Send CathInfo's owner Matthew a gift from his Amazon wish list:
https://www.amazon.com/hz/wishlist/ls/25M2B8RERL1UO

Author Topic: Copernican heliocentricity concept gradually broke the back of Bible credibility  (Read 445 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline happenby

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 2768
  • Reputation: +1077/-1637
  • Gender: Female

Copernicanism, in short, is a concept that is protected in a bunker under a 50 foot thick ceiling of solid “scientific” concrete. It is meant to be impregnable. It is a concept that has become ensconced in men’s minds as the indestructible cornerstone of enlightened modern man’s knowledge. Virtually all people everywhere have been taught to believe–and do believe–that this concept is based on objective science and dispassionate secular reasoning, now long since freed from religious superstitions based on the Bible.
Indeed, it was this Copernican heliocentricity concept that gradually broke the back of Bible credibility as the source of Absolute Truth in Christendom. Once the Copernican Revolution had conquered the physical sciences of Astronomy and Physics and put down deep roots in Universities and lower schools everywhere, it was only a matter of time until the Biological sciences launched the Darwinian Revolution.
This embrace of Darwinism then quite predictably emboldened increasingly secular-minded mankind to further reject Biblical Absolutism and replace its teachings with yet more new “truths” in areas of learning having to do with economics and government. Thus was unsuccessful and floundering Marxism given new life. Marx openly tried to dedicate his own books to Darwin, exulting: “You have given me the basis for my system”. Thus, the “Social Science” disciplines were born and began to make their contributions to the destruction of Bible credibility…
Darwin, of course, only popularized evolutionism with his book in 1859, giving it a supposed mechanism thru natural selection and mutations, both since demonstrated to be utter nonsense. The actual roots of the evolutionary concept can be traced back to antiquity…as indeed can the roots of Copernican heliocentricism. Certainly the neo-heliocentrists, i.e., the early Copernicans such as Kepler were evolutionists. Galileo, like Kepler his friend, a neo-heliocentrist, was probably an evolutionist.

fixedearth.com


Offline roscoe

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7610
  • Reputation: +617/-404
  • Gender: Male
 Helio & Geo- centrism are wrong as E & S are Both in motion... :fryingpan:

There is nothing in the Universe that is fixed in position and w/o motion

And btw--- E being in motion has Zero effect on credibility of Bible.
There Is No Such Thing As 'Sede Vacantism'...
nor is there such thing as a 'Feeneyite' or 'Feeneyism'


Offline roscoe

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7610
  • Reputation: +617/-404
  • Gender: Male
Why are my reply's on this topic not showing up in Recent Posts?? :confused:
There Is No Such Thing As 'Sede Vacantism'...
nor is there such thing as a 'Feeneyite' or 'Feeneyism'

Offline Smedley Butler

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 1334
  • Reputation: +551/-1531
  • Gender: Male
Why are my reply's on this topic not showing up in Recent Posts?? :confused:
ROFL
:jester:

Offline happenby

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 2768
  • Reputation: +1077/-1637
  • Gender: Female
Helio & Geo- centrism are wrong as E & S are Both in motion... :fryingpan:

There is nothing in the Universe that is fixed in position and w/o motion

And btw--- E being in motion has Zero effect on credibility of Bible.
Please show empirical proof that earth is not fixed or without motion.


Offline roscoe

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 7610
  • Reputation: +617/-404
  • Gender: Male
Common Sense dictates that it is not possible to prove something is Not true. :sleep:

You prove that E IS fixed w/o resorting to Sola Scriptura heresy...
There Is No Such Thing As 'Sede Vacantism'...
nor is there such thing as a 'Feeneyite' or 'Feeneyism'

Offline happenby

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 2768
  • Reputation: +1077/-1637
  • Gender: Female
Common Sense dictates that it is not possible to prove something is Not true. :sleep:

You prove that E IS fixed w/o resorting to Sola Scriptura heresy...
Proof has been provided in these threads using quotes from Scripture, Fathers, science and math. Preconceived notions notwithstanding, there's plenty of sources here to get the picture.  So the ball is in your court.

Offline Neil Obstat

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 18177
  • Reputation: +8276/-692
  • Gender: Male
.


.
Considering there are as many stars outside of galaxies as inside, it appears that diffuse galaxies such as IC1101 cause significant gravitational lensing. In other words, from our perspective the stars within 3 million light years of IC1101 appear relatively scrunched together, while the pull of gravity being so strong that the stars appear to be part of the galaxy. Just a heads up, and you may already know this, but central compact objects like black holes get kind of wonky when it comes to the interface.  It won't tell you the mass unless you select one of its orbiting stars and then actually examine the object.  I noticed this when going to the center of clusters and checking out intermediate mass and super-massives while flying around. I just don't think the engine is coded in such a way to take them into account.  They're basically the only thing in the sim that has multiple stars orbiting around a central compact object.  Everything else is stars orbiting themselves and planets and other objects orbiting stars. You'll probably never find planets around the stars that orbit compact objects like that; it's rare...I've never seen it. Intelligence in any galaxy would probably think we are strange and probably as frightening to them, as they are to us. They may think we are ridiculous since we are very divided and secular and do not pull together. We have probably been detected and categorized by a higher intelligence as the equivalent to insects so it's unlikely they will visit unless resources are needed by them. I doubt they will ask for permission before they take them.
.--. .-.-.- ... .-.-.- ..-. --- .-. - .... . -.- .. -. --. -.. --- -- --..-- - .... . .--. --- .-- . .-. .- -. -.. -....- -....- .--- ..- ... - -.- .. -.. -.. .. -. --. .-.-.