Author Topic: Dimond Brothers (Read 2249 times)

LaughingAmigo · « **on:** January 06, 2016, 08:34:44 PM »

The Dimond Brothers are Jєωs? Dimond is a derivative of Diamond. Jєωs have historically been traders in gold, silver, pearls, diamonds, and the like, hence the last names of Goldman, Goldberg (Gold Mountain), Silberman (Silver Man), Silverstein (Silver Stone), Pearlman, and Dimond (Diamond).

They are following the Jєωιѕн Protocols:

Quote

Protocol 17:5

. . . WE SHALL NOT OVERTLY LAY A FINGER ON EXISTING CHURCHES, BUT WE SHALL FIGHT AGAINST THEM BY CRITICISM CALCULATED TO PRODUCE SCHISM[/b] . . .

What are the Dimond Brothers doing? Why, they are literally fighting against the Catholic Church by criticism calculated to produce the schism of sedevacantism.

OHCA · « **Reply #1 on:** January 06, 2016, 08:40:11 PM »

They're nuts. But I don't believe they're Jєωs.

sword of the Spirit · « **Reply #2 on:** January 06, 2016, 09:00:37 PM »

Quote from: LaughingAmigo

The Dimond Brothers are Jєωs? Dimond is a derivative of Diamond. Jєωs have historically been traders in gold, silver, pearls, diamonds, and the like, hence the last names of Goldman, Goldberg (Gold Mountain), Silberman (Silver Man), Silverstein (Silver Stone), Pearlman, and Dimond (Diamond).

They are following the Jєωιѕн Protocols:

Quote
Protocol 17:5

. . . WE SHALL NOT OVERTLY LAY A FINGER ON EXISTING CHURCHES, BUT WE SHALL FIGHT AGAINST THEM BY CRITICISM CALCULATED TO PRODUCE SCHISM[/b] . . .

What are the Dimond Brothers doing? Why, they are literally fighting against the Catholic Church by criticism calculated to produce the schism of sedevacantism.

Well here is something for you to laugh at amigo; who cares if they are Jєωs fighting against Christ and His Church (objectively) they could be in a state of grace (subjectively). How do know they aren't good people, living moral lives and following their conscious in good faith? In addition, maybe they are invincibly ignorant through no fault of their own.

Who are we to judge?

JezusDeKoning · « **Reply #3 on:** January 06, 2016, 09:59:10 PM »

I've always thought one of them used Dimond as a pseudonym. Ergo, it's not their real last name.

tdrev123 · « **Reply #4 on:** January 06, 2016, 10:26:58 PM »

Quote from: JezusDeKoning

I've always thought one of them used Dimond as a pseudonym. Ergo, it's not their real last name.

Its not their original last name -- they changed it when they became monks, a common practice.

I am pretty certain it is their legal name now--in the lawsuit against them by a former member over a $1.2 million donation, Dimond was what it was listed as their surname.

I have always thought it interesting that their last name did sound Jєωιѕн but I think it probably has nothing to do with anything.

LaughingAmigo · « **Reply #5 on:** January 07, 2016, 04:18:10 PM »

Quote from: tdrev123

Quote from: JezusDeKoning
I've always thought one of them used Dimond as a pseudonym. Ergo, it's not their real last name.

Its not their original last name -- they changed it when they became monks, a common practice.

It is indeed a common practice for Jєωs to change their last name. Ulyanov (Jєω) changed his last name to Lenin before founding the Communist U.S.S.R. Bronshtein (Jєω) changed his last name to Trotsky before founding the Communist Red Army.

If I were to list every Jєω who changed their last name, I would never finish this post.

LaughingAmigo · « **Reply #6 on:** January 07, 2016, 05:01:51 PM »

Quote from: JezusDeKoning

I've always thought one of them used Dimond as a pseudonym. Ergo, it's not their real last name.

More proof they are Jєωιѕн.

roscoe · « **Reply #7 on:** January 07, 2016, 05:34:09 PM »

Has anyone ever aksed them??? :confused1:

Desmond · « **Reply #8 on:** January 07, 2016, 05:41:58 PM »

By googling the surname "Dimond", the only historically famous person coming up is this US Senator:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anthony_Dimond

Who apparently wasn't Jєωιѕн but possibly catholic, and adverse to Jєωs.

Other people with the same surname of note are newzealander rugby players, apparently none Jєωιѕн.

TKGS · « **Reply #9 on:** January 07, 2016, 05:42:31 PM »

Actually, I've come to the conclusion that people who accuse everyone of being Jєωs are actually Jєωs who are trying to sew confusion.

LaughingAmigo is clearly a Jєω! See how he uses a Spanish word to throw off the suspicion? That's why he's laughing.

Desmond · « **Reply #10 on:** January 07, 2016, 05:43:53 PM »

Quote from: LaughingAmigo

Quote from: JezusDeKoning
I've always thought one of them used Dimond as a pseudonym. Ergo, it's not their real last name.

More proof they are Jєωιѕн.

But why would crypto-Jєωs/marranos choose a Jєωιѕн-sounding pseudonym?

LaughingAmigo · « **Reply #11 on:** January 07, 2016, 05:57:59 PM »

Quote from: Desmond

By googling the surname "Dimond", the only historically famous person coming up is this US Senator:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anthony_Dimond

Who apparently wasn't Jєωιѕн but possibly catholic, and adverse to Jєωs.

Other people with the same surname of note are newzealander rugby players, apparently none Jєωιѕн.

VERY FIRST RESULT from searching Google for "last name diamond" immediately says:

Quote

Diamond Name Meaning: Jєωιѕн (αѕнкenαzιc): Americanized form of a Jєωιѕн surname

OHCA · « **Reply #12 on:** January 07, 2016, 06:01:17 PM »

Quote from: TKGS

Actually, I've come to the conclusion that people who accuse everyone of being Jєωs are actually Jєωs who are trying to sew confusion.

LaughingAmigo is clearly a Jєω! See how he uses a Spanish word to throw off the suspicion? That's why he's laughing.

I am a little suspicious of him too. Why do you think he came here talking bad about the bastards though if he's a Jєω himself.

LaughingAmigo · « **Reply #13 on:** January 07, 2016, 06:03:17 PM »

Quote from: Desmond

But why would crypto-Jєωs/marranos choose a Jєωιѕн-sounding pseudonym?

I don't know. Why did the Jєωιѕн shill in this forum, the (currently banned) TraditionalistThomas (check out this thread to see his avatar), openly use a Jєωιѕн avatar (the Jєω, General Eisenhower)?

Maybe it's just a Jєω thing. Maybe it's to let other Jєωs know they are Jєωs, like secret Freemason handshakes. Just speculating. Whatever the case, it's fairly obvious by their choice of name, choice of career (promoting schism in the church of the Jєωs' arch-enemy) and the way they do it (two brothers, Jєωs are known to be very tribal) that they are definitely Jєωιѕн charlatans.