Send CathInfo's owner Matthew a gift from his Amazon wish list:https://www.amazon.com/hz/wishlist/ls/25M2B8RERL1UO
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
Ohh whoopy... the "goddess" of flat-tardom has made a return...
You should change your forum name, you do it a disservice.
Who are you to preach to me!? Am I the one forging Scripture to adorn false idols?
You don't use any proofs whatsoever, but neither will you look at the evidence. All you can do is treat people badly in the name of defending your view. Its obvious that if there are ANY changes in scripture between the 1500's and the 1800's, the person involved has already proven his changes at the very least, suspect of corruption.
Theistic FEism... a litany of distinction fails such as, for example, between "accident" and "substance".
Ohh boo-hoo... if only you could see how ridiculous you people look...
Oh, do show. Prove your point. Nothing to the contrary of what was alleged has been provided that explains why its ok to change the meaning of scripture by translation. Talk is cheap. Use your whiny keyboard to prove tampering with scripture is ever permitted.
I think you're being rather devious here... bottom line, you and your cronies could care less about upholding the integrity of "translation," it's all "smoke and mirrors" for defending your false religion.
Translation is it? Then why not the earlier translation prior to changes? It is tradition that supports truth, not change. Change proves itself false every time. Just about the time Pius X would finally come along to warn of modernism, too. Goes to show the truth can be obvious and some people still refuse to see.
Did you ever "connect the dots" as a child? I have a feeling you didn't, because you sure the hell ain't doing it here...
Remember fellow True Catholics this should sound familiar to you, the Protestant always accuse us Catholics as changing scripture also. Hmmm, I wonder how they explain the Holy Ghost who guides and keeps the Word of God in Truth.