People are sure that he is not guilty because the allegations against him are so wildly implausible that there just isn't any additional information that could even make them possible, let alone "beyond reasonable doubt". Unless we wish to consider things like time machines and cloaks of invisibility.

And it is not just Novus Ordo organizations and personal friends saying that.  Ann Barnhardt (who refers to " anti-pope Bergoglio) says "The charges that ++Pell was convicted of simply don’t hold water.  The notion that he or anyone could orally rape two lads in a busy sacristy while fully vested immediately after a huge pontifical Mass is defies all logic, reason and common sense.   " She says this as one who thinks he is both a horrible human being and a sickening bishop, not as a supporter.   https://www.barnhardt.biz/2019/03/01/my-take-on-pells-conviction-fwiw/

And Milo Yiannopoulos, who does not fit either category you stipulate, also concludes that it is too implausible to accept.
https://www.spectator.com.au/2019/03/for-whom-the-pell-tolls/

There is only one logical conclusion in this case and there is no reason to question the motives of the people who reach it.  We are, however, forced to wonder how anyone could claim that the allegations against Cardinal Pell suggest that he is guilty. These are the people we would suspect of hidden agendas and dubious motives.

What is the Vatican's "contribution" behind the scene to Cdl Pell's conviction?

Has anyone here read Henry Sire, 'The Dictator Pope'? I have not read it but a trusted friend, referring to this book, wrote:

"Cardinal Pell was first appointed to the new financial czar role in the Vatican, I think in 2015, his authority was second only to the Pope, he even had authority over the finances of the Secretariat of State, run by Cardinal Parolin. Parolin complained about this and got his own way, Pell's wings were clipped very soon after, and gradually the Pope removed more and more authority from Pell to the extent that it was becoming very difficult for him to do his job. He had uncovered at least a billion Euros that was unaccounted for, as well as informing Pope Bergoglio who among the curia were responsible for the financial scandals. The pope did nothing to address the situation, and the archbishops and cardinals retained their positions, in fact it seems the pope uses their moral corruption and weakness to further his own agenda. Many of these cardinals are part of the lavender mafia, i.e., homos. Pell was seen as a threat. The timing of charges laid on Pell coincides with all these shenanigans in Rome. Apparently there is much relief in Rome now that he is out of the way, especially from a Cardinal B....., and a Cardinal B......... They wanted him gone."

THE CARDINAL PELL FILE  Updated March 7, 2019   This resources web page presents many commentators who have questioned the conviction of Cardinal Pell on child sex abuse charges. Some commentators are Catholic. A few are Catholic but not friends of Cardinal Pell. Many are non-Catholic or not religious. Variously they point to the lack of evidence for a conviction, contrary evidence from the witnesses brought by the prosecution, and the public trial by media before charges were laid that made the process a persecution not a prosecution. Consequently, as some point out, Victoria’s legal system is as much on trial as Cardinal Pell. The glaring problems with the trial and frenzied media attacks on the Cardinal brings into question the possibility of a fair trial or appeal. To balance public debate on the case, we invite people to email and share on social media, download and print articles you consider most relevant, and distribute widely. Give to relatives and friends. Leave in public places. To see the latest on The Cardinal Pell File click here.

Copyright © 2018 News Weekly, All rights reserved. Our mailing address is: News Weekly PO Box 251 Balwyn Vic 3103 Leave a legacy of your ideas and beliefs, please remember us in your will.

Didn't realise it would be boxed and difficult to read Here is the body of the request:


THE CARDINAL PELL FILE
Updated March 7, 2019
 
This resources web page presents many commentators who have questioned the conviction of Cardinal Pell on child sex abuse charges. Some commentators are Catholic. A few are Catholic but not friends of Cardinal Pell. Many are non-Catholic or not religious.

Variously they point to the lack of evidence for a conviction, contrary evidence from the witnesses brought by the prosecution, and the public trial by media before charges were laid that made the process a persecution not a prosecution. Consequently, as some point out, Victoria’s legal system is as much on trial as Cardinal Pell. The glaring problems with the trial and frenzied media attacks on the Cardinal brings into question the possibility of a fair trial or appeal.

To balance public debate on the case, we invite people to email and share on social media, download and print articles you consider most relevant, and distribute widely. Give to relatives and friends. Leave in public places.