Does Hollywood Airbrush Jєωs & gαys?

August 11, 2009
by Henry Makow Ph.D.

Imagine a movie based on the true story of a "rising star" reporter who invented his feature stories but passed them off as true.

Imagine he scammed a half-dozen magazines that took themselves very seriously, like The New Republic, The New Yorker and Rolling Stone.  

Would the reporter's religious background and sɛҳuąƖ orientation be pertinent to understanding his actions? What if this con artist were a WASP heterosɛҳuąƖ from the Midwest but they portrayed him as a Jєωιѕн ɧoɱosɛҳųαƖ? In a movie about basic honesty, would that be honest? Wouldn't that suggest prejudice?

"Shattered Glass," (2003), is based on the hoaxer Stephen Glass,a Jєωιѕн ɧoɱosɛҳųαƖ who wrote for The New Republic in the mid 90's. He is portrayed as a Midwest WASP heterosɛҳuąƖ by a WASP actor, Hayden Christensen.

We live in an era of "identity politics."  Obama is the first "Black" President. His Administration has many ɧoɱosɛҳųαƖs. Sonia Sottomayer is the first "Latina" Supreme Court Judge. A hidden hand is pushing minorities to the fore. But when minorities screw up; oh well, suddenly their minority status is airbrushed and they belong to the majority.

Minorities are good; the heterosɛҳuąƖ WASP majority is bad.

The movie goes out of its way to portray this gαy reporter as a heterosɛҳuąƖ. The women on the New Republic staff swoon over him. In one scene, he remarks that he must stop complimenting females on their accessories or they will think he is gαy.

The Glass character comes from the Highland Park area of Chicago. Although this seems to be a Jєωιѕн enclave, it is portrayed as old WASP establishment.  There are recurring scenes where Glass is lecturing a journalism class at his old high school. The worshipful girl students, the doting teacher, the prominent American flag, are all distinctly Gentile.

However the movie dropped one clue that raised my suspicions. Glass says he has to attend law school because "where I come from, you're nobody unless you're a doctor or a lawyer." That sounded very familiar so I watched an extensive interview with Glass from "Sixty Minutes" and sure enough...he is not only Jєωιѕн but gαy.

WHY IS THIS IMPORTANT?

glasspic.jpgBecause the movie refuses to acknowledge Glass's real identity, it doesn't go beyond relating how his hoax unravelled. There is no probing of his character and motives. As a result, the movie is about half-as-good as it should be.

Glass's minority identity may explain why his ruse wasn't discovered earlier; why he was a "star"; and why he was "protected" for so long by colleagues and editors.

America is about half-as-good as it should be because it can't confront other Jєωιѕн or gαy whoppers for fear of being politically incorrect. For example, Larry Silverstein should be asked why World Trade Centre Building Seven just happened to be wired for demolition on Sept. 11, 2001, and was demolished, but the twin towers weren't?

A gαy activist whopper that has the potential to destroy millions of lives is the notion that ɧoɱosɛҳųαƖity is a normal lifestyle choice and not a developmental disorder.

In "The Kinsey Report" Rockefeller-sponsored gαy Alfred Kinsey redefined heterosɛҳuąƖ behavior by secretly adding ɧoɱosɛҳųαƖs to his sample.

I believe that the majority of Jєωs like myself and gαys are honest and decent people. But if we remain silent about the subversive activities of certain Jєωιѕн or gαy figures, we implicate ourselves.

Prejudice is another word for experience. We can't help but notice that a disproportionate share of the world's liars are either gαy or Jєωιѕн or both.  The reasons for this are complex. It may have something to do with both groups feeling unjustly excluded from society and believing  therefore anything goes.

In "After The Ball: How America Will Conquer Its hatred & Fear of gαys in the 90's,"  gαy activists Marshall Kirk and Hunter Madsen say, "a surprisingly high percentage" of pathological liars and con men are gαy. This results from a natural habit of self-concealment, and leads to a stubborn self-deception about one's own gαyness and its implication." (pp. 276 ff)

The Jєωιѕн proclivity to lie may have something to do with a Cabalistic belief that reality can be socially defined. The lack of belief in the immortality of the soul may be another factor. This is a complex issue.

FINALLY

The upshot is that the more Hollywood portrays Jєωιѕн or gαy behaviour as if it were American mainstream  behaviour, the sooner it will be.

I have never seen Christianity portrayed in a truly favorable light in a Hollywood movie. Only once have I seen a Jєω portrayed in an negative light. (In "The Upside of Anger" (2005) a Jєωιѕн radio producer is exploiting a young woman sɛҳuąƖly. )I can't remember seeing a ɧoɱosɛҳųαƖ portrayed negatively. No group is perfect, not even "a persecuted minority."

Every day Hollywood presents negative or banal Jєωιѕн behavior in a positive light as American behavior. In "I Love You Man," masculine behavior is defined by two Jєωs who are aren't identified as such. They masturbate and play music in a garage but they don't hunt, build things or engage in physical sports.  In Judd Apatow's movies, the characters are Jєωs who mostly behave in a repulsive manner. Yet, they are not identified as Jєωs and their behavior is presented as endearing.

Millions of heterosɛҳuąƖ women have modelled themselves on the four gals in "Sex and the City." The show was created by gαy Jєω Darren Starr, and the girls act like male ɧoɱosɛҳųαƖs.

Americans have been under psychological attack for some time.  Political correctness is a trick. The worst Jєωs and gαys are being used by the Illuminati to corrupt society. The best Jєωs and gαys cannot remain silent. Nor can anyone else.

Thanks for the article Chant.  It was good.

Robert