If I remember correctly there were people on this very forum who thought fake snow was being dropped on Atlanta a few years ago.
They were convinced by videos of people holding cigarette lighters to snowballs which did not immediately melt and had carbon build up on them. Exactly the same behaviour as real snow, thanks to sublimation and capillary action.
Of course there is a virus. Of course it is new (very probably a work in progress that escaped from a bio-weapon lab). It just isn't very dєαdlу except to the old and decrepit.
The world has whipped itself into a collective mania as it has a few times before. The most recent being Y2K. It has been exploited politically. A few countries have looked at it objectively, Sweden, Belarus. Others did nothing because they were chaotic or distracted. They did not have huge death tolls.
The next crisis will bring the same evil idiots out of the woodwork, be it a series of forest fires, earthquakes, an asteroid impact. Climate change will be blamed, man is evil etc.
What we are seeing is a weak adulterous effeminate world go insane. I am determined to watch it with my sanity intact. It is more fun that way.
Have you researched HAARP and weather manipulation? It's been in use since the 1950's.
It was I who posted the video on fake snow because I was not convinced by the video and asked those here who are more knowledgeable than I if it was fake news. That's called investigation. It's what smart people do rather than assume they know everything already.
"Of course there is a virus."
Really? How do you know? Are you a scientist? Have you isolated and purified it according to KOCH's postulates? Have you photographed it? You provide no evidence.
Neither has anyone else other than a computer generated model based on speculation and a computer generated, completely fabricated picture of what they assume it looks like.
The science isn't settled. It would be great if people could research the science a bit so we could discuss that rather than pad their confirmation bias and their ego along with it, pooh-poohing those who are bold enough to question the emperor's invisible clothing.
Science requires humility and curiosity and a willingness to dig and research.
It's kind of similar to understanding the Catholic Faith. You go where the truth leads regardless of how unpopular it may be.
I would suggest researching the work of Stefan Lanka who I referenced above and his German Supreme Court Case. You said that no qualified virologist questions the "science" of the virus...well you skipped over him in my post above.
Also the docuмentary, House of Numbers, by Brent Leung is a real eye opener into the lies of the elite scientists of the world. A young film student travelled the world to interview the top scientists, including nobel prize winners Dr Luc Montaigner, catching him at his lies, and Dr Kerry Mullis, the inventor of the PCR test who called out Montaigner. He also interviews the Perth Group of scientists who called out Montaigner on not meeting the criteria of KOCH's postulates with regards to HIV.
I'm am still undecided on this issue but am willing to look at all sides and listen to the various arguments if (and this is important) they are backed by evidence.