ORIGIN OF EXECRABILIS



    Why was the Church moved to issue this far-reaching Papal

Bulla back in 1460?  By the special assistance of the Holy Ghost,

permitting the supernatural gift of prudence to play a decisive

part, Pope Pius II exercised this means of condemning the error

of "conciliarism" so rampant in his day.



    After the death of Pope Boniface VIII in 1303 the enemies of

Christ, inside and outside His Church, tried to escape from the

Church's teachings, handed down through the Apostolic Pontiffs,

by seeking appeals from papal pronouncements and policies to

that of a general Council of the whole Church, bypassing the Pope

if necessary, or victimizing him as they attempted with Martin V

in 1414.  This contemptuous, arrogant attitude came to be known

as the "Conciliarist usurpation of the papal power by a Council."



    Clearly, "conciliarism" is an imminent danger for the

Church, the papacy and divine doctrine in any age.  Relying upon

the error of "conciliarism," kings and clergy became defiant to

the Holy See, threatening to appeal to future Councils and to

future Popes in the hopes of changing Church doctrine or policy  

In furtherance of this practice, special groups sought to place

men of their own anti-Catholic thinking on the Throne of Peter.



    Then, in 1458, Pius II came to the Throne, himself

indoctrinated with the "Conciliarist" attitude.  However, once

seated on the Papal Throne, he realized the evil of appealing to

a future Council whether for the expressed or secret purpose of

overturning Church Tradition and the Deposit of Faith.  So

serious had matters worsened that by 1460 Pius II felt impelled

to issue his now-famous Bulla, Execrabilis, on February 15th of

that year, outlawing this harmful maneuver and binding it with

two of the severest punishments the Church may inflict.



    In Execrabilis he laid down definite Church Law to protect

the Church, the Faith and the sheepfold from illegal Councils,

not only in his time but in all time to come.



    This papal pronouncement, this Church teaching, has the

grace of infallibility since it relates specifically to Faith and

Morals; Moreover, it can never be revoked or rendered inoperative

or null  and void.  Pope Pius II, in obedience to his solemn and

paramount duty to protect the Faith and Morals of the Faithful,

equipped the Apostolic Church with this potent weapon to combat

illegal councils, to deal death blows to them.



    In justice, we Apostolic Catholics of today must use this

weapon against the illegal 2nd Vatican Council, an evil council

called to escape Christ's divine doctrine, His Church's teachings

and practices; a satanic council called to "liberate" mankind

from the past judgments of the Holy See, the binding judgments of

the Keys of Peter.  We must use Execrabilis to beat to death the

abominable, detestable, execrable V-2 Council that dared to

reopen the infallible judgments of Christ's Church, in violation

of divine precepts and laws prohibiting this anti-Catholic act.



    Rarely do you find an infallible pronouncement so brief yet

so all-embracing and all-binding as is Execrabilis.  So concise

is Execrabilis that one is apt to miss the import of its sweeping

message, overlook its significance, on first reading.



    So disastrous is the effect of Execrabilis upon the V-2

Council that the very knowledge of its existence by awakening

Catholics who oppose V-2 sent stirring volcanic shakes and

shivers through Paul 6, mastermind and implementor-in-chief of

this anti-supernatural V-2 Council.  So terrified of Execrabilis

was Paul 6, as are his lackeys today, they busied themselves

fashioning arguments against the definite and final judgment of

Execrabilis in a vain effort to escape its quashing effects on

their perfidious V-2 Council.  One can say Execrabilis is the

ecclesial broom that sweeps the Church clean of the sinful works

of an illegal Council.  As an unruly dog is frightened and put to

rout by a broom or mop wielded in the hands of the conscientious

mother of a household, so too the refractory whelps of V-2 are

terrified by Execrabilis in the hands of Holy Mother Church.

VATICAN I



    Some four-hundred years after Execrabilis, the First Vatican

Council (1869-70), a holy dogmatic Council, deemed it expedient

to amplify and reaffirm the law laid down in Execrabilis.



    Back in 1869, in their efforts to destroy the Kingdom of God

on earth, the Catholic Church, Her enemies fastened upon the

finality of Church pronouncements, seeking to disprove belief in

their infallibility and permanence.



    History tells us that Vatican I was called to define Papal

Infallibility but few books today tell us why the question of

infallibility had become so burning and vital an issue.



    Plainly, there were two factions at work: one for

infallibility; the other wanted to see past Church Judgments

reopened and changed or obliterated.  Even as today, the one side

was made up of loyal Apostolic Catholics; the other side

comprised the Marranos and their followers, many of whom were

confused and duped - as were many of the bishops at Vatican II -

duped into believing the Church's judgments could be obliterated

or modified.



    The issue seized upon by the Marranos at V-1 would be the

same wedge they used at V-2: a new and different Church stand on

the Jєωs.  They wanted a different attitude and thinking from

Catholics on the Jєωs than what the Church has always held and

taught.  They wanted an acceptance of rabbinic тαℓмυdic Judaism

as a religion in its own right, higher and even better than

Christianity.



    In 1869-70 the Jєωs wanted to be exonerated of deicide and

wanted the lifting of the Curse of God which their wickedness

brought upon their race.  Once this door was open to them, there

would be no bar to the ѕуηαgσgυє of Satan bringing into the

Church all of its bags of false gnostic doctrines, as was later

to happen at the V-2 Council (1962-65).



    In 1869-70 the Marrano-enemy sought to achieve his goal by

trickery - inducing the prelates at the V-1 Council to approve

declarations directly opposed to what the Church has previously

declared.  In short, to contradict Herself.  This would amount to

reopening the whole sum of Her past infallible judgments which

are irreformable.  What the Marranos had in mind, of course, was

the destruction of the whole Deposit-of-Faith, the stripping of

the Catholic Church, Her demise.



    Marrano Maneuver: - For getting their way at the V-1

Council, the Marranos had devised a clever maneuver.  Perhaps

you've heard the story of the lady who was stopped on the street

corner by a salesman and offered the opportunity to buy a mink

coat cheap.  He shows her a real mink coat, she pays her money

and receives a box.  Upon arriving home and opening the box she

finds not a soft, luxurious mink coat but one of prickly opossum.



    Such was the old bait and switcheroo game the Marranos tried

at V-1.  First the Jєωs approached the Council Fathers with a

proposal that they sign a "summons to conversion of the

Israelites," which is an intention without fault.  It should

happen!  But later, the Jєωs added assertions, the same old

heretical lies they always propose, which stand in open

contradiction to the doctrine laid down in this respect by the

Holy Catholic Church (Pinay, Plot Against the Church, pp. 18-19),



    The Franco-Prussian War and Papal Infallibility happened to

be declared the same week.  In spite of the horrors and gathering

darkness of war, Pius IX had only one concern, the welfare of the

Universal Church.  He did not terminate V-1 until a re-

declaration of Papal Infallibility on faith and morals was

settled once and for all time.  This infallible pronouncement

means that past Church judgments are irreformable, never to be

reopened ever.  Thus, none may alter the permanent traditional

infallible doctrines of the Church in any age.



    And God knows Pius IX had a difficult time in getting the

full support of the majority of bishops to commit themselves to

the Church's traditional and constant doctrine of infallibility.

It wasn't that the prelates were against infallibility but they

showed signs of uncertainty as to when and how this doctrine

applied.  They did not understand the importance in 1869-70 of

urgency for re-declaring this dogma that had already been

recognized at the Councils of Lyons and Florence.  Foes in their

midst tried their utmost to persuade the bishops that a

re-declaration in modern times was unnecessary, which is like

saying that those who said their morning prayers as children have

no need to repeat them in later life.



    Pius IX wanted a dogmatic Council to reaffirm Papal

Infallibility for one very vital reason.  He wanted to make clear

that past Church judgments, being infallible as they are, are

therefore permanent, binding for all ages and thus are never to

be reopened or reformed so as to give them new expressions.



    The Church's judgments are irreformable and constant because

they are the living echoes of the infallible teachers of the

Faith down through the centuries.  And Pius IX wanted a

modern-day dogmatic Council to spell this out.



    Unfortunately, many prelates were unable to see why the

Church, in spite of Her judgments, couldn't give a little here

and there, as the prelates seemed willing to do in their personal

judgments.  It would make life more pleasant for them if the

Church were not so unyielding.  That this would jeopardize the

Faith, leading to its inevitable demolition, was of no great,

concern to bishops favoring the policy of compromise, although

they didn't see this as a compromise.



    American Example: - Concerning such policy it must be noted

that in whatever country the influence of Jєωry and its

Fɾҽҽmαsσɳɾყ is strong, those bishops are weak on the protective

needs of Holy Church in the constancy and permanency of Her

judgments.



    Take America for example.  American prelates, in

disobedience to Popes, have kept priests from reading and

teaching from their pulpits the papal encyclicals because their

contents might offend Jєωs and Protestant Masons.  These

encyclicals would have early alerted the Catholic populace to

the dangerous enemy in our land and also made known the duty to

overcome them; but for the sake of false peace, American bishops

held their tongues, the people remained in their ignorance, all

the while sopping up the enemy's anti-Christian mentality and

ideas through osmosis.  Knowingly or unknowingly, the actions and

speech of American bishops have all too often mirrored the

sophistries of the ѕуηαgσgυє and the Grand Lodges.  What the

people see and hear their bishops do and speak, they will

imitate.



    For America, the land ruled by the Jєω and Freemason, the

Bishop of Baltimore ran the show from the sidelines at V-I.  He

urged the bishop of Cincinnati to gather signatures to be

presented to the Pope begging that infallibility not be

re-declared.  However, the bishop of Baltimore didn't want to be

caught with his signature on the petition so he declined to sign,

using his position as a member of the Committee of the Faith as

his excuse.  There were 27 who did sign it, almost all of them

Americans (Life and Work of Pope Leo XIII, by Rev. J. J.

McGovern, D. D,, 1903, "Archbishop Purcell on Infallibility").



    But by no means were American bishops alone in their

opposition.  Other Jєω-Masonic strongholds gave evidence of

influence as indicated by the 140 German, Hungarian, French and

Italian bishops who addressed a similar petition to the Holy

Father, who naturally refused to adopt the prejudicial plea.  The

final vote re-declaring papal infallibility with the constancy

and irreformability of Church judgments and the re-outlawing of

appeals to an ecuмenical Council over the head of the Popes was

pronounced upon by 975 prelates.



    Jєω Plans Frustrated: - The outbreak of the Franco-Prussian

War that caused the hasty closing of the V-I Council was a

fortuitous event, frustrating the plans of the Jєωs at the very

time they were about to have their "postulate" question on the

Jєωs come before a general discussion by the duped Council

Fathers who had fallen for the switcheroo game.  Despite what V-1

was in the process of declaring concerning infallibility and the

non-opening of past judgments, the perfidious Jєωs were in the

heat of pulling off their coup anyway.  Thanks to the war the

Jєωs didn't get the floor - at V-1, that is.

FOUR IMPORTANT FEATURES





   Execrabilis has four important features:  1. the binding

nature of the Church's judgments; 2. the wide coverage of persons

on whom the sentence falls; 3. the requirements for lifting the

sentence; 4. the effect of Church Laws on councils wrongly called

and used.





   A.  The term "judgment" as used in Execrabilis, and as

amplified and re-affirmed by Council V-1, sweepingly embraces

dogma, doctrine, teaching and worship.  Execrabilis covers not

only the judgments of the Church then existing at the time of

Pope Pius II but also locks in the judgments of succeeding popes

against attacks by an illegal council or an unlawfully acting

pontiff.  Thus every judgment of the Church touching faith and

morals is embraced.  Condemned are all the suppressions,

innovations, changes and false doctrines introduced by the 2nd

Vatican Council, including its attempt to change the thinking and

attitude of Catholics on faith and morals.  This Law is a defense

against any who attempt to change the Church's judgments against

rabbinic Jєωry, Fɾҽҽmαsσɳɾყ, Communism, Naturalism, Humanism,

anti-Supernaturalism, et cetera.





   B.  The next thing to note is the wide coverage of persons

upon whom the sentence of Execrabilis falls.  Everyone - a Pope

included - who violates the law laid down in Execrabilis is

deemed guilty.  Thus all who plot and call an illegal council ...

sit on commissions and draft anti-Catholic schemas ... take part

in its proceedings against the Church ... or implement or promote

such a judgment-breaking council - all violate the intent and

spirit of Execrabilis and are automatically thrust out of the

Church with the sentence of anathema which means damnation.





   Therefore, John 23 who called the 2nd Vatican Council to

question and evade the Church's judgments, and Paul 6 who

dedicated himself to furthering the illegal Council and who

completed its work, issued all its docuмents and implemented the

Council, were put out of the Church with the indignation of God

upon their souls.





   Similarly excommunicated with the wrath of God are the

priests who worked on the various preparatory commissions and

prepared hostile schemas, and also the prelates, consultors,

advisors who participated in the V-2 Council's anti-Catholic

activities in any way, inasmuch as their efforts constituted

adherence to and the extending of favor and assistance to the

enemies of Christ, for it is they who appealed for the V-2

Council.  Likewise banished from the Church are all diocesan

bishops who saddle the Saviour's sheepfold with V-2.  Teachers,

heads and faculty of seminaries, colleges, universities who

promote the work of the V-2 Council incur the sentence of

Execrabilis since they spread the false doctrines of the enemies

of the Cross in opposition to the judgments of Christ's Church.





   So extensive is the coverage of the guilty that even

scriveners and witnesses and, in general, all those who knowingly

furnish counsel, help, or favor those who appealed for the V-2

Council (Jєωs and Masons) are punished with the same drastic

penalty.  The guilty include all who wilfully accept the

heretical V-2 Council and its bad fruits: all priests who, in

violation of their oath to defend the Church against heresy,

embrace the new and strange teachings of V-2, knowing they are

opposed to the judgments of the Apostolic Catholic Church, who

submit to the unlawful suppressing of the Sacrifice of the Mass

and tolerate the anti-Catholic "New Ordo," who turn aside the

Trent Catechism to teach V-2/CCD false doctrine, or in any way

aid in the entrenching of the execrable and illegal V-2 Council -

all are excommunicated from the Apostolic Church with the

indignation of God upon their heads.





   C.  The third notable aspect of Execrabilis is its reserving

to the Supreme Pontiff alone the power to lift the sentence of

excommunication attaching to the guilty for this particular sin.





   This reserving of absolution naturally presupposes a

legitimate Pontiff able to lift the dreadful sentence.  But,

since 1958, no legitimate representative of Christ sits upon the

earthly seat of Judgment.  Usurpers, men who suppress the Primacy

and Sovereignty of Christ's Church, men who refuse the triple

Crowned Tiara and all it signifies, lack the power of the keys.

Such imposters are unable to either excommunicate or lift the

sentence of excommunication.  These imposters, in spite of their

"elections," have by their heresies thrust themselves out of the

Church and therefore cannot lift the excommunication, because one

who is put outside the Church cannot lawfully exercise any of the

Papal Power (see Fr. Saenz, "The Vacant See," Veritas, Dec.

1975).  Those who are outside the Church are not inside the

Church.





   Since the Chair of Peter is vacant at this time, those who

have fallen under the sentence of Execrabilis are in BIG trouble

because, as the Council of Trent tells us, "Priests have no power

of absolution in reserved cases except at the point of death."

Trent also tells us: " ... that the absolution which a priest

pronounces upon one over whom he has not either an ordinary or a

delegated jurisdiction ought to be of no weight whatever"

(Doctrine on the Sacrament of Penance, Chap. VII, "On the

Reservation of Cases," Sess. XIV.  Can be found in Dogmatic

Canons and Decrees; New York: The Devin-Adair Co., 1912, pp.

102-103).





   For a priest to absolve a reserved sin at point of death, it

is essential there be an acknowledgement of guilt.  It is

essential that the sinner abjure V-2; he must repent

participating in the illegal V-2 Council or the promoting,

supporting or implementing of it, as well as acts favoring those

who caused the illegal V-2 Council to be called.  Without

repentance there can be no absolving the reserved sin which

remains unconfessed.  In such sinful, unrepentant and unabsolved

state the sinner goes to meet his Maker.





   The world has witnessed V-2 popes go to their death

unrepentant and unabsolved of their V-2 crimes against God and

His Church, as defined in Execrabilis and by the First Vatican

Council.  It is reported that on his death bed John 23 "in firm

tones discussed the Council and expressed his wishes as to its

future in very definite terms" (Hatch, A Man Named John; Image

Books, a division of Doubleday & Co., Inc., 1963, page 226).





   In John's deathroom stood many prelates of the Church, two

of them his confessors.  None of them bothered to help John 23

reconcile himself with and make his peace with the Creator

because they themselves would not admit the wrongness of the

judgment-breaking illegal V-2 Council, would not admit that it is

a mortal sin to alter, supplant and suppress the infallible

judgments of the Church, or sinful to call a council to achieve

these condemned goals, or that the Church does indeed inflict

penalties, stretching into eternity, upon those who break Her

Laws.  What is bound on earth is bound also in Heaven under the

Power of the Keys.





   Paul 6, the immediate successor of John 23, also stood by

the illegal V-2 Council even in the time of death.  Anticipating

his own death as early as 1963 at age 66, in the year of his

election, Paul 6 wrote his last will and testament and added to

it in 1972 and again in 1973.  Seeming to be very much aware that

he was not a true Representative of Christ, he requested that

he neither have a funeral like true Pontiffs nor have a similar

burial.





   In his typical caustic sniping at genuine Catholic practices

and holy tradition he stated: "As regards my funeral: let it be

simple and animated by religious piety.  I do not wish to have

the catafalque, as is the custom for the funeral of Popes;

instead let things be carried out in a humble and becoming

manner." As to his tomb - he wanted none.  "No monument for me."

V-2 was to be his monument, the epitome of impiety.





   In his last will and testament, Paul 6 wrote of his main

wish - the implementation of the heretical V-2 Council.  " ...

Let its prescriptions be put into effect."  As to ecuмenism he

stated: "the approach to the separated Brethren must go on ..."

He added with his usual Modernist deceit, "but without deflecting

from true Catholic doctrine."  The false ideas held by Paul 6

regarding "true Catholic doctrine" were far from the divine

truths given to the Catholic Church in the Two Founts of

Supernatural Revelation.





   In his final testament Paul 6 turned aside from the Church's

warnings against the world, the flesh and the devil.  All true

Pontiffs have pictured the world as the city of Satan very much

opposed to the City of God.  They counsel the faithful to serve

God, not the world.  But Paul 6 said "one must study the world,

love it and serve it" (taken from "The Testament of Paul VI,"

L'OR [L'Osservatore Romano], August 24, 1978, pages 1, 2).





   Sensing his days were numbered - as indicated by his

frequent reference to dying - Paul 6 was in a hurry to get on

with entrenching the V-2 Council more deeply.  The last months of

the life of Paul 6 saw an intensified program by him in

implementing V-2 which included his malicious dedication

to making the Vatican the special and cordial meeting place and

haven for Jєωs, Masons, Communists, all avowed enemies of

the One True Faith and One True Church.





   Paul 6 called for closer and closer ties between Catholics

and Jєωry.  Newspaper photographs and headlines repeatedly

recorded his flaunting Papal decrees and Church Laws against

fraternizing and actively supporting the enemies of the Cross

and Christian Order.  In private audiences he told Jєωs and

Moslems, rejecters of Christ, that they worship the same God as

Catholics.  When he wasn't entertaining the enemy at the Vatican

he sent representatives to address the Godless UNO to stress

"peace," meaning the Church would not oppose Her enemy,

continually reassuring this pledge which he had made publicly

before the UNO in October 1965.





   This "man of sin," Paul 6, invaded the heart and soul of the

Catholic family in urging a more liberal interpretation of the

marriage laws, so as to destruct more and more Catholic

marriages.





   His General Audiences were constant calls to "follow the

[V-2] Council."





   This is but a brief list of the many monstrous crimes of

Paul 6 against Christ's Church and the Faith during his last

days.  Right up to the day of his death Paul 6 had busied himself

laboring for the further advancement of the illegal V-2 Council.





   Without regret or remorse Paul 6 departed this life leaving

worldwide spiritual chaos in his wake: millions of souls

languishing for the divine Mass and Sacraments that Paul 6

suppressed and supplanted with his own form of V-2 worship and

liturgy to man and the lord of this world.  So great is the

devastation by V-2 that the See of Peter and the episcopal Sees

everywhere have been emptied.  The Brides of Christ are

bewildered, confused, scattered and gone, cut down like grain

before the scythe.  The priests of Christ turn away from Him,

unwilling to understand what has happened at the hands of the

"man of perdition."





   Such was this ephod-wearing man, Paul 6, bearer of "the

Broken Cross," whose career and last testament opposed the

Eternal Testament of Christ.  Arrogant and hardened to the very

end, unheedful of the judgment of God's Wrath, imposed by

Execrabilis and other eternally-binding judgments of His Church,

Paul 6 came face to face with the Eternal Judge.  With millions

of souls and the Angels and Saints witnessing against him, Paul 6

dared to meet God, He Who says "Vengeance is Mine, and I will

repay " (Rom. 12: 19).  What a dreadful state to be in, standing

before the Judgment Throne of Heaven.





   Next came J-P 1, occupier of the papal chair for only 33

days, who willfully preferred to trod the deflecting footsteps of

his two immediate predecessors John 23 and Paul 6 - even to the

taking of their names.





   In pledging his fullest support to the illegal V-2 Council,

J-P 1 refused the Tiara and designated himself "the first

Minister" of the conciliar sect counter-church founded by John 23

and Paul 6, the two main puppets of the ѕуηαgσgυє who had been

unlawfully given the Chair of Peter to carry out the plot against

Christ's Church.  J-P 1 did not desire to be a true Pontiff; not

wanting to be known or accepted as the Supreme Pontiff of

Christ's Church, as indeed he was not, and was well aware of this

accusing fact





   Two of his most scandalous testaments were his collection of

letters and his statements regarding his lack of belief.        





   In an ill-conceived "letter" to Christ, J-P 1 dared to

presume to counsel Christ, the Author of Charity, the Word of

God, as to what to say and what to promise.  On his disbelief, he

publicly stated he no longer accepted the Divine Religion,

entrusted to the Catholic Church to safeguard and to teach, as

the "only true religion" with rights that others have not and

that he no longer believed that only truth has rights.  "In the

end," he said, "I convinced myself that we had been wrong" (see

Veritas, Aug.-Sept. 1978, pages 14, 19).





   The record is clear.  None of these three V-2  "popes,"

unholy holders of the Papal Chair, regretted the anti-Christian

acts against the Church and Faith brought about by V-2.  And so

the binding judgment of Execrabilis fell full force upon all

three.  Such was their status when the Angel of Death whisked

their souls away to the Courts of Heaven.





   V-2 cardinals, bishops, priests, religious and laity are

also dying unrepentant and unabsolved of their guilt in the

infamous V-2 Council.  Unpardoned because of their hardened

refusal to acknowledge V-2 is wrong; unshrived because of their

refusal to admit the evil consequences V-2's satanic actions have

brought upon the earth.





   Because of V-2 the whole world is in BIG trouble.  To be

implicated in any way with a council like V-2 is something not to

be dismissed lightly,





   And what about the latest pretend "pope," Tiaraless John

Paul 2, who revels in calling Paul 6 his "father" and "mentor"?

Karol Wojtyla, coming to Rome from behind the iron-curtain

country of Poland, has told us over and over that he is committed

to carrying out all the wishes of Paul 6 regarding the V-2

Council.  In other words Charlie will carry out the will and

testament of the anti-Christian Paul 6 rather than execute the

Will and Testament of Jesus Christ, Whose Blood has sealed

forever the Covenant of the Sanctuary in the Sacrifice of the

Cross which every priest has been commanded to offer "in Memory

of ME."  So the divine Covenant of the Sanctuary, forsaken by

Paul 6, will continue to be forsaken, and replaced and supplanted

by the satanic covenant of Paul 6 and his New Order under the

"ministry" of J-P 2.  "In memory of Paul 6" - in place of "In

Memory of ME" - is to be the guiding light of J-P 2.





   Is there any sign of regret in the speech and actions of J-P

2?  Certainly not.  Having begun his V-2 "ministry" sans Crown

and Coronation, Charlie has picked up the "Broken Cross"

bequeathed to him by Paul 6, carrying this Communist "peace

symbol" as a brazen sign, a code the enemies of the Cross

understand only too well, but which deceives the gullible who

mistakenly think JP-2 is paying Christ respect.





   Because of his participation in the anti-Christian actions

during the V-2 Council, and also because of his publicly

professed total commitment to the implementation of the illegal

V-2 Council, the terrible sentence of Execrabilis lays on the

head of J-P 2.





   D.  The fourth essential feature of Execrabilis is its

DEMOLISHING EFFECT on V-2 and any council called to escape the

Church's judgments.





   Execrabilis pronounces, declares and decrees all such

councils - no matter in what age they are called - to be

beforehand CONDEMNED, REPROVED, QUASHED and ANNULLED.





   In effect, under its sweeping decree of nullity, V-2 and all

its docuмents and its actions are  emptied of all standing,      

are stripped of all legitimacy, and rendered wholly null and

void!  V-2 is as if it never had been called, so far as binding

the Church or commanding obedience of any person.





   Consequently, the V-2 Council, called at the request of the

enemies of Christ, is wiped away and no Catholic is bound by it

in any way.  Wilful adherence or obedience to the condemned and

quashed V-2 Council subjects a person to ipso facto

excommunication and the wrath of God.  In this way the Apostolic

Church safeguards and maintains respect for Her valid Councils.

PRICE OF UPDATING





   For listening to the bigotry and lies of the rabbinic

gnostic Jєωs via the detestable and execrable V-2 Council, the

V-2ers are in a state of rebellion against God.  They have

contracted the same spiritual malady of the Jєωs: blindness,

hardness of heart, and the Wrath of God.





   Is this not reason enough for all V-2ers to pause and

consider whether their continued adherence to the illegal and

execrable V-2 Council is worth the loss of their soul?  Let the

hierarchy, priests, religious, sisters and laity, who unwisely

think that in partaking of V-2's sins they are "updating" and

"renewing" the Church in the modern mentality, take clear note of

the spiritual jeopardy into which they have been plunged by the

execrable V-2 Council.  Let them obey the heavenly injunction to

come out from the V-2 counter-church, the harlot, lest they too

be partakers of her sins and receive her plagues (Apoc. 18: 4ff).





   A WAY OUT - To be at peace with God, one must renounce V-2

completely, "come out from her" all the way, and never go back.

If you cannot find a non-V-2 priest to confess your past guilt,

then do as the Church instructs those who have no available

priest:  Make a Perfect Act of Contrition.  "O my God!  l am

heartily sorry for having offended Thee, and I detest all

my sins, because I dread the loss of Heaven and the pains of

hell, but most of all because they offend Thee, my God, Who art

all-good and deserving of all my love.  I firmly resolve, with

the help of Thy grace, to confess my sins, to do penance, and to

amend my life.  Amen."





   Before God, renounce V-2 and all its works and pomps.

Firmly resolve never again to participate in any of its

activities.  Then we must place ourselves into the Merciful Hands

of God and await the day when we can receive the absolution of a

genuinely faithful Apostolic Catholic priest.  Many of us will

have to die without a priest, as did Paul McCabe back in 1971

(see Veritas, August 1971), and as others have done.  We must

trust in God ... keep His Commandments ... hold fast to the Faith

... respect the Laws and Judgments of the Apostolic Church.  Be

not duped or confounded by the V-2 counter-church.

 ACTS FAVORING JєωRY





   What constitutes actions favoring and supporting Jєωry

against the Christian Faith?  We will list a few obvious ones.





   Participating in Seder meals is an act favoring Jєωry

against the Christian Faith ... taking part in ѕуηαgσgυє

"interfaith services" favors and supports Jєωry ... permitting

Jєωs to purge Catholic books or to rewrite books on Catholic

doctrine is to favor and support those belonging to the body of

Antichrist ... allowing Jєωs to lecture or teach in Catholic

schools, seminaries, colleges, universities is to lend support

and favor to Jєωry against the Catholic Church and Faith ...

inviting and permitting Jєωs to speak from Catholic pulpits is to

favor and support Jєωry's war against Christ ... to give ear to

the erroneous teachings of the тαℓмυdic gnostic Jєωs in their

pretense that their interpretation of Holy Scripture is better

than the Catholic teaching is to help strengthen Jєωry's false

religion and to favor and support Jєωry against the Catholic

Faith and Christ's Church ... to remove sacred images and to

replace these with Jєωιѕн inspired iconoclastic art in churches

is to cater to Jєωry and insult Christ ... to give support to the

false charge of "anti-semitism" is to favor and support Jєωry's  

animosity toward Christ ... to promote Catholic/Jєωιѕн relations,

dialogue, "closer ties" is to promote and favor Jєωry ... to

protect and aid an unbelieving, тαℓмυdic-gnostic Masonic Jєω

sitting in the Chair of Peter (Paul 6) is to favor and

support Jєωry's war against Christ Jesus, God the Son, Who became

Man for our sake ... to follow and support holders of the Holy

Chair who pledge to continue and to implement the illegal V-2

Council is to aid and support Jєωry's war against the divine

Church and Faith.





   The list could go on and on.  It is impossible for anyone to

participate in the works of the Jєωιѕн V-2 Council and not aid

Jєωry's war against Christ and His Church.  Punishment for

supporting and favoring the enemies of the Faith is separation

from the Kingdom of God both on earth and in Heaven, as Canon 58 adjudges.

BULLA OF PAUL IV





   There was a certain Abbe des Graviers, writing in Courier de

Rome (No. 156, pp 9-12), who took issue with Catholics applying

the Bulla of Paul IV to Paul 6.  His first whine was that

ordinary Catholics have no knowledge of Canon Law, and he

whimpered that it cannot be concluded that Cardinal Montini (Paul

6) was invalidly elected to the Roman See, and he was aghast to

discover that sensible Catholics are saying the Apostolic See has

been vacant since 1958 at the death of Pope Pius XII.





   Abbe des Graviers thought that since there is a question

whether the Bulla was ever applied, it is doubtful that it can be

applied now.  This is a silly argument.  Sensing this, he came up

with what he feels is a stronger objection, saying: "In any case,

this is of little import for since 1918 we have had the Code of

Canon Law and Pope Benedict XV's constitution Providentissma

Mater Ecclesia.  Graviers says this has become the Law of the

Church and it is it that defines what it is to be a heretic, and,

as he says, "it is indispensable to know what is the definition

of a heretic."





   Then Abbe Graviers said: "Neither Fr. Giovanni Battista

Montini, nor Mgr. Montini, nor Cardinal Montini was ever

canonically reprimanded," despite his many heretical statements

contrary to the Catholic Faith.  Therefore, said Abbe Graviers,

the man could not be a formal heretic and pointed to the "Credo

of Paul 6."  It may surprise the Abbe to learn this credo is full

of heresy (see Veritas, Dec. 1972).





   Abbe said it would be impossible for Paul 6 to teach heresy

Ex Cathedra, overlooking that Paul 6 had never issued anything Ex

Cathedra.  The Abbe was obviously using these evasive and puny

arguments to get around Pope Paul IV's Bulla that automatically

judges a person to be a heretic without a formal judgment, if the

guilty primate had fallen from the Faith before elevation to a

Church office.





   Abbe Graviers said "there's little left of this Bulla,

retained only in Canon 2.264, 2.228, 2.232, 2,242, 2.265."  He

imbibed heresy himself: "Thus the conclusion is quite simple:    

it is not possible to have recourse to the Constitution of Paul

IV as a weapon against Paul 6 (Montini).  To do so would be

neither honest nor canonically sound."  He ignores that the

Apostolic Church has already judged that it is fair, honest,

proper, yea, a duty to apply to the fullest all past Church

Judgments along with their severest penalties against those who

dare to speak lies against Christ's Spotless Bride and attempt to

kill Her.





   There is a response to Abbe Graviers arguments.





   Providently, Church judgments, such as the Bulla of Pope

Paul IV, become operative without need of official action.  The

Bulla of Paul IV is conditional not on reprimand but on public

heresy.  The Bulla, itself, constitutes the essential canonical

reprimand.  Accordingly, one who, before his election to the

Papal Chair, was a hardened, public heretic, as in the case of

Paul 6, cannot be the legitimate successor of Peter.  If he

should sit in the Holy Chair, he does so as an usurper.

OUR STAND





   To criticize and to put down those who rightly assert the

V-2 Council is illegal and must not be obeyed is dishonest.

Those who foolishly and recklessly follow V-2 while refusing to

listen to those who tell them it is an evil, anti-Catholic

council indulge in hypocrisy.  To pretend one is Catholic while

at the same time obeying a council brought into being by those

who hated Catholicism is worse than playing the fool, because of

what is under attack by V-2: the divine religion.





   Although concealing it from Catholics, the enemy-within

knows very well the Apostolic Tradition, the Scriptural and the

Canonical basis upon which the assertions of Church Militant are

firmly founded.  In turn these are the central points of the

enemy's attack.





   We Apostolic Catholics stand upon the Two Founts of

Supernatural Revelation, the two founts fought against by the 5th

Column within so bitterly during the V-2 Council years (see

Veritas series on Divine Revelation begun in May 1978 and

continuing during 1979-80).





   We Catholics stand upon the Rock of Peter and the Binding

Power of the Keys.  We stand upon the INFALLIBLE and IRREFORMABLE

Laws and judgments of Christ and His Church.





   We stand upon the Apostolic vigilance against the enemy of

the Cross.  We stand with the Apostles who had much trouble

from the hardheaded, spiritually-blinded Jєωs, some of whom kept

sneaking into the Church by way of pretend-conversions with

the ulterior motive of tearing down the Church at the beginning

and also attempting to buy the healing powers from the Apostles.

The divine Catholic Religion has always been "offensive" or

"anti-semitic" to the Jєωs, not because it is but because they

pretend it is with their rejection of Christ, so as to seek to be

"liberated" from the obligation of conversion and acceptance

of the society built upon Christian Order.





   We stand upon the Church's doctrine against the perfidious

Jєωs; doctrine that goes back to Christ Himself Who made this

Divine Judgment against the hardened, unbelieving Jєωs: "You are

of your father the devil and the desires of your father you will

do.  He was a murderer from the beginning and he stood not in the

truth, because truth is not in him.  When he speaketh a lie, he

speaketh of his own for he is a liar, and the father thereof.





   "But if I say the truth, you believe Me not." (John 8:

44-45).





   We Catholics who bring just charges against the V-2 Council

and the meddling "ѕуηαgσgυє of Satan" (Apoc. 2: 9) and who make

the accurate assertion of illegality against the robber V-2

Council and who oppose the damnable interference by World Jєωry

into the affairs of the divine Church, do not do so on our own or

of our own.  No.





   It is the Apostolic Church Herself, through the binding

Power of the Keys, who prejudges the V-2 Council to be execrable,

illegal, non-binding, and who prejudged that those who brought it

about or pledge their loyalty to it have the Wrath of God upon

themselves.  The Church passes Her sentence with "bell, book and

candle."





   A bell tolls ... a book is closed ... a candle is

extinguished.  The bell tolls for the spiritual death of a soul

... the closing of the book signifies the striking of a name

from the Book of Life ... the extinguishing of the candle

signifies the spiritual darkness into which a doomed soul is

thrust.  Bell, book, candle ....