Send CathInfo's owner Matthew a gift from his Amazon wish list:
https://www.amazon.com/hz/wishlist/ls/25M2B8RERL1UO

Author Topic: Corporations as individual, or group of people?  (Read 131 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Matthew

  • Mod
  • *****
  • Posts: 31202
  • Reputation: +27121/-495
  • Gender: Male
Corporations as individual, or group of people?
« on: June 17, 2021, 06:18:59 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • One of those things you assume "everyone does" -- until you leave your home country and find out NO, everyone doesn't think of it that way.

    In America, corporations and companies are seen as a single person. Our Legal system and government regards Google, Microsoft, and Apple (and every other corporation) as a SINGLE PERSON, just like you or I.

    It's made it's way into our language:

    "Google is trying to become the #1 search engine."

    But that is NOT the only way to do it. Don't believe me? Go to another English speaking country, like Australia. They would speak that sentence like this:

    "Google are trying to become the #1 search engine."

    Basically, when they say a company name, they treat it like "The people at _____" which is plural.

    So "Google has released a new version of Android" needs to be modified, since "The people at Google has released a new version of Android" is grammatically incorrect. They would change the "has" to "have" and then the sentence would make sense in their mind: "Google have released a new version of Android".

    As an aside, I can't criticize the upside-down Aussies on this one -- I think they are more correct. There IS no single person named "Google" -- only a GROUP of individuals pursuing interests of the corporation. In other words -- something plural. Giving corporations personhood in the United States was a BIG MISTAKE, but that's a huge topic, which I can't go into right now. There is a really good docuмentary on this subject, which I don't recall the exact name of. I watched it though, and I learned a lot.
    Want to say "thank you"? 
    You can send me a gift from my Amazon wishlist!
    https://www.amazon.com/hz/wishlist/ls/25M2B8RERL1UO

    Paypal donations: matthew@chantcd.com


    Offline forlorn

    • Sr. Member
    • ****
    • Posts: 2449
    • Reputation: +964/-1098
    • Gender: Male
    Re: Corporations as individual, or group of people?
    « Reply #1 on: June 17, 2021, 07:57:03 PM »
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • I find myself switching between the two a lot. Even in the BBC, which is meant to follow British English standards to a T, they appear to use the American way sometimes too(e.g "Fifa extends...", yet "The committee are..." from the same article). It's an interesting one; it forces you to think about how you conceptualise an entity/organisation.

    For example, being a speaker of British English, I'd normally tend towards using plural here like the Aussies. But I'd never say "the Church are..." in a million years. Sounds totally off to me. But I would say "Manchester United are my favourite football team". I think for companies I usually use the plural, but I don't think either would stand out to me.