Corexit: “People who work near it are hemorrhaging internally.”
July 26th, 2010

Via: Democracy Now:

Well, Corexit is one of a number of dispersants, that are toxic, that are used to atomize the oil and force it down the water column so that it’s invisible to the eye. In this case, these dispersants were used in massive quantities, almost two million gallons so far, to hide the magnitude of the spill and save BP money. And the government—both EPA, NOAA, etc.—have been sock puppets for BP in this cover-up. Now, by hiding the amount of spill, BP is saving hundreds of millions, if not billions, of dollars in fines, and so, from day one, there was tremendous economic incentive to use these dispersants to hide the magnitude of the gusher that’s been going on for almost three months.

Congressman Markey and Nadler, as well as Senator Mikulski, have been heroes in this respect. Congressman Markey made the BP and government put a camera down there to show the public the gusher. And when they did that, experts saw that the amount of material, oil being released, is orders of magnitudes greater than what BP and NOAA and EPA were saying. And the cover-up started to evaporate.

But the use of dispersants has not. Consequently, we have people, wildlife—we have dolphins that are hemorrhaging. People who work near it are hemorrhaging internally. And that’s what dispersants are supposed to do. EPA now is taking the position that they really don’t know how dangerous it is, even though if you read the label, it tells you how dangerous it is. And, for example, in the Exxon Valdez case, people who worked with dispersants, most of them are dead now. The average death age is around fifty. It’s very dangerous, and it’s an economic—it’s an economic protector of BP, not an environmental protector of the public.

Now, the one thing that I did want to mention to you, Amy, that’s occurred in most investigations, back even in the Watergate days, people said, “follow the money.” And that’s correct. In this case, you’ve got to follow the money. Who saves money by using these toxic dispersants? Well, it’s BP. But then the next question—I’ve only seen one article that describes it—who owns BP? And I think when you look and see who owns BP, you find that it’s the majority ownership, a billion shares, is a company called BlackRock that was created, owned and run by a gentleman named Larry Fink. And Vanity Fair just did recently an article about Mr. Fink and his connections with Mr. Geithner, Mr. Summers and others in the administration. So I think what’s needed, we now know that there’s a cover-up. Dispersants are being used. Congress, at least three Congress folks—Congressman Markey, Congressman Nadler and Senator Mikulski—are on the case. And I think the media now has to follow the money, just as they did in Watergate, and tell the American people who’s getting money for poisoning the millions of people in the Gulf.

EPA Senior Analyst Says that the Federal Government
is covering up the Lethality of Corexit:

Video

Quote from: Matthew

Even if my guess is wrong, what I'm NOT wrong about is that only a Jєω could care so much about money and so little about human beings (gentiles). Jєωs consider us gentiles to be "goyim" or cattle, remember -- and they are obsessed with material wealth.

Matthew, I think you are wrong here. While the Jєωs may be in charge, they have many servants who are just as evil as they are and who care just as little about human life. The Jєωs may be Satan's children, but Satan has other children as well who can be just as evil, if not more so. I believe that apostate Christians who serve the devil are more evil than the Jєωs because the Jєωs grew up serving the devil and never knew anything else, while the apostate Christians once served God and then rebelled, making them traitors as well.

I don't really call anyone children of Satan because he didn't create him. The Jєωs obviously are not holy people. There's such a thing as being posessed by Satan, though (which everyone here knows).