Study Communism and you will learn that they use dupes, "useful idiots" and "front organizations."
useful idiot is a derogatory term for a person perceived as propagandizing for a cause without fully comprehending the cause's goals, and who is cynically used by the cause's leaders. The term was originally used during the Cold War to describe non-communists regarded as susceptible to communist propaganda and manipulation.
The reality is that the controlled media are pointing to Blacks as the cause of the problem in order to coverup the reality that this is a Communist/ Freemasonic revolution using front groups like BLM in order to MISDIRECT.
Those who are misdirected by blaming "Blacks" for the riots are allowing themselves to be:
1. emotionally manipulated
3. failing to realize that this is spiritual warfare: the enemies of the Church v. the Holy Sacrifice of the Mass. (This is why all Communist revolutions as well as the French revolution kill priests.)
Those who mistake the Communist Front Organization, in this case BLM, will not be able to adequately respond to the danger.
Oh, I'm all too familiar with the concept of "dupes" and "useful idiots," madam. I might also point out here that I have taken note of your repeated and emphatic identification of our enemies as "communists" and "freemasons," which, while true, stands out in particularly stark relief in the context of your (from what I have seen) total silence in specifically naming the Jews
as the common entity behind both of those outfits. This strikes me as significant, especially since you so passionately insist that we look behind the "front groups" (which both Communism and Masonry are), and concentrate on the spiritual
element to our struggle (and we have no greater spiritual enemy on earth than the Synagogue of Satan).
The image you paint of blacks as some completely neutral element, completely devoid of any agency of their own, or responsibility for their actions, flies in the face of certainly known objective facts. What about violent crime statistics? Have "the Reds" been operating blacks by remote control to force 13% of the population to commit more than 50% of the violent crimes for the past several decades?
Violent crime is highly correlative with lower intelligence and its concomitant shorter time preferences / impulsivity. Significantly, blacks routinely score 15 points - a full standard deviation - lower than whites in measurable intelligence, and this is consistent across national, economic, and class lines. Are the Pinkos placing intelligence-inhibiting microchips into hair weaves and du-rags? Or is it entirely possible that Almighty God did not create the races equal in all areas, any more than He created individuals equal in all areas, and that, in implicitly or explicitly arguing for that equality, you're promoting the Masonic error of egalitarianism out of one side of your mouth, while condemning the Masons out of the other?
The Jews - and that's who our enemy is by the way, so don't be afraid to say it - have indeed manipulated the black population of America since at least 1909 when a gaggle of Jewish lawyers founded the NAACP to put the unassimilable black population of America to political use as chaos-sewing proxy warriors. But the fact of the matter is that, in doing so, the Jews were taking advantage of a pre-existing racial crisis in America, and not inventing a new one. This is common sense. Blacks have been in America for four centuries
- as long as the Dutch have been here. And yet the Dutch have assimilated so totally into the fabric of the nation that they effectively don't even exist as an identifiable or (pertinent to our debate) manipulatable
group anymore. The blacks have not so assimilated in those four centuries. Why do you suppose that is?
I'll repeat myself to emphasize this glaringly huge Elephant in the Room that you seem constitutionally unable to see: Blacks have been here in America as long as the Dutch have. So why did the Jews not create a "Dutch Lives Matter" movement? Why are there no roving bands of wooden-clogs-wearing youths with surnames starting with "Van der" randomly sucker-punching non-Dutch people, and protesting the loss of Dutch hegemony, and demanding that the City of New York be abolished and Nieuw Amsterdam restored?