Interesting post, claudel. I've been wondering about those sorts of statistics for a while now too. Do you have a link to a simple place where it gives mortality statistics during this situation?
If you are a trained statistician, simply go to the Euromomo site and begin reading. If you aren't, open up a search engine—preferably one such as Startpage or Gibiru that doesn't track you or report you to the government—and use the search term "euromomo data". What ought to strike you right off the bat is that every link on the first three pages of results is from a mainstream source with its knickers in a twist as it claims that the morbidity data don't adequately reflect the harm covid-19 is doing!
This of course is what the Jєωs mean by chutzpah. The government and media aren't content with requiring physicians and hospitals to assume that
any death not traceable to something like a fall from a window or a highway accident is attributable to covid-19—a directive dating back to March that had the sole intent of falsifying data. Now (((they))) want us to believe that those deaths by misadventure and all similarly unrelated deaths
should be attributed to covid-19, and they are angry that the unmassaged statistics fail to back up their assertions.
As Knut Wittkowski demonstrated three months ago, the "safety" measures are doing people immeasurably more harm than doing nothing at all would have done. The wearing of masks is demonstrably linked to illness and even death from hypoxia (insufficient oxygen intake) and hypercapnia (excessive
CO2 intake). But for typical power-mad Establishment types, a fortiori for Deep Staters, deaths from disorders that are negatively related to covid-19 "safety" measures are bad data and hence cancelable—along with the people who cite them.