Send CathInfo's owner Matthew a gift from his Amazon wish list:
https://www.amazon.com/hz/wishlist/ls/25M2B8RERL1UO

Author Topic: Comments on Fr Robinson's new book The Realistic Guide to Religion and Science  (Read 10664 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Stanley N

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 1208
  • Reputation: +530/-484
  • Gender: Male
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!1
  • klasG$e, did Sungenis get his PhD from Calamus International University?


    Offline klasG4e

    • Sr. Member
    • ****
    • Posts: 2307
    • Reputation: +1344/-235
    • Gender: Male
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • klasG$e, did Sungenis get his PhD from Calamus International University?

    Why don't you ask Dr. Sungenis, but before you do why not tell me why you put the $ sign in my Username.  I've been participating on CathInfo for years and as far as I know you are the first person to ever do this.  If you are trying to imply that I make money (or derive any other benefit) from the sale of any of Dr. Sungenis' material you are in gross error.


    Offline Stanley N

    • Full Member
    • ***
    • Posts: 1208
    • Reputation: +530/-484
    • Gender: Male
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!1
  • $ is shift 4. I hope you never type a single letter incorrectly.

    Why would anyone need to ask Sungenis anything about this - he published "My PhD from Calamus International University".

    Offline klasG4e

    • Sr. Member
    • ****
    • Posts: 2307
    • Reputation: +1344/-235
    • Gender: Male
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0


  • Why would anyone need to ask Sungenis anything about this - he published "My PhD from Calamus International University".

    Then, why in the world are you asking me: "klasG$e, did Sungenis get his PhD from Calamus International University?"

    Offline rosenley

    • Newbie
    • *
    • Posts: 18
    • Reputation: +12/-0
    • Gender: Male
    "If the Revolution is disorder, the Counter-Revolution is the restoration of order. And by order we mean the peace of Christ in the Reign of Christ, that is, Christian civilization, austere and hierarchical, fundamentally sacral, antiegalitarian, and antiliberal." - Dr. Plinio Corrêa de Oliveira


    Offline klasG4e

    • Sr. Member
    • ****
    • Posts: 2307
    • Reputation: +1344/-235
    • Gender: Male
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Here is the link to the essay mentioned by the previous commenter: https://isidore.co/misc/Physics%20papers%20and%20books/Cosmology/Copernican%20principle/Sungenis%20&%20De%20Lano/about%20Sungenis%27s%20%22Diploma%20Mill%22%20PhD.pdf
    Thanks much for your intervention rosenley!  Hopefully, the thread can continue on without any further attempted trashing of Dr. Sungenis' academic credentials, much less by extension his good name.

    Offline Stanley N

    • Full Member
    • ***
    • Posts: 1208
    • Reputation: +530/-484
    • Gender: Male
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Then, why in the world are you asking me: "klasG$e, did Sungenis get his PhD from Calamus International University?"
    You accused me of defamation. 

    Offline klasG4e

    • Sr. Member
    • ****
    • Posts: 2307
    • Reputation: +1344/-235
    • Gender: Male
  • Thanks!2
  • No Thanks!0
  • You accused me of defamation.
    Quote from: klasG4e on October 06, 2018, 01:49:51 PM
    Quote
    I recently received my copy of Dr. Sungenis' (I always refer to him as a doctor because he earned his very legitimate PhD by way of a very hard earned and extraordinary 700 page thesis on geocentrism)
    Stanley N: Thank you for sharing this. This ends up explaining a lot.
    If his "dissertation" were academically rigorous, he could have taken it to a real academic institution, perhaps taken some classes in bible studies and theology, and received a recognized, accredited degree.
    Instead, he apparently went to Calamus International University. It no longer exists, but was registered in  Venuatu (an island nation in the south Pacific) at the time. Registration as a business does not mean it was accredited as a university. CIU degrees are not recognized in the US, and it was not really accredited. CIU is generally recognized as a "diploma mill" with at best, very low standards. As an example, a reviewer for his "dissertation" was Bennet, who was coauthor of GWW, which as you imply was substantially his "dissertation". That alone would look like a conflict of interest at most real universities. Furthermore, did people with appropriate credentials ever approved his dissertation? I see zero evidence it ever received peer review. So thank you for pointing out that Sungenis appears to have a fake PhD.


    klasG4e: Yes, Stanley I did accuse you of defamation based on your above earlier response to me.  Having already been aware of what Dr. Sungenis stated in the following link, I stand by that accusation and will leave it to the readers of this thread who care to check out what Dr. Sungenis has publicly stated in his defense as to whether they would consider your words a smear (i.e., defamation) of Dr. Sungenis or not.  The link to Dr. Sungenis position is here: https://isidore.co/misc/Physics%20papers%20and%20books/Cosmology/Copernican%20principle/Sungenis%20&%20De%20Lano/about%20Sungenis%27s%20%22Diploma%20Mill%22%20PhD.pdf  


    Offline cassini

    • Sr. Member
    • ****
    • Posts: 3294
    • Reputation: +2076/-236
    • Gender: Male
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • I too have read Robert Sungenis's book. It is indeed a very comprehensive rebuttal of Fr Robinson's book which I also read. How he had the patience to write such a LONG book is beyond me.

    As one who has had a long interest in the subject of creation, heliocentrism and geocentrism, long ages, evolution and Big Bangism, I find when we get to a point where only PhDs or those with similar degrees in astronomy, physics, biology, Earth sciences etc, are looked upon as the 'experts' who can answer questions relating to whether Genesis was metaphorical or literally true, most readers are out of their comfort zone.

    Personally, I am a Genesis for beginners man. In my many years of research I will remember the day when I read an article on Albert Einstein by Martin Gwynne. Now remember Einstein has been regarded as having been a scientist beyond human reason, a man gifted by God with a brain and a half. In it he said Einstein's version of relativity was more than nonsense, it was SIMPLE nonsense. Searching through university book on modern physics i came across a question for a astudent's exam. It was 'HOW CAN A MAN CARRYING A 20FOOT LONG POLE FIT INTO A 10FT SQUARE ROOM AND CLOSE THE DOOR BEHIND HIM.' According to Einstein's theory of relativity he can do it if he enters the room at the speed of light. you see the pole shrinks at the speed of light etc.

    So too is evolution simple nonsense. Ever see how complex a single cell is? If you want I will show you. How did that cell gain accuмulation and 'life'? Next we have to imagine any creature 'evolving.' Now evolution means something staying alive with its parts evolving. Science fiction couldn't make it up.
    Theistic evolution is where Catholics like Fr Robinson bring in such nonsense and try to make it a matter of FAITH. They use God to solve their nonsense, BILLIONS of miracles to get zombie evolution look Catholic.

    Catholic creation however is an act of God that he finished. It is not miracles, miracles happen only after all was created, finished. Evolution never finishes. What in God's name is hard to believe in the immediate or seven day creation act? Why try to make creation concord with scientific nonsense? What you end up with Fr Robinson is Catholic nonsense. Catholicism teaches many things happened beyond scientific understanding, so why single out direct creation as Genesis tells us?

    But do not blame the Fr Robinson's of this time, for they have inhereted this nonsence by way of popes. I recently came across a website book on papal speeches to the Academy of Sciences. What I read from popes in the last century would make your hair curl. Copernicus Galileo, Kepler, Isaac Newton, Voltaire Einstein and others are God's gift to mankind and religion. You read 'science' enhanced people's faith in the Creator and Catholicism. Look up the index on Galileo, the new St Science of the popes and you will not believe what they say about faith and science.

    http://www.pas.va/content/dam/accademia/pdf/sv100.pdf


    Offline klasG4e

    • Sr. Member
    • ****
    • Posts: 2307
    • Reputation: +1344/-235
    • Gender: Male
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Quote from: klasG4e on October 06, 2018, 01:49:51 PM
    Stanley N: Thank you for sharing this. This ends up explaining a lot.
    If his "dissertation" were academically rigorous, he could have taken it to a real academic institution, perhaps taken some classes in bible studies and theology, and received a recognized, accredited degree.
    Instead, he apparently went to Calamus International University. It no longer exists, but was registered in  Venuatu (an island nation in the south Pacific) at the time. Registration as a business does not mean it was accredited as a university. CIU degrees are not recognized in the US, and it was not really accredited. CIU is generally recognized as a "diploma mill" with at best, very low standards. As an example, a reviewer for his "dissertation" was Bennet, who was coauthor of GWW, which as you imply was substantially his "dissertation". That alone would look like a conflict of interest at most real universities. Furthermore, did people with appropriate credentials ever approved his dissertation? I see zero evidence it ever received peer review. So thank you for pointing out that Sungenis appears to have a fake PhD.


    klasG4e: Yes, Stanley I did accuse you of defamation based on your above earlier response to me.  Having already been aware of what Dr. Sungenis stated in the following link, I stand by that accusation and will leave it to the readers of this thread who care to check out what Dr. Sungenis has publicly stated in his defense as to whether they would consider your words a smear (i.e., defamation) of Dr. Sungenis or not.  The link to Dr. Sungenis position is here: https://isidore.co/misc/Physics%20papers%20and%20books/Cosmology/Copernican%20principle/Sungenis%20&%20De%20Lano/about%20Sungenis%27s%20%22Diploma%20Mill%22%20PhD.pdf  

    If anyone cannot access or does not wish to access the above linked article (dated 1-28-2007), they may simply read Dr. Sungenis' note to me dated 10-7-2018.  It reads as follows: "Regarding my Ph.D. degree, Calamus International University (CIU) issued bachelors, masters, and Ph.D. degrees under the governmental authority of the Republic of Vanuatu. Therefore the degrees issued were not “fake.” They were legal degrees, as official as degrees from any other institution under governmental authority. However, the CIU degrees were not accredited in the United States, and that is because CIU did not seek accreditation from governments outside of Vanuatu, and Vanuatu did not require accreditation, similar to Denmark. Further, CIU was not a “diploma mill,” since diploma mills are facilities that issue fake degrees for money but require no previous or current academic work, nor previous bachelors or masters degrees. CIU required both previous accredited bachelors and masters degrees, as well as significant academic work from each of its Ph.D. students, as well as a monitored and graded Ph.D. dissertation, judged and approved by other Ph.Ds in the same field. My dissertation took over two years to write and was approved “Excellent” in nine out of nine categories. For the past 12 years I have freely divulged all these details to the public since I received the Ph.D. degree from CIU in 2006. I went into the CIU program knowing full well it was non-accredited, and I did so because, after investigating what was available, I could find no accredited institution that would allow a Ph.D. in geocentrism. What I didn’t expect is that my ideological enemies would exploit CIU’s non-accreditation in the fierce defamatory manner they have. These kinds of people judge from appearance, not from substance. The substance of my work for the past 30 years has been acknowledged both nationally and internationally, by peer and foe alike, and that work took much more time and effort than my Ph.D. The high academic quality of my work is obvious for all to see, at least those who are not filled with animosity and prejudice against me simply because I sometimes deal with esoteric issues with which they don’t agree. Over the past 25 years of service I have given to the Catholic community in teaching and defending the Catholic faith, I have written over 45 books; produced three movies; hosted two television shows; was a guest on 45 radio shows; participated in 30 formal debates; written hundreds of articles; ran an apologetics organization and was one of the best apologists in my field. What counts is the quality of my work, and that work speaks for itself, including my most recently published book, Scientific Heresies and Their Effect on the Church."

    But that the defamation of Dr. Sungenis via attacks on his Ph.D. degree from Calamus International University by Catholics and others would finally come to an end -- at least on this thread.  I would encourage others who support Dr. Sungenis and his work to file away the link above as well as the note from him I have quoted verbatim above.  I believe it is safe to say that Robert Sungenis is the most preeminent and renowned geocentrist in the world today.  For that reason if no other I sadly suspect the attacks on him and his work will continue until the day he dies.  

    Offline Stanley N

    • Full Member
    • ***
    • Posts: 1208
    • Reputation: +530/-484
    • Gender: Male
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!1
  • klasG4e: Yes, Stanley I did accuse you of defamation based on your above earlier response to me.  Having already been aware of what Dr. Sungenis stated in the following link, I stand by that accusation
    Defamation is saying false things. He did receive his PhD from Calamus, and it is generally regarded as a diploma mill. Your failure to retract demonstrates something about you.


    Offline klasG4e

    • Sr. Member
    • ****
    • Posts: 2307
    • Reputation: +1344/-235
    • Gender: Male
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Defamation is saying false things. He did receive his PhD from Calamus, and it is generally regarded as a diploma mill. Your failure to retract demonstrates something about you.

    Sungenis addresses the accusation of Calamus being a diploma mill in the quote of his which I am again pasting for you below.  He denies that it was and explains the reason for his denial.  I believe that what Sungenis says is true (I have known him personally for many years and have found him to be a very truthful and honorable Catholic gentleman) and therefore I do not retract my charge of defamation.  By the way, it appears from what you have posted on CathInfo that you do not believe in geocentrism.  I have found over the years that those who do not believe in geocentrism have spread all sorts of defamation against Dr. Sungenis.  No surprise there.

    Dr. Sungenis states: "Regarding my Ph.D. degree, Calamus International University (CIU) issued bachelors, masters, and Ph.D. degrees under the governmental authority of the Republic of Vanuatu. Therefore the degrees issued were not “fake.” They were legal degrees, as official as degrees from any other institution under governmental authority. However, the CIU degrees were not accredited in the United States, and that is because CIU did not seek accreditation from governments outside of Vanuatu, and Vanuatu did not require accreditation, similar to Denmark. Further, CIU was not a “diploma mill,” since diploma mills are facilities that issue fake degrees for money but require no previous or current academic work, nor previous bachelors or masters degrees. CIU required both previous accredited bachelors and masters degrees, as well as significant academic work from each of its Ph.D. students, as well as a monitored and graded Ph.D. dissertation, judged and approved by other Ph.Ds in the same field. My dissertation took over two years to write and was approved “Excellent” in nine out of nine categories. For the past 12 years I have freely divulged all these details to the public since I received the Ph.D. degree from CIU in 2006. I went into the CIU program knowing full well it was non-accredited, and I did so because, after investigating what was available, I could find no accredited institution that would allow a Ph.D. in geocentrism. What I didn’t expect is that my ideological enemies would exploit CIU’s non-accreditation in the fierce defamatory manner they have. These kinds of people judge from appearance, not from substance. The substance of my work for the past 30 years has been acknowledged both nationally and internationally, by peer and foe alike, and that work took much more time and effort than my Ph.D. The high academic quality of my work is obvious for all to see, at least those who are not filled with animosity and prejudice against me simply because I sometimes deal with esoteric issues with which they don’t agree. Over the past 25 years of service I have given to the Catholic community in teaching and defending the Catholic faith, I have written over 45 books; produced three movies; hosted two television shows; was a guest on 45 radio shows; participated in 30 formal debates; written hundreds of articles; ran an apologetics organization and was one of the best apologists in my field. What counts is the quality of my work, and that work speaks for itself, including my most recently published book, Scientific Heresies and Their Effect on the Church."

    Offline Stanley N

    • Full Member
    • ***
    • Posts: 1208
    • Reputation: +530/-484
    • Gender: Male
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!1
  • Sungenis addresses the accusation of Calamus being a diploma mill in the quote of his which I am again pasting for you below.  He denies that it was and explains the reason for his denial.  I believe that what Sungenis says is true (I have known him personally for many years and have found him to be a very truthful and honorable Catholic gentleman) and therefore I do not retract my charge of defamation.  
    You may to some extent be entitled to your own opinions, but you are not entitled to your own facts.
    Calamus is generally regarded as a diploma mill. Defining diploma mill in a peculiar way doesn't change that.
    If you had any honour or integrity, you would retract your false and malicious accusation.
    Getting a degree of any sort from that institution is evidence of poor judgment in and of itself, quite independent of the subject matter involved.

    Offline Struthio

    • Full Member
    • ***
    • Posts: 1650
    • Reputation: +453/-366
    • Gender: Male
  • Thanks!0
  • No Thanks!0
  • Calamus is generally regarded as a diploma mill.

    You, Stanley N, insist that Calamus is generally regarded as a diploma mill.

    On the other hand, you have not been impressed by quotes of physicists and astronomers who are regarded as gods by your same standards (godless academia). Rather, you acted as if the quotes hadn't even been presented to you.
    Men are not bound, or able to read hearts; but when they see that someone is a heretic by his external works, they judge him to be a heretic pure and simple ... Jerome points this out. (St. Robert Bellarmine)

    Offline klasG4e

    • Sr. Member
    • ****
    • Posts: 2307
    • Reputation: +1344/-235
    • Gender: Male
  • Thanks!1
  • No Thanks!0
  • You may to some extent be entitled to your own opinions, but you are not entitled to your own facts.
    Calamus is generally regarded as a diploma mill. Defining diploma mill in a peculiar way doesn't change that.
    If you had any honour or integrity, you would retract your false and malicious accusation.
    Getting a degree of any sort from that institution is evidence of poor judgment in and of itself, quite independent of the subject matter involved.

    So you are now the arbitrator of facts?!  Stanley, your real grudge is not with me.  It is with Robert Sungenis who you have showed disrespect to in this thread.

    As for honor and integrity, it is because of any honor and integrity that I possess that I do not retract my accusation of defamation.  I publicly stand up here for the honor and integrity of Robert Sungenis which you have attacked in this thread.  He, himself, has defended himself concerning the type of accusation you have made against him and I am in complete agreement with his defense.