Author Topic: Promoting adultery - proverbial kids look like The Mailman  (Read 639 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Matthew

  • Mod
  • *****
  • Posts: 26576
  • Reputation: +22812/-318
  • Gender: Male
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • When you spend thousands of dollars on a stock art or advertisement shot, can't you go ideal just a little bit? You know, an intact family, one where the parents are biologically related to their children?

    I know about widows, widowers, and adoption -- but why idealize an objectively un-ideal situation? Why glorify the exceptions?

    Why do they have to promote adultery, cuckoldry, and sleeping around until you get older "when it's time to settle down and get married"?
    And let's acknowledge the elephant in the room -- this isn't just cuckoldry, but race mixing, being promoted by the Jews once again (NOT for our benefit, I should point out) which is why the cuckoldry is visible at all.

    The Jews think race-mixing is awesome for everyone but themselves. If it's so awesome, why do they reserve this great blessing for the Goyim only? They want it for us because it would tend to harm our country on a fundamental level.

    BOTH of these advertisements came across my path on the same day! I'm not just going to ignore it; I'm going to draw attention to it and say something critical.

    The father of the black family looks like a meme in the making -- remember that famous photo of the father whose son just came out as transgendered? It's a white guy with a goatee; maybe someone has the picture. The face that guy makes is priceless, which is why the meme went viral.

    This guy is making a similar face, knowing that those 2 kids aren't his. Those kids are from a prior "relationship" a.k.a. adultery, a.k.a. they look like the mailman.

    P.S. I realize these aren't real families; all human beings pictured herein are ACTORS, but hand-picked actors. Nothing in a movie or advertisement is left to chance. So I'm not criticizing these actual actors (human beings with immortal souls, etc.) but rather the CHARACTERS, MOVIES and the PLOTS THEREOF being pictured and promoted by the Jєωιѕн corporations.
    Feeling generous? Want to say "thank you"? Feel free to send gift(s) from my Amazon wishlist!
    https://www.amazon.com/hz/wishlist/ls/25M2B8RERL1UO

    Start Amazon.com session by clicking this link, and my family and I get a commission on your purchase!

    Offline SimpleMan

    • Full Member
    • ***
    • Posts: 1788
    • Reputation: +506/-110
    • Gender: Male
    Re: Promoting adultery - proverbial kids look like The Mailman
    « Reply #1 on: May 25, 2020, 07:55:34 PM »
  • Thanks!5
  • No Thanks!0
  • I'm sorry --- I know I'm not always the sharpest barb on the wire, but for the life of me, I can't see anything whatsoever wrong with either of these pictures.  One shows a white family camping.  The other shows a black family cooking out.  There isn't any dramatic variance in the children's appearance from that of either parent.  Sometimes traits of one parent show up more strongly than traits of another parent.  My son looks far more like his mother than like me (do not read that the wrong way), but she is from deepest Poland and her gene pool probably hasn't had much variation in fifty generations, whereas I am a northwestern European mutt from maritime countries.  In other words, her genes are deep, thick, and concentrated, whereas mine are more variegated.  And yes, the black man is making kind of a dorky face, but how is that significant?  The only thing that even remotely "jumps out" at me is that the white son looks vaguely Hispanic, but the father himself has dark hair.  I have cousins who looked like that when they were young boys, and nobody ever questioned whether they were white or not.  Features vary.  Sometimes traits skip generations.  I'd have to come down on the side of "nothing to see here, move on".

    But Matthew, I'm sure you had a very good reason for noticing something.  You are a very astute observer, and I respect the work you do on this page very much.  Could you help me out, and show me what I'm missing?


    Online Viva Cristo Rey

    • Hero Member
    • *****
    • Posts: 10009
    • Reputation: +2781/-448
    • Gender: Female
    Re: Promoting adultery - proverbial kids look like The Mailman
    « Reply #2 on: May 26, 2020, 08:39:17 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!1
  • KBOne world agenda.   They want everyone to look the same with no God. Another reason to dislike the Beatles “Imagine “is a catchy song with dangerous lyrics.

    What drives me crazy is commercials that say “heroes” “we are all in this together”.   No mention of God.
    People forget that when Beatles were publicly promoting atheism by saying they were bigger than God, people were burning their albums and the Beatles were forgotten until John Lennon’s death.  

    Commercials that show two daddy’s or two Mommy’s are disgusting. 

    Commercials are communist brainwashing propaganda.  














    To live with the Saints in Heaven is all bliss and glory....To live with the saints on Earth is just another story!  (unknown)

    Offline SimpleMan

    • Full Member
    • ***
    • Posts: 1788
    • Reputation: +506/-110
    • Gender: Male
    Re: Promoting adultery - proverbial kids look like The Mailman
    « Reply #3 on: May 26, 2020, 09:58:36 AM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • For a look at what happened when they tried to make sure everybody in the family looks exactly alike:



    The girl front and center must have inherited some of those "Dark Irish" genes :jester: :jester: :jester:

    Offline Matthew

    • Mod
    • *****
    • Posts: 26576
    • Reputation: +22812/-318
    • Gender: Male
    Re: Promoting adultery - proverbial kids look like The Mailman
    « Reply #4 on: May 26, 2020, 10:42:56 AM »
  • Thanks!1
  • No Thanks!0
  • The only thing that even remotely "jumps out" at me is that the white son looks vaguely Hispanic, but the father himself has dark hair.  I have cousins who looked like that when they were young boys, and nobody ever questioned whether they were white or not.

    The boy in the first picture looks clearly Hispanic. Look at the color of his legs compared to his sister. No one else in the "family" has that much melanin.

    As for the black family, the parents are portrayed as 100% black but "their" 2 boys are obviously mulatto (half white half black). Look at their straight, slightly wavy hair. Black people *never* have hair like that.

    I'll admit it's subtle enough to escape most people's care or radar -- but I look at things more closely than most, and I'm extra sensitive to this kind of social/cultural brainwashing. And that's what this is.

    They want to get us increasingly comfortable with this. And it's not for our good, as I pointed out. I'm not criticizing any and all mixed race families. I'm criticizing the Jews (the ѕуηαgσgυє of satan, who say they are Jews but are not, to quote Holy Scripture) who have engaged in a multi-generational program of brainwashing to weaken, scatter, divide, and destroy the goyim and lead us all to a nєω ωσrℓ∂ σr∂єr where Jews run the world.

    NO THANKS.
    Feeling generous? Want to say "thank you"? Feel free to send gift(s) from my Amazon wishlist!
    https://www.amazon.com/hz/wishlist/ls/25M2B8RERL1UO

    Start Amazon.com session by clicking this link, and my family and I get a commission on your purchase!


    Offline AlligatorDicax

    • Full Member
    • ***
    • Posts: 908
    • Reputation: +372/-173
    • Gender: Male
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!1

  • [...] but for the life of me, I can't see anything whatsoever wrong with either of these pictures.  One shows a white family camping.  [....]  The only thing that even remotely "jumps out" at me is that the white son looks vaguely Hispanic, but the father himself has dark hair.  I have cousins who looked like that when they were young boys, and nobody ever questioned whether they were white or not.

    On the other hand, a family member adopted a son decades ago, and within my memory, from young childhood into adulthood, he always had the permanently tanned skin that's strongly suggestive here in Florida of Hispanic descent.  His facial features also looked Hispanic, more plausibly developing toward the Ricardo "Mr. Roarke" Montalbán style, than toward the Carlos "Juan Valdez" Sánchez style.  If my family member received any info about the adopted child's ethnicity during the adoption process, it's never been admitted or disclosed to me; in fact, he refused to discuss the ethnicity that seemed obvious to pretty much every other adult member of my family.  Really now, considering the high modern rate of unmarried motherhood among Hispanics, and the more than 100,000 Puerto Ricans living just in their 4 largest concentrations in Florida as of the 2010 Census, do readers seriously doubt that there might be abundant Hispanic infants available for adoption here?  That being in sharp contrast to the scarce white infants available for adoption, which has driven white couples to seek them overseas (notably in the former Soviet Bloc).


    Features vary.  Sometimes traits skip generations.  [....]  Could you help me out, and show me what I'm missing?

    I agree that "features vary".  Maybe the girl's face is simply quite dirty, altho' that would seem to be highly unusual for an advertising photo unrelated to soaps or body washes.  But in my predominantly black neighborhood, it's not unusual to see very pale coloration that's combined with oddly dark facial highlights, as also seen on the girl in the ad photo, in an occasional "ugly duckling".  Such a child might be seen in an otherwise ordinary grouping of 1 woman with the rest children, predominately black, "coming to visit grandma".  The woman, sometimes white, to all external appearances, often seems to be a "baby-mama" (i.e., a likely unmarried woman who, relatively early in life, has already borne the children of different fathers).  Perhaps the woman aspires to the government payments granted to a "welfare queen", or perhaps she is simply naturally stupid [×].  Altho' I've never discussed it with any black men of my acquaintance, I infer that among their "buds", impregnating a white woman yields some prestige; either "movin' on up", or social retribution against the "slave-masters".

    And as I'm reminded by what I've written above, the long-term charity of adopting the unwanted children of others could be the explanation.  Altho' that doesn't make the group an example of the ideal family sought by Matthew.

    -------
    Note ×: Upon further review, to reduce my risk of crossing the line of being unacceptably sɛҳuąƖly explicit on CathInfo, thus subverting the G-rating that Matthew wants to maintain, I deleted my digression to my inferences about condom use among blacks.  And yes, I'm aware of the relevant encyclical by Pope Paul VI.

    Offline Last Tradhican

    • Hero Member
    • *****
    • Posts: 5086
    • Reputation: +2642/-1057
    • Gender: Male
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • On the other hand, a family member adopted a son decades ago, and within my memory, from young childhood into adulthood, he always had the permanently tanned skin that's strongly suggestive here in Florida of Hispanic descent.  His facial features also looked Hispanic, more plausibly developing toward the Ricardo "Mr. Roarke" Montalbán style, than toward the Carlos "Juan Valdez" Sánchez style.  
    Hispanics just means they come from a Spanish speaking country. It is a like saying a person is an American. An American can be a Southern European olive skinned brown eyed Italian or a Northern Italy fair skinned blue-eyed blonde (and that is just the Americans from Italy). The country of Argentina has a much larger percentage of peoples of pure European descent than the USA (from Spain, Italy, Germany, England).

    Ricardo Montalban looks like a Southern Italian type. Juan Valdez is a South American mestizo.

    It is best and more precise to say a person is Latino of European descent, or of olive skinned Southern European descent, or of Fair skinned Northern European descent,  or of African descent, or of Indian descent, Mestizo, Mulato, … then you have the Orientals, they have a lot of those South America too AND they all are Hispanics, they all live in a Spanish speaking country and speak Spanish. It also shows that the person using the descriptions is a traveled man.  
    The Vatican II church - Assisting Souls to Hell Since 1962

    For there shall arise false Christs and false prophets, and shall show great signs and wonders, insomuch as to deceive (if possible) even the elect. Mat 24:24

    Offline AlligatorDicax

    • Full Member
    • ***
    • Posts: 908
    • Reputation: +372/-173
    • Gender: Male
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!1

  • Hispanics just means they come from a Spanish speaking country.

    That's nearly what the U.S. Census Bureau advised their employees in 2010, when it pointed out in its teaching materials for its temporary workers that "Hispanic is not a race".

    That conceded, I was simply responding to ‘SimpleMan’ in the terms that he used.  And I believe that it's broadly understood, at least in the Southern U.S.A., what physical attributes he and ‘Matthew’ intended to convey by "Hispanic".

    As a practical matter of federal law, "Hispanic" seems to mean that altho' a person so described is conceded not to be a member of a distinct "race", he is nonetheless entitled to life-long federal "affirmative action", and excused from any life-long failure to learn English, as a member of a special nonracial "protected class".  I'm confident that it's contrary to what even many liberal United Statesians expected the Civil Rights Act and Voting Rights Act to mandate.  Each was a part of the "Great Society" programs that were finagled into federal law by the Lyndon Johnson Administration (1963--1969).  But even when initial versions of touted federal legislation doesn't mandate something that's objectionable, lҽϝƚιsƚs will see to it that its reäuthorizations expand its reach into objectionable mandates.


    It is a [lot?] like saying a person is an American.  An American can be a Southern European olive skinned brown eyed Italian or a Northern Italy fair skinned blue-eyed blonde (and that is just the Americans from Italy).

    Ummm, not a complete list for Italy.  You're overlooking at least the fair skinned blue-eyed blondes from Sicily (e.g., a slender beauty among my coworkers in a past job), whose relevant genes are almost certainly from the Norman (i.e., Frenchified Viking, thus genetically Scandinavian) conquest of that Italian island from Muslim occupation.

    Now that you've brought up strict definitions, an "American" is strictly anyone from either of the 2 Western-Hemisphere continents called "America".  That's why I sometimes use the awkward but more meticulous label "United Statesian".

    It might be least ambiguous to return to using the now-disparaged terms "Teutonic" or "Nordic", "Alpine", or "Mediterranean".  As I believe I understand the latter term, it includes the medium-melanin skin of many ethnicities, e.g., many southern Italians, many Greeks, Lebanese, Biblical "Hebrews", and Arabs.  More categories will be needed for other ethnicities, e.g., Iranians/Persians (who are not Arabs), various genuine Indians from India (the latter two formally being "Caucasian", despite variations having very dark skin), &c.  But anyone who suggests that is likely to be accused of being a "nαzι".

    As a practical matter of federal law, "Hispanic" seems to mean that altho' a person thus described is not a member of a distinct "race", he is nonetheless entitled to life-long federal "affirmative action", and excused from life-long failure to learn English, as a member of a special nonracial "protected class.  I'm confident that it's contrary to what even many liberal United Statesian supporters expected the Civil Rights Act and Voting Rights Act to mandate.  Each was a part of the "Great Society" programs that were finagled into federal law by the Lyndon Johnson Administration (1963--1969).  But even when initial versions of touted federal legislation don't mandate something that's objectionable, lҽϝƚιsƚs will see to it that its reäuthorizations expand its reach into objectionable mandates.


    then you have the Orientals, they have a lot of those [in?] South America too AND they all are Hispanics, they all live in a Spanish speaking country and speak Spanish.

    Whoa!  That's stretching the definition waaay too much.  When a man immigrates, e.g., from Japan, has an obviously Japanese surname, and somehow wins ɛƖɛctıon to the presidency of whatever South-American country that happened--Chile, Peru, Colombia, or Venezuela--I just can't bring myself to accept a claim that he should be described as "Hispanic".


    Offline Geremia

    • Sr. Member
    • ****
    • Posts: 3573
    • Reputation: +1027/-204
    • Gender: Male
      • St. Isidore e-book library
    "race mixing" or exogamy?
    « Reply #8 on: May 26, 2020, 07:35:24 PM »
  • Thanks!3
  • No Thanks!2
  • race mixing, being promoted by the Jews once again
    What's wrong with exogamous marriages? Moses had an Ethiopian wife, and his critic was struck with leprosy (Numbers 13). Is that the "Jєωιѕн" "race mixing" your talking about?
    St. Isidore e-book library: https://isidore.co/calibre

    Offline SimpleMan

    • Full Member
    • ***
    • Posts: 1788
    • Reputation: +506/-110
    • Gender: Male
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!1
  • Whoa!  That's stretching the definition waaay too much.  When a man immigrates, e.g., from Japan, has an obviously Japanese surname, and somehow wins ɛƖɛctıon to the presidency of whatever South-American country that happened--Chile, Peru, Colombia, or Venezuela--I just can't bring myself to accept a claim that he should be described as "Hispanic".
    I was using "Hispanic" in the colloquial, commonly understood sense.  It is not supposed to have any racial connotation, but alas, it does --- olive-and-darker skin, black hair, pronounced not-quite-white facial features, and so on.  It's my understanding that lighter-skinned Cubans view themselves as kind of sui generis, something distinct from "Hispanic".  It's interesting to note that Fidel Castro and his nephew, NBC newsman Jose Diaz-Balart, are not related by blood --- Jose is Fidel's wife's nephew --- but they both have eyes that are kind of smallish, deep-set, and somewhat close together, long noses, and sort of oval faces with strong, slightly protruding jawlines and chins.  In other words, they're not blood relation, but you couldn't prove it by me.  They look like they could be father and son.

    Alberto Fujimori of Peru (I assume that's who you were describing) being both Japanese and Hispanic, yes, that's kind of a stretch, but according to the nomenclature of our federal government, that's precisely what he would be.  Other instances of "Hispanic but you have to stop and think about it":

    * - Nestor Kirchner of Argentina (German/Croatian)
    * - Carlos Menem of Argentina (Syrian)
    * - actress Alexis Bledel (Danish/German/British)
    * - Alfredo Stroessner of Paraguay (German)
    * - Bernardo O'Higgins (Irish)

    ...and many, many others.  Actress Jessica Alba would also be considered Hispanic (she's Danish-Chilean), but she is "exotic"-looking enough that "Hispanic" is no stretch.  Ditto for Salma Hayek (Lebanese-Mexican).  FWIW, some Argentinians regard "Argentinian" as something distinct from "Hispanic", similar to white Cubans. 

    I did not include Brazilians because, unless I'm missing something, nobody considers then Hispanic.  Models Xuxa (Maria Meneghel), Cintia Dicker, and Gisele Bündchen are German, pure and simple.

    Offline BTNYC

    • Sr. Member
    • ****
    • Posts: 2777
    • Reputation: +3119/-96
    • Gender: Male
    Re: "race mixing" or exogamy?
    « Reply #10 on: May 27, 2020, 08:42:42 AM »
  • Thanks!4
  • No Thanks!2
  • What's wrong with exogamous marriages? Moses had an Ethiopian wife, and his critic was struck with leprosy (Numbers 13). Is that the "Jєωιѕн" "race mixing" your talking about?

    You're either naïve in the extreme, or you're being flatly disingenuous if you mean to imply the Jews have not made a huge, culturally ubiquitous effort at eliminating "whiteness" by every means at their disposal - flooding white countries with foreigners, spreading dekulakization narratives vilifying whites for their "privilege," and, yes pushing images of mixed race couples on TV, in films, and advertising. Jews associate "whiteness" with Christendom, and are not satisfied with even a 100% apostate Europe and America. They want to wipe out the sons and daughters of Christendom completely, as they see us as Edom - their ancient religious and ethnic enemy.

    God bless you if you've lived a life so blessedly sheltered that you haven't noticed, but Jews do promote race-mixing, despite your scoffing use of scare quotes and Poche-level scriptural cherry-picking.


    Offline Geremia

    • Sr. Member
    • ****
    • Posts: 3573
    • Reputation: +1027/-204
    • Gender: Male
      • St. Isidore e-book library
    Re: "race mixing" or exogamy?
    « Reply #11 on: May 30, 2020, 02:33:59 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • You're either naïve in the extreme, or you're being flatly disingenuous if you mean to imply the Jews have not made a huge, culturally ubiquitous effort at eliminating "whiteness" by every means at their disposal - flooding white countries with foreigners, spreading dekulakization narratives vilifying whites for their "privilege," and, yes pushing images of mixed race couples on TV, in films, and advertising. Jews associate "whiteness" with Christendom, and are not satisfied with even a 100% apostate Europe and America. They want to wipe out the sons and daughters of Christendom completely, as they see us as Edom - their ancient religious and ethnic enemy.
    I'm familiar with E. Michael Jones's Slaughter of the Cities.

    God bless you if you've lived a life so blessedly sheltered that you haven't noticed, but Jews do promote race-mixing, despite your scoffing use of scare quotes and Poche-level scriptural cherry-picking.

    Actually, the real Jews were against "race mixing"; cf. Tobias 6:11, 7:14.
    St. Isidore e-book library: https://isidore.co/calibre

    Offline SimpleMan

    • Full Member
    • ***
    • Posts: 1788
    • Reputation: +506/-110
    • Gender: Male
    Re: Promoting adultery - proverbial kids look like The Mailman
    « Reply #12 on: June 30, 2020, 04:40:58 PM »
  • Thanks!1
  • No Thanks!0
  • Yikes!  I was trying to find an inexpensive RV to rent, so I can take my son on a decent vacation this year without having to deal with lodging hassles, and this picture came up!


    Offline Matthew

    • Mod
    • *****
    • Posts: 26576
    • Reputation: +22812/-318
    • Gender: Male
    Re: Promoting adultery - proverbial kids look like The Mailman
    « Reply #13 on: June 30, 2020, 06:25:48 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Actually, the real Jews were against "race mixing"; cf. Tobias 6:11, 7:14.

    That is neither here nor there, since "real Jews" haven't existed for about 20 centuries.
    All we've had for centuries are "them that say they are Jews and are not, but are the ѕуηαgσgυє of Satan." (Apoc. 2:9)
    Feeling generous? Want to say "thank you"? Feel free to send gift(s) from my Amazon wishlist!
    https://www.amazon.com/hz/wishlist/ls/25M2B8RERL1UO

    Start Amazon.com session by clicking this link, and my family and I get a commission on your purchase!


     

    Sitemap 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16