only NOT bend the laser beam down, but would in fact bend it even higher, in the other direction.  Two lasers going in opposite directions at the same place and same time cannot both be seen from the other side.  That puts the nail into the coffin of your precious deus ex machina to save the globe earth.

Right, you show this, but not this:


This is the Thorntonbank wind farm, isn't it?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thorntonbank_Wind_Farm

Right, you show this, but not this:

Absolutely I show that, with numbers and explanations, and an detailed explanation for why refraction cannot account for that phenomenon.

As for your picture, where are the numbers?  From where was it taken?  How far away are the individual turbines, etc.  As typical for globers, they don't do any of this actual work.

Refraction, reflection, wave heights, atmospheric conditions can all account for a picture like the one you posted.

But they are incapable of explaining Dr. John D's Black Swan picture above.  Nor can refraction explain the two-way laser test from the same location.  Both lasers could not have been spotted at the same time for the reasons explained.

I saw one similar picture as this, where the numbers were ridiculous and cannot possibly account for what was being seen, and the size of the propellors was exaggerated to twice what the actual size would have been, clearly indicating some kind of atmospheric magnification.

So provide the location of this picture and data regarding the distances away the various turbines are.  Is this even a real picture?  Nobody knows.  Anyone could shop something.  Please provide the data, and I'll have a look at it.  Lower ones could be reflections of something else.  How tall are these things?  How far away from the observer?  How much of them are anticipated to be cut off by "curvature" given their distance?

Provide the data and it can be analyzed.  Without the data it's absolutely meaningless.